• Aucun résultat trouvé

Reconstruction of the skeleton of the sauropod dinosaur camarasaurus cope (morosaurus marsh)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Reconstruction of the skeleton of the sauropod dinosaur camarasaurus cope (morosaurus marsh)"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

VoL.6, 1920 PALAEONTOLOGY: OSBORN AND MOOK

RECONSTRUCTION OF THE SKELETON OF THE SAUROPOD DINOSAUR CAMARASA URUS COPE (MOROSA URUS

MARSH)

By HENRY FAIRFIELD OSBORN AND CHARLES CRAIG MOOK

AMERICAN MusEUM or NATURAL HISTORY, NEW YORK CITY Read beforetheAcademy, November 11, 1919

The principles of modern research in vertebrate palaeontology are

illustrated in the fifteen years' work resulting in the restoration of the

massive sauropod dinosaur known as Camarasaurus, the "chambered saurian.."

The animal was found near Canyon City, Colorado, in March, 1877. The first bones were described by Cope, August 23, 1877. The first

at-tempted restoration was by Ryder, December 21, 1877. The bones analyzed by this researchwerefoundprobablytobelong to sixindividuals

ofCamarasaurus mingled with the remains of somecarnivorousdinosaurs, allfrom thesummitofthe Morrisonformation, nowregardedasof Jurassic-Cretaceous age. In these two quarries Cope named nine new genera

and fourteennewspeciesofdinosaurs, noneofwhichhavefoundtheirway

into. palaeontologic literature, excepting Camarasaurus. Out of these twenty-three names weunravel threegenera, namely:

One speciesof Camarasaurus, identical with Morosaurus Marsh.

One speciesofAmphicaclias, close toDiplodocus Marsh.

One speciesofEpanterias, closetoAllosaurus Marsh.

The workingout oftheCamarasaurus skeleton resultsin both the artica ulated restoration and the restoration of the musculature. The

followingare theprincipal characters: Theneckis veryflexible; anterior vertebrae of the back also freely movable; the division betweenthelatter and the relatively rigid posterior dorsals is sharp. Double spines of the cervicals andflexible anterior dorsals show throughtheskin of the restora-tion. Spines of the relatively inflexible dorsals, sacrals and caudals

arecomparatively lowandbroad. The breadthof neck, thorax,andpelvis,

as shown by the bones, is relatively greater than in other sauropodous dinosaurs. The tail had no terminal whip-lash. The scapula is very

massive and expanded at the summit. The cross-section of the thorax

isrelatively much broaderthan in other Sauropoda. The general conclu-sion is that Camarasaurus was a very broad and massive, slow-moving

sauropod, in fact, the most massive reptile in proportions that has ever been found.

This study is partof the senior author's research for the Monographon theSauropodainpreparationforthe U. S. Geological Survey.

Références

Documents relatifs

Peut communiquer dans le cadre d’une tâche simple et courante ne demandant qu’un échange d’information simple et direct sur des sujets familiers relatifs au travail et aux

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TRAJECTORY COMPUTATION 5 DYNAMIC MODEL 8 PERTURBATION DUE TO PLANETARY ATTRACTIONS 9 PERTURBATIONS DUE TO EARTH OBLATENESS 11 The Geopotential Function 11

We obtain an analytical solution in the case of cold contacts and cold phonon bath (T ph ¼ 0 ). T ¼ ð P= Þ 1=4 is the maximum temperature reached in the absence of electron

sistent with the recent description of Antetonitrus in- genipes from the Lower Elliot Formation of South Africa, which documents the acquisition of certain key sauropod characters,

Using this tech- nology the aim of this study was to explore whether a PCA-based model could be applied for accurately predicting internal skeleton points, such as joint centers

We observed from tongue contour tracings that the Mid Bunched configuration generally has a lower tongue tip than the Front Bunched one in speakers who present both bunched

The aim of this paper is to extend the estimates concerning the residual type indicators to the mortar finite element discretization of a model problem, more precisely of the

The High Court of Justice completely disregarded whether the construction of exclusive Israeli civil communities on an occupied land, over which the Israeli legal regime is