Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
Building Research Note, 1986-04
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=637982ce-d533-421e-839e-6393dc6cd9a3 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=637982ce-d533-421e-839e-6393dc6cd9a3
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/40000471
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Measurements and observations made during residential sprinkler
demonstrations
S e r T H l
R92
no,2h3
em 2 B D CNational Research
Conseilnational
19
Council Canada de recherches CanadaInstitute for lnstitut
de
Research
inrecherche
en
Construction construction
Building Research Note
Measurements
and Observations Made during
Residential Sprinkler Demonstrations
by
I. Oleszkiewicz
Fire Research Section
Institute for Research in Construction
BRN
243
ISSN 0701-5232
Ottawa, April
1986@Kational Research Council Canada.
1986MEASUREMENTS A N D OBSERVATIONS MADE DURING RESIDENTIAL
SPRINKLER DEMONSTRATIONS
*?
ABSTRACT
Measurements and observations made during demonstration tests of
resideri~ial
sprinkler systems, conducted in Charlottetown, Prince Edward
Island,',in June 1984, are presented.
'+2Ce document fait 6tat des mesures et observations faites lors dPessais
de d6monstration d'extinct~urs
automatiqyes pour habitations men& en juin
1984
3Charlottetown,
3 1'Ile-du-Prince-Edouard.INTRODUCTION
Statistics show that most fire fatalities occur in residential fires.
The low ceiling heights and the small size of compartments in the typical
home cause the hot fire gases to descend quickly to below eye level. An
obvious solution to the problem is the early detection and suppression of
the fire. The use of smoke detectors has decreased the number of
residential fire fatalities, but detection alone is not sufficient. It
cannot save lives if the occupants of the building are incapacitated due to
age, disability or other factors.
Traditional sprinklers have proven unsuccessful, due to their slow
response time, in providing life safety for the occupants of the compartment
of fire origin. Fast response is important, but so is the capability of the
sprinkler to discharge a sufficient quantity of water in the right spray
pattern from an ordinary household water supply.
A
new type of sprinkler,
referred to as the residential sprinkler, has been developed to meet the
needs of residential buildings.
The Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council
o$ Canada, agreed to participate in two demonstration tests of residential
sprinkler systems in Charlottetown, P.E.I.,
in June 1984. The tests had
been devised jointly by manufacturers of fire protection equipment and by
fire protection authorities.
The objectives of the demonstration tests were:
i) to show the ability of residential sprinklers to extinguish
afire
before conditions in the room of fire origin became untenable;
ii) to demonstrate the suitability of plastic piping for use in residential
sprinkler systems;
iii) to demonstrate the operation of an "intelligent" fire alarm system.
Although the tests were primarily for demonstration purposes, useful
data were collected concerning the performance of residential sprinklers.
TEST FACILITY
The test facility consisted of two rooms built adjacent to the Fire
Fighters Training Tower (Figure
1).
The interiors of the rooms were
.: ?
o SPRINKLER
8
PRESSURE GAUGE 2 THERMOCOUPLETHERMOCOUPLE LOCATION ROOM NO. 1
1
-
AT THE SIDEWALL S PR I NKLER2
-
0.9 m ABOVE THE FLOOR 3-
1.5 m ABOVE THE FLOOR 4-
0.075 m BELOW THE CEILING 5 - AT THE SIDEWALL SPRINKLERROOM NO. 2
1 TO 4
-
AT THE PENDANT SPRINKLERS5
-
0.9 m ABOVE THE FLOOR 6-
1.5 m ABOVE THE FLOOR 7-
0.075 m BELOW THE CEl L l NG 0-
1.5 m ABOVE THE FLOOR, 0 . 1 mFROM THE WALL
3
f i n i s h e d w i t h gypsum board p a i n t e d w i t h l a t e x p a i n t ; t h e f l o o r s were b a r e c o n c r e t e .
A c ; l o s e d - c i r c u i t TV w i t h m o n i t o r s was i n s t a l l e d i n t h e tower and a n e a r b y t + a i n i n g c e n t r e . V
SPRINKLER INSTALLATIONS
Two t y p e s of s p r i n k l e r s , b o t h h a v i n g a t e m p e r a t u r e r a t i n g of 60°C (140°F) were i n s t a l l e d : h o r i z o n t a l s i d e w a l l r e s i d e n t i a l s p r i n k l e r s i n Room 1, and pendant r e s i d e n t i a l s p r i n k l e r s i n Room 2. F i g u r e 1 shows t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e s p r i n k l e r s . P l a s t i c p i p i n g of 25.4 mm ( 1 i n . ) nominal d i a m e t e r , made from e i t h e r c h l o r i n a t e d PVC ( p o l y ( v i n y 1 c h l o r i d e ) ) o r Poly B
( p o l y b u t y l e n e ) , was used. The p i p e s were exposed.
FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
The f i r e a l a r m s y s t e m c o n s i s t e d of 8 a d d r e s s a b l e i o n i z a t i o n - t y p e smoke d e t e c t o r s i n e a c h room ( g i v i n g a t o t a l of 16 d e t e c t o r s ) w i t h a
m i c r o p r o c e s s o r - c o n t r o l l e d c e n t r a l u n i t . The s e n s i t i v i t y of t h e d e t e c t o r s c o u l d be a d j u s t e d i n d i v i d u a l l y from t h e keyboard of t h e c o n t r o l u n i t .
INSTRUMENTATION
During t h e t e s t s , t h e a i r t e m p e r a t u r e and CO l e v e l i n t h e room, and t h e p r e s s u r e and w a t e r f l o w r a t e i n t h e s p r i n k l e r p i p i n g were measured.
The v e r t i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n of t e m p e r a t u r e was monitored by b a r e
' t h e r m o c o u p l e s f i x e d a t 915 mrn ( 3 f t ) , and 1525 mm ( 5 f t ) above t h e f l o o r and 7 5 mm ( 3 i n . ) below t h e c e i l i n g . Other thermocouples were l o c a t e d c l o s e t o t h e s p r i n k l e r s .
The CO l e v e l was measured u s i n g a s a m p l i n g s e t w i t h a n a i r pump and a Draeger d e v i c e (chosen because of i t s p o r t a b i l i t y ) . Air samples were t a k e n 1525 mm ( 5 f t ) above t h e f l o o r .
Water p r e s s u r e was measured w i t h a p r e s s u r e gauge a t a p o i n t j u s t b e f o r e t h e burn room. The f l o w r a t e and t o t a l q u a n t i t y of w a t e r were measured u s i n g a S i g n e t p a d d l e - w h e e l flowmeter/accumulator.
The flowmeter and a l l t h e thermocouples were a u t o m a t i c a l l y r e a d and r e c o r d e d by a d a t a l o g g e r . Other d a t a , t o g e t h e r w i t h s p r i n k l e r a c t i v a t i o n t i m e s , were r e c o r d e d manually. The smoke d e t e c t o r s were n o t monitored i n d i v i d u a l l y because of t h e l i m i t e d s c a n n i n g speed of t h e d a t a l o g g e r .
FIRE SCENARIOS
S i x t r i a l and two d e m o n s t r a t i o n b u r n s , s i m u l a t i n g f i r e s i n h e a l t h c a r e and h o t e l rooms, were c a r r i e d o u t . The t r i a l f i r e s were conducted i n o r d e r t o e s t a b l i s h p r o p e r s c e n a r i o s f o r t h e d e m o n s t r a t i o n tests.
4
To r e d u c e t h e t e s t i n g t i m e , f l a m i n g f i r e s w e r e chosen. A waste-paper b a s k e t f i l l e d w i t h crumpled newspaper was u s e d a s t h e s o u r c e of f i r e . The f l a m e s i s s u i n g from t h e b a s k e t i g n i t e d a n e a r b y p i e c e of f u r n i t u r e (bed o r
*
The arrangement of f u r n i t u r e d u r i n g t h e d e m o n s t r a t i o n t e s t s i s shown i n F i g u r e 1: i t i s a r e p r o d u c t i o n of t h e arrangement used d u r i n g T r i a l
RESULTS
T r i a l T e s t 1 i n Room 1 and T r i a l Test 1 i n Room 2 were conducted b e f o r e t h e i n s t r u m e n t a t i o n was completely i n s t a l l e d .
F i g u r e s 2 t o 7 show a i r t e m p e r a t u r e vs. t i m e a t t h e thermocouple l o c a t i o n s d u r i n g t h e two d e m o n s t r a t i o n tests and t h e f o u r t r i a l tests f o r which i n s t r u m e n t a t i o n was a v a i l a b l e . A c t i v a t i o n times f o r t h e s p r i n k l e r and
t h e f i r s t smoke d e t e c t o r are i n d i c a t e d on t h e t i m e a x i s . T r i a l T e s t 2, Room 1 ( F i g u r e 2)
The f i r e was v e r y s m a l l . The s p r i n k l e r a t l o c a t i o n 5 a c t i v a t e d 48 s e c o n d s a f t e r i g n i t i o n and e x t i n g u i s h e d t h e f i r e a l m o s t immediately. The a i r t e m p e r a t u r e remained low d u r i n g t h e test. The CO l e v e l , however,
r e a c h e d 8000 ppm one minute a f t e r i g n i t i o n . The w a t e r p r e s s u r e w a s 290 kPa (42 p s i ) and t h e f l o w r a t e was 1.37 L/s (21.7 U.S. gpm). The f i r s t smoke d e t e c t o r a c t i v a t e d 17 seconds a f t e r i g n i t i o n .
"
1 2 0 W C C 0 20 40 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 6 0 180 200 T I M E , s F i g u r e 2. Air t e m p e r a t u r e vs. t i m e ; T r i a l T e s t 2, Room 2 l ~ l ~ l ~ l ~ l ~ l ~ l ~ l ~ l ~ l-
-
-
-
v SPRINKLER-
v SMOKE DETECTOR-
1 - 5 THERMOCOUPLE LOCATIONS-
--
-
- v 2 v 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1T r i a l Test 3, Room 1 ( F i g u r e 3 )
The f i r e grew b i g g e r and l a s t e d l o n g e r t h a n i n t h e p r e v i o u s t e s t . The s p r i n k l e r a t l o c a t i o n 5 a c t i v a t e d 101 seconds a f t e r i g n i t i o n . The gas temperature was h i g h e r t h a n d u r i n g t h e p r e v i o w t e s t , b u t n o t s u f f i c i e n t l y h i g h t o cause f l a s h o v e r . The CO l e v e l remained low. The w a t e r p r e s s u r e was
160 kPa (23 p s i ) and t h e flow r a t e was 1.981 L / s (31.5 U.S. gpm). The f i r s t smoke d e t e c t o r a c t i v a t e d 107 seconds a f t e r i g n i t i o n . l ~ l [ ~ ~ Il I ,I I l I I 1 l l i
-
-
-
-
v S P R I N K L E R - - v SMOKE DETECTOR-
1-
5 THERMOCOUPLE - LOCATIONS-
-
-
T I M E ,s
F i g u r e 3. Air t e m p e r a t u r e vs. time; T r i a l Test 3, Room 1
$ r i a l T e s t 2, Room 2 ( F i g u r e 4 )
Because of t h e arrangement of t h e f u r n i s h i n g s and t h e i r h i g h
c o m b u s t i b i l i t y , and t h e u s e of s p r i n k l e r s w i t h a t e m p e r a t u r e r a t i n g h i g h e r t h a n t h a t r e q u i r e d , t h e f i r e was v i g o r o u s and g a s t e m p e r a t u r e s were high. The s p r i n k l e r a t l o c a t i o n 3 a c t i v a t e d 128 seconds a f t e r i g n i t i o n and
promptly e x t i n g u i s h e d t h e f i r e . The CO l e v e l was n o t recorded. The w a t e r p r e s s u r e was 290 kPa (42 p s i ) and t h e flow r a t e was 1.4 L/s (22.2 U.S. gpm). The f i r s t smoke d e t e c t o r a c t i v a t e d 20 seconds a f t e r i g n i t i o n .
T r i a l T e s t 3. Room 2 ( F i g u r e 5)
The arrangement of t h e f u r n i s h i n g s was modified. A h i g h l y combustible p r i v a c y c u r t a i n , used i n t h e p r e v i o u s t e s t , was n o t r e i n s t a l l e d . S p r i n k l e r s w i t h a t e m p e r a t u r e r a t i n g of 60°C were used. The f i r e developed more s l o w l y t h a n d u r i n g t h e p r e v i o u s t e s t . Two s p r i n k l e r s a c t i v a t e d ( l o c a t i o n s 2 and 3) and suppressed t h e f i r e b e f o r e t h e eye-level g a s t e m p e r a t u r e
(thermocouple 6) reached 75OC. The s p r i n k l e r a t l o c a t i o n 2 a c t i v a t e d
? v SPRINKLER r SMOKE DETECTOR 1-7 THERMOCOUPLE 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 6 0 1 8 0 2 0 0 T I M E , s F i g u r e 4. Air t e m p e r a t u r e vs. t i m e ; T r i a l T e s t 2, Room 2 1 8 0 16 0 14 0 v SPRINKLER 1 2 0 SMOKE DETECTOR 1 0 0 1 - 7 THERMOCOUPLE 8 0 6 0 4 0 2 0 T I M E , s F i g u r e 5. Air t e m p e r a t u r e vs. t i m e ; T r i a l T e s t 3 , Room 2
l o c a t i o n 3. The f o l l o w i n g CO l e v e l s were recorded: 0 pprn a f t e r 30 seconds, 0 pprn a f t e r 2 m i n u t e s , 500 pprn a f t e r 3 minutes, and 300 pprn a f t e r 4 minutes. The w a t e r p r e s s u r e was 324 kPa (47 p s i ) and t h e flow r a t e was 1.57 L/s
(24.8 U;S. gpm). The f i r s t smoke d e t e c t o r a c t i v a t e d 30 seconds a f t e r
i g n i t i o n . X‘
Demonstration T e s t , Room 1 ( F i g u r e 6 )
The f i r e development was s i m i l a r t o t h a t d u r i n g T r i a l T e s t 3 i n Room 1 e x c e p t f o r a s l o w e r s t a r t which was caused by a d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e randomly a r r a n g e d i g n i t i o n s o u r c e (waste-paper b a s k e t w i t h crumpled p a p e r ) . The s p r i n k l e r a t l o c a t i o n 5 a c t i v a t e d 3 minutes a f t e r i g n i t i o n . The f o l l o w i n g CO l e v e l s were recorded: 0 pprn a f t e r 1 minute, 150 pprn a f t e r 3 m i n u t e s , and 300 pprn a f t e r
4
minutes. The w a t e r p r e s s u r e was 269 kPa (39 p s i ) and t h e flow r a t e was 1.63 L/s (26 U.S. gpm). The f i r s t smoke d e t e c t o r a c t i v a t e d 34 seconds a f t e r i g n i t i o n .S e v e r a l p e o p l e remained i n s i d e t h e room u n t i l t h e f i r e was e x t i n g u i s h e d . They r e p o r t e d no u n t e n a b l e c o n d i t i o n s , a l t h o u g h t h e y e x p e r i e n c e d some d i s c o m f o r t due t o smoke and w a t e r s p r a y . They s t r e s s e d t h a t they d i d n o t f e e l h o t , a l t h o u g h t h e t e m p e r a t u r e reached l l l ° C a t t h e 1525 mm l e v e l ( F i g u r e 6, thermocouple 3). 0 0 20 40 6 0 80 100 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 6 0 1 8 0 2 0 0 T I M E , s l ~ l ~ l ~ l ~ l ~ l ~ l ~ l ~ l ~ ~
-
-
-
-
v SPRINKLER-
- v SMOKEDETECTOR
1-
5 THERMOCOUPLE LOCATIONS --
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
v v 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 ~ ~ ~F i g u r e 6. Air t e m p e r a t u r e vs. time; d e m o n s t r a t i o n t e s t , Room 1
Demonstration T e s t , Room 2 ( F i g u r e 7 )
The f i r e development was s i m i l a r t o t h a t d u r i n g T r i a l T e s t 3 i n Room 2. Only one s p r i n k l e r a c t i v a t e d ( a t l o c a t i o n 3 ) , 2 minutes a f t e r i g n i t i o n . The f o l l o w i n g CO l e v e l s were recorded: 0 pprn a f t e r 1 minute, 200 pprn a f t e r
2.5 m i n u t e s , 400 ppm a f t e r 3.5 m i n u t e s , and 300 ppm a f t e r 5 minutes. The w a t e r p r e s s u r e was 324 kPa (47 p s i ) and t h e f l o w r a t e was 1.6 L/s
(254 U.S. gpm). The f i r s t smoke d e t e c t o r a c t i v a t e d 19 s e c o n d s a f t e r i g n i t i o n .
u
0 0 20 4 0 6 0 80 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 6 0 1 8 0 200 TIME, s V SPRINKLER SMOKE DETECTOR 1-
7 THERMOCOUPLE v F i g u r e 7. Air t e m p e r a t u r e vs. t i m e ; d e m o n s t r a t i o n t e s t , Room 2 SUMMARYThe purpose of t h e tests was t o d e m o n s t r a t e new s p r i n k l e r t e c h n o l o g y i n a c t i o n . The t e s t c o n d i t i o n s were chosen t o be a p p r o p r i a t e f o r d e m o n s t r a t i o n p u r p o s e s r a t h e r t h a n t o y i e l d i n f o r m a t i o n f o r r e s e a r c h . N e v e r t h e l e s s , i t i s c o n s i d e r e d d e s i r a b l e t o r e p o r t what was measured and o b s e r v e d a s t h e r e i s l i t t l e p u b l i s h e d i n f o r m a t i o n on t h e e a r l y s t a g e of f i r e development c o u p l e d w i t h t h e dynamic r e s p o n s e of r e s i d e n t i a l s p r i n k l e r s .
The r e p o r t s f r o m p e o p l e exposed t o t h e f i r e environment i n Room 1 i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e N a t i o n a l F i r e P r o t e c t i o n A s s o c i a t i o n t e n a b i l i t y c r i t e r i o n f o r t e m p e r a t u r e , s e l e c t e d a s 65OC ( l ) , i s c o n s e r v a t i v e f o r s h o r t e x p o s u r e s .
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
These tests were c a r r i e d o u t u n d e r t h e a u s p i c e s of t h e I n t e r n a t i o n a l A s s o c i a t i o n of F i r e C h i e f s . P a r t i c i p a n t s i n t h e s e tests i n c l u d e d t h e
Canadian Automatic S p r i n k l e r A s s o c i a t i o n , Canadian F i r e Alarm M a n u f a c t u r e r s A s s o c i a t i o n , Bow P l a s t i c s Ltd., B.F. Goodrich Chemical Group and G r i n n e l l F i r e P r o t e c t i o n Systems Co. Ltd.
The a u t h o r g r a t e f u l l y acknowledges t h e t e c h n i c a l a s s i s t a n c e p r o v i d e d by J.W. MacLaurin and R.C. Monette, who p a r t i c i p a t e d i n t h e tests i n
C h a r l o t t e t o w n , and J.E. B e r n d t , who p r o c e s s e d t h e d a t a a n d p r e p a r e d t h e g r a p h s .
1. Cot6, A r t h u r E., " F i e l d T e s t and E v a l u a t i o n of R e s i d e n t i a l S p r i n k l e r Systems: P a r t 11", F i r e Technology, Vol. 20, No. 1, F e b r u a r y 1984, p. 48.