• Aucun résultat trouvé

Table of Content

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Table of Content"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Table of Content

Acknowledgements………..………..p.2 List of Figures……….………... p.6 List of Tables……….………...…….… p.7

Introduction………...…….……….p.8

Chapter 1 | Theoretical Perspectives: From Social Cognitive Theory to Teacher Self- Efficacy………...………....p.18

1. Social Cognitive Theory………... p.19 1.1. Triadic Reciprocal Causation………...p.19 1.2. Human Agency………...p.21 2. Bandura’s Self-Efficacy Theory ………... p.23 2.1. Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy……….…………... p.24 2.2. Source of Self-Efficacy………...p. 25 2.3. Self-Efficacy and Human Functioning………...p. 26 3. Teacher Self-Efficacy: Theoretical, Conceptual and Measurement Considerations...p.28 3.1. The History of Teacher Self-Efficacy Measurements: From Rotter’s Locus of Control Theory to Bandura’s Self-Efficacy Theory ………..p.30 3.2. The Challenge of Measuring Teacher Self-Efficacy: Toward the Clarification of the

Measurement Issues………..… p. 45 3.2.1. The Optimal Level of Specificity Issue……….. p.45 3.2.2. The Item-Wording Issue………...p.46 3.2.3. The Validity Issue………...…...p.47 4. Teacher Self-Efficacy and Student Achievement: Overview of Empirical Evidences…..p.49 5. Discussion……….…...p.59 6. Research Questions……….. p.63

Chapter 2 | Methodological Framework of the Research………...p.65

1. Sampling Procedure………...………...p.66

(2)

2. Questionnaire Design…………...………...…. p.73 2.1. Student Questionnaire…………...………. p.73 2.2. Teacher Questionnaire…………...……… p.76 3. Overview of the Data Collection and Field Work………….………..… p.77

4. Analysis Methods………... p.80 4.1. Confirmatory Factor Analysis……… p.80 4.1.1. General Procedure of Confirmatory Factor Analysis………..p.82 4.1.2. Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Validity Evidences………..…..p.91 4.2. Multilevel Analysis………...………p.92 4.2.1. The General Logic Behind Multilevel Regression Model……...……...….p.93 4.2.2. Overview of Multilevel Regression Models used to investigate our

Research Question…………..………..p.97

Chapter 3 | A Comparative Study of the Validity of Three Different Teacher Self-Efficacy Measurement Instruments………..………... p.104

1. The Teacher Efficacy Scale (Gibson and Dembo, 1984)………..………… p.105 1.1. Background Information about the TES ……… p.105 1.1.1. Focus on the Scale Development Procedure …………...………… p.105

1.1.2. Overview of Empirical Researches on the Factorial Validity of the

TES………...………..p.107 1.2. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the TES……… p.111 1.1.1. Participants …………....………..…………...……… p.111

1.1.2. Measures…….…………...………..………….……… p.111

1.1.3. Procedure…………...………..…………...……….… p.111 1.1.4. Results…………...………..…………...………... p.113 2. The Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale (Tshannen-Moran et al., 2001)……… p.211 2.1. Background Information about the TSES ………...… p.121 2.1.1. Focus on the Scale Development Procedure …….……...……… p.121

2.1.2. Overview of Empirical Researches on the Factorial Validity of the

TSES……….……….p.123 2.2. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the TSES………..……… p.128

2.1.1. Participants ……….………..…………...……… p.128

2.1.2. Measures…….…………....………..…………...……… p.128

(3)

3.2. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the TSES-MATH……… p.135 3.1.1. Participants ……….…...……...………..…………...……… p.135

3.1.2. Measures…….…………...………..…………...……… p.139

3.1.3. Procedure…………...……..………..…………...……….. p.137 3.1.4. Results…………...………..…………...………..…... p.137 4. Convergent and Discriminant Analysis……….…..…………...………. p.141 5. Discussion……… p.142

Chapter 4 | Investigation of the Impact of Teacher Self-Efficacy on Student

Achievement: A Multilevel Analysis ………..………. p.147

1. Research Questions………..……… p.148 2. Method……….……… p.148 2.1. Sample…………...……….…………..…………...……… p.148 2.2. Variables …….…...………...………….………..………...………… p.149 2.3. Procedure………...………..…………...………... p.153 3. Results…………...………..…………...………..…...p.155 3.1. Descriptive Statistics.……….…………..…………...……… p.155 3.2. Checking Multilevel Regression Assumptions ……..………..………...… p.157 3.3. Results of the Multilevel Regression Analysis……..………..………… p.159 4. Discussion………...………...………..…...p.165

Conclusion………..………...…….…… p.169

Références

Documents relatifs

Nous remercions donc tous ceux qui sont venu nous rendre visite sur le stand et nous espérons de pouvoir garder le contact de ceux-ci en venant sur le forum Les Ondes du Routier

The second scale, Efficacy of using Inclusive Instructions was comprised of six questions. These items included 1) I can accurately gauge student comprehension of what I have

following constructs should provide an indication of whether high teacher self-efficacy and high student self-efficacy coincides with high student ability: (a) whether teacher

suasion  –  encouragement,  support,  and  feedback  from  colleagues  and  supervisors;  and  physiological  and  emotional  cues  –  how  a  teacher  is 

This research considers relationships between student achievement (knowledge and cognitive skill), teacher efficacy (Gibson & Dembo, 1984), and interactions with assigned

Frères Mentouri (Constantine) Member: Dr.. This dissertation is dedicated to my parents, who unfortunately did not live to see the fulfilment of this research. To my sisters and

Again, our analytic framing of teaching as management of interactions among teachers, students, content, and environments suggests that teacher educators’

The intemsbip c:ompooent of tIUs study was coodutted during the university faU semester 1996, a period of twelve weeks. The research was conducted with three teachers and a principal