03 75 Abstract:This study aims to find out some of the causes and the difficulties of conducting the evaluation process in the share of physical education and sports, and howTeaching performance good for the professor of physical education and sports on the evaluation process affects, in the light of the quality standards where the researcher used in this study, the descriptive approach, and prepared the researcher to identify one for the purpose of made up the study of the four axes (planning and implementation,teaching methods, the process of educational communication), and conduct a personal interview with (03) inspectors of Education, and the random sample composed of 75 professors from secondary school in Algiers, and the results showed that the most important reasons for the weakness of the evaluation process is the performance of the scientific and professional teacher and the quality of the teacher's performance a positive role in the improvement and development of the evaluation process in the share of physical education and sports.
Key words: quality quality performance professor of physical education and sportsEvaluation.
3 tradtawfik10@yahoo.com
1 2007 3 2003 31 2007 144 )
2 3 1 2 3 4 4 5 5 1 Juran Deming Crosby 2005 17 ISO 2005 15 5 2 2008 85 5 2 2003 50
112 6 1 2003 " : . ) ( ( ) 7 7 . 23 ) ( 2003 2004 . : : 18,04 14,52 09,21 08,17 . " " 3,07 > 0,05 21 " " 4,06 > 0,01 21 7 7 " " 2,47 > 0,05 21 : . .
. . 6 6 1 " 1986 19 6 2 : " 75 435 6 3 6 3 1 " ) 2001 33 13 10 10 1 4 " 5 1 2 3 4 6 3 1 2 6 3 1 3 0,71 0,86
6 3 2 2007 125 03 6 4 . SPSS 7 7 1 01 01 217 2,89 72,2 % 02 215 2,86 71,5 % 03 . 219 2,92 73 % 04 219 2,92 73 % 05 179 2,38 59,5 % 06 216 2,88 72 % 07 . 203 2,70 67,5 % 08 217 2,89 72,2 % 09 . 154 2,12 53 % 10 165 2,20 55 % 11 . 201 2,68 67 % 12 208 2,77 69,25 % 13 214 2,85 71,25 % 09 154 2,12 53 % 04 219 2,92 73 % 01 10 13 2,86 2,92 67 % 73 % 3 4 2,92 73 % 8 11 7 12 13 2 6 1 . ) 10 9 4 ) 2
2,67 66,87 % ) 2,5 1982 94 7 2 02 01 193 2,57 64,5 % 02 167 2,22 55,5 % 03 ی 188 2,5 62 5 % 04 ی ی 188 2,5 62,5 % 05 ی ی 197 2,62 65,5 % 06 198 2,64 66 % 07 ی 171 2,28 57 % 08 183 2,44 61 % 09 198 2,64 66 % 10 217 2,89 72,25 % 02 167 2,22 55,5 % 10 217 2,89 72,25 % 02 2,22 55,5 % 02 2,89 72,25 % ) 10
) 2,5 02 2,53 63,25 % 1992 " 7 2 03 01 159 2,12 53 % 02 214 2,85 71,5 % 03 177 2,36 59 % 04 220 2,93 73,25 % 05 197 2,62 65,5 % 06 . 198 2,64 66 % 07 141 1,88 47 % 08 183 2,44 61 % 09 198 2,64 66 % 10 217 2,89 72,25 % 07 141 1,88 47 % 04 220 2,93 73,25 % 03 07 10 2,44 2,93 61 % 73,25 % ) 01 03 2 07 41 %
. .
