• Aucun résultat trouvé

Sensitivity of different methods for simultaneous evaluation of emissivity and temperature through multispectral infrared thermography simulation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Sensitivity of different methods for simultaneous evaluation of emissivity and temperature through multispectral infrared thermography simulation"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02264677

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02264677

Submitted on 7 Aug 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Sensitivity of different methods for simultaneous evaluation of emissivity and temperature through

multispectral infrared thermography simulation

Thibaud Toullier, Jean Dumoulin, Laurent Mevel

To cite this version:

Thibaud Toullier, Jean Dumoulin, Laurent Mevel. Sensitivity of different methods for simultaneous evaluation of emissivity and temperature through multispectral infrared thermography simulation. EGU 2019 - European Geoscience Union, Apr 2019, Vienne, Austria. 21, pp.1, 2019. �hal-02264677�

(2)

Conclusion and perspectives

Bibliography

Sensitivity of different methods for simultaneous evaluation of emissivity and temperature

through multispectral infrared thermography simulation

Thibaud TOULLIER

1,2

, Jean DUMOULIN

2,1

, Laurent MEVEL

1,2

1 Inria, I4S Team, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042, Rennes, France

2 IFSTTAR, COSYS-SII, Allée des Ponts et Chaussées, 44344, Bouguenais, France

Introduction and nomenclature

Results

This study focuses on the simultaneous evaluation of temperature and emissivity with multispectral infrared thermography (IRT). It leans on the study and development of an IRT simulator able to address 3D scene in static or dynamic configuration. The sensitivity of 4 different temperature and emissivity joint estimation methods are then evaluated.

Conclusion:

 Comparison of 4 methods to estimate simultaneously emissivity and temperature  Study and development of a 3D scene IRT simulator

Perspectives:

 Add measurement noises in the simulation process to observe their effect

 Combine temporal and spatial information in Bayesian methods for further improvements of joint estimation

[1] M. F. Cohen, S. E. Chen, J. R. Wallace, and D. P. Greenberg. A progressive refinement approach to fast radiosity image generation. ACM SIGGRAPH computer graphics, 22(4) :75–84, 1988. [2] J.R. Howell, R. Siegel, and M.P. Pinar. Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer. CRC Press, 5th edition, 2010.

[3] A. Gillespie, S. Rokugawa, T. Matsunaga, J S. Cothern, S. Hook, and A. B Kahle. A Temperature and Emissivity Separation Algorithm for Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Images. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 36(4) :14, 1998.

[4] Jean-Claude Krapez. Radiative Measurements of Temperature. In Thermal Measurements and Inverse Techniques, Heat transfer. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2011. OCLC : ocn587104377. [5] J. N. Ash and J. Meola. Temperature-emissivity separation for LWIR sensing using MCMC. volume 9840, page 98401O. International Society for Optics and Photonics, May 2016.

Authors wish to thanks Bretagne Region for its financial support

Radiosity equation

1

𝐵𝐵𝑘𝑘,Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 = 𝑀𝑀𝑘𝑘,Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 + 1 − 𝜖𝜖𝑘𝑘,Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖

𝑗𝑗=1,𝑗𝑗≠𝑘𝑘 𝑗𝑗=𝑁𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒

𝑉𝑉𝑘𝑘𝑗𝑗𝐹𝐹𝑘𝑘→𝑗𝑗𝐵𝐵𝑗𝑗,Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖

IRT Simulator through the radiosity method

Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 Wavelength interval of 𝑖𝑖th band 𝐵𝐵𝑘𝑘,Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 Radiosity of patch 𝑘𝑘 on Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖

𝜖𝜖k,Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 Emissivity of patch 𝑘𝑘 in Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 𝑀𝑀𝑘𝑘,Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 Emittance of patch 𝑘𝑘 on Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖

𝑇𝑇 Object’s temperature 𝑉𝑉𝑘𝑘𝑗𝑗 = 0,1 Visibility between patches 𝑘𝑘 and 𝑗𝑗

View factor

Geometrical coefficient for radiative exchange between two diffuse elements

𝐹𝐹1→2 = �

𝐴𝐴1 �𝐴𝐴2

cos 𝜃𝜃1 cos 𝜃𝜃2

𝜋𝜋𝑟𝑟2 𝑑𝑑𝐴𝐴1𝑑𝑑𝐴𝐴2

Temperature and emissivity retrieval

With Bouguer’s law and for infinitesimal surfaces2:

𝐸𝐸sensor,Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 = 𝐼𝐼𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑗𝑗𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐𝑡𝑡,Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 cos 𝜃𝜃𝑟𝑟2 𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑠 = cos 𝜃𝜃𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑗𝑗𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐𝑡𝑡 cos 𝜃𝜃𝑟𝑟2 𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑑𝑑𝑆𝑆𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑗𝑗𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐𝑡𝑡 𝐿𝐿𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑗𝑗𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐𝑡𝑡 Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖, 𝑇𝑇 ⇒ Undetermined system with 𝝐𝝐𝚫𝚫𝝀𝝀𝒊𝒊 and 𝑻𝑻 unknowns

𝐸𝐸capteur,Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 = 𝑔𝑔 𝜃𝜃𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐𝑠𝑠, 𝜃𝜃𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑗𝑗𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑡, 𝑟𝑟 𝝐𝝐𝚫𝚫𝝀𝝀𝒊𝒊Lo(Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖, 𝑻𝑻)

T (K) T (K)

Simulation 1 293.15 Simulation 3 333.15

Simulation 2 313.15 Simulation 4 353.15

A target with 4 different materials properties

3D Model

Fig. 2 : (a) Spectral emissivity distribution of 4 artificial

materials for the target in the 7.5𝜇𝜇𝜇𝜇 − 13𝜇𝜇𝜇𝜇 bandwidth (b) Simulation results for 𝑇𝑇 = 313.15𝐾𝐾

(c) Camera, target and environment in the visible (d) Temperature ranges

« Temperature Emissivity (TES) Method »𝟑𝟑

𝑇𝑇 Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 = 𝐿𝐿𝑜𝑜−1 𝛾𝛾Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 − 𝐿𝐿𝜖𝜖 𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑒 Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 𝑚𝑚𝑐𝑐𝑚𝑚 + 𝐿𝐿𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑒 Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 , �𝑇𝑇 = maxΔ𝜆𝜆 𝑖𝑖 (sgn 𝛾𝛾Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 − 𝐿𝐿𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑒 Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 𝑇𝑇 Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 ) ̃𝜖𝜖 Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 = 𝛾𝛾Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 − 𝐿𝐿𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑒 Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 𝐿𝐿𝑜𝑜 Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖, �𝑇𝑇 − 𝐿𝐿𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑒 𝛥𝛥𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 , 𝛽𝛽 Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 = ̃𝜖𝜖 𝛥𝛥𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 ̃𝜖𝜖 Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 , 𝜖𝜖𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑖𝑠𝑠 ≈ 𝑎𝑎 − 𝑏𝑏 𝛽𝛽𝑚𝑚𝑐𝑐𝑚𝑚 − 𝛽𝛽𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑖𝑠𝑠 𝑐𝑐 ̂𝜖𝜖 Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 = 𝛽𝛽 Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 𝛽𝛽𝜖𝜖𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑖𝑠𝑠 𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑖𝑠𝑠

Non linear optimization

argmin � 𝑖𝑖=1 𝑁𝑁 𝛾𝛾Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 − 𝜖𝜖Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 � Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖𝐿𝐿 𝑜𝑜 𝜆𝜆, 𝑇𝑇 𝑑𝑑𝜆𝜆 2 𝜖𝜖Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 = � 𝑗𝑗=0 𝑀𝑀 𝑎𝑎𝑗𝑗Φ𝑗𝑗(Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖) ; 0 ≤ 𝜖𝜖Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 ≤ 1; Φ𝑗𝑗 1≤𝑗𝑗≤𝑀𝑀 orthonormal basis (Tchebychev-1)

200𝐾𝐾 ≤ 𝑇𝑇 ≤ 400𝐾𝐾 Multi-temperature𝟒𝟒 argmin � 𝑖𝑖=1 𝑁𝑁 𝛾𝛾Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖,𝑇𝑇1 − 𝜖𝜖Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 � Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖𝐿𝐿 𝑜𝑜 𝜆𝜆, 𝑇𝑇 1 𝑑𝑑𝜆𝜆 2 + 𝛾𝛾Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖,𝑇𝑇2 − 𝜖𝜖Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 � Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖𝐿𝐿 𝑜𝑜 𝜆𝜆, 𝑇𝑇 2 𝑑𝑑𝜆𝜆 2 𝜖𝜖Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 = � 𝑗𝑗=0 𝑀𝑀 𝑎𝑎𝑗𝑗Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖𝑗𝑗 ; 0 ≤ 𝜖𝜖Δ𝜆𝜆𝑖𝑖 ≤ 1; 200𝐾𝐾 ≤ 𝑇𝑇1 ≤ 400𝐾𝐾; 200𝐾𝐾 ≤ 𝑇𝑇2 ≤ 400𝐾𝐾

Compared methods

Bayesian (Monte-Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC))𝟓𝟓

A priori known laws:

𝜖𝜖 ≈ 𝒩𝒩 𝜇𝜇𝜖𝜖, Σ𝜖𝜖 𝑇𝑇 ≈ 𝒰𝒰(𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑖𝑠𝑠, 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑐𝑐𝑚𝑚) With 𝜇𝜇𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑖𝑒𝑒𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑠 = 0.60.6 0.6 , Σ𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑖𝑒𝑒𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑠 = 1 0.8 0.8 0.8 1 0.8 0.8 0.8 1

Draw variables 𝜖𝜖 and 𝑇𝑇 by using the targeted distributions 𝑝𝑝(𝜖𝜖|𝛾𝛾) and 𝑝𝑝(𝑇𝑇|𝛾𝛾) with a Slice-within-Gibbs sampler.

Stopping criteria

• Optimization algorithms ⟹ local minimum • Metaheuristic ⟹ 10000 iterations 𝑅𝑅𝑀𝑀𝑆𝑆𝐸𝐸 𝑥𝑥 = 𝑁𝑁 1 𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑖𝑚𝑚𝑐𝑐 × 𝑁𝑁𝑐𝑐𝑖𝑖𝑚𝑚𝑜𝑜𝑒𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑘𝑘=1� 𝑁𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑖𝑖𝑒𝑒𝑠𝑠 � 𝑗𝑗=1 𝑁𝑁𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑖𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 𝑥𝑥𝑘𝑘,𝑗𝑗 − 𝑥𝑥𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑗𝑗𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑖𝑒𝑒𝑜𝑜,𝑘𝑘 2 Observations

 Non linear methods find a local minimum without any guarantee on the physical solution

 TES relies on a correlation based on a database linked with airborn based applications

 MCMC is a metaheuristic that requires a long time and effort to be computed

Fig. 1 : Geometry for two

infinitesimals elements

Fig. 3 : Temperature estimation for the 4 different methods

Fig. 4 : Emissivity estimation for the 4 different methods

• GPU acceleration through OpenGL’s API • User-friendly graphical interface

• Python interpreter for user-case scenarios

C++ Implementation

• Use models from literature :

⇒ Get the solar spectral radiation at ground

⇒ Sensor model for radiative illumination to image

a b

c

d

Références

Documents relatifs

They can be ranked by their resistance to storage at elevated temperatures, with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and hepatitis B vaccine showing the highest thermostability,

Un nouveau type de fibre optique a été utilisé et nous avons montré que son profil à gradient d'indice inversé (IGI) permet une propagation de la lumière aux

Nevertheless, based on our previous data recorded under the same experimental conditions[24], it is questionable whether the late (about 40 minutes after ketamine

This study presents, to the best of our knowledge, the first systematic comparison of single-gene markers versus multi-gene machine-learning models of tumour sensitivity to drugs

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

PhotoDSC has been applied to follow the global kinetics of chain scissions resulting from the UV light irradiation or from the thermal degradation of a high molecular.. weight

Flow measurements in the Orleans ductile iron pipe sub-DMA to establish the relationship between background leakage rate and pressure were also performed in... late October

A specific system performance is approximated in each subsystem optimization, using Response Surface (RS) models for simulating other disciplines state