• Aucun résultat trouvé

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY BEHAVIOUR OF Gd DOPED EuO UNDER HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY BEHAVIOUR OF Gd DOPED EuO UNDER HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: jpa-00219972

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00219972

Submitted on 1 Jan 1980

HAL

is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire

HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY BEHAVIOUR OF Gd DOPED EuO UNDER HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE

J. Desfours, C. Godart, J. Nadai, A. Mauger, G. Weill, M. Averous

To cite this version:

J. Desfours, C. Godart, J. Nadai, A. Mauger, G. Weill, et al.. ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY

BEHAVIOUR OF Gd DOPED EuO UNDER HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE. Journal de Physique

Colloques, 1980, 41 (C5), pp.C5-219-C5-222. �10.1051/jphyscol:1980537�. �jpa-00219972�

(2)

JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE Colloque C5, supplément au n° 6, Tome 41, juin 1980, page C5-219

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY BEHAVIOUR OF Gd DOPED EuO UNDER HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE

J . P . D e s f o u r s(*}, C. Godart ( t e f c ) , J . P . Nadai (*) , A.Mauger (***}, G. W e i l l * * * * } M. Averous(*'

(t) •C.E.E.S. Université des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, Montpellier, France.

fstefîj Chimie Métallurgique et Spectroscopie des Terres Rares E.R. 209, C.N.R.S., 92190 - Meudon Bellevue (té±) Laboratoire de Physique des Solides, C.N.R.S., 92190 Meudon Bellevue.

Résumé.- Des monocristaux de EuO dopé au Gd ont été élaborés avec une concentration initiale en Gd de 1,5%. Le paramètre de réseau a été déterminé aux rayons X et est plus petit que celui de l'EuO pur. Des mesures de résistivité ont été faites jusqu'à 5 kbar de 50 K à 200 K. La concentration des porteurs a été déterminée à haute et basse température par des mesures d'effet Hall. La température de Curie a été déter- minée par des mesures de magnétisation.

Les points importants qui ressortent de ce travail sont que :

i) la résistivité décroît sous pression tandis qu'elle augmente sur les échantillons d'EuO dopé à l'Eu;

ii) le pic de résistivité est déplacé avec la pression vers les hautes températures à raison de 0,8 K/kbar tandis que le point d'inflexion de la Courbe p(T) est déplacé à raison de 0,7 K/kbar. Le coefficient de pression négatif de la résistivité mesuré sur cet échantillon a été attribué à un effet de mélange des bandes 5dr et 6s ; ainsi les variations de résistivité sous pression sont dues à des variations de mobilité car l'échantillon reste dégénéré à haute et basse température.

Abstract.- Single crystals of Gd doped EuO have been grown with an initial Gd concen- tration of 1.5%. The lattice parameter has been determined by X-ray analysis and is smaller that of pure EuO. Measurements of resistivity under hydrostatic pressure have heen performed up to 5 Kbar in the temperature range 50 K - 200 K. The carrier concentration has been determined at high and low temperature by Hall effect measu- rements. The Curie temperature has been determined by magnetization measurements.

The main points of interest of this work are : i) the resistivity decreases under pressure while it increases in samples of Eu doped EuO ;

ii) the resistivity peak is shi- fted by pressure towards high temperature at a rate of 0.8 K/kbar while the inflexion point of the p-vs-T curve is shifted at a rate of 0.7 K/kbar. The negative pressure coefficient of resistivity measured for this sample has been explained by the mixing of 6 s and 5 d bands ; so that the variations of resistivity under pressure are due to mobility variations because the sample remains degenerated at high and low tem- perature.

1 Introduction•- In two preceding papers we investigated the resistivity behaviour of Eu rich EuO under hydrostatic / l / and uniaxial / 2 / pressure. The aim of the pre- sent work is to study the effect of an hy- drostatic pressure on the resistivity of EuO samples doped with 1.5% of gadolinium.

The important difference between Eu rich and Gd doped crystals is that the first ones are oxygen deficient and the second ones are made up with an Eu + Gd composition which corresponds to stoechlmetry.

The experimental results show a new fact : for Gd doped EuO, the pressure coef- ficient of resistivity is negative in the whole range 50 K - 300 K while it is positi- ve in the paramagnetic phase (T>80K) for Eu rich EuO. We attempt to give an explanation for this difference.

2 Experimental results.- i) The lattice pa- rameter has been determined by a Debye- Scherrer diagram. The results are : for Eu

o

r i c h EuO a = 5 . 1 4 3 A ; f o r Gd doped EuO a =

° ++

5.137 A. The substitution of Eu ions by Gd diminishes the lattice parameter by a factor of 1.2°/o 0.

ii) A Curie temperature of about 70 K for Gd doped samples, has been determined by means of a vibrating sample magnetometer.

iii) The resistivity of Gd doped EuO has been measured under hydrostatic pressure up to 5 kbars in the temperature range 5 0 K 300K. The figure 1 shows the resistance curves for different pressures around T c (50 - 180 K ) . At all temperatures the resis- tivity is decreased exponentially with pressure which allows us to define a pres- sure coefficient of resistivity B= ^n p

2 dP

which is plotted versus temperature in figure 2.

Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1980537

(3)

JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE

1 -

Eu 0 Gd 9-2

E

P = 140 h a r s

e P = 1030 bars

P = 2900 bars

; P = 5000 b a r s

1

!'

, I , 9

Fig. 1 Resistance versus temperature at different pressures.

Fig. 3 Eu rich EuO

dotted line : experimental pressure coef- ficient of resistivity

B = - Lnp versus temperature

dP

full line : calculated magnetic dependent part of the pressure coefficient of resistivity For comparison, we have plotted the values

6 =-- Lnp Tc versus temperature.

of for Eu rich EuO.in figure 3. m d~ ' - dP

Fig. 2

3 Discussion.- The curve B (T) exhibits a minimum around 50 K, and a maximum around 120 K. This behaviour can be imputed to magnetic interactions. When pressure is ap- plied, such magnetic interactions give to

f3 the following contribution :

which is superposed on the pressure depen- dence of the resistivity with the lattice compressibility :

B =

'

d L n p '

"

1 dl? J

I

lattice

so, at all temperatures, we can write

At low temperatures, when pressure is applied, the resistivity peak is shifted

Fig. 2 ~d doped EuO towards higher temperatures.It has been

dotted line : experimental pressure coef- shown that for EU rich ~ ~ this results 0 , ficient of resistivity

from the shift of Tc bv pressure. In the

B = -

gp

versus temperature

- -

case of Gd doped samples, the peak is not full line : calculated magnetic dependent SO well defined and, we

iave

the

part of the pressure coefficient of resistivity 2

second derivative d p / d ~ 2 of the p

-

VS- T

= d Lnnp

.

d TC 2 2

m dT dP curve. The temperatures for which d p/cQ

is zero, which correspond to Tc / 3 , 4 / are

(4)

increased by pressure at a rate of 0.7 K/

kbarwhich is in agreement with the shift of the resistivity peak. Then it is quite sure that around Tc, the resistivity is changed by the effect of pressure on magne- tic interactions. We can then consider that the variationsof

B R

with T are negligible with respect to these of Bfi ;

d Lnp

.

dTc

B m = - ~

d~

since p only depends on (T-Tc)

.

'There is no

significant difference between Eu rich EuO and Gd doped EuO in this range of tem- peratures,

At high temperatures, on the contrary,

Bm

vanishes and $

- B .

The experimental values is

-

0 .12 x loi3 bar-' and remains constant. rhe sign of 6 in this Gd doped EuOsample is thus negative although it is

positive in Eu rich EuO. When Eu

*

ions

are substitued by ~ d + + + ones, the lattice

0

parameter is decreased from 5.143 A to

0

5 -137 A as mentioned above and it results that crystal field splittings of the 6 s

-

5 d levels are increased /5/, so the mixing persists. The sample remains degenerated at all pressures and the carrier concentration is not changed.Thus the only parameter which can be pressure dependent is the mobi- lity.

In the case of Eu rich EuO (1) we showed that the positive pressure caeffi- cient is essentially due to a transfer from 6 s band to5d band with pressure assuming that they were shifted without deformation

raking into account the deformation we obtain

d Lnp d Lnp dv I

dv2) (11 l S i d = ( ~ h e f c o - ' e ~ k l s + "2

d Lnp dnl dnl

with(T)=

- 1

e l 2 ) is the

de f= 0

so that the effective masses are decreased (m12 a b7-:> and the mobilities are increa- sed ( p1,2 a m1,2 ; with y>O). So we

obtain d1~1,2 > 0 and the second term in equation /1/ gives a negative contribution.

r

So, with a free carrier concentration of about lo2' cm-3 in Gd doped sample the effect of the second term will be more important and we obtain a negative value in Gd doped EuO and a positive value of

Bwas obtained in Eu rich EuO.

4. Conclusion.- The study of transport properties under hydrostatic pressure as a

function of temperature gives new informa- tion on conductivity processes in EuO.

For Gd doped EuO with a carrier concentra- tion of about lo2' the pressure coefficient of resistivity is negative at all temperatures..It can be defined as the sum of two terms : B E +

. , B

The first one corresponds to the change in mobility as a result of pressure effect on the effec- tive masses of 5 d and 6 s bands. The second one corresponds to the increase of the Curie temperature as a result of pressure effect on magnetic interactions.

EU rich EuO /1/ exhibits the same behavisnr but the main part of resistivity changes are due to the transfer of electrons from 6 s band (high mobility) to 5 d band (low mobility) with pressure. This process is more important than that of effective mass and leads, in the paramagnetic phase, to a positive value of

B.

The high electron concentration induce2 by gadolinium increases the effect of band 3efom.ation and gives a negative value to 8 .

Acknowledgements.- The authors are grate- ful to M. Vellas for technical assistance,

positive term, without deformation /2/.eis the charge of electron.

When pressure is applied, the 6 s,5d band widths W are increased due to the increase of the overlap of wave function,

3

(5)

JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE

R e f e r e n c e s

/1/ D e s f o u r s , J 2

.,

G o d a r t , C

.,

W e i l l , G

.,

Averous, M

.,

L l i n a r e s , C

.,

P h y s . Rev. B 18 n o 6 (1976) 2750

.

-

/2/ D e s f o u r s , J .P . , G o d a r t , C

.,

R i d a i , J .P

.,

Averous, M

.,

14th I n t

.

Con£

.

on t h e

P h y s i c o f s e m i c o n d u c t o r s , Edirnbourgh 1978 / 3 / D e Gennes, P .G

.,

F r i e d e l . J

,

J

.

Phys

.

Chem

.

S o l i d s

4

(1958) 71

.

/4/ F i s h e r , M.E

.,

L a n g e r , J .S

.,

Phys

.

Rev. L e t t . 20 (1968) 6 6 5 .

-

/5/ Wachter, P

.,

S o l i d S t a t e Commun

1

(1969) 6 9 3 .

Références

Documents relatifs

Transitional domain of pressure exists between y-phase and real a-phase (7.5-10 kbar) after electronic transition at 7.5 kbar and between a-phase and real a'-phase (52-72 kbar)

en premier lieu, Lacan cherche comment disposer?. le trèfle sur le tore grâce à la bande

[r]

Parmi les suites suivantes, lesquelles sont des suites extraites des autres1. Rappeler les formules de trigonom´ etrie donnant cos a cos b et

On va appliquer la m´ ethode qui permet d’obtenir l’expression du terme g´ en´ eral ` a partir de la formule de r´ ecurrence.. (a) Recherche du

Manuel Azaña, par exemple, projette dès  un ouvrage cri- tique de la « littérature du désastre », qui restera inachevé ; et rédige, à partir de , des

À partir de l'observation attentive à laquelle elle s'est livrée, dans la durée d'une action à laquelle elle a elle- même participé comme lectrice, elle montre comment se déploient

2, inasmuch as our data deduced from magnetic measu- rements fully agree with those deduced from magnetooptical measurements /4/ for samples with similar electron