• Aucun résultat trouvé

Canada's Fire Costs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Canada's Fire Costs"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Technical Note (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building

Research), 1968-03-01

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/20359037

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Canada's Fire Costs

Shorter, G. W.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=19663e9a-8b97-4bd4-a601-838fbb66a558 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=19663e9a-8b97-4bd4-a601-838fbb66a558

(2)

DIVISION OF BUILDING RESEARCH

No.

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA

518

NOTJE

'IfE

C

JHI

Ii

II

C

AIL

PREPARED BY G. W. Shorter CHECKED BY ApPROVED BY N. B. H. DATE March 1968 PREPARED FOR Inquiry and record purposes

SUBJECT CANADA'S FIRE COSTS

The Dominion Fire Commissioner, with the

co-operation of the Provincial Fire Marshals and Fire Commissioners arid other provincial and federal agencies, publishes each year a report entitled "Fire Losses in Canada. ,,(1) The information in this report provides a general appraisal of the fire problem in Canada. In 1965, the 68, 000 fires which occurred resulted in a property loss of $144 million and 589 fire deaths (Table I). Over the last 10 years the property loss per head and the fire death rate have remained relatively constant.

Examination of fire losses by occupancy (Table II) shows that although 72 per cent of all fires occur in residential properties, losses in this type of occupancy represent only

26 per cent of the total fire losses. On the other hand, the avail-able records on loss of life indicate that 75 per cent of all fire

deaths occur in residential buildings. Manufacturing and mercantile occupancies, which account for only 12 per cent of all fires, result in losses amounting to 46 per c'ent of the total losses.

(3)

e,

2

-The three Inost common causes of fire in Canada are those associated with smoking, heating and electrical wiring and appliances (Table III). In spite of extensive promotion of fire prevention measures, careless smoking habits cause

40.5 per cent of all fires.' Although for many years Canada has been active in the field of certification of heating and electrical equipment and standard installation procedures, fires associated, with the use of this type of equipment cause 22.5 per 」セョエ of all fires. The other 37 per cent of fires, which cause 71.3 per cent

of the total loss, result from a wide variety of causes termed miscellaneous or undetermined. In view of these statistics, architects and designers should assume that it is difficult to elimInate all fii-'e hazards and their designs should reflect this assumption.

Canada is generally considered to have an unenviable' fire record. Reliable and uniform statistics on an international basis are lacking, but some information appeared in an article in the NFPA i'FireJournal. ,,(2) Information on relative property losses (Table IV) and on relative loss of life for several countries (Table V) was taken from the above article. Although the accuracy of these figures is questionable, they do show that Canada has a serious fire problem which needs constant attention.

An attempt has been made in Table VI to set forth the relative annual fire costs for the United Kingdom and the United States as well as Canada.

A variety of sources were used by the author to establish the the Canadian figures. U. S. figures were obtaIned from

"A

Study of Fire Probiems" puqlished by National Academy of Sciences (3); U. K. figures were obtained from the "The Cost of Fire" published by Fire, The Journal of the British Fire Services (4).

REFERENCES

(1) Report of the Dominion Fire Commissioner, Fire Losses in Canada, 1965, Office of the Dominion Fire Commissioner, Ottawa.

(4)

(2)

(3 )

(4)

3

-P. Bugbee. Are We Losing the Battle Against Fire Waste. Fire Journal, 61 (5): p. 5-7. September 1967. A Study of Fire Problems, National Academy of Sciences Pub1. 949, Chapter III, p. 26-51.

J. F. Fry. The Cost of Fire, Fire, The British Fire Servic es, 56 (703): p. 591- 594. April 1964.

(5)

Table I

*

PROVINCIAL LOSSES AND FIRE DEATHS

Population Number of fires Loss Per head Fire deaths

**

Fire death rate

1965 19. 6 million 68 thousand $144 million $7.37 589 3.0 10-Year average $7.40 3.2

*

Does not include forest and federal losses.

**

Fire death rate is the number of fire deaths per 100, 000 population per annum.

Table II

FIRE LOSSES BY OCCUPANCY (lO-Year average 1956-65)

Occupancy Residential properties Institutional and assembly

buildings Farm properties Manufacturing properties Mercantile properties Miscellaneous properties Number of Fires

(Thousands) Per cent 58.6 72 1.1 1 5.8 7 1.6 2 7.8 10 6.0 8 Loss

($ Millions) Per cent 34.3 26 8.2 6 12.2 9 18.5 14 42.0 32 17.4 13

(6)

Table III CAUSES OF FIRES (10- Year average 1956-65) Cause Number of Fires (Thousands) Loss

Per cent ($ Millions) Per cent Heating 10.2 12.6 12.6 9.5 Electrical wiring and

appliances 8.0 9.9 16.3 12.2 Smoking 32.4 40.5 9.3 7.0 Miscellaneous 17.5 21. 6 26.4 19. 8 Undetermined 12.8 15.4 68.4 51. 5

Table IV

VARIOUS COUNTRIES RELATIVE PROPERTY LOSS BY FIRE (1964) Country Fire Loss in Miilions of U. S. Dollar s Gross National Product in Billions of U. S. Dollars

Fire Loss Per Billion Dollars of GNP (Millions of Dollars) Canada 136.20 38.5 Denmark 19.48 8.9 France 306.10 87.5 Norway 18.00 6.3 Sweden 30.00 17.5 Switzerland 9.88 12.9 U.K. 215.00 92.2 U.S. 1,652.70 628.7 3.54 2.19 3.50 2.86 1. 71 0.77 2.33 2.63

(7)

Table V

VARIOUS COUNTRIES RELA TIVE LOSS OF LIFE

BY FIRE (1964)

Country Fire Death Rate* Australia 1. 74 Belgiwn 0.87 Canada 3. lO France 0.45 Japan 0.97 Sweden 0.94 U. K. 1.97 U. S. 6.20

*

Fire death rate is the number of fire deaths per lOO. 000 population per annum.

(8)

Table VI ESTIMATES OF'

RELATIVE ANNUAL FIRE COSTS

Source of Cost Fire Losses

Canada $Millions

0/0

u.

S. U. K.

Direct physical damage injury Fire Insurance Administration and adjusting Fire Control Fire suppression

(inCluding water supply)

135.0 1.5 90.0 153.0 30.3 0.3 20.2 34.3 29.5 4.7 19.5 32.2 30.0 0.2 26.8 26.8

Fire prevention .and protection Incremental increase in building costs 6.0 60.0

1.3}

13.7 13.5 Not known 16.0

Figure

Table III CAUSES OF FIRES (10- Year average 1956-65) Cause Number of Fires (Thousands) Loss
Table VI

Références

Documents relatifs

“The PLE is not a software application as such,” writes Graham Attwell , “but rather a ‘mash up’ of different applications and services although of course, it is possible

In this regard, a new bonding technology called FLOMET was introduced in the 1990’s in order to improve the flow behavior of mixes for demanding applications or difficult die

private sector profit over human life. The second key assumption is that in order for the CAEB project to result in equitable economic development outcomes for the Afro

Sharma and Gedeon [18] published a survey in automatic stress detection in 2012, where objective ways for measuring stress using physiolog- ical and physical information were

Parameters such as reaction time and formaldehyde-to-phenol sources (phenol + lignin) mass ratios were optimized to achieve the requirements for industrial wood adhesives

Pour cet exemple, aucune conclusion ne peut être émise quant à la non faisabilité dans la mesure où avec ou sans polyvalence, la disponibilité

Bien que ce fonctionnement demande plus d’organisation, cela pourrait être l’occasion pour Estavayer-le-Lac/Payerne Tourisme de garder un lien avec les hébergeurs et de leur

When the possibilistic database is a database where attribute val- ues are fuzzy (i.e., for each tuple and each attribute, we have a possibility distribution restricting the