• Aucun résultat trouvé

Search for alternate hosts of the coconut Cape St. Paul Wilt Disease

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Search for alternate hosts of the coconut Cape St. Paul Wilt Disease "

Copied!
20
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Search for alternate hosts of the coconut Cape St. Paul Wilt Disease

( CSPWD ) pathogen

Team Members

Egya Ndede Yankey CSIR-OPRI

Fabian Pilet CIRAD – France

Robert N. Quaicoe CSIR-OPRI Sylvester K. Dery CSIR- OPRI

Dollet Michel CIRAD – France

Victoria P. Dzogbefia KNUST-Kumasi

(2)

INTRODUCTION AND JUSTIFICATION

Lethal Yellowing ( LY ) locally called Cape Saint Paul Wilt Disease

(CSPWD )is caused by a phytoplasma

It was first observed in 1932 and has since

become the foremost threat to the coconut industry in Ghana

Ankobra river area

Asebu

Asebu

Ankobra area

(3)

Why alternate hosts studies

The lethal yellowing phytoplasma has other hosts other than coconut in other places:

In the Americas it is reported to affect at least 38 palm species (Harrison et. al. 1999 )

In Jamaica the weeds Emelia fosbergii and

synedrella nodiflora were reported to host the

pathogen ( Brown et al. 2007 )

(4)

In Ghana the history of the disease at Cape Three Points makes a strong case for the presence of

alternate hosts of the phytoplasma:

1964: Devastated palms in the area (Ofori and Nkansah, 1997 )

1977: wiped off varieties introduced for resistance screening by CSIR-CRI ( Dery et al., 1997 )

1981: With the exception of SGD, all other varieties planted in a screening plot under the Fr-GH-C.I coconut project were

decimated ( Dery et.al.,1997 )

1995-Date : Nearly cleared all varieties (62.3%) imported under

the EC-STD III project ( Anon, 2006 )

(5)

It is in the light of this history that the presence of alternate hosts was investigated. The hypothesis being that, the phytoplasma, an obligate parasite needed another host to survive when their primary hosts, the coconuts were unavailable due to death from the disease

The identification of alternate hosts will greatly increase our understanding of the spread of the disease and help evolve sound control measures against its spread

In this work 57 plant species belonging to 23

botanical families were screened for their host

status to the CSPWD causing pathogen.

(6)

METHODOLOGY

Sampling sites: Cape Three Points ( W/R ) Asebu ( C/R )

Sampling Period:

July-Dec ( Rainy season )

March- April ( Dry season )

(7)

DNA Extraction

DNA was extracted from the test plants

employing the protocol of Daire et al. 1997 2 individual plants were pooled into each DNA sample.

For each plant species 15 DNA samples

were prepared

(8)

PCR & Gel electrophoresis

• Screening was first carried out with phytoplasma universal primers P1/P7.

• CSPWD specific primers G813/GAKSR were applied to positives from the above test

• PCR products were analysed by Gel electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel and viewed under UV light. Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism analysis ( RFLP ) with RSA 1, EcoR1, Hind III and Alu 1 was carried out on positives from the G813/GAKSR test.

• Cloning and Sequencing was performed by

Cogenics- France

(9)

Results of assay of rainy season samples

Primers

P1/P7 G813/GAKSR

sampl(N) +ves %+ves sampl(N) +ves %+ves

PLANT SPECIES ( ASEBU )

Commelina beghalensis 15 7 46.7 7 0 0

Solanum torvum 15 0 0 0 0 0

Calapogon mucunoides 15 2 13.3 2 0 0

Desmodium adscendeus 15 13 86.7 13 13 100

Malacantha alnifolia 15 4 26.7 4 0 0

Panicum maximum 15 1 6.7 1 0 0

Citrus limon 15 3 20 3 0 0

Nephrolepis bisserata 15 0 0 0 0 0

Tridax procumbens 15 0 0 0 0 0

(10)

Asebu samples cont’d Primers

P1/P7 G813/GAKSR

sampl(N) +ves %+ves sampl(N) +ves %+ve

Pennisetum purpureum 15 0 0 0 0 0

Ficus exasperate 15 0 0 0 0 0

Oxythenanthera abyssinica 15 0 0 0 0 0

Chromolaena odorata 15 0 0 0 0 0

Rauvolfia vomitoria 15 0 0 0 0 0

Sida acuta 15 0 0 0 0 0

(11)

Cape 3 points samples

Primers

P1/P7 G813/GAKSR

sampl(N) +ves %+ves sampl(N) +ves %+ves PLANT SPECIES

Setaria megaphylla 15 0 0 0 0 0

Mimosa pudica 15 0 0 0 0 0

Stachytarpheta indica 15 0 0 0 0 0

Aspilia africana 15 0 0 0 0 0

Borreria scabra 15 0 0 0 0 0

Dissotis rotundifolia 15 0 0 0 0 0

Asystasia gangetia 15 0 0 0 0 0

Ananas sativa 15 0 0 0 0 0

Rauvolfia vomitoria 15 0 0 0 0 0

Flagellaria guineese 15 0 0 0 0 0

Pueraria phaseoloides 15 0 0 0 0 0

(12)

Primers

P1/P7 G813/GAKSR

sampl(N) +ves %+ves sampl(N) +ves %+ve

Pueraria phaseoloides 15 0 0 0 0 0

Manihot esculenta 15 0 0 0 0 0

Voacanga africana 15 0 0 0 0 0

Saccharum officinale 15 0 0 0 0 0

(13)

Results of assay of dry season samples

Primers

P1/P7 G813/GAKSR

sampl(N) +ves %+ves sampl(N) +ves %+ve PLANT SPECIES ( ASEBU )

Stachytarheta indica 15 0 0 0 0 0

Desmodium adscendeus 15 0 0 0 0 0 Synedrella nodiflora 10 0 0 0 0 0 Ipomoea involucrata 15 0 0 0 0 0

Lypersicon esculentum 4 0 0 0 0 0

Jussiae spp. 15 0 0 0 0 0

Sporobolus pyramidalis 15 0 0 0 0 0

Brachiara deflexa 15 0 0 0 0 0

Cymbopogon citratus 15 0 0 0 0 0

Capsicum annum 15 0 0 0 0 0

(14)

Asebu samples cont’d Primers

P1/P7 G813/GAKSR

sampl(N) +ves %+ves sampl(N) +ves %+ve

Eleusine indica 15 0 0 0 0 0

Digitaria adscendens 15 0 0 0 0 0

Euphorbia heterophylla 15 0 0 0 0 0

Solanum tuberosum 15 0 0 0 0 0

(15)

Primers

P1/P7 G813/GAKSR

sampl(N) +ves %+ves sampl(N) +ves %+ve PLANT SPECIES ( Cape 3 pts )

Sanseviera liberica 15 4 26.7 4 0 0

Panicum laxum 15 0 0 0 0 0

Cassytha filiformis 15 0 0 0 0 0

Lantana camara 15 0 0 0 0 0

Clerodendrom capitatum 15 0 0 0 0 0

Morinda lucida 15 0 0 0 0 0

Chassalia kolly 15 0 0 0 0 0

Rottboellia exaltata 15 0 0 0 0 0

Cyperus spp. 15 0 0 0 0 0

Alcherna cordifolia 15 0 0 0 0 0

(16)

Cont,d

Primers

P1/P7 G813/GAKSR

sampl(N) +ves %+ves sampl(N) +ves %+ve PLANT SPECIES(Cape 3 pts)

Pennisetum pedicellatum 15 0 0 0 0 0

Spigelia anthelmia 15 0 0 0 0 0 Phyllanthus amarus 15 0 0 0 0 0

Justica flava 15 0 0 0 0 0

Paspalum scrobiculatum 15 0 0 0 0 0

(17)

Amplification of Desmodium adscendeus samples with G813/GAKSR

M 1 2 3

M45 6 7 8 9 10 11 121314 15 3&15:positve controls

1&2,4-14: Desmodium samples

(18)

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of Desmodium adscendeus samples (G813/GAKSR products) using

3 restriction endonucleases

M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Controls: Lanes 1, 5 and 10

RSA 1 Hind III EcoR1

(19)

Cloning and sequencing: DNA sequences from the D. adscendeus sample were determined to be related to Bacillus megatorium and

Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

CONCLUSION:

• No alternate host identified yet.

• The screened species do not pose any threat to coconut plantations vis-à-vis the spread of the disease.

• More plants need to be screened

(20)

Références

Documents relatifs

Teulière J, Bernard G and Bapteste E (2020) The Distribution of Genes Associated With Regulated Cell Death Is Decoupled From the Mitochondrial Phenotypes Within Unicellular

Number of batches (N B), Number of insects collected (NI) and number of positive batches (presence of band) of insects on the number of batches of insect tested for the PCR P1/P7,

Variety No. of observed No.. The genetic modelling was found to show very good agree- ment between predicted and observed values and lends credence to the earlier assumption that

Abstract: Lethal Yellowing disease locally called Cape Saint Paul wilt disease (CSPWD) is the bane of the coconut industry in Ghana and is caused by a phytoplasma.. In Ghana, there

Cape Saint Paul Wilt disease of coconut in Ghana: Surveillance and management of disease

Cape Saint Paul Wilt Disease of Coconut in Ghana: Surveillance and Management of Disease SpreadJ. Surveillance et Gestion de L’Extension de la Maladie du Cocotier de Cap Saint Paul

Resistance Screening Trials on Coconut Varieties to Cape Saint Paul Wilt in Ghana.. Sélection de Variétés Résistantes a la Maladie de Cap Saint Paul

- Dery, S.K., N’Cho, Y.P., Sangare, A., and Arkhurst, E.D. Paul Wilt Disease of coconut in Ghana. ) Proceedings of an International workshop on lethal yellowing-like diseases