• Aucun résultat trouvé

A multi-objective control strategy for combined peak shaving and frequency regulation in V2B/V2G applications

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "A multi-objective control strategy for combined peak shaving and frequency regulation in V2B/V2G applications"

Copied!
33
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la

première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site

LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=c056c90b-b343-44a5-ab48-44d1f4e6a740 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=c056c90b-b343-44a5-ab48-44d1f4e6a740

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

A multi-objective control strategy for combined peak shaving and frequency regulation in V2B/V2G applications

(2)

A multi-objective control strategy for

combined peak shaving and frequency

regulation in V2B/V2G applications

Alain Tchagang** and Yeong Yoo*

*National Research Council Canada (NRC)-DT **National Research Council Canada (NRC)-EME

For IEA-HEV Task28 Workshop Barcelona, June 07, 2018

(3)

Introduction

The Canadian Government has set a target of reducing

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions by

30%

in 2030 compared to emission levels in 2005.

The transportation sector is responsible for

23%

of energy related GHG emissions.

EVs

can significantly reduce transportation emissions in Canada. The global EV market share is expected to be

54%

of new car

sales and

33%

of the global car fleet by 2040.

V2X

(X=home, buildings and grid) may create an additional

stream of revenue for EV owners, enabling much faster adoption of EVs and earlier realization of large environmental benefits in

(4)

Why is Energy Storage needed?

3

 Energy storage has been successfully deployed to improve the technical and economic performance and the flexibility and resilience of the electricity grid.

(5)

Vehicle-to-X (X= Home, Buildings and Grid)

V2B V2G

Source: IREC Source: Enel

Source: Nissan Motor Company

(6)

EVs and V2X deployment in Canada

Key R&D activities enabling the acceleration of EVs and V2X deployment in Canada

To develop lower-cost, higher energy EV batteries that perform safely and reliably under Canadian conditions

To develop viable fast charge strategies and technologies at low temperatures

To evaluate benefits and impacts of EV’s with grid interactions and services

(7)

NRC-VPT Program

EV Safety and Reliability

Fast-charging

assessment of EV batteries at Canadian low

temperature climate conditions

• Assessment and understanding of the

impact

of fast

charging

on different EV battery chemistries

in the

Canadian climate

• Modelling

and

techno-economic assessments

of the

impact of fast-charging at low T for different EV

battery chemistries

(8)

NRC V2X RD&D Project

“Techno-Economics Studies and Field Trial of V2X in Canada”, 4 year PERD V2X RD&D project (Apr 2016-Mar 2020)

With a consortium of 8 partners, including Non-government

partners (Manitoba Hydro, BC Hydro, and Powertech Labs), Government

Departments (Natural Resources Canada, National Research Council

Canada, Environment Canada, Transport Canada), and Academia (Carleton University)

Potentially with additional partners of EV and EVSE manufacturers / suppliers

To conduct techno-economic simulation studies for evaluating V2X concepts in each and all Canadian provinces

To perform field trial at the Canadian Centre for Housing

Technology (CCHT) facilities in NRC campus to provide critical field performance data for V2X applications and support V2X codes, standards and regulations development

(9)

Field Trial at CCHT facilities

The Canadian Centre for Housing Technology features twin research houses to evaluate the whole-house performance of new technologies in side-by-side testing.

New leading-edge low-rise multi-unit residential building to be

smart-homes to respond to client needs for R&D services and testing in the

following areas: mechanical equipment, renewable energy & control

systems, and intelligent building and smart grid integration technologies.

(10)

Conceptual design of a validation system based on PHIL simulation for V2X

Regenerative Grid Simulator

DC Solar Array & PV Simulator

Stationary Battery Energy Storage

House Load & Load Simulator Grid-tied PV Inverter Bidirectional EV DC Fast Charger Electric Vehicle (V2X) BMS AC Mains Local Grid Supervisory Control & Monitoring Platform Hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) Simulation

Ethernet MPPT Transformer 1 (600V/120-208V) Real-time Simulator Software-in-the-loop (SIL) Simulation Power Hardware-in-the-loop (PHIL) Simulation

Transformer 2 (120V/120-240V)

(11)

Modeling and Simulation for V2H

(12)

Modeling and Simulation for V2B/V2G

11

(13)

Vehicle-to-building/Grid (V2B/V2G)

 Proactively manage energy consumption and costs of buildings using the energy stored in EVs

 Potential benefits to both vehicle and building owners by

offsetting some of the higher cost of PEVs, lowering buildings’ energy costs, and providing reliable emergency backup

services

 Part of microgrid and smart grid technologies

 Being integrated with renewable energy generation, smart buildings, smart EV charging, and in some cases, stationary backup storage

 Market opportunities including demand charge avoidance,

peak shaving, time-of-use pricing, and other utility energy

pricing schemes, reducing the cost of building operations and providing emergency backup power

(14)

Components modeling for V2H using M-24A local grid

13

PV system with MPPT Transformers, Grid simulator with local grid

(15)
(16)

Objectives and Methodologies

15

Goal: To use electrical energies from EV batteries for

peak shaving and frequency regulation in a vehicle-to-building/grid (V2B/V2G) technology

Proposed Approach: Multi-objective optimization

framework for EV batteries to perform 1) load

management (building load and driving), 2) peak shaving, and 3) frequency regulation services

This framework accounts for 1) battery degradation, 2) operational constraints, and 3) uncertainties in customer loads, driving profiles and regulation signals.

(17)

Electricity Bill Calculation

Bill calculation for an industrial building or a commercial unit

1

( ) ( )

T elec peak

elec peak Peak t

H H Hr tr t

  

where, αelec ($/MWh): energy price, r(t): power consumed at t,

αpeak ($/MW): peak demand price, rpeak(t): power consumed at t over 15 or 30 minutes Electricity Bill: Summation of energy charge and peak demand charge

 Energy vs. Power Demand

(18)

Electricity Bill Calculation:

Summer Time-of-Use

17

Time of Use (TOU): May 1 to October 31 time-of-use hours

Ref. Oakville Hydro

(19)

Electricity Bill Calculation: Peak Shaving  Peak shaving 0 ( ) ( ) ( ) N a n n r t r t b t   

0 ( ) ( ) ( ) N a peak peak n n r t r t b t   

Demand charges make up a significant portion of commercial and industrial customers’ total electricity costs, typically between 20 and 70 percent.

Ref.: SunnyCal Solar

where, bn(t): power injected by nth MBESS (i.e. batteries of the nth EV; stationary batteries power in case of n=0),

bn(t) > 0 for discharging, bn(t) < 0 for charging,

rɑ(t): actual power drawn from the grid at a given time t, : residual peak demand power

: averaged power injected by nth MBESS,

f(bn): operating cost of nth MBESS.

1 0

( ) ( ) ( )

T N

elec peak a

elec a peak peak

t n

H H Hr tr t f

 

(20)

Electricity Bill Calculation:

Time-of-Use (TOU) and Peak Demand Charges

(21)

Electricity Bill Calculation: Global Adjustment

 Global Adjustment: All Ontario electricity customers pay for Global Adjustment. Residential and small business customers being

billed by an LDC using time-of-use (TOU) rates have GA costs

embedded within those TOU prices.

 Global Adjustment: The differences between the wholesale

market price for electricity, known as Hourly Ontario Energy Price (HOEP) and regulated rates for Ontario Power Generation’s

nuclear and hydroelectric generating stations

 Payments for building or refurbishing infrastructure such as gas-fired and renewable facilities and other nuclear, as well as the contracted rates paid to a number of generators across the province

 Customers with a peak demand of 50 kilowatts (kW) and up to and including 5 MW will typically pay the global adjustment

through their regular billing cycle with their local distribution company.

(22)

Electricity Bill Calculation: Frequency Regulation

 Frequency regulation

where, S: revenue to provide frequency regulation service over time T (in PJM market), s(t): normalized frequency regulation signal,

c: benefit from frequency regulation in $/MW,

min: penalty cost for frequency regulation in $/MWh, C: total battery power capacity,

Cs(t): demand frequency regulation energy f(bn): operating cost of nth MBESS.

min 1 0 0 . | ( ) ( ) | ( ), T N N c n t n n SC Tb t Cs t f     

 

 

bn

Ref.: “Frequency Regulation Basics and Trends” (December 2004), Oak Ridge National Laboratory

 Smooth blue line: Load ramp up from 3,600 MW to 4,000 MW over a three-hour period from 7 to 10 a.m.

 Jagged green line: Actual demand during the same time period

 Very jagged red line at the bottom: Scaled up representation of the minute-to-minute differences

between the blue supply line and the green demand line

 The 60 MW slice of highly variable demand is the domain of frequency regulation.

(23)

Electricity Bill Calculation: Battery Degradation  Battery degradation/cost max min 6 .10 ( ) | ( ) | 2 .( ) cell n n n n n f b t K SoC SoC    n b

where, f(bn): operating cost of nth MBESS mainly resulting from battery degradation,

: nth MBESS cell price ($/Wh),

Kn: number of cycles of nth MBESS,

: max. state of charge of nth MBESS,

: min. state of charge of nth MBESS.

(24)

Problem Formulation

23

Objectives of this work:

1) To reduce the total energy cost H,

2) To find the SoC optimal range to reduce battery degradation rate,

3) To provide building load supply when necessary,

4) To utilize EV batteries for EV powertrain, peak shaving and frequency regulation simultaneously.

(25)

Optimization Scheme and Control Algorithm: Multi-Objective Optimization

 Goals  use EV battery to provide

 Peak Shaving for building owner

 Frequency regulation for building owner

 Load management (house load and driving) for EV owner

 While

 Minimizing the electricity bill of building owner

 Minimizing the electricity bill of EV owner

 Minimizing the degradation of EV battery for EV owner

 Minimizing total electricity cost, including energy cost,

peak demand charge, EV battery degradation cost and

(26)

Optimization Scheme and Control Algorithm: Control Algorithm

25

Input

- Vp = Optimal peak shaving threshold

- Cp = Available max battery capacity

of all N Evs

- SoCn(limit) = SoC limit of the nth EV

- N = number of EV

Output

- SoCn(t) = Battery SoC status of nth

(27)

5 different EV Driving and SoC Profiles for a Commercial Unit with 70kWh/day

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 61 1 2 1 1 8 1 24 1 3 0 1 3 6 1 4 2 1 4 8 1 5 4 1 6 0 1 6 6 1 7 2 1 7 8 1 8 4 1 9 0 1 9 6 1 1 ,0 2 1 1 ,0 8 1 1 ,1 4 1 1 ,2 0 1 1 ,2 6 1 1 ,3 2 1 1, 38 1 1 ,4 4 1 So C (% )

EV1 EV2 EV3 EV4 EV5

Time (minutes) EV1 = [10% - 90%], EV2 = [20% - 90%], EV3 = [30% - 90%], EV4 = [40% - 90%], EV5 = [50% - 90%].

(28)

SoC usage per EV for a Commercial Unit with 70kWh/day

SoC (%)

EV1 EV2 EV3 EV4 EV5 Min SoC 10 20 30 40 50

Max SoC 90 90 90 90 90

Available daily SoC range 80 70 60 50 40

Driving to work and errands 25 20 15 10 5

Driving home and errands 25 20 15 10 5

Peak Shaving (work) 15 15 15 15 15

(29)

Simulation – Battery degradation and electricity bill

estimation for V2B/V2G (Commercial Unit with 70kWh/day)

Battery degradation depending on SoC limits: EV1 = [10% - 90 %], EV2 =

(30)

Simulation – Battery degradation and electricity bill

estimation for V2B/V2G (Commercial Unit with 70kWh/day)

29

Comparative analysis of the original bill normalized to 1 with bills after peak

shaving, frequency regulation, and combination of peak shaving and frequency regulation, under different SoC limits

Electricity bills to be paid by EV owners after

(31)

Conclusions

1. V2X validation testing facility has been built at CCHT Flexhouse at NRC Montreal Rd.

campus in Ottawa ON, including grid simulation, renewable power generation, load simulator and bi-directional DC fast charger.

2. This V2X test facility will be utilized for determining the effect of bidirectional charging

on V2X-capable EVs and performing the simulation and validation of energy management and control strategies to verify potential benefits of V2X.

3. In order to verify the proposed control algorithm for V2B/V2G application, a small

residential building or commercial unit with an electricity consumption of 70kWh/day

and 5 EVs having a battery storage capacity of 24 kWh per EV has been utilized for

simulation on battery degradation and electricity bill estimation.

4. A multi-objective strategy using EV batteries was presented not only for V2B (building

load and powertrain) application, but also for reducing the peak demand charge and gaining revenue from participating in frequency regulation market as V2G.

5. The results can be applicable to any larger buildings with a fleet of EVs by multiplication and additional detailed adjustment.

6. The deeper the depth of battery discharge is used, the higher the battery degradation

is pronounced. Among five EVs with short and different commute driving profiles, 5th

EV with SoC within [50% - 90%] showed the lowest battery degradation.

7. Comparative analysis with previous works that used battery storage systems for either peak shaving or frequency regulation showed that EV batteries for V2B/V2G can

(32)

Acknowledgments

31

• This work was financially supported by the NRC’s Vehicle Propulsion Technology (VPT) Program and by Natural

Resources Canada (NRCan) through the Program of Energy Research and Development (PERD).

(33)

Thank you

Yeong Yoo

Senior Research Officer

Battery Testing and Optimization

NRC Energy, Mining and Environment Research Centre National Research Council Canada

Tel: 613-993-5331

Références

Documents relatifs

Using a battery to stabilise the flow of energy is similar to an energy buffer between the rate requested by the load or network and the flow supplied by power sources, but

In contrast to previous observa- tions for remdesivir 23 , the antiviral activity of HCQ in Vero E6 cells did not translate to the human airway epithelium model; doses of 1 μM or

Economic performances affect positively fiscal space and tax revenues as shown by the statistical negative sign and positive of economic growth and the level of

Le dernier chapitre de cette première partie (Chap. 125) dresse un bilan des acquis et des limites de la gravimétrie moderne, et s’at- tache à montrer l’intérêt de la

To predict extracapsular extension, the addition of T2 score to the base model provided the highest benefit when compared to PHI (Figure 7), while combination of both biomarkers

Therefore, to consider load forecast uncertainty within the proposed MCS framework, it would be necessary to change to a sequential simulation model, in which the uncertain

It presents, for each comparison, the distribution of the 8 p-values (one per FM). Each p-value is the result of the comparison between the 30 values obtained for each objective

sized that 1) physicians are more at risk to commit suicide than the general population, 2) women physicians are more at risk to commit suicide than their male counterparts, 3)