• Aucun résultat trouvé

Diffusive shock acceleration: a first order Fermi process

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Diffusive shock acceleration: a first order Fermi process"

Copied!
28
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Diffusive shock acceleration:

a first order Fermi process

(2)

Shock waves

Discontinuity in physical parameters

shock front

n

1

, p

1

, T

1

v

1

n

2

, p

2

, T

2

v

2

(immaterial surface)

upstream medium downstream medium

What can we tell from the purely macroscopic point of view?

(3)

Shock waves “jump conditions”

Conservation equations

shock front

n

1

, p

1

, T

1

v

1

n

2

, p

2

, T

2

v

2

(immaterial surface)

upstream medium downstream medium

mass

momentum energy

adiabatic index

(4)

Shock waves “jump conditions”

Solve macroscopic conservation equations

shock front

n

1

, p

1

, T

1

v

1

n

2

, p

2

, T

2

v

2

(immaterial surface)

upstream medium

downstream medium

(5)

Solution:

γ + 1

γ + 1/M 1 2 ± (1 - 1/M 1 2 ) v 2

v 1 =

Trivial solution: v 2 = v 1 !

γ + 1

γ - 1 + 2/M

12

v

2

=

v

1

n

1

=

n

2

γ + 1

2 γ M

12

- ( γ - 1) p

2

=

p

1

Shock wave solution:

NB: M

1

can be either > 1 or < 1, but

[ M

12

- ( γ - 1)/2 γ ] × [ M

22

- ( γ - 1)/2 γ ] = ( ( γ + 1)/2 γ)

2

M

1

> 1 ⇔ M

2

< 1 But entropy must increase!

(6)

Astrophysical shocks

Supernovae eject supersonic material

SN 1006 Tycho Kepler

< 35 pc S

N R

1-3 10 5 yr

~ 10 51 erg

+ gamma-ray bursts (relativistic fireballs)

Stellar mass black

holes emit plasma blobs

(7)

3C 219

Astrophysical shocks

Active galactic nuclei produce jets

with internal shocks and huge

shocks at the end (hot spots)

(8)

SN shocks: V ~ 10 000 km/s ; E ~ 2 MeV/proton

Stopping length ~ 1 kpc !

But: interaction with B and E fields

◆ R

L

= p/qB ~ 10

-8

pc

◆ Streaming with v > c

A

“impossible”.

What is a collisionless shock?!

In the interstellar or intergalactic medium, all

the shocks are “collisionless”!

(9)

“Acceleration by change-of-frame”

Magnetic cloud, MHD wave, etc.:

anything that is moving are carrying

B fields able to scatter particles…

(10)

Second order, stochastic Fermi acceleration

V B

B

B

The energy gain is only due to the difference in both collision rates, which is ∝ V/c

More head-on collisions than overtaking collisions

Energy change at each “collision”: ∝ V/c

Resulting average energy gain: ∝ (V/c) 2

(11)

Diffusive shock acceleration

Shock wave (e.g. supernova explosion)

Magnetic wave production

Downstream : by the shock (compression, turbulence, hydro and MHD-instabilities, shear flows, etc.)

Upstream : by the cosmic rays themselves !

→ ‘isotropisation’ of the distribution (in local rest frame)

V

shock

Interstellar medium

Shocked medium

(12)

You’re always lucky!

At each crossing, the particle sees a

‘magnetic wall’ at V = (1-1/r)

→ only head-on collisions…

V

shock

V

shock

/ r

Interstellar medium

Shocked medium

(13)

Shock acceleration

3 points of view...

Shock rest frame

n

1

, p

1

, T

1

v

1

n

2

, p

2

, T

2

v

2

Upstream rest frame

v

1 -

v

2

Downstream rest frame

v

1 -

v

2

v

2

As seen from upstream, the

downstream medium is coming closer v

1

As seen from downstream, the upstream medium is coming closer head-on “collisions”

at V = v

1

-v

2

⇒ energy gain

(14)

New version of the same calculation

Magnetic cloud replaced by the plasma on the other side of the shock front

Upstream rest frame

v

1 -

v

2

v

1

(15)

Angular distribution at the crossing of the shock

Upstream rest frame

v

1 -

v

2

v

1

relative velocity

Average crossing angles

and

(isotropy on either side of the shock front)

(16)

Average energy gain

(17)

Shock acceleration:

Acceleration process

Fermi process

First order process

Acceleration cycles

(18)

Shock acceleration cycles

Cf. stochastic, second order Fermi acceleration process: exponential growth of the energy

After n cycles

Acceleration rate:

with τ acc independent of E

Escape rate independent of E ⇒

(19)

Acceleration rate

Time to complete one cycle:

◆ Confinement distance: κ /u

◆ Average time spent upstream: t 1 ≈ 4 κ / cu 1

◆ Average time spent upstream: t 2 ≈ 4 κ / cu 2

u

2

u

1

κ 2 /u 2 κ 1 /u 1

upstream downstream

diffusion coefficient

(20)

Acceleration rate

Finally, τ acc ~ t cycle × V s /c ~ 1 month !

Bohm limit: κ = r g v/3 ~ E β 2 /3qB

◆ Proton at 10 GeV: κ ~ 10

22

cm

2

/s

◆ ⇒ t

cycle

~ 10

4

seconds !

u

2

u

1

κ 2 /u 2 κ 1 /u 1

upstream

downstream

(21)

Achtung !

u

2

u

1

κ 2 /u 2 κ 1 /u 1

upstream downstream

with

and

The acceleration timescale depends on E

But this was required to get a power-law spectrum (cf. Fermi miracle!)

(22)

Second ingredient: escape timescale

Flux of particles crossing from upstream to downstream

V

shoc

k

V

shock

/ r

Flux of particles escaping downstream

Escape probability

Escape timescale also depends on E!

(23)

A power-law spectrum anyway!

Both τ acc and τ esc depend on E, but τ acc / τ esc does not!

So let’s forget about time, and think in terms of cycles…

◆ Both the relative energy gain and the escape probability per cycle are independent of E: this is enough!

where

(24)

Resulting energy spectrum

Return probability:

Energy after n cycles

Remaining number of particles after n cycles:

(25)

Resulting energy spectrum

Return probability:

Energy after n cycles

Remaining number of particles after n cycles:

(26)

Universal power-law index

One obtains:

For a non-relativistic shock

◆ P

esc

<< 1

◆ Δ E/E << 1

with

… where ‘r’ is the shock compression ratio

◆ r = γ +1/ γ -1 for a strong shock

For a monoatomic or fully ionised gas, γ=5/3

x = 2, compatible with observations

(27)

Maximum energy achievable?

Energy losses

Friction with ambient medium

Synchrotron, IC

Pair production

photo-π

Escape

◆ Keep the particle in the accelerator

◆ Diffusion, gyroradius

Destruction

◆ Photo-disintegration

Age of the

players!

(28)

Fermi 1 vs Fermi 2

Acceleration timescale

Second order (stochastic) Fermi acceleration

with

First order (shock) Fermi acceleration

and so

and with

so

Références

Documents relatifs

Figure 2.13 : Profils verticaux de vitesse de courant correspondant aux phases de vive-eau/morte-eau (a-b) et flot/jusant (c-d), obtenus à partir des mesures ADCP effectuées dans

F IGURE 5.4: Creep deformation ∆γ with water content W = 0.12% under different values of shear stress at packing fraction φ = 0.60 left and under different packing fraction values

Afin de déterminer les variations de la précision de la localisation en fonction des différents paramètres du système, les deux valeurs de la TDOA ont été calculées

Complète les encadrements suivants par deux entiers

By looking specifically at protons, we present a comprehensive body of experimental results concerning the mean free path, the nucleon-nucleon cross-section and in-medium effects

We consider regular acceleration (Fermi 1 process) at the shock front of supernova remnants, as well as stochastic reacceleration (Fermi 2 process) and escape (controlled by

The shock wave polymerisation proceeds without any catalysts commonly used to initiate the process at normal conditions £2,4 1. The active centers are created by the shock wave,

We first review the main the- oretical frameworks developed for the study of particle acceleration in astrophysical flows: diffusive shock acceleration, shock drift and shock