• Aucun résultat trouvé

Experimental test to assess hygrothermal performance of building envelope systems

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Experimental test to assess hygrothermal performance of building envelope systems"

Copied!
35
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la

première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

3rd International Building Physics Conference [Proceedings], pp. 1-34,

2006-08-27

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=415ef0a8-788b-4aeb-9247-1682ea7c77ce

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=415ef0a8-788b-4aeb-9247-1682ea7c77ce

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Experimental test to assess hygrothermal performance of building

envelope systems

(2)

Experimental Tests To Assess Hygrothermal

Performance of Building Envelope Systems

Prepared by :

Dr. Wahid Maref, Dr.Michael Lacasse & Madeleine Rousseau

For the

3rd International Building Physics

Conference-August 27-31, 2006 (Montreal,Qc, Canada)

(3)

Outline

• Hygrothermal Performance of BES

– Modeling

– Field Experiment

– Laboratory experiments

(4)

Outline

• Hygrothermal Performance of BES

– Modeling

– Field Experiment

– Laboratory experiments

• Conclusion

(5)

Hygrothermal Performance of

Building Envelope Systems

MODELING

MODELING

(i.e. IRC’s HAM Tools

hygIRC 1D & 2D,

WeatherSmart)

LABORATORY

LABORATORY

(i.e. DWTF, EEEF)

FIELD

FIELD

(i.e. IRC RHs, CCHT)

Why?

How?

Which?

What?

Why?

How?

Which?

What

Why?

How?

Which?

What?

(6)

Outline

• Hygrothermal Performance of BES

– Modeling

– Field Experiment

– Laboratory experiments

• Conclusion

(7)

Modeling

• Why to do modeling?

• How to model?

• Which model to use?

(8)

Modeling: IRC’s HAM Tools

hygIRC 1-D V. 1.1 is a user-friendly, one-dimensional version of

NRC-IRC's hygIRC, a state-of-the-art hygrothermal model.

‰

1-D hygIRC can be used for

parametric analysis: changing weather (locations), materials, for

example

For more information please visit hygIRC

Website

:

http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/bes/software/hygIRC/index_e.html

hygIRC 2D is the Advanced hygrothermal models

‰

Best handled by hygIRC 2-D

air leakage

water leaks

gravity effects

(9)

Outline

• Hygrothermal Performance of BES

– Modeling

– Field Experiment

– Laboratory experiments

• Conclusion

(10)

Field Experiments

• Why to do field experiment?

• How to do experiment?

• Which physical phenomena to investigate,..?

• What do you expect from experiments?

(11)

Field Experiments

• IRC’s Research Houses:

– Research House #3 (IE/BES)

– CCHT

(12)

IRC Field Exposure of

Wall Facility (FEWF)

Background

Objectives

– Compare performance of different side-by-side wall assemblies

– improve understanding of HAM response of wall and window

assemblies exposed to naturally occurring climate loads of Ottawa as

well as to indoor environment loads of T, RH and P defined by

occupancy and HVAC systems.

– Research the interaction between the building envelope and the

indoor environment

– Complement IRC’s controlled laboratory test and modeling

simulations

(13)

IRC Field Exposure of

Wall Facility (FEWF)

Window Monitoring Objectives:

– The cold weather monitoring will examine the potential for

condensation and possibly mould growth at several locations

of the windows and the wall adjacent to it, with blinds open

and with blinds closed, and that for three orientations:

฀ • Glass edge

฀ • Window frame

฀ • Indoor sill shelf

฀ • Wall/window interface

(14)

IRC Field Exposure of

Wall Facility (FEWF)

Windows Characteristics

– Triple glazed

– Double low-e coatings

– Argon-filled

– Insulating spacer

– Fiberglass box frame

(15)

IRC Field Exposure of Wall

Facility (FEWF)

Experimental Approach

Year 1 (2006-2007) Commission the facility by monitoring

three identical test specimens of traditional construction

(2x6) through Fall, Winter and Spring.

Year 2 (2006-2007) Investigate the performance of two to

three wall specimens of different innovative designs based

on industrial collaboration/partnership.

Year 3 and beyond Expand the program in collaboration

with Indoor Environment to examine whole house

performance issues.

(16)

Windows

South facade

Instr

ed w

Instrument

ed window

Instrumented

window

Test frame to be

designed to provide

the largest possible

free bay for

placement of

several test

specimens

Max. 19 ft available

Stack casing

location

North facade

West facade

(17)

IRC Field Exposure of

Wall Facility (FEWF)

8 5 4 2 1 3 7 6

84 in

20 13 9 Finishing trim

Jamb extension trim Window sash Glazing Window frame 18 22 10

21 in

62 in

15 14 11 21 12

16 in

19 23 16 17

Window Monitoring

(18)

IRC Field Exposure of

Wall Facility (FEWF)

Interior

Exterior

A B C E F G D H I J K O P Q R N L M 1,2,3,6 9,11 13,14,15 13,15 20,21 Po Pi Instrumentation

Sill Detail

Interior

Exterior

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q 16,17,18,19 Instrumentation Po Pi

Jamb Detail

Window Monitoring

(19)

IRC Field Exposure of

Wall Facility (FEWF)

(20)
(21)

IRC Field Exposure of

Wall Facility (FEWF)

Test Bay

19ft 7ft 6in 24in 5ft 8in 6ft W1 W2 W3 Test bay Mask to minimize lateral heat and air

transfer between specimens (~R30) Test specimen

(22)

IRC Field Exposure of

Wall Facility (FEWF)

Interior Exterior

Wall Cross-Section #1

2

Wall Cross-Section #2

Exterior Interior Interior

Wall Cross-Section #3

Exterior 3 1 4 5 6 7 1 9 2 6 7 5 8 6 7 5 1 3 2 5 10 11

(23)

IRC Field Exposure of

Wall Facility (FEWF)

Instrumentation - Plan View

Interior

Drywall

Plastic Air/Vapour Barrier Stud Cavity with Fiberglass Insulation Vinyl Siding

Sheathing Membrane OSB

Material

Air Pressure sensor

Moisture Pins

RH and T sensors

T sensors

Exterior

Jeld-Wen Wireless RH&T Sensors

Heat Flux Transducer (for W2 only)

(24)
(25)

Outline

• Hygrothermal Performance of BES

– Modeling

– Field Experiment

– Laboratory experiments

(26)

Laboratory Experiments

• Why to do lab experiments?

• How to do experiment?

• Which physical phenomena to investigate,..?

• What do you expect from experiments?

(27)

IRC Laboratory

Experiments-Test Specimen in DWTF

Detail A

Variation

• Develop procedures

to assess rainwater

ingress

• Evaluate specific

window-wall

interface details to

determine how

effective they

manage rainwater

intrusion

(28)

IRC Laboratory Experiments

-Test Specimen in DWTF

Window A

Window A

Q

Water Spray

Water Spray

Point of water entry

Point of water entry

– Pressure Difference

Δ

P

• Test conditions

representative of North

American climate

conditions

• Test Pressures:

Range between 0-700 Pa

• Spray rates:

0.8 to 3.4 L/min.-m

2

• Wall system air leakage:

0.3 to 0.8 L/s-m

2

at 75

(29)

IRC Laboratory Experiments

-Specimen Details

Clear cavity behind siding

(19 mm wood furring strips used)

Non-finned (box) window frame

Variation - extra sealant and backer rod at

the jambs and head

Selected Practice

B-side

Variation (V-side)

Caulking and backer rod between

window frame and rough opening

(30)

W1

Location of Deficiencies

Saw cut in cladding

Deficiencies in sealant

bead and backer

rod between window

frame and siding

(31)

Laboratory - Water Management + Deficiency

Reservoir Water Entry - 03 ABS

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Chamber Pressure (Pa)

W

a

te

r E

n

tr

y

(m

l/

m

in

)

B-side Reservoir - 08 Spray

B-side Reservoir - 16 Spray

B-side Reservoir - 34 Spray

V-side Reservoir - 08 Spray

V-side Reservoir - 16 Spray

V-side Reservoir - 34 Spray

B

V

03

03

W1

V -side

B-side

Much larger rate of water entry to reservoirs

on both sides of wall - compared to “No

Deficiency”

– effect dependent on chamber pressure

(32)

Laboratory-Water Management + Deficiency

Reservoir Water Entry - 08 ABS

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Chamber Pressure (Pa)

Wa

te

r En

tr

y

m

l/

m

in

B-side Reservoir - 08 Spray

B-side Reservoir - 16 Spray

B-side Reservoir - 34 Spray

V-side Reservoir - 08 Spray

V-side Reservoir - 16 Spray

V-side Reservoir - 34 Spray

B

V

08

08

W 1

V -side

B-side

Increased level of ABS leakage Î Twice rate

of water entry to

B-side

as compared to

V

-side

reservoir

• V -side reservoir

- Water entry rate to

increased slightly with increased air barrier

system leakage

• B-side reservoir

- Large increase in water

entry rate due to increase in ABS for 1.6 and

3.4 cascade rates

(33)

• Hygrothermal Performance of BES

– Modeling

– Field Experiment

– Laboratory experiments

(34)

Acknowledgments

– NRC for funding this cross program initiative between IRCs

IE and BES programs

– IE/IAQ Group

– FEWF Team:

• William Lei

• Mike Nicholls

• Marianne Manning

• Roberts Berzins

• Stacey Nunes

• Khaled Abdulghani

(35)

Dr. Wahid Maref

Wahid.maref@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca

Tel. 1-613-993 5709

Références

Documents relatifs

Received: 29 June 2020; Accepted: 27 July 2020; Published: 30 July 2020    Abstract: (1) Background: We have updated knowledge of the psychometric qualities

In light of the previous analysis, we propose three theoretical hypotheses on intra- national trade in developing countries, which are subject to empirical verification: 1)

Based on a comparative analysis of nine case studies that used the Work Assessment Method from six contrasted countries, this review (1) gives generic ideas on work

(1) In systems with ergodic magnetic field lines, ideal MHD accurately predicts marginal stability, even in fusion grade plasmas.. (2) In closed field line

The excess mass spectra for all 4 multiplicity bins, re- sulting from subtraction of the “conservative” hadron de- cay cocktail from the measured data, are shown in Figs.. The

Figure 21 shows the mean and standard deviation of the residual pedestals averaged over all channels, for other runs taken in October 2006, as a function of the run number..

We down sample the Cifar100 data with 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% of the training samples, and present the test error rates obtained by Fold-2 AdaMixUp in Figure 7 (red curves).. The

/ La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur. For