• Aucun résultat trouvé

Impact of a genetic selection led on digestive efficiency on gut microbiota composition in broiler chicken

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Impact of a genetic selection led on digestive efficiency on gut microbiota composition in broiler chicken"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01608757

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01608757

Submitted on 3 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative CommonsAttribution - ShareAlike| 4.0 International License

Impact of a genetic selection led on digestive efficiency on gut microbiota composition in broiler chicken

Fanny Calenge, Jordi Estelle Fabrellas, Christelle Hennequet-Antier, Aziza Caidi, Pascale Quéré, Sascha Trapp, Bertrand Bed’Hom, Sandrine Grasteau,

Irène Gabriel

To cite this version:

Fanny Calenge, Jordi Estelle Fabrellas, Christelle Hennequet-Antier, Aziza Caidi, Pascale Quéré, et al.. Impact of a genetic selection led on digestive efficiency on gut microbiota composition in broiler chicken. 10. INRA-Rowett Symposium on Gut Microbiology. Twenty years and counting, Jun 2016, Clermont-Ferrand, France. 2016. �hal-01608757�

(2)

Impact of a genetic selection led on digestive efficiency on gut microbiota composition in broiler chicken.

Impact d’une sélection génétique sur l’efficacité digestive sur le microbiote intestinal de poulet

Fanny CALENGE1, Jordi ESTELLÉ1, Christelle HENNEQUET-ANTIER2, Aziza CAIDI1, Pascale QUÉRÉ3, Sascha TRAPP3, Bertrand BED’HOM1, Sandrine MIGNON-GRASTEAU2, Irène GABRIEL2.

1GABI, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France 2URA, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France

3ISP, INRA, Université François Rabelais, 37380 Nouzilly, France.

Afin de comprendre l’influence complexe du microbiote intestinal sur l’efficacité digestive et la santé chez le poulet de chair, nous avons exploité une population F8 de 200 animaux dérivés d’un croisement entre deux lignées de poulet divergentes sélectionnées pour leur efficacité digestive avec un régime à base de blé. Des travaux précédents ciblant par Q-PCR les principaux groupes bactériens ont montré que la composition du microbiote caecal diffère entre les deux lignées. Nous avons sélectionné deux groupes de 20 animaux à partir de ces lignées

In order to understand the complex influence of intestinal microbiota on digestive efficiency and health in broiler, we took advantage of a F8 advanced intercross line progeny of 200 animals derived from a cross between two broiler chicken lines (D+/D-) divergently selected for their digestive efficiency on a wheat based diet. Previous work targeting specifically major groups of bacterias showed that caecal microbiota composition differs between D+/D- lines. We selected 2 groups of 20 animals with extreme digestive efficiencies at 23 days from this progeny. The AMEn values were 2558 and 3190 kcal.kg-1 dry matter in the low and high efficiency groups, respectively. We assessed the microbiota composition in ileum, jejunum and caeca using a 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach. Relative abundances of the bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in each sample and their phylogenetic classification were obtained using the QIIME pipeline. Richness, α- and β- diversity indices and comparisons of compositions in OTU were obtained with the phyloseq and metagenomeseq R packages. As expected, caeca contained the richest and more diverse microbiota. We identified significant differences in OTU composition between the different intestinal segments, the more abundant order being Clostridiales for the caeca and Lactobacillales for ileum and jejunum. We observed significant differences in OTU abundances between the high/low digestibility groups of animals in each segment, thus confirming and enriching previous results. We identified 84 differentially abundant OTUs in caeca, with for instance 3 OTUs corresponding to Butyricicoccus pullicaecarum, which is known as a butyrate producing bacteria with potential probiotic effects. We identified specific microbiota signatures in the gut of chickens harbouring poor/high digestibilities. We are currently investigating the correlations between individual variations in gut microbiota, digestive efficiency and physiology and innate immune status, in order to better describe the complex interplay between these physiological pathways.

Références

Documents relatifs

La production d’un médicament se fait en plusieurs étapes, de la fabrication au conditionnement primaire et enfin au conditionnement secondaire. Les étapes de

characterizing digestive efficiency (AMEn, coefficients of digestive utilization of starch, lipids, proteins and dry matter (CDUS, CDUL, CDUP, CDUDM)), anatomy of the digestive

The traits measured were body weight (BW), feed conversion ratio (FCR), AMEn, weights of crop, liver, gizzard and proventriculus, and weight, length and density of the duodenum,

Il faut dire encore que la Brain Gym pourrait aussi très bien faire l’objet d’une étude en lien avec l’intelligence émotionnelle, soit « l’habileté à percevoir et à

دعسلا مأ يكم لاصتلااو ملاعلاا مولع مسق لاصتلااو ملاعلاا مولع مسق ةعماج راتخم يجاب - ةبانع ةعماج راتخم يجاب - ةبانع موهفم ىظيح قايس في ةيمومعلا تاطلسلا لبق

Significant success stories have already been achieved in this respect: in one project in Albania (see p. 15), the close partnership between the gov- ernment, VET schools,

Also, we found that superoxide levels in stationary phase cells, as determined by the % of dihy- droethidium (DHE) stained cells, were lower in ypr114wΔ, yjr116wΔ and yyΔΔ mutants

كلذك وتفاقث 3 تاسسؤملا لك يف وى امك عقاولا جاتروبورلا نف روصي ـ لإا ةيملاع ، ةيعمس( برقا ويف ) تنرتنا ، ةبوتكم، ةيرصب ىلإ دمتعي كلذل ةيعقاولا ةجلاعملا يف