• Aucun résultat trouvé

Table of Content

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Table of Content"

Copied!
6
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Table of Content

Acknowledgments ... i

Abstract ...iv

Samenvatting ...vi

Résumé ... viii

Table of Content...x

List of Figures ...xii

List of Tables ...xiv

List of Acronyms ... xvii

Introduction ...1

PART I PRESENTATION OF THE RESEARCH... 6

Chapter 1 | Theoretical Context of the Research...7

Chapter 2 | Theoretical Hypotheses... 20

2.1. The Relative Deprivation Hypothesis ... 21

2.2. The Identification Hypothesis ... 30

(2)

PART II RESULTS...79

Chapter 5 | Descriptive Statistics and Exploratory Data Analysis... 80

5.1. Univariate Analysis of the Socio-Demographic Variables... 80

5.2. Mediating Variables ... 86

Chapter 6 | Pupils’ Gender-Related Attitudes... 96

6.1. Data...102

6.2. Results...104

6.3. Discussion...112

Chapter 7 | Pupils’ Sexual Prejudice...116

7.1. Traditional, Modern Sexual Prejudice and Gay Civil Right Issues ...119

7.2. Data...122

7.3. Results...127

7.4. Discussion...136

Chapter 8 | Pupils’ Endorsement of Assimilationism...140

8.1. Hypotheses ...142

8.2. Data...147

8.3. Statistical Analysis ...150

8.4. Results...151

8.5. Discussion...155

Chapter 9 | Impact of Schools on Pupils’ Attitudes towards Minorities...160

9.1. School Explanatory Variables (N:70) ...165

9.2. Results...170

9.3. Discussion...181

Chapter 10 | General Discussion...185

References ...200

Attachments ...213

(3)

List of Figures

Figure 1: Brussels Administrative Units ... 42

Figure 2: Flowchart of the Research ... 51

Figure 3: Municipalities Selected in our Sample ... 52

Figure 4: Location of Participating Schools in Relation with the Proportion of Non-EU Immigrants in Brussels Municipalities in 2006 ... 56

Figure 5: Location of Participating Schools and Average Income per Inhabitant in Brussels Municipalities... 57

Figure 6: Location of Participating Schools and Proportion of Inhabitants Younger than 20 in Brussels Municipalities in 2006 ... 58

Figure 7: Location of Participating Schools and Total Population in Brussels Municipalities in 2008 ... 59

Figure 8: Illustration of the Dependency that May Compose our Clustered Sample with the Covariance Structure of an Outcome ... 64

Figure 9: Diagram of a Two-Level Hierarchy Structure: Pupils (p) within Schools (s)... 65

Figure 10: Graphic Illustration of a Random Intercept Model... 66

Figure 11: Graphic Illustration of a Random Intercept Random Slope Model ... 68

Figure 12: Three-Level Nested Structure: Multivariate Responses (I) within Pupils (P) within Schools (S)... 71

Figure 13: Mediational Model (Reproduced from Baron & Kenny, 1986, p. 1176)... 75

Figure 14: School Track ... 82

Figure 15: Socio- Economic Situation of the Family ... 83

(4)

Figure 27: Ethnic Identification of Pupils with a Migrant Background ... 93

Figure 28: Distribution of the Women Emancipation Item...103

Figure 29: Distribution of the Gender Role Item...103

Figure 30: Frequency of the Mokken Scale with the Items on the Endorsement of Assimilationism ...149

Figure 31: Schema of the Sequential Regression for the Endorsement of Assimilationism ...150

Figure 32: Distribution of the Gender Diversity Index across Schools...167

Figure 33: Distribution of the Cultural Diversity Index across Schools...168

Figure 34: Distribution of the Average SES across Schools...170

Figure 35: Distribution of the Standard Deviation of SES across Schools...170

Figure 36 : Cultural Diversity Index against Predicted Values of HomoT3 at the School Level with the Impact of Cultural Diversity Index (N=70) ...176

Figure 37: Cultural Diversity Index against the Predicted Values of HomoT3 with the Impact of CDI (N=67)...177

Figure 38: Social Diversity against Predicted Values of HomoT3 at the School Level with the Impact of Social Diversity (N=70) ...178

Figure 39: Position of the Six Outlying Schools on the Distribution of SD SES and Average SES...179

Figure 40: Social Diversity against Predicted Values of HomoT3 with the Impact of Social Diversity (N=64) ...180

Figure 41: Average SES against Predicted Values of HomoT3 at the School Level with the Impact of Average SES (N=70) ...181

Figure 42: Graph for Guttman Errors in Response Patterns for the Entire Sample...288

(5)

List of Tables

Table 1: Berry's Typology of Acculturation Strategies ... 31

Table 2: Comparison of the Non-Participating and Participating Schools with Regard to Municipalities ... 53

Table 3: Comparison of the Non-Participating and Participating Schools with Regard to the Education Systems... 54

Table 4: Comparison of the Non-Participating and Participating Schools with Regard to the Education Networks... 54

Table 5: Comparison of the Non-Participating and Participating Schools with Regard to Education Tracks ... 55

Table 6: Comparison of the Sample Composition with the Official Statistics on the School Going Population of the Last Year of the Secondary Education in 2006-2007 in Brussels Region ... 62

Table 7: Overview of the Research Questions and Statistical Analyses... 78

Table 8: Frequency of the Origin Categories... 81

Table 9: Country of Birth of Pupils with a Migrant Background ... 82

Table 10: Mother Tongue ... 82

Table 11: Gender... 82

Table 12: Employment Status of the Mother... 85

Table 13: Religious Socialisation ... 85

Table 14: Religious Services Attendance ... 86

Table 15: First Institutional Discrimination Item against Country of Birth of the Mother... 87

Table 16: Second Institutional Discrimination Item against Country of Birth of the Mother ... 88

Table 17: Third Institutional Discrimination Item against Country of Birth of the Mother... 88

(6)

Table 26: Overview of the Results of Youngsters' Attitudes towards Gender-Related Issues...112

Table 27: Overview of the Hypotheses on Sexual Prejudice...122

Table 28: Items on Attitude towards Lesbians and Gay Men ...123

Table 29: Frequency of the Eight Sexual Prejudice Items...124

Table 30: Multivariate Analyses of Variance with the Explanatory Variables at the Individual Level and the Eight Sexual Prejudice Items ...126

Table 31: Socio-Demographic Predictors of Sexual Prejudice at Level 1 (Controlling for School Variation)...128

Table 32: Variance-Covariance Matrix at Level 1 for the Model Comprising the Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Pupils...129

Table 33: Identification with Receiving Society, Ethnic Identification and Experience of Group-Level Institutional Discrimination as Mediating Variables for the Socio-Demographic Predictors at Level 1 (Controlling for School Variation)...131

Table 34: Variance-Covariance Matrix at Level 1 for the Model Comprising the Socio-Demographic Predictors and the Mediating Variables ...133

Table 35: Variance-Covariance Matrix on the School Level for the Model Comprising the Socio-Demographic Predictors and the Mediating Variables at the Individual Level ...135

Table 36: Overview of the Results of Youngsters’ Sexual Prejudice...136

Table 37: Hypotheses on Perceived Group-Level Institutional Discrimination and Experienced Group-Level Institutional Discrimination by Ethnic Minorities and the Majority...146

Table 38: Overview of the Hypotheses on the Endorsement of Assimilationism...147

Table 39: Analysis of Variance for Each Predictor on the Assimilationism Scale...149

Table 40 : Results of the Individual Characteristics on the Attitudes towards Assimilationism –by Controlling the Impact of Schools ...152

Table 41: Overview of the Results on the Endorsement of Assimilationism ...154

Table 42 : Index of Dissimilarity for Gender, Ethnic Origin, and SES across Schools...166

Table 43: Predictors of Sexual Prejudice at the School Level (Controlling for the Socio-Demographic Predictors and the Mediating Variables at Level 1)...172

Table 44: Variance-Covariance Matrix at the School Level for the Model Comprising the Schools Characteristics and the Individual Characteristics...173

Table 45: Contingency Table with the Region of Origin and Gender ...279

Table 46: Contingency Table with the Region of Origin and Education Tracks ...279

Table 47: Contingency Table with the Region of Origin and Education Degree of the Mother...280

Table 48: Contingency Table with the Region of Origin and Marital Situation of the Parents ...280

Table 49: Contingency Table with the Region of Origin and Employment Status of the Mother ...281

Table 50: Contingency Table with the Region of Origin and Religious Education...281

Table 51: Contingency Table with the Region of Origin and Religious Services Attendance...282

Table 52: Correlation Matrix of the Nine Sexual Prejudice Items...284

Table 53: Communalities of the Principal Axing Factoring...284

Table 54: Pattern Matrix of the Principal Axing Factoring...284

Table 55: Labels and Items on Assimilationism...286

Table 56: Item Score Pattern ...286

Table 57: Summary Results for the Scale ...286

Table 58: Summary per Item ...286

Table 59: Summary per Item for the Check of Monotonicity ...287

Table 60: Summary per Item for the Check of Non-Intersection via Restscore Groups...287

Références

Documents relatifs

PhD Dissertation: “Itineraries of Spoiled Children: An Analysis of Candidate Selection Processes for European Elections.” Table of Content Acknowledgements.... i List

[r]

Chapter 3 | A Comparative Study of the Validity of Three Different Teacher Self- Efficacy Measurement Instruments ………..………... The Teacher Sense of Efficacy for

CHAPTER 2: BUILDING AND DEVELOPING THE FIELD OF RESISTANCE STUDIES .... N ONVIOLENT ACTION AND CIVIL RESISTANCE – WHAT HAPPENS IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE

The Libet experiment and its contribution to human will The neural origin of willed actions.. The when decision The what decision The

Expression and regulation of putative targets using in vitro cellular GIST model 43 2.2.3.. Localization of selected putative targets by immunohistochemistry in

Study 1: What is the biological, imaging and clinical response of solitary <5cm hepatocellular carcinoma to the Y90 Radiation Segmentectomy

1) The consulate visa section’s organizational purposes: managing the risk of enjoying legal opportunities and the risk for the welfare state ... 218. 2) The Immigration Office: