• Aucun résultat trouvé

Increasing pea or fababean N 2 fixation by intercropping with durum wheat to improve the cereal grain protein concentration

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Increasing pea or fababean N 2 fixation by intercropping with durum wheat to improve the cereal grain protein concentration"

Copied!
15
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02751025

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02751025

Submitted on 3 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

with durum wheat to improve the cereal grain protein concentration

Laurent Bedoussac, Eric Justes

To cite this version:

Laurent Bedoussac, Eric Justes. Increasing pea or fababean N 2 fixation by intercropping with durum wheat to improve the cereal grain protein concentration. 5. International Food Legumes Research Conference (IFLRC V) and 7. European Conference on Grain Legumes (AEPVII), Apr 2010, Antalya, Turkey. �hal-02751025�

(2)

Laurent BEDOUSSAC 1 and Eric JUSTES 2

1

Université de Toulouse; ENFA; UMR INRA-INPT/ENSAT 1248 AGIR

2

INRA, UMR INRA-INPT/ENSAT 1248 AGIR 31326 Castanet Tolosan, France

[email protected] [email protected]

Increasing pea or fababean N 2 fixation by intercropping with durum wheat

to improve the cereal grain protein concentration

7th European Conference on Grain Legumes

Antalya, 30 April 2010

(3)

Improve agricultural systems efficiency

• Intensification of agriculture in the last 50 years sometimes leads to:

- Environmental contamination (water, soil, air) - Resistance to chemicals (e.g. Griffon 2006)

Input costs

Limited resources

Energy consumption

Efficiency of agricultural systems needs to be improved

One of the solutions: diversification of agro-systems One of the solutions (Malézieux et al. 2008)

• Intercropping = the simultaneous growing of two or more species in the same field for a significant period but without necessarily being sown and harvested at the same time (Willey 1979)

Durum wheat – Faba bean row-intercropping

Durum wheat – Winter Pea mixed on the line

01/11

(4)

Advantages and Disadvantages of intercrops

Cereal – grain legume spring intercrops are known to improve the use of available resources (complementary use of light & N pools)

(eg. Corre-Hellou 2005; 2006; 2007, Hauggaard-Nielsen et al. 2001; 2003; 2005; 2006; 2009)

Global yield

Cereal grain protein content

Chemicals inputs (but contradictory results in the literature) Better stability over years

(eg. Jensen 1996, Hauggaard-Nielsen et al. 2001; 2003; 2005; 2006; 2009)

Coherent with actual French agricultural policies:

“Increase organic farming production by 50% in 2012”

“Reduce pesticides use by 50% in 2018”

Interest for southern France and Mediterranean areas:

Durum wheat quality in low N inputs systems European grain legume production

Adapted to irregular and restrictive climates (particularly water)

But… Lack of knowledge and references on winter intercrops on winter intercrops

Technical difficulties

Necessity to sort grains (for human consumption)

Industry, cooperatives and farmers hesitation 02/11

(5)

Objectives and general hypotheses of our work Hypotheses:

Hypotheses:

Intercrop efficiency depends on the balance between competition and complementarity for resource use

- Species :

i) Growth, ii) Resource needs, iii) Aerial architecture

- Farming practices :

i) N available, ii) Date and sowing densities, iii) Sowing pattern, iv) Pesticides...

- Weather and soil

Wide range of possibilities

Allowing efficient crop management systems design adapted to specific objectives

Objectives:

Objectives:

1. Analyse intercrops functioning in a wide range of

competition in particular N availability (amount/dynamic) 2. Determine optimal management to improve IC efficiency

03/11

(6)

Choice of field experiments

• Lack of knowledge choice of field experiments

• 1 main objective: Evaluate a wide range of competition

• 3 years experiment = 3 complementary objectives :

2005-2006: Evaluate hypotheses & potentialities for winter crops

2006-2007: Complete the understanding (functioning & mechanisms) in dynamics 2007-2008: Design and evaluate prototypes of crop management systems according to specific objectives in low input & organic systems

H E I G H T

• 5 wheat cultivars Intrinsic grain protein content

Neodur Nefer

Intermediate

Acalou Short

L1823 Orjaune

Tall

High Intermediate

Low

• 2 “winter” legumes: 1 pea (Lucy) & 1 faba bean (Castel)

• Various N availabilities (Amount & Dynamics) 04/11

(7)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

PSC WSC IC WSC IC PSC WSC IC WSC IC

N0 N180 N0 N140

2005-2006 2006-2007

G ra in y ie ld ( t/ h a a t 0 % ) Pea

Wheat

• LER > 1 in low N systems

IC up to 19% more efficient than SC

• LER 1 with large amount of N available

IC efficiency depends on N-fertilization & IC more suited to low N

• N-fertilization slightly increased wheat yield

• Pea yield strongly reduced by N-fertilization

IC efficiency for yield depends on N availability

Pea Wheat

Lodging and diseases

Wheat (Nefer) – Pea (Lucy) in 2005-2006 and 2006-2007

= 1.19 LER

= 1.01 LER

= 1.19 LER LER

= 0.75

05/11

(8)

Intercropping increases legume N 2 fixation

• Pea N 2 fixation in IC > SC

The more wheat N acquisition the more pea N 2 fixation Complementarity for N pools use

• High pea N 2 fixation in IC (80-85 %Ndfa)

14 kg N/ha up taken from soil (only 15% of N available)

N β

N 100 N

Ndfa

%

ref 15

pea 15 ref

15

− δ

δ

× δ

=

15

N natural abundance method (Shearer and Kohl 1986)

δ

15

N

ref

= IC wheat β = -1‰

(Voisin et al. 2002)

Nefer – Lucy ; Unfertilized treatments

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

2005-2006 2006-2007

Percentage of N derived from air (%Nacc)

Sole cropped Pea Intercropped Pea

Wheat (Nefer) – Pea (Lucy) in unfertilized treatments

64% 52%

82% 84%

06/11

(9)

Intercropping improves light absorption

Wheat growth earlier than that of pea and then slower

The whole IC absorbed more PAR than the SC

Species complementarities

in time & height growth

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 500 1000 1500 2000

PAR absorbed (% of incident PAR)

FPARa IC N0 FPARa SC W N0 FPARa SC P N0

Degree days (°C.d)

Nefer – Lucy 2006-2007

BUT

IC less efficient than SC wheat with large amount of N

Wheat (Nefer) – Pea (Lucy) in 2006-2007

07/11

(10)

IC improves wheat grain protein content

IC GPC higher than in SC

The lower SC Wheat GPC the larger the increase

IC more adapted to low N input systems

Why larger amount of N available per grain in IC ?

Exp. I and II y = 0.67x + 5.27

R2 = 0.87***

7 9 11 13 15

7 9 11 13 15

2005-2006 (Exp. I) N0

N100 N180

2006-2007 (Exp. II) N0

N60+

N80 N140

In te rc ro p p e d W h e a t G ra in P ro te in C o n te n t (% D W )

Sole cropped Wheat Grain Protein Content (%DW)

y=1.2x y=1.1x y=x Wheat (Nefer) – Pea (Lucy)

08/11

(11)

Why more N available per grain in IC?

Wheat (mean of Nefer, Neodur, Acalou & Orjaune) – Pea (Lucy) in 2006-2007 (N0)

100%

(34 kg N/tonne)

100%

SC 100%

(reference)

N available /yield unit N

available Yield

100%

(34 kg N/tonne)

100%

SC 100%

(reference)

N available /yield unit N

available Yield

109%

(37 kg N/tonne)

100%

SC1/2 92%

(% SC)

109%

(37 kg N/tonne)

100%

SC1/2 92%

(% SC)

147%

(49 kg N/tonne)

85%

IC 58%

(% SC)

147%

(49 kg N/tonne)

85%

IC 58%

(% SC)

09/11

(12)

• IC improves the use of available resources (LER>1) in low N input

- Complementary use of N pools - Complementary light absorption

- Intercrop efficiency reduced with N fertilization

• IC improves durum wheat grain protein content (GPC) in low N input

• IC efficiency reduced with N fertilization

- Early N fertilization wheat growth & available light for pea

• IC functionning & efficiency is function of:

- Dynamic competition & complementarity - N fertilization, cultivar, species & densities

Design crop management systems adapted to specific objectives

Conclusions

10/11

(13)

Perspectives

11/11

• Knowledge needs for designing cropping management systems - Which are the best-adapted legume cultivars and species ? - Effect of sowing densities and sowing pattern ?

• Knowledge needs for pests, diseases and weeds in IC

• Technical feasibility, Interannual stability and Effect of phosphorus ?

• Intercrop modelling for designing management systems

• Next question to resolve:

How to introduce Durum wheat-Grain legumes IC

in the cropping systems and in agrofood chain?

(14)

Thank you for your attention

For more details:

http://wwagir.toulouse.

inra.fr/agir

Plant and Soil (2010) Vol. 330, 19:35

Vol. 330, 37:54

(15)

IC could green aphids but not weevils

IC could weeds compared to Pea SC

IC could wheat septoria and pea ascochyta

98 W / 23 F 112 W / 13 F

IC-F efficiency depends on plant densities

Références

Documents relatifs

During crop growth, sole cropped and intercropped wheat biomass were significantly increased with fertilizer N amount in

In four parallel workshops, participants made practical recommendations on three important issues: the feasibility of using a BIS for inter-European data collection to improve

Au total, les perspectives d’emploi sur les dix prochaines années resteraient orientées à la hausse pour l’ensemble du domaine de l’enseignement et de la formation, mais

• Aim of this study : evaluate the assumption that increasing planned biodiversity through intercropping of winter grain legumes with durum wheat can reduce legume pests

This study contributes to our knowledge of the range of plants at risk of being attacked by future invaders based on knowledge of the host plants of potential

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Akken yezmer lḥal llan wudmawen nniḍen icudden ɣer wayen i d-yemlal deg tudert-is am wakken neẓra Meɛtub lwennas d win yulsen zwağ, ahat yewwi-d ɣef tmeṭṭut

This algorithm is based on the observation by Kabal et al. in [9] that in the cepstral domain, the minimum-phase ∗ component of a reverberant speech signal shows distinct