• Aucun résultat trouvé

Deprotonative metallation of ferrocenes using mixed lithium-zinc and lithium-cadmium combinations.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Deprotonative metallation of ferrocenes using mixed lithium-zinc and lithium-cadmium combinations."

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00738773

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00738773

Submitted on 20 Jun 2014

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Deprotonative metallation of ferrocenes using mixed lithium-zinc and lithium-cadmium combinations.

Gandrath Dayaker, Aare Sreeshailam, Floris Chevallier, Thierry Roisnel, Palakodety Radha Krishna, Florence Mongin

To cite this version:

Gandrath Dayaker, Aare Sreeshailam, Floris Chevallier, Thierry Roisnel, Palakodety Radha Krishna, et al.. Deprotonative metallation of ferrocenes using mixed lithium-zinc and lithium-cadmium com- binations.. Chemical Communications, Royal Society of Chemistry, 2010, 46 (16), pp.2862-2864.

�10.1039/b924939g�. �hal-00738773�

(2)

Deprotonative metallation of ferrocenes using mixed lithium-zinc and lithium-cadmium combinations

Gandrath Dayaker,

a,b

Aare Sreeshailam,

a,b

Floris Chevallier,

a

Thierry Roisnel,

c

Palakodety Radha Krishna*

b

and Florence Mongin*

a

Received (in XXX, XXX) Xth XXXXXXXXX 200X, Accepted Xth XXXXXXXXX 200X

5

First published on the web Xth XXXXXXXXX 200X DOI: 10.1039/b000000x

A mixed lithium-cadmium amide and a combination of lithium and zinc amides were reacted with a range of ferrocenes;

deprotonative mono- or di-metallation in general occurred

10

chemoselectively at room temperature, as evidenced by subsequent quenching with iodine.

Metallocenes have met an important development. Ferrocene has notably been extensively used to synthesize a variety of derivatives with applications ranging from catalysis

1

to

15

materials science

2

and bioorganometallic chemistry.

3

Among the methods used to functionalize ferrocene compounds, deprotonative metallation plays an important role.

4

The presence of a substituent containing heteroatoms on ferrocene usually directs deprotonation to the adjacent

20

position, giving after subsequent quenching 1,2- unsymmetrical ferrocenes. The reagents classically used for this purpose are lithium bases, which are highly polar reagents, hardly tolerating the presence of reactive functional groups. For these reasons, restricted conditions such as low

25

temperatures or solvents of low polarity have to be used in order to ensure good results, when attained.

In recent studies, ferrocene was mono- or poly-metallated using mixed alkali metal-magnesium, -zinc, and -manganese bases, and the species isolated were studied by X-ray

30

diffraction.

5

Another mixed lithium-magnesium base, TMPMgCl  LiCl (TMP = 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidino), allowed chemoselective deprotonation reactions of ferrocenes bearing an ester, a nitrile and a carboxylic acid function, when used in a polar solvent at temperatures around 0 °C.

6

35

Among recently documented non cryogenic alternatives for the deprotonative metallation of aromatics,

5

in situ prepared mixtures of ZnCl

2

· TMEDA

7

(TMEDA = N,N,N',N'- tetramethylethylenediamine), or CdCl

2

· TMEDA,

8

and 3 equivalents of LiTMP proved efficient for the

40

functionalization of a large range of ferrocene substrates including aromatics bearing reactive functions and sensitive heterocycles. Hence we decided to attempt their use in the ferrocene series.

It is known

9

that ferrocene can be lithiated using 2 equiv of

45

tert-butyllithium in the presence of 0.1 equiv of potassium tert-butoxide in THF (tetrahydrofuran) at –75 °C. The lithium-cadmium base, which can be considered as (TMP)

3

CdLi,

8

was first chosen to attempt the metallation of ferrocene (1). When treated with 0.5 or 1 equiv (with respect

50

to Cd) of (TMP)

3

CdLi in THF at room temperature for 2 h, ferrocene (1) remained unchanged, as demonstrated by

subsequent quenching with iodine. In contrast, when the deprotonation step was carried out using 1 equiv of base at the reflux temperature of pentane for 3 h, the iodide 2a was

55

isolated in 86% yield (Scheme 1).

F e

1

1 ) (T M P )3C d L i (1 e q u iv ) p e n ta n e , re flu x, 3 h

2 ) I2

F e

2 a (8 6 % )

I

+ F e

2 b (0 % )

I I

Scheme 1 Deprotonative cadmiation of ferrocene

In the presence of a chelating group, the same reaction is favoured. Thus, the similar functionalization of the acetal 3

60

can be performed either at the reflux temperature of pentane to afford the acetal-protected iodide 4a in 76% yield, or at room temperature in THF to give, after subsequent deprotection of the aldehyde, the derivative 5a in 51% overall yield. When THF was the solvent, the 2,5-diodo derivative 4b

65

was also formed in 10% yield (Scheme 2). It is pertinent to mention that lithium bases were previously used to deprotonate the acetal 3, albeit at lower temperatures in order to prevent substantial cleavage of the dioxane ring.

10

3

1 ) (T M P )3C d L i (1 e q u iv ) p e n ta n e , re flu x, 3 h

2 ) I2

F e

ra c-4 a (7 6 % ) O O

I

F e O

O

1 ) (T M P )3C d L i (1 e q u iv) T H F , rt, 2 h

2 ) I2

ra c-4 a + F e

4 b (1 0 % ) O O

I I

P T S A T H F :H2O 1 0 0 °C , 1 h

F e

ra c-5 a (5 1 % , 2 ste p s ) C H O I

70

Scheme 2 Deprotonative cadmiation of 2-ferrocenyl-1,3-dioxane

In order to check the chemoselectivity of reactions using (TMP)

3

CdLi, the metallation of ferrocene ketones was attempted. Starting from acetylferrocene (6) logically resulted in THF or pentane in a complex mixture presumably due to

75

the presence of acidic  -protons. From benzoylferrocene (7), it proved possible using 0.5 equiv of base in THF at room temperature for 2 h to isolate the mono- and diiodide 8a,b in 36 and 2% yield, respectively (Scheme 3).

We then turned to methyl ferrocenecarboxylate (9), which

80

(3)

should be less sensitive than ketones 6,7. Indeed, employing only 0.5 equiv of base resulted in the formation of the mono- and diiodide 10a,b in 73 and 10% yield, respectively.

Reaction times of 0.5 and 4 h did not modify significantly the yields. The dimetallation could be favoured using 1 equiv of

5

base, to furnish the diiodide 10b in 82% yield (Scheme 4).

7

1 ) (T M P )3C d L i (0 .5 e q u iv ) T H F , rt, 2 h

2 ) I2

F e

8 b (2 % ) P h

O

I

F e P h

O

+

F e P h

O

I I

ra c-8 a (3 6 % )

Scheme 3 Deprotonative cadmiation of benzoylferrocene

1 ) (T M P )3C d L i (1 e q u iv) T H F , rt, 2 h

2 ) I2

1 0 b (8 2 % ) 9

1 ) (T M P )3C d L i (0 .5 e q u iv ) T H F , rt, 2 h

2 ) I2

F e

1 0 b (1 0 % ) O M e

O

I

F e O M e

O

+ F e O M e

O

I I

ra c-1 0 a (7 3 % )

Scheme 4 Deprotonative mono- and dicadmiation of methyl

10

ferrocenecarboxylate

The structure of the latter was determined unequivocally by X-ray diffraction analysis of crystals obtained by slow evaporation of a dichloromethane solution (Figure 1).†

15

Figure 1 ORTEP diagram (30% probability) of the diiodide 10b.

This possibility was successfully extended to the ferrocenecarboxylate 11, for which the corresponding diiodides 12b was isolated in a satisfying yield (Scheme 5).

1 ) (T M P )3C d L i (1 e q u iv) T H F , rt, 2 h

2 ) I2

1 2 b (6 8 % )

F e O

O

I I

O 1 1

F e O

O

S i O P h

P h

tB u S iP h

tB u 20 P h

Scheme 5 Deprotonative dicadmiation of ferrocenecarboxylates 11-13

The base in situ prepared from ZnCl

2

· TMEDA and 3 equivalents of LiTMP, which can be considered as a 1:1 mixture of (TMP)

2

Zn and LiTMP,

7

was then chosen to attempt the metallation of some ferrocene compounds. Bare ferrocene

25

(1) remained unchanged when treated at room temperature in THF with the lithium-zinc base. Exchanging THF for pentane and carrying out the reaction at reflux resulted in the formation of a mixture of monoiodide 2a, 1,1'-diiodide 2b and unreacted ferrocene (1). This contrasts with what has been

30

obtained using (TMP)

3

CdLi, and showed that the lithium- cadmium base is more efficient for the functionalization of

bare ferrocene.

In the case of the acetal 3, as previously observed using (TMP)

3

CdLi, a mixture of the mono- and the diiodide 4a,b

35

(80:20 ratio) was obtained using 1 equiv of ZnCl

2

· TMEDA and 3 equiv of LiTMP in THF at room temperature. Dividing by two the amount of base allowed to discard the diiodide 4b, but to the detriment of the conversion (Scheme 6).

3

F e ra c-4 a x = 1 : 7 0 % x = 0 .5 : 5 5 %

O O

I

F e O

O

+ F e

4 b x = 1 : 1 8 % x = 0 .5 : 0 % O O

I I 1 ) (T M P )2Z n

(x e q u iv ) + L iT M P (x e q u iv )

T H F , rt, 2 h 2 ) I2

40

Scheme 6 Deprotonative zincation of 2-ferrocenyl-1,3-dioxane

In the presence of electron-withdrawing substituents, the ferrocene ring can be efficiently deprotonated using the in situ generated mixture of (TMP)

2

Zn (0.5 equiv) and LiTMP (0.5 equiv). From the ferrocene ester 9, the monoiodide 10a was

45

selectively obtained, and isolated in 83% yield (the

1

H NMR spectra showed that remaining starting material was the only impurity present in the crude). The dideprotonation was similarly not observed when cyanoferrocene (13) and N,N- diethylferrocenecarboxamide (14) were involved in the

50

reaction, and the expected iodides 15a and 16a were isolated in 87 and 91% yield, respectively (Scheme 7).

9: R = C O2M e 1 3: R = C N 1 4: R = C O N E t2

1 ) (T M P )2Z n (0 .5 e q u iv ) + L iT M P (0 .5 e q u iv )

T H F , rt, 2 h 2 ) I2

F e R I F e

R

ra c-1 0 a (8 3 % ) ra c-1 5 a (8 7 % ) ra c -1 6 a (9 1 % )

Scheme 7 Deprotonative zincation of methyl ferrocenecarboxylate, cyanoferrocene and N,N-diethyl ferrocenecarboxamide

55

Deprotonative zincation of aromatic compounds followed by in situ palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling of the lithium zincate such generated constitutes a straightforward access to biaryl compounds.

7

Using catalytic amounts of PdCl

2

as palladium source and 1,1’ -diphenylphosphinoferrocene (dppf)

60

as ligand with 2-chloropyridine allowed the synthesis of the pyridine derivatives 15c and 16c in satisfying yields (Scheme 8). The structure of the compound 15c was determined unequivocally by X- ray diffraction analysis (Figure 2).†

1 3: R = C N 1 4: R = C O N E t2

1 ) (T M P )2Z n (0 .5 e q u iv ) + L iT M P (0 .5 e q u iv )

T H F , rt, 2 h F e

R F e

R

ra c-1 5 c (6 7 % ) ra c -1 6 c (8 0 % ) N

2 ) C l N

2 m o l.% P d C l2 2 m o l.% d p p f

re flu x, 2 4 h 65

Scheme 8 Deprotonative zincation of cyanoferrocene and N,N- diethylferrocenecarboxamide followed by cross-coupling

Monometallation mediated by the lithium-zinc base also proved possible for methyl ferrocene- 1,1’ -dicarboxylate (17).

Under the same reaction conditions, the iodide 18a was

70

obtained in 72% yield. Unfortunately, using 1 equiv of

(TMP)

3

CdLi with this substrate failed in only giving one

(4)

diiodide. Indeed, two diiodides (compounds 18b) and even a triiodide (18c) were isolated from the complex mixture obtained (Scheme 9).

Figure 2 ORTEP diagram (30% probability) of the compound 15c.

5

1 ) (T M P )3C d L i (1 e q u iv) T H F , rt, 2 h

2 ) I2 1 7

F e

ra c-1 8 b 1 (2 0 % )

O M e O

I

F e O M e

O

F e O M e+

I O

ra c-1 8 a (7 2 % ) 1 ) (T M P )2Z n (0 .5 e q u iv)

+ L iT M P (0 .5 e q u iv ) T H F , rt, 2 h

2 ) I2 O M e

O

O M e O

F e O M e

O

I

ra c-1 8 c (3 0 % ) O M e O I

I O M e

I O

1 8 b 2 (1 5 % )

F e O M e+

I O

O M e O I

Scheme 9 Deprotonative metallation of methyl ferrocene- 1,1’ - dicarboxylate

Finally, the behaviour of bromoferrocene (19) towards the lithium-zinc base was considered. Under the conditions

10

described above, 1-bromo-2-iodoferrocene (20a) was obtained as the main product (64% yield). 1-Bromo-3-iodoferrocene (20b) concomitantly formed, and was isolated in 7% yield (Scheme 10). Such a migration of a heavy halogen has previously been observed using lithium amides as metallating

15

agents,

11

and could be explained herein by the presence of LiTMP in the basic mixture.

1 9

1 ) (T M P )2Z n (0 .5 e q u iv) + L iT M P (0 .5 e q u iv)

T H F , rt, 2 h 2 ) I2

F e B r I F e

B r

ra c-2 0 a (6 4 % ) F e

B r

ra c-2 0 b (7 % ) +

I

Scheme 10 Deprotonative zincation of bromoferrocene The structure of the iodide 20a was established on the basis of

20

its NMR spectra, by comparison with previously reported data.

12

By slow evaporation of a dichloromethane solution of the iodide 20a, it also proved possible to collect suitable crystals for X-ray diffraction analysis. The presence of bromo and iodo groups at adjacent positions was confirmed by this

25

way. However, the analysis of the data was complicated by a phenomenon which could be interpreted by a partial enrichment in favour of one enantiomer during the crystallization (Figure 3).†

In summary, (TMP)

3

CdLi is an efficient reagent, allowing

30

the monodeprotonation of weakly activated ferrocenes and the dideprotonation of ferrocenes activated by an ester function.

The corresponding Li-Zn base is more suitable for the room

temperature monofunctionalization of activated ferrocenes.

35

Figure 3 ORTEP diagram (30% probability) of the iodide 20a: main enantiomer (left) and racemic mixture (right, X21 = Br, X22 = I and X22

= Br, X21 = I)

The authors gratefully acknowledge Rennes Métropole, Région Bretagne for financial supports given to G. D. and A.

40

S., University of Rennes 1 and CNRS for financial support given to G. D. This research has been performed as part of the Indo-French "Joint Laboratory for Sustainable Chemistry at Interfaces".

References

45

a

Chimie et Photonique Moléculaires, UMR 6510 CNRS, Université de Rennes 1, Bâtiment 10A, Case 1003, Campus Scientifique de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes, France. Fax: +33-2-2323-6955; E-mail:

florence.mongin@univ-rennes1.fr

b

D-211, Discovery Laboratory, Organic Chemistry Division-III, Indian

50

Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad-500 607, India. Fax: +91- 40-27160387; E-mail: prkgenius@iict.res.in

c

Centre de Diffractométrie X, Université de Rennes 1, Bâtiment 10B, Campus Scientifique de Beaulieu, F-35042 Rennes Cedex, France.

† Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Experimental

55

procedures and characterization of compounds, CIF files of 10b (CCDC 755178), 15c (CCDC 755179) and 20a (CCDC 755180). See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/

1 (a) A. Togni, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 1475–1477; (b) R. G. Arrayás, J. Adrio and J. C. Carretero, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,

60

2006, 45, 7674–7715.

2 N. Long, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 21–38.

3 D. R. van Staveren and N. Metzler-Nolte, Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 5931–5986.

4 R. C. J. Atkinson, V. C. Gibson and N. J. Long, Chem. Soc. Rev.,

65

2004, 33, 313–328.

5 (a) R. E. Mulvey, F. Mongin, M. Uchiyama and Y. Kondo, Angew.

Chem. Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 3802–3824, and references cited therein;

(b) R. E. Mulvey, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42, 743–755, and references cited therein.

70

6 A. H. Stoll, P. Mayer and P. Knochel, Organometallics, 2007, 26, 6694 – 6697.

7 J.-M. L'Helgoual'ch, A. Seggio, F. Chevallier, M. Yonehara, E.

Jeanneau, M. Uchiyama and F. Mongin, J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 177–183.

75

8 (a) J.-M. L'Helgoual'ch, G. Bentabed-Ababsa, F. Chevallier, M.

Yonehara, M. Uchiyama, A. Derdour and F. Mongin, Chem.

Commun., 2008, 5375–5377; (b) K. Snégaroff, J.-M. L'Helgoual'ch, G. Bentabed-Ababsa, T. T. Nguyen, F. Chevallier, M. Yonehara, M.

Uchiyama, A. Derdour and F. Mongin, Chem. Eur. J., 2009, 15,

80

10280–10290.

9 R. Sanders and U. T. Mueller-Westerhoff, J. Organomet. Chem., 1996, 512, 219–224.

10 See for example: W. Steffen, M. Laskoski, G. Collins and U. H. F.

Bunz, J. Organomet. Chem., 2001, 630, 132–138.

85

11 See for example: M. Mallet, G. Branger, F. Marsais and G.

Quéguiner, J. Organomet. Chem., 1990, 382, 319–332.

12 Butler, I. R., Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2008, 11, 15–19.

(5)

Graphical and textual abstract for the contents pages.

1 ) (T M P )3C d L i (1 e q u iv ) T H F , rt, 2 h

2 ) I2 F e

(8 2 % ) I

F e F e

I C O2M e

ra c (8 3 % )

1 ) (T M P )2Z n (0 .5 e q u iv )

+ L iT M P (0 .5 e q u iv ) T H F , rt, 2 h

2 ) I2

C O2M e C O2M e

I

5

(TMP)

3

CdLi is an efficient reagent for the monodeprotonation of weakly activated ferrocenes and the dideprotonation of ferrocenes activated by an ester function. The corresponding Li-Zn base is more suitable for the monofunctionalization of ferrocenes activated by different functions.

10

Références

Documents relatifs

Herein, we report a new chemoselective deprotonation tool for regio-controlled functionalization of five-membered aromatic heterocycles using a basic mixture obtained from

Deproto-metallation using mixed lithium-zinc and lithium-copper bases and computed CH acidity of 2-substituted quinolines... Gros e and Florence

Metalation of chiral ferrocenecarboxylates 6c-e using the base in situ prepared from CdCl 2 ·TMEDA (x equiv) and Li(TMP) (3x equiv) followed by trapping with I 2.. b

Substituted five-membered aromatic heterocycles are structural units present in many natural products and pharmaceutical synthetic intermediates.[27] Deprotonation reactions

We recently accomplished the room temperature deproto-metalation of a large range of substrates including sensitive heterocycles and functionalized benzenes using a

The synthesis of N-arylated pyrroles and indoles is documented, as well as their functionalization by deprotonative metallation using the base in situ prepared from LiTMP and ZnCl

reactions of N-aryl and N-heteroaryl pyrazoles using the TMP- based mixed lithium-zinc combination were performed using the CH acidities of the substrates in THF

The Li-assisted deprotonation (path 1) is a similar pathway to that seen in TMP-Zn-ate mediated DoM reactions, 6g and takes place via “open form TS” (TS1) with a reasonable