• Aucun résultat trouvé

The center and the commutator subgroup in hopfian groups

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "The center and the commutator subgroup in hopfian groups "

Copied!
12
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

The center and the commutator subgroup in hopfian groups

1~. I-hRSHON

Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, Brooklyn, :N.Y., U.S.A.

1. Abstract

We continue our investigation of the direct product of hopfian groups. Through- out this paper A will designate a hopfian group and B will designate (unless we specify otherwise) a group with finitely m a n y normal subgroups. For the most part we will investigate the role of Z(A), the center of A (and to a lesser degree also the role of the commutator subgroup of A) in relation to the hopficity of A • B. Sections 2.1 and 2.2 contain some general results independent of a n y restric- tions on A. We show here

(a) If A X B is n o t h o p f i a n for s o m e B , t h e r e exists a finite abelian g r o u p iv such t h a t if k is a n y positive integer a homomorphism 0k of A • onto A can be found such t h a t Ok has more t h a n k elements in its kernel.

(b) I f A is fixed, a necessary and sufficient condition t h a t A • be hopfian for all B is t h a t if 0 is a surjective endomorphism of A • B then there exists a subgroup B . of B such t h a t AOB-=AOxB.O.

In Section 3.1 we use (a) to establish our main result which is

(e) I f all of the primary components of the torsion subgroup of Z(A) obey the minimal condition for subgroups, then A • is hopfian,

I n Section 3.3 we obtain some results for some finite groups B. F o r example we show here

(d) I f IB[ -~ p ' q ~ . . , q? where p, ql 9 9 9 q, are the distinct prime divisors of ]B[ and ff 0 < e < 3 , 0 ~ e ~ 2 and Z(A) has finitely m a n y elements of order p~ then A • is hopfian.

Several results of the same nature as (d) are obtained here.

In Section 4 we obtain some results similar to (d) b y placing some restrictions on the c o m m u t a t o r subgroup of A. W e also s h o w here

(e) A • B is hopfian ff B is a finite group whose Sylow p subgroups are cyclic.

(f) A • is hopfian if B is a perfect group,

(2)

182 AI%KIV FOR iKATEliIATIK. "VO1. 9 NO. 2

Our main avenue of a t t a c k on the problems to be considered m a y be outlined here very briefly. N a m e l y if B has finitely m a n y normal subgroups and A X B is not hopfian we choose a homomorphic image C of B with as few normal sub- groups as possible such t h a t A X C is not hopfian. Then as in L e m m a 7 of [3], Z(C), the center of C is non-trivial and there exists a surjective endomor/~hism of A x C such t h a t ~ is not an isomorphism on A and such t h a t C~ r f ] C = 1 for all integers r, r # 0. Furthermore C does not have an abelian direct factor. Our approach in this paper is to assume A X B is not hopfian and to gather information about C. W i t h suitable restrictions we achieve a desired contradiction.

Throughout this paper C a n d cr will be as defined here.

The existence or non existence of a hopfian group A with the properties (a) is unresolved. We show in our remarks following Theorem 1 t h a t if Z(A) has a finite torsion group and A has properties (a) then A ---- A x 9 F 1 for some finite central subgroup _E 1 and some subgroup A 1 which is a non-hopfian homomorphic image of A. Conversely if A can be decomposed in the above manner then regardless of the nature of Z(A), A has the properties in (a). For if F ~. F 1 one can easily obtain a homomorphism of A x F onto A with arbitrarily large kernel. Baumslag and Solitar have shown t h a t there exists a finitely generated hopfian group with a non-hopfian group of finite index [1]. I n view of this anomolous result, we do not think t h a t it is unreasonable to suspect t h a t a group A with properties (a) exists.

I n a n y case our result (c) together with the results of [2] and [3] show t h a t A X B is hopfian for a wide range of A. In general, extensions of hopfian groups by hopfian groups are studied in [2] and [3] and the latter contains a bibliography of some relevant papers on the subject.

2. Some general results

2.1. Strong hopficity

We conjecture t h a t if B has finitely m a n y normal subgroups A X B must be hopfian. I f this conjecture is false A is in a certain sense close to being non-hopfian.

For write A ~ . C - - - - A s - C l a - - - - C x A , where C 1 C Z ( C ) , A , c A . Note Ca is in the centralizer of Aa 9 C1~ so t h a t there is a homomorphism y of C X A , onto Ca 9 A , -~ L such t h a t y is the identity oR A , and such t h a t y agrees with on C. Note L . C = A x C so t h a t L / L N C - ~ A. Hence cr maps A x C 1

onto L which in t u r n can be mapped onto A homomorphicly. I f we designate the resulti~.g homomorphism of A X C 1 onto A b y a , we see ~ , is not an isomorphism on A and since IA N kernel ~1 m a y be made as large as we please b y choosing a suitable c~, so m a y ]A fl kernel ~,I. Also we note ~ , m a y be extended to a homomorphism of A x Z(C) onto A for in the above discussion we m a y replace C 1 b y Z(C) and A , b y A* where A , c A * c A . I n the sequel ~ , will be as

(3)

T H E C E N T E R A N D T H E C O M M U T A T O R S U B G R O U P I N H O P F I A N GI~,OUPS 183

above. These considerations prompt the definition: Let F be an arbitrary finite abelian group. We call a group A strongly hopfian if every homomorphism of A • 2" onto A has kernel of bounded order ~ _N where N is dependent only on A and 2". Clearly, a strongly hopfian group is hopfian.

We m a y summarize the above discussion as

THEORE~ 1. I f A is strongly hopfian and if B has finitely many normal sub- groups, then A • is hopfian.

As an example of some conditions which imply strong hopficity suppose t h a t the torsion subgroup of Z(A), E, is finite. Suppose further t h a t normal subgroups of finite index in A which are homomorphic images of A are hopfian. Then A is strongly hopfian. For if 0 is a homomorphism of A • onto A, 2" a finite abelian group, we have A 0 j+l C A 0 i, j ~ 0 and

A -~ AO j . 2"0. 2"0 2 . . .2"0 i , j ~ l .

Hence A ~ A 0 i 9 E so t h a t [A : A 0/] _~ [El. Hence ultimately the subgroups A 0 i are identical, say for j ~ k. :But then since 0 maps M ~ A 0 h onto itself, 0 is an isomorphism on M. Since A : M . E, we see t h a t kernel 0 contains at most [E[ elements of A. I t easily follows t h a t A is strongly hopfian.

T~EO~EM 2. I f Z ( A ) is contained in any normal subgroup of finite index in A which is a homomorphic image of A , then i f L has finitely many normal subgroups or i f L is finitely generated abelian group then A • L is hopfian.

Proof. The hypothesis implies t h a t A is strongly hopfian, so t h a t if L has finitely m a n y normal subgroups, A • L is hopfian b y Theorem 1. I f L is a finitely generated abelian group, we m a y assume b y Theorem 3 of [3] t h a t L is an infinite cyclic group. B u t then if A • is not hopfian, almost exactly as before we can obtain a homomorphism S of A • L onto A which is not an isomorphism on A.

B u t then A = A S . L S . I f AS is of infinite index in A, t h e n A = A S x L S , and LS is infinite cyclic. B u t then A • L is hopfian b y Theorem 3 of [3]. Hence AS is of finite index in A so L d c A S , t h a t is A S = A . :But t h e n 8 is an iso- morphism on A contrary to assumption.

Theorem 1 naturally leads us to ask what we can say about homomorphisms of A X 2" onto A where 2" is a finite abelian group. I n this direction we m a y state, THEORE~ 3. I f A does not have a direct factor of prime order and i f F is a finite abelian group of square free exponent and if 0 is an arbitrary homomorphism of A • onto A with kernel K, then 0 is an isomorphism on A, K : 2 " , and K is a central subgroup of A •

(4)

184 ARKIV FOR ~ATElVIATIK. VOL 9 N o . 2

Proof. Let A 0 fl FO -~ 2,10, F1 C F . Hence we m a y find J~ such t h a t iV = 2 ' 1 • 2 and K ~ A • However if 01 is the restriction of 0 to A •

01 maps A • 2 onto A, so t h a t if A 1 - ~ K f ] A , then A 1 = k e r n e l 01 so t h a t (A[A1) • 2,2 ~ A. Hence 2,~ ---- 1 so t h a t A 0 ---- A. Hence 0 is an isomorphism on A and 2 " 0 c A 0 . I f we write fO-~a/O, f E 2 " a / E A , then one m a y show K - ~ { f - l a / ] f e F} and K is a central subgroup isomorphic to 2,.

2.2. A necessary and sufficient condition that A • be hopfian

THEOREM 4. A necessary and sufficient condition that A B be hopfian for all B is that i f 0 is an arbitrary surjective endomorphism of A X B then there exists some group subgroup B , of B such that A O B = A O x B , O.

Proof. The necessity is obvious. For the sufficiency suppose t h a t our hypothesis holds for all groups B b u t A • B is not hopfian for some fixed B. B u t t h e n b y hypothesis we m a y write

Ao~C = A s • C, c C . (1)

Now Ao~C ~ A I • A 1 C A. Note C, is a central subgroup of C so t h a t C, is a finite abelian group. Now since C , s f] C = 1, if we project C , s into A1, (by mapping C into 1 and A 1 onto itself via the identity map) a n d if say A , is this projection of C , s into A1, then A , ~ C , . Furthermore we claim A , fl A s = 1. To see this say C , is the direct product of i cyclic groups El, E 2 . . . E~ generated b y ca, e 2 . . . e~ respectively, where each E~ is of order a power of a prime. Then

A s 9 C = (A • 2 1 5 . . . •215162

Write ei=aie~, e ~ e C , a i e A 1. L e t A k ~ - A • 2 1 5 . . . • k, O < k ~ i , a n d let A ~ A. L e t A~ be the subgroup generated b y ak+l, ak+~ .. . . a,, k < i, and let A~ be the identity group. Suppose

A s C = A k s • k < i . (2)

(2) is certainly true for k = i. B u t if /c > 0, we m a y write from (2), A s ' C - ~ F • F = A k - l s X A k , .

Since ek is of prime power order, say order e L = p', either ak or e~ has order p ' m o d F . I f the order e ~ m o d 2 ' is p"

A s - C' = F x (e~)

which implies t h a t C has a direct abelian factor which would contradict the " m i n i m a l i t y " of C. Thus

(5)

T H E C E N T E R A N D T H E C O I K M U T A T O R S U B G R O U P I N H O P F I A I ~ G R O U P S 185

Ao~ " C = F X (ak) = Ak-lo~ • Ak, -1 so t h a t (2) is true for 0 < k < i .

Since A~ = A , , setting k = 0 in (2) gives us our assertion.

Now if y is the projection of Ao~C onto A~ which maps A , into 1 and which is the identity on Ac~, clearly Cy ~ C and Cy [7 A---= 1. Furthermore, CAAor so certainly C~,A(A • Hence, A • C = A • Cy. As in L e m m a 4 of [3] this implies ~ is an isomorphism on A contrary to assumption.

We note t h a t we have also established the following results in the proof of t h e theorem:

CO~OLL~a~u 1. A sufficient condition that A • be hopfian for fixed A and for fixed B is that for each homomorphic image E of B and for each surjective endo-

morphism y of A x E we have A y E = A y • for some D c E.

COnOLLARY 2. I f A • is not hopfian, then it is impossible to find C . C C such that A ~ C = A ~ • C.~.

3. Restrictions o n

Z(A)

3.1. Z(A) with a torsion group with minimal condition for its primary subgroups The main results of this section depend mainly on the endomorphism a . of the previous section and on the following result:

L ~ M A 1. Suppose A • B is not hopfian. I f L is a Sylow p subgroup of Z(C) there exists a basis Yl, Y2 . . . . Ye for L such that i f 0 is an arbitrary positive power of o~ then for any i, l < i < e,

yiO ~-- y[l~y~2~ . . . y~u . . . y:~ rood A where the exponents rli, r : ~ , . . , ri~ are all divisible by p.

Proof. L e t Z(C) = M • where L is a Sylow p subgroup of Z(C). L e t L = L I • 2 1 5 . . . x L ,

is a direct product of cyclic groups of the same order pnj where where each L i

n u + l < n u , u--- 1,2 . . . . s - - 1. Suppose w C L k . L e t wO~-wlwpw 3 . . . w s m o d A where w i C L i. We claim Wl, w 2 , . . . , wk are pth powers in Z(C). Since w is of order p-k and each L i for i < k is a direct product of cyclic groups of order p-k and n i > n ~ we can easily see t h a t w~ i s a ptL power in Z(C) for i < k . I t is n o t obvious however t h a t wk must be a p,h power. To see this, choose a

(6)

186 ARKIV FOR " Y I A T E M A T I K . Vol. 9 N o . 2

basis ml, m e , . . . , m i for L~ so t h a t L~ is t h e direct p r o d u c t o f t h e <ms> a n d each m s is of o r d e r p"k. L e t w k = m~lm~ 2 .. . . m}i. T o show wk is a pth p o w e r we show p is a divisor of each t~. S u p p o s e for e x a m p l e p is n o t a divisor o f tl.

L e t F be t h e s u b g r o u p g e n e r a t e d b y me, ma, 9 9 9 , mj a n d let E be t h e s u b g r o u p g e n e r a t e d b y t h e Li, i # k. L e t A 1 = A • M • E • F . H e n c e , A1C 0 = A 1 • <ml>, CO/A 1 N C O , ~ < m l > . B u t t h e o r d e r of w O m o d A 1 N C O is p-k. H e n c e ,

CO = <wO> • (A~ N CO).

Since 0 is an i s o m o r p h i s m on C this implies t h a t C has a cyclic d i r e c t f a c t o r o f o d e r p=k which is impossible. N o w if Yl, ?/2 .. . . , y~ is o b t a i n e d b y t a k i n g t h e u n i o n o f basis' o f each L s a n d i f t h e y's are i n d e x e d such t h a t r < t implies t h e y's in L~ p r e c e d e t h e y ' s in L, t h e n t h e y's h a v e t h e asserted p r o p e r t y .

THEOREM 5. Let B have finitely many normal subgroups. Suppose that for each prime 2, the subgroup of elements in Z ( A ) of order a power of p satisfies the minimal condition for normal subgroups. Then A • is hopfian.

_Proof. S u p p o s e t h e assertion is false. L e t Lp b e a Sylow p g r o u p o f Z(C) for t h e p r i m e divisor p o f JZ(C)1. L e t P b e t h e pta :powers o f t h e elemests o f o r d e r a p o w e r o f p in Z ( A ) • W e will show t h a t we can f i n d s u b g r o u p s L e C Z ( A ) • Z(C) a n d p o s i t i v e integers rp such t h a t

Lp ~ Lp , L~, N A -~ I , a n d L e e ( p e P . (3) T o o b t a i n t h e desired c o n t r a d i c t i o n n o t e t h a t (3) implies t h a t A • Z(C) is t h e direct p r o d u c t o f t h e g r o u p s A a n d Lp for p a p r i m e divisor o f [Z(C) I. H e n c e if r is a p o s i t i v e c o m m o n m u l t i p l e o f t h e r e a n d y = cr r, t h e n each e l e m e n t o f L~y is a pth p o w e r for all p a n d h e n c e e a c h e l e m e n t o f L ~ , . is a pth power.

B u t n o t e t h a t if H is a n a r b i t r a r y g r o u p w i t h a finite central p s u b g r o u p H 1 a n d if H = H I H ~ for some s u b g r o u p H e C H a n d if ~ is a h o m o m o r p h i s m o f H o n t o some g r o u p K such t h a t e v e r y e l e m e n t in HI~ is a pth p o w e r t h e n K = H28. H e n c e AV. = A, a c o n t r a d i c t i o n o f t h e h o p f i c i t y o f A.

W e will give a n i n d u c t i v e m e t h o d for c o n s t r u c t i n g t h e L e. L e t p be a f i x e d p r i m e divisor o f 1Z(C)] a n d let Yl, Ye .. . . , y, b e a basis for Lp as in L e m m a 1.

W e will show t h a t t h e r e exists ul, u S .. . . , u, in Z ( A ) • Z(C) such t h a t for 1 < i < e

us -~ ys m o d A , (4)

us a n d ys h a v e t h e same order, a n d (5) some f i x e d p o w e r o f er m a p s us i n t o P (6) Once we do this we see t h a t t h e s u b g r o u p g e n e r a t e d b y t h e us, 1 < i < e is iso- m o r p h i c t o L~ a n d m a y be t a k e n as Lp. Our m e t h o d first gives u,, t h e n u,_1, t h e n u,_ 2 a n d so f o r t h .

(7)

T I t E C E I ~ T E I ~ , A l g D T t t E C O I ~ I I ' C I U T A T O I ~ S U B G I ~ O U 1 ~ I I g H O ~ ' F I A I ~ G I ~ O U P S 187

S u p p o s e t h a t s is a n i n t e g e r , 1 ~ s __< e a n d t h a t we h a v e a l r e a d y f o u n d u s, us_ 1 .. . . , u~ s u c h that. (4) a n d (5) h o l d for s ~ i ~ e a n d t h a t s a y s o m e p o w e r 0 o f ~ m a p s us, us_l . . . . , u~ i n t o P . W e s h o w t h a t u n d e r this a s s u m p t i o n we c a n f i n d u E Z(A) • Z(C) such t h a t u ~ Ys-~ r o o d A a n d u a n d Y,-1 h a v e t h e s a m e o r d e r a n d s o m e p o w e r of 0 m a p s u i n t o P . T h e n u m a y b e t a k e n as u8_1 a n d we m a y r e p e a t t h e p r o c e d u r e u n t i l all t h e u ' s are c o n s t r u c t e d . (The i n d u c t i v e s t e p o f f i n d i n g u~_l also shows h o w to f i n d u,.)

W r i t e y ---- Ys-1. L e t K b e t h e g r o u p g e n e r a t e d b y us, u~+l, 9 9 9 , u,. T h e n we c a n w r i t e yO ~- a l y ~ l . . , y~:-~ rood K , a 1 E A w h e r e e a c h t, a b o v e is divisible b y p . H e n c e ,

yO ~--- a 1 r o o d P . K . (7)

I f alO ~ a s y ~ l . . , y~_-i 1 r o o d K , a s e A, t h e n yO s - - a s y ~ l . . , y~,~l rood P - K f r o m w h i c h we d e d u c e t h a t e a c h of t h e q, a r e divisible b y p. H e n c e a 10 ---- a s rood ( K . P ) . B y considering yO 3 we see in a s i m i l a r w a y t h a t we m a y w r i t e asO ~ a 3 rood (KP), a 3 E A a n d t h a t we c a n define a~ E A i n d u c t i v e l y so t h a t

a~O ~- a~+ 1 r o o d (KP) .

One m a y v e r i f y t h a t a~ E Z(A) a n d t h a t t h e o r d e r of a~ is a d i v i s o r of t h e o r d e r o f y. F u r t h e r m o r e , since 0 m a p s K - P i n t o P we see a k0 ~ -~- ak+~ r o o d ( K . P ) a n d yO "~ ~ a,~ r o o d ( K . P ) . N o w t h e e l e m e n t s of o r d e r a p o w e r of p in Z ( A • C) f o r m a direct p r o d u c t of a divisible g r o u p a n d a finite group. H e n c e n o t all t h e aj- c a n b e d i s t i n c t r o o d P . H e n c e we c a n f i n d p o s i t i v e i n t e g e r s k a n d m s u c h t h a t a~--- a ~ + ~ m o d P . H e n c e , (ya~l)O " E K . P a n d c o n s e q u e n t l y , (ya[1)O "~+1 E P . H e n c e , if we define u,_~ ~ ya[ ~ t h e n ujO "~+1 E P , s - - 1 < e so t h a t t h e p r o o f is c o m p l e t e .

COROLLARY 1. I f B is a finite group such that the subgroup of Z(A) consisting of elements whose orders are divisors of IBI obeys the minimal condition for subgroups then A • B is hop finn.

Pro@ Since C is a h o m o m o r p h i c i m a g e o f B o n l y p r i m e divisors o f IB]

c o m e i n t o p l a y in t h e case w h e r e B is finite.

COrOLLArY 2. I f B has finitely many normal subgroups and 0 is a surjeetive endomorphism of A • B such that

aO : aO s for a e Z(A) (8)

then 0 is an automorphism. I f B is finite and (8) holds only for central elements of A whose orders are divisors of IB] then 0 is an automorphism.

Proof. S u p p o s e t h e a s s e r t i o n false. T h e n in p a s s i n g f r o m 0 a n d A • t o a n d A • C we n o t e t h a t (4) m a y b e p r e s e r v e d ; t h a t is we m a y a s s u m e a ~ ~-- a ~ 2

(8)

188 ARKIV FOR MATEI~ATIK. VOl. 9 I q o . 2

for a E Z ( A ) or for c e n t r a l e l e m e n t s o f A w h o s e o r d e r s d i v i d e ]B] in ease B is finite. N o w p r o c e e d e x a c t l y as in t h e t h e o r e m t o c o n s t r u c t t h e g r o u p s L~. D e f i n e

0, s, y, us . . . . u. as before. ~qow a p p l y 0 t o (7) o b t a i n i n g yO 2 =-- alO ~-- alO 2 rood P

so t h a t U,_l m a y b e t a k e n as ya~ 1.

3.2. _Finite B

W e a p p l y t h e results o f section 2.2 in this section t o finite g r o u p s w i t h some special restricts o n IB[. I n c o n t r a s t t o Corollary 1 o f T h e o r e m 5 we s h o w t h a t in some eases we n e e d n o t p a y a t t e n t i o n t o all t h e e l e m e n t s in Z ( A ) whose orders are divisors of IB].

Lv, M ~ 2. I f G is a group and i f 7 is an endomorphism of G and i f g C G and the elements g$, gy2, gya . . . . are finite in number, we can f i n d a positive integer r such that gT" -~ g72~.

Proof. Choose p o s i t i v e integers e a n d f such t h a t g72' = gy2,+f. T h e n for a n y q ~ 0 , g 7 2 ~ - ~ q = g 7 ~ + f q - q . Choose q so t h a t 2 ~ + / q - q = 2 ( 2 ~ q - q ) a n d choose r = 2 ~ q .

LEMMA 3. Suppose B is finite and Z ( A ) has only finitely many elements of order p2. I f A • is not hopfian, then Z(C) is not of the form L • where JL is cyclic of order 1, p or p2, p a prime and where M is of square free exponent prime to p.

Proof. Suppose t h e assertion is false. L e t

Ao~C = A a . Cla , Ao~ N Ca = C2a w i t h C a c C 1 C Z ( C ) .

T h e n we claim C 1 is n o t o f s q u a r e free o r d e r or else C 1 = C 2 • C a so t h a t A a C --- A s • Caa c o n t r a r y t o Corollary 2 o f T h e o r e m 4. H e n c e L is o f o r d e r pg. a n d L ~ C r F u r t h e r m o r e i f L = (w},

wa ~ A a (9)

or a g a i n we w o u l d o b t a i n a c o n t r a d i c t i o n o f Corollary 2 o f T h e o r e m 4. Moreover, since A ( C a ) - ~ A m o d Z ( C ) a n d As(C)--= A a m o d Z ( C T ) , one sees t h a t Co~/A N Co~ a n d C/A~ fl C are i s o m o r p h i c t o s u b g r o u p s o f Z(C). H e n c e

E = ( w p) • M C A a -1 N A a (10)

or otherwise C w o u l d h a v e a finite abelian d i r e c t f a c t o r w h i c h is impossible. Since A a ['l Ca C E a we see A a ['l Ca C A.

(9)

TILE C E N T E R A N D T H E C O M M U T A T O R S U B G R O U P I N H O P F I A N GROUPS 189 N o w let K = C~ 13 (C X A 13 A~). W e c l a i m K = A ~ 13 C~. W e h a v e a l r e a d y s h o w n A ~ 13 Cc~ C K . On t h e o t h e r h a n d s u p p o s e k E K . T h e n

k = Cor = c l a , c 6 Z ( C ) , C 1 6 Z ( C ) , a 6 A 13 A ~ . (11) F r o m (10) we see t h a t if w ~ - w q m o d A , t h e n ( p , q ) = p . H e n c e (10) a n d (11) i m p l y

% e A ~ (12)

so t h a t K---A~[3Cc~ as a s s e r t e d . B u t t h e n if we set G - - - - A x C a n d M - ~ (A 13 A~)C~ w e see

G / M = [(A~)(C~)]/M ~ A ~ / A n A ~ ~ (A . A ~ ) / A

so t h a t [ G : M ] < {C[. B u t M 1 3 C - - - - 1 so [ G : M ] > ]C[. H e n c e , we conclude A x C - - - - M x C .

N o w in all o f o u r a b o v e a r g u m e n t s we m a y r e p l a c e ~ b y ~ , i > 1, a n d A b y a n y A 1 s u c h t h a t

I n p a r t i c u l a r as in (9)

A ~ X C = A x C . (13)

WOJ ~ A 1 a i , i > 1 (14)

f o r a n y A 1 in (13).

I n a n y case o u r h y p o t h e s i s c o n c e r n i n g Z ( A ) g u a r a n t e e s t h a t t h e e l e m e n t s wed, i---- 1 , 2 , 3 . . . are f i n i t e in n u m b e r 9 B y L e m m a 2 we m a y choose r > 0 s u c h t h a t w~ ~ --- w~ 2~. B u t t h e n if we set A 1 ~-~ A 13 A ~ ~- C~ ~ a n d a = w a ~ we see a 6 A 1 a n d wcr - ace ~, c o n t r a r y t o (14).

THEOREM 6. I f {B[---p'q;1 9 . . q , , e, where p, q l , . . . , q s are the distinct prime divisors of [B[, and 0 < e < 3 , l < e I < _ 2 for l < i < s and i f Z ( A ) has finitely m a n y elements of order p~, then A x B is hopfian.

Proof. S u p p o s e t h e a s s e r t i o n is false. T h e n p3 is n o t a d i v i s o r o f {Z(C){ or else C w o u l d h a v e a direct a b o l i s h f a c t o r o f o r d e r p2 [4]. S i m i l a r l y q~, i = i, 9 . . . s, is n o t a d i v i s o r o f [Z(C){ a n d we a r r i v e a t a c o n t r a d i c t i o n o f L e m m a 3.

I n a s i m i l a r w a y , t h e n e x t t w o t h e o r e m s follow e a s i l y w i t h t h e a i d o f t h e p r e v i o u s t h e o r e m , L e m m a 3 a n d T h e o r e m s 6 a n d 3 o f [3].

~ 4 fl el~ e 2

T ~ O ~ E M 7. I f [B{ -~ ,, ~1 ~2 9 9 9 q:8 where p, ql . . . . , qs are the distinct prime divisor of {B], 1<_ e~ < 2 for 1 < i < s, and i f Z ( A ) has only finitely m a n y elemests of order p~, and i f a Sylow p group of B is non-abelian, then A X B is hop fiSh.

(10)

190 ~ K i v F6R ~TE~2~IK. Vol. 9 No. 2

T a E o ~ ] ~ 8. I f Z ( A ) has onlyfinitely many elements of order p2 and if ]B] = pa, p a prime, the A • is hopfian.

TJZEO~E~I 9. Let [B] P~ P2 ~1 ~: . . p:~, 1 < e ~ < 3 , _ _ where the Pl are the distinct prime divisors of [B[. Let L~ be a Sylow p~ group of B and suppose that at most one of the groups L i a r e abelian. I f Z(A) has finitely many elements of order p~, i : 1,2 . . . . , r, then A • is hopfian.

Proof. Suppose t h e assertion false. Then Z(C) is not divisible b y p~ for a n y Pi or C has an abelian direct factor. On the other hand, [Z(C)[ must (by L e m m a 3) be divisible b y p~ 9 p], i r j. Since C does not have a n y abclian direct factor we must have e~ = e i = 3. B u t then the Sylow pl and the Sylow P1 groups of C are abclian and isomorphic to the Sylow pj and the Sylow p~ groups of B, contrary to assumption.

4. Restriction on the commutator subgroup

I n investigating the hopficity of A • B, we can obtain some further results b y considering some of the following restrictions on A':

A ' c Z ( A ) . (15)

I f B is finite, and p~ is a divisor of IBl, p a prime, t h e n A' has (16) only finitely m a n y elements of order p~.

I f K is an arbitrary normal subgroup of a homomorphic image D of B such t h a t Z(D) r 1, t h e n A ' has only finitely m a n y normal subgroups (17) isomorphic to K.

L ] ~ v ~ 4. I f (15), (16) or (17) hold and A • is not hopfian, then C' is a central subgroup of C. I n any case, C' c Ao~ and C'~ C A.

Proof. As in the proof of L e m m a 3, C~'A f] Ca a n d C'A~ fl C arc abelian so t h a t the last two assertions arc evident. Hence if (15) holds our assertion is evident. I f (16) holds, let y be in a Sylow p group of C'. B u t then y ~ c A ' for i ~ 1. B y L e m m a 2 we m a y choose a positive integer r such t h a t

y~r : y~pr.

ttence y r C A~ r f] C~ r so t h a t y~r is a central element. I f (17) holds we note t h a t since C'~ ~ c A ' , we m a y choose (exactly as in L e m m a 2) r ~ 0 with C'~ ~ C'~ 2". tIence C ' ~ c - A~ r so C'~" and hence C' is central.

Now recall t h a t for a n y group G, Z(G) D G' C 1% (G) where F r (G) is the F r a t t i n i subgroup of G, and for a finite group G, G' c l~r (G) implies t h a t (7 is nilpotent. ~ e n c e we have the following:

(11)

T S E C E N T E R A N D TI=s COI~IIYIUT&TOR S U B G I ~ O U P I N H O P F I A N G R O U P S 191

L E M ~ 5. I f B is finite and A • is not hopfian and i f (15), (16) or (17) holds, then C is nilpotent.

el e2 Vr

TItEO~E~ 10. Suppose B is a finite group, [B] Pl P2 9 9 .Pr , where the p, are the distinct primes dividing IBI. Suppose one of the conditions (15), (16) or (17) holds. I f e~<_3 for all i, then A • i s h o p f i a n . I f e ~ < 4 for all i and Z ( A ) has only finitely many elements of order p~, i = 1, 2, . . . r, then A • B is hopfian.

Pro@ Suppose the assertion is false. B y L e m m a 5, C is nilpotent and hence is a direct product of p groups for various primes p, where p divides

IBI.

How- ever, b y Theorem 6 of [3], the direct product of a hopfian group with a group of order pa is hopfian. In a n y ease with the aid of Theorem 8 and Theorem 3 of [3]

we have our result.

TIZEO~E~ 11. I f B = B ' 9 JL where L is an abelian subgroup of B and i f one of the conditions (15), (16) or (17) holds, then A • is hopfian.

Pro@ Suppose the assertion is false. Note any homomorphic image of B satisfies the same hypothesis as B. Hence we m a y write, C = C' 9 M where M is abelian.

B y L e m m a 4 C' is a central subgroup of C so t h a t C is abelian and consequently finite contrary to Theorem 3 of [3].

COROLLARY. I f B is finite and i f all the Sylow p groups of B are cyclic, then A • B is hopfian.

Pro@ B / B ' is cyclic. ([6] Theorem 11).

THEOREM 12. I f B is a perfect group then A • ks hopfian.

Proof. Suppose the assertion is false. A n y homomorphie image of a perfect group is perfect. Hence C is perfect. B y L e m m a 4, C C A~ which is contrary to Lemma 4 of [3].

(12)

192 AI%KIV F O R iKATEMATIK. VoL 9 N o . 2

References

1. BAU~S~AG, G. and S o L I T ~ , D., Some two generator one r e l a t o r non-holofian groups. Bull.

Amer. Math. Soc., 68 (1962), 199--201.

2. HmSHON, R., Some theorems on hopficity. Trans. Amer. Math. ,.~oc., 141 (1969), 229--244.

3. --}>-- On h o p f i a n groups. Pacific J . Math., 32 (1970), 753--766.

4. - - ~ - - A conjecture on h o p f i c i t y a n d r e l a t e d results. Arch. Math. (Basel), to appear.

5. --}>-- Some new groups a d m i t t i n g essentially unique directly indecomposable decompo- sitions. Math. A n n . , to a p p e a r .

6. Z A S S E ~ V S , H., The theory of groups. Chelsea, New Y o r k 1958.

Received November 5, 1970 R . IIirshon

P o l y t e c h n i c I n s t i t u t e o f Brooklyn, 333 J a y Street,

Brooklyn, N.Y., U.S.A.

Références

Documents relatifs

Then, we generalize this problem algebraically to parabolic subgroups of Artin–Tits groups of spherical type and we show that, to compute the minimal standardizer of a

With each such a we associate the braid which is the union of the strings of β starting at a and the strings obtained by shrinking the tubes corresponding to the interior components

All groups considered in this paper are abelian and additively writ- ten ; rings are associative and with an identity, modules are unitary... The

In order to show that L is contained in a minimal pure subgroup of G, we may assume that D[p]CL since a divisible subgroup is an absolute direct summand.. This completes the proof

Repeat the exer- cise in homology, for cor G×K H×K and tr G×K H×K (in homology, the hypothesis that G be finite can be supressed, but of course we need [G : H ] &lt; ∞ for the

Write a detailled proof of the Cartan-Eilenberg double coset for- mula, using the hints given in the lecture..

T HEOREM. Let f be an automorphism of the finite extension G of a soluble FAR group. For i) it suffices to assume only that G is a group with finite Hirsch number (even in a

Boolean algebras endowed with additional operations have been widely studied (see [8] and [15]). In this context modal algebras and di- agonalizable algebras are of