• Aucun résultat trouvé

Response to Salvadori et al.: adverse cardiac events during catecholamine therapy: a role for hydrocortisone?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Response to Salvadori et al.: adverse cardiac events during catecholamine therapy: a role for hydrocortisone?"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Christian A. Schmittinger Christian Torgersen Gu¨nter Luckner Daniel C. H. Schro¨der Ingo Lorenz Martin W. Du¨ nser

Response to Salvadori et al.:

adverse cardiac events

during catecholamine therapy:

a role for hydrocortisone?

Accepted: 1 July 2012

Published online: 7 August 2012 Ó Copyright jointly held by Springer and ESICM 2012

This reply refers to the comment available at: doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2663-4.

Dear Editor,

We thank Dr. Salvadori and his col-leagues for their interest in our work [1] and the constructive comments. In view of the evolving controversy regarding the effects of hydrocorti-sone therapy in sepsis during the study period (January to December 2009), the use of hydrocortisone was strictly reserved for patients with septic shock requiring escalating norepinephrine doses. This explains why only one patient suffering from septic shock received hydrocortisone (continuous infusion of 200 mg/day) at study enrollment. Unfortunately, this precludes evaluation of the influence of hydrocortisone on the binary occurrence of adverse cardiac events in our study population. At the

occurrence of an adverse cardiac event, 15 of 21 septic shock patients (71.4 %) received a continuous hydrocortisone infusion at a median (interquartile range, IQR) daily dose of 192 (192–288) mg. The absolute number of adverse cardiac events did not differ between septic shock patients with or without hydrocorti-sone therapy [4 (2.5–6) versus 3 (2–7)] in both an unadjusted (p = 0.64) and adjusted (p = 0.12) model (model adjustment for Simpli-fied Acute Physiology Score II, need for renal replacement therapy, pres-ence of chronic liver diseases). Interestingly, however, patients on hydrocortisone developed adverse cardiac events at higher median vasopressor load [0.48

(0.36–0.54) lg/kg/min] than patients who did not receive hydrocortisone [0.18 (0.06–0.43) lg/kg/min] in both an unadjusted (p = 0.005) and adjusted model (p = 0.006). The type of adverse cardiac event had no influence on this association (p = 0.17 and p = 0.13, respec-tively). Carrying the hypothesis of Salvadori and colleagues on a poten-tially protective effect of

hydrocortisone on the occurrence of adverse cardiac events during cate-cholamine vasopressor therapy further, one may speculate that hydrocortisone raised the individual threshold at which catecholamine vasopressors may induce adverse cardiac events in our study patients with septic shock. Taking the post -hoc character of this analysis and the low number of septic shock patients developing adverse cardiac events

(n = 21) into consideration, these data must be regarded as purely hypothesis-generating. Further stud-ies are, therefore, needed to evaluate the influence of a hydrocortisone therapy on the occurrence of adverse (cardiac) events during catecholamine vasopressor therapy in septic shock.

Reference

1. Schmittinger CA, Torgersen C, Luckner G, Schro¨der DCH, Lorenz I, Du¨nser MW (2012) Adverse cardiac events during catecholamine vasopressor therapy: a prospective observational study. Intensive Care Med 38:950–958. doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2531-2

C. A. Schmittinger C. Torgersen Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

C. A. Schmittinger (

)

)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, and Rescue Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland

e-mail: christian.schmittinger@luks.ch Tel.: ?41-41-2054901

C. Torgersen G. Luckner  D. C. H. Schro¨der I. Lorenz

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria

M. W. Du¨nser

Department of Anaesthesiology,

Perioperative and Intensive Care Medicine, Salzburg General Hospital and Paracelsus Private Medical University,

Salzburg, Austria Intensive Care Med (2012) 38:1726

Références

Documents relatifs

[r]

[r]

In this paper, we introduce the basic framework of the OVAE and how OVAE is used to represent and analyze all adverse events reported in the product package inserts

background Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)- associated early cardiac adverse events (CAEs), mostly acute and fulminant myocarditis, have been well characterized and mainly

This prospective multicenter study aimed to demon- strate that systemic administration of low-dose steroids during resuscitation of brain-dead donors makes vaso- pressor

– Scenario B shows a situation in which the pacemaker paces in LV only after an AV interval, while RV pacing is inhibited due to sensing of an intrinsic activity in RV.. – Scenario

We first con- struct a graph using candidate ADE extracted from biomedical literature, and then propose a method to select critical vertices from the graph as core vertices with

Key findings are: (1) Health care providers involved in adverse events need to be given the opportunity to talk about their experience; (2) The best way to provide support is