• Aucun résultat trouvé

Membrane Deflection and Fastener Load Data Measured During the October 1995 Wind Tunnel Tests on a Mechanically-Attached EPDM Single-Ply Roofing System

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Membrane Deflection and Fastener Load Data Measured During the October 1995 Wind Tunnel Tests on a Mechanically-Attached EPDM Single-Ply Roofing System"

Copied!
72
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

Internal Report (National Research Council of Canada. Institute for Research in

Construction), 1997-05-01

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=212552e9-ff25-45c1-852d-eea285ecc783 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=212552e9-ff25-45c1-852d-eea285ecc783

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/20338238

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Membrane Deflection and Fastener Load Data Measured During the

October 1995 Wind Tunnel Tests on a Mechanically-Attached EPDM

Single-Ply Roofing System

(2)

S H 1

R.127 National Research Conssil national

RLCJII;

I*l

Council Canada de recherches Canada

C O P . 2

Institute for Fnstitut de

no. 7 4 7 Research in recherche en

M a y 1 9 9 7 Construction construction

Membrane

~eflection

and

Fastener Load

Data

Measured

During

the October 1995

Wind TLnnel Tests on

a

Mechanically-

Attached

EPDM Single-Ply Roofing System

:.

A. Baskaran,

M.G.

Savage,

F.

Alfawakhiri and K.R.

Cooper

CISTI

/ K I S T NRC/CNRC :?C R e f S e r

Received

o n ;

10-15-97

I n t e r n a l r e p o r t .

Internal Report

No. (IRC-IR-742)

Date of issue: May

1997

e r n a l r e p o r t

( I n s t i t u t e

f NALYSE

This internal report, whik

not

intended for general distribution, may

be

cited or referenced

in

other publications.

(3)

This report

summarires

the

membrane

deflections

and fastener

loads measured

on

a

mechanically-attached,

EPDM. single-ply flat roofing

system.

The measurements

were made

in

the 9

m

x

9 m Wind Tunnel of

the NatTonal Research Council

of Canada in

October

1995 as part

d

the

Special

Interest

Group for Dynamic Evaluation d Roofing

Systems (SGDERS), a

program of the

(4)

Table

of

Contents

kblsfracf

...

...

...

... .,

...1...1.1...

i

..

Table of Contents

...-...-...

...

...

a1 1

.

Intduction

...-...

,...

...

1 2

.

Experimental Outfine

...

-

...

l.l

...

.1

...

1

...

3. Report

Content

...-...*...

...

-

...

-

...

.=....

...

2 4

.

Refamncas

.

...r...-

-

...

...-.*

...

...*...

....

-

...

3

...**....

...,...,....**....*...*..

...

...*...*...

.

5 Explanatory Tables and Figurns .1

..

-.

-

4

...,....

**...

**....*...

6. Tinre Histories

ofthe

Membrane Deffe~tions

...

...

...

...

I1

7

.

Time Histoties

of

the Fastener

Loads

...

-

.

.

8

.

Statisticalbata

...-...*...

...I...m...

-=.

...

43

(5)

1.

Introduction

The Institute for Research in Construction (IRC) a1 the National Research Cauncil

oF

Canada has

initialed

a project entitled

'Dynamic

EvaEmth uf

Roof

Attachment

Systems'

to

evaluate

mechanically-

athched mf systems under

dynamic

wind loading (Baskaran and Dull 1995)- A research collaboration

was

established between the

IRC and

the

Institute

for Aerospace

Research

(IAR) to investigate the unsteady aerodynamic loading of typical single-ply, mechanically-attached, roofing

systems.

Under

this

project. two series of experiments were carried

out.

The first series, partially funded by

the

Department

of

National Defense (DND), tested

a

PVC roofing system. Pressure distribution data measured

during

the November 1994 tests on a PVC Single-

Ply

Roofing System were documented

by

Savage,

Baskaran,

Cooper and

Lei

(19961, whereas the force

data

were archived by Baskran, Savage. Alfawakhirj,

and Cmper

(1997).

The

second

series tested an EPDM rmfing system. A newly-formed consortium

-

the

Special

Interest Group for Dynamic Evaluation of Roofing Systems

(SIGDERS)

-

funded this

test, SlGDERS was formed trom a group

of

partners

w b

were

interested

in r w f

design. These partners

included:

Manufacture~s

Canadian

General Tower

Ud..

Prospex

Roofhg Products Ctd,, Carlisle SynTec

Systems,

Cemfort Inc., Firestone Building

Products

Ch.,

JPS

Elastornerics

Cop.

-

Construction

Products Group,

Soprema Canada, Vicwes?

Steel.

BuiWng

Owners Department

of

National Defense.

Public Works

and

Government Senrices Carrada, Canada Post C o w ration.

industry m i a t i o n s

Canadian Roolfing

Contractors'

Association,

National Roofing Contractors" M a t i o n .

Research AgerW= Institute for Research in

Constnrction. Enstituie

for Aerospace

Research..

2.

Experimental OutIine

The

measurements

were performed in the 9

m x 9

m

wind

tunnel

of

the IAR

in

both uniform and

sheared wind simulations. The test program

measured

the

mean and the unsteady pressure distributions

over

the

roof membrane, as well

as

the mean atxi the unsteady

loads

an

the Tasteners used to

attach the

membrane to the deck One building platform was tested for

various

wind conditions. Its dimensions

(6)

m d d and roof

a s e m b y

components.

Tfie differences between EPOM and PVC

system

components

are as

follows:

m the membrane was d non-reinforced EPDM;

a bar attachment system was used to

hold

the membrane instead

of

point fasteners; the insulation was loose-laid:

no

vapor barrier

was used; instead,

a

support board was

loose-laid

above

the deck.

The measurements were made in smooth wind (Uniform)

and in

a simulated tuhulent wind corresponding to an open

country

e m u r e

(Open). Measurements

were

made far

two

wind directions

at

different wind speeds. Openings

were

made in

the model walls to investigate the effect

of

varying

internal

pressure

on

the

roof behavior. f

he

ten test conRgurations are summarized in Table 1. The roof-

height wind speeds are presented

in

Table

2.

The entire raot sample was

covered

by

a sheet

of

EQDM membrane M i h was fadend at 13 kmtions by

metal

bars,

arranged

in the paftem shown in Agure 2. Four

bars

were

selected to measure

the induced loads in the three odhogonaf

directions

and quipped

with f o m balances. Each bar had

two

balances as

shorn in Figure 3.

A h ,

four ultrasonic

sensors

were fixed to the deck at

selected

locations

to measure membrane ddections. Lmtions

of

farce

bahces and

uhsonic

sensors

are shown in

Figure 4. The load

and

deflection data were gathered at the frequency of I 0 0

Hz

for about 60 seconds.

3.

f

eport Content

The pressure distribution

data

was presented in a

separate report

by Savage et al(1996). This report presents the measured membrane deflections

and

fastener b d s

in

the

form

of time h'iories, dab

tables

and

bar

charts.

Time histories of the membrane

deflections, in engineering units, tar

selected

configurations are

presented

in Section

6. T i e histories

of

the fastener loads and, in engineering

units.

far

selected configuratiem

are presented in, Section 7. The configuration parameters are explained in a dormat similar to that shown

in Figure

5. For

all

tested mnfiguralions, time histories were analyzed to

obtain

statistical

parameters (mean, -mum and

minimum

peaks,

and standard deviation) which are tabulated

in

Section

8, Section 9 presents the effed of wind speed on

the mean

a M

peak

fastener

b d s

and membrane

deflections,

as

bar charts,

for

all configurations.

(7)

4.

References

1. Baskaran,

A and

Dutt,

0.

(1995),

'Evaluation

of Roof Fasteners Under

Dynamic Wind

Loading",

Prcxreedings

of the lntemational Wind Engineefing Conference, New

DeIhi. India,

Januasy 8

-

13, pp.

1207

-

121 8.

2.

Savage, M.G., Baskran, A,,

Cooper,

K.R.

and

Lei, W. (1996), 'Pressure Distribution Data Measured

During the November 1994 Wnd Tunnel Testa

on

a

Mechanical@-Attached,

PVC

Single-Ply

Roofing

System",

National

Research

Council of Canada,

Institute for

Aerospace Research, Report LTR-A-

003. February.

3.

Baskaran,

A, Savage, M.G., Alfawakhiri,

F

and Cooper.

K.R.

(1997), 'Force Distribution

Data

Measured During

the November 1994 Wind Tunnel Tests on a Mechanically-Attached, PVC Single

Ply

Roofing

System",

National

Research

Council

ad

Canada, Institute for Research in

Construction,

1RC Report

740.

4.

Sawage,

M.G.,

Baskran, A,, AWawakhiri. F. and Cooper.

K.R.

(1996).

*Pressure DDiniution

D a b

Measured During

the October 1995

Mnd

Tunnel Tests on Mechnimlly-Attached, EPDM Single-Ply

Roofing Systemn,

National

Research Council of Canada. Institute for Ilemspace

Research.

Report

(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)

H

4 . 3 7

rn

; Open

;

v

=

30

mph

,

angle

=

45

f

1 * 1 5 0 1

p-"

E

1 4 0 -

E

Y

r

1 3 0 - 21

.-

w y.

120

rn

z

110 I0 100

--m.

I 1 I 1 m 1 0 10 20

30

40 50 66

Time

(see)

11aShd.grf

(18)

\

H

=1.37

rn

;

Open

; v

=

60

mph

,

angle

=

45

1

CC 150

-

'

140

-

E

Y

c

130-

0

s

i 2 0 - m

%

710

-

a

, 1 1 t I

'loo

I I a I I a

t

(19)

H 1 . 3 7 m ;

Open;

v = 3 0 m p h r a n g l e = O

*

30

Time

(sec)

(20)

H

=1.37

m

;

Open

;

v

=

60

mph

,

angle

=

0

,

(21)

H

4 . 3 7

m

;

Uniform

; v

=

30

mph

,

angle

=

0

1

A 150

E

$40

E

Y

r

130

0

.-

*

0

120

w

i a o

d

I 1 I m 1 6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time

(ses)

150lM.grf

(22)

I

H

~ 1 . 3 7

rn

;

Uniform

;

v

=

60

mph

,

angle

=

0

1

26

30

(23)

I

H

=1.37

rn

;

Uniform.; v

75

mph

,

angle

= 0

(

(24)

I

H

4 . 3 7

m

;

Uniform

;

v =

30

mph, angle=45

1

106

r

- I I I

0 I 0 20

30

40 50 60

Time

[see)

(25)

H

=I

.37

rn

;

Uniform

;

v

=

50 mph

,

angle

=

45

I W U -1- -1 v

.

.

0

I 0

-

20 30 46 50 60

Ti me

(see)

(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)

H

1.37

m

;

Open

;

v

=

30

mph

,

angle = 4 5

-

(30)

H

4.37

m

; Open

;

v

=

30

mph

,

angle=45

30 Time (sec)

(31)
(32)

2

I

H

-1.37

rn

;

Open

;

v

= 60

mph

,

angle

=

45

I I I I 0 I 70 20

30

40 50 60 1' I

Time

(see)

1105hP.grf

(33)

H

4 . 3 7

m

; Open ;

v

=

30 mph

,

angle

=

0

900

7 C4 a0

z

Y 60

-

40

-

I

20

-

01-

-

-

1 I 1 I ' 0 7 0 20

30

40 50 6.0

Time

(sec) 1397 hfl .grl

(34)

H 4 - 3 7

rn ;

Open

;

v

=

30

mph

, angle

=

0

(35)
(36)

H

37-37

m ;

Open

;

v

=

60

mph

,

angle

=

0

30

Time (see)

(37)

H

4 . 3 7

m ;

Uniform

;

v

=

30

mph

,

angle

=

0

A 80

z

w 60 40 I

20

0

Time (set)

(38)

h

H = I 3 7

rn

;

Uniform

;

v

=

30

mph

,

angle

=

CI

20

-

0

7

:

0 10 20

30

40 50 60

Time

[see)

rmm@

(39)

H

~ 1 . 3 7

rn ;

Uniform

; v =

60

mph

,

angle

=

0

30

(40)

H

11.37

rn ;

Uniform

;

v

=

60

mph

,

angle

=

0

30

(41)

30

Time

(sec)

(42)

H

=1.37

rn

;

Uniform

;

v

=

75

mph

,

angle

=

0

30

(43)

H -1.37

rn

;

Uniform

;

v

=

30

mph

,angle

=

45

80

-

z

Y 60 40

-

L I 20

-

I.. .

.

30

Time

(sec)

(44)

H ~ 1 . 3 7

rn

;

Uniform

;.

v

=

30

mph

,

angle

=

45

0

0 I 20

30

40 50 60

Time (see)

T f O M L g r f

(45)

H -1.37

m

;

Uniform

;

v

=

50 mph

,

angle

=

45

(46)

H

~ 1 . 3 7

rn

;

Uniform

;

v

=

50

mph

,

angle

=

45

30

(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)

H

='l,37

m

;

Open

; angle

=

45

I

-

Mean

;

-

Peak

Wind Speeds (

mph )

57

(62)

I

H =T ,37

m

; Open ;

angle

=

45

7

1

-

Peak

(63)

H

=1,37

m

;

Open

;

angle =

0

1

-1

-

Mean

;

-1

-

Peak

(64)

H

=1,37 m ;

Open

;

angle=

0

1

(65)

H

=I

,37

m

;

Uniform

;

angle

=

0

(66)

H

=1,37

rn

;

Uniform

;

angle

= 0

1

-1

-

Mean

;

(1

-Peak

Wind

S p e e d s

( mph

) C 7

(67)

H

=I

,37

rn

;

Uniform

;

angle

=

45

1

1

-

Mean

;

Wind

Speeds ( mph

)i

(68)

H =I

,37

m ;

Uniform

;

angle

=

45

z

(1

-

Mean

;

35

40

45

(69)

H

~ 1 . 3 7

rn

; Open

;

angle

=

45

P . . .-

.

I . . -I 7" .;>: .:-;- .,. -. .. ,*. .+-. . % ... .-1 .:'a, yz+ - 3

-

.

. < - . . -..- .,,.

-

. . :-"2

.

- -

.. - .- .: .- I.- .-,--.I- :. . ....- ,. -

-

.;..

,.

. .."- ., , >. -.I-. .- .;., .:.*1 . , - .,,:*>. <i<.: : .,: 1.1.:

-

- .+, -- %'.<Y ;-; .:- ,> . .- . :- . 8 [,75;<;,. - : .-+$' ;-.. :-: :?=* 2 i j $ :.=

.

... ..-. .i 3 : >.>;.;,L?: -7 ,. m ,.,d., .-: --

-

- . . : .

.--

.:>

.

,., ;!+ - --3

r

".--

.-,

.\5

..

:. . > +:-g<+-a .;>q:'-;. .*:.*,<.; ?-$: .-.I .yh- .. - -

.

..:. .:..:* , :. .,~*. . - -

.-

.I ..:, ' > ". . - I..-.. . - ,,% . , - - - - 4:: - .<..:

-..-

.. 1 .

.

. . .--7

...

.- *' .- - , ' -. .",4 - 2 - --.., " +,>..::: <,><; . . . -.;- , : +.a - -, , . . .. _.

.

+ . .*. . 30 40 5 0 55 60

Wind

Speeds

(

mph

)

11 bdgrf

(70)

H

=1.37 rn

;

Open

; angle

=

0

40

60 55

(71)

H 11.37

rn

;

Uniform

;

angle

=

0

Wind

Speeds

(

mph

) 67 -

- .

..,"- 1 . , . , 8 ... ..' . , ,, ;<.- . - ., ? .." -.+ . I . .-:.::,, . , , : . - - I * . ;: >: :" , <. ,::. ' F . ~ \ ' < .

-

- - . . .. . - - . -<>. - , . ,. . . 2.:,.; .. . -

.-..

27. rTr ' . . - - i - - - i :,- ,.;;-2 -. .PA>' ,.<:

.

...-

.-, .I:--. ;.- .

.-

.

=:-i - , .. -,<A . - . .-. , ,. . - -. r -, , , . . h . . , , -; .: :; = - -- -< .'....I. -: ..FA: , .

;":

, . . '

.

--. -.<& .a . . , ;. . ;?..? I : ,'. .: . : - , , , ' I : -: I , . ;

-

a,, - - . - , 4 - . I

.

, - ,.

+.

:.

. - . ,:<" .. ,- i ,, +. . . I " . ,: 1 - - ..,'. , -: ..-r.

(72)

H =I

.37

rn

;

Uniform

;

angle

=

45

40

50

$5

Wind

Speeds

(

mph

)

Figure

Table  of  Contents  kblsfracf  .........................................  .........  .....

Références

Documents relatifs

OS: Overall survival; PFS: Progression-free survival; CIR: Cumulative incidence of relapse; CI: Confidence interval; MIPI: Mantle cell lymphoma International

This process of trying to characterize the signaling networks and molecular pathways involved in cellular signaling and the mechanical machinery of the cell allows the

Keywords: III-V multijunction solar cells; III-V multijunction solar cell design; dilute nitride; InGaAsN; four-junction.. Paper 16084SS

Figure 3. A3A inhibits the early phases of HIV-1 infection specifically in myeloid cells. A) HeLa cells were transfected with either control or HA-tagged A3A coding constructs

The thy- 1.2 YFP-expressing mouse cone bipolar cells allows us to easily differentiate presynaptic expression of proteins in the outer retina at photoreceptor terminals

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

SHOCC, a sub-hourly occupancy-based control model, provides building energy simulation programs, such as ESP-r, access to advanced behavioural models, such as the Lightswitch2002

Using laser scanning and digital images, combined with existing floor plans and limited surveying, we can completely model a complex site with realistic details. Our procedure