• Aucun résultat trouvé

Considering patients’ empowerment in chronic care management: a multidisciplinary approach

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Considering patients’ empowerment in chronic care management: a multidisciplinary approach"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Considering patients’ empowerment in chronic care management:

a multidisciplinary approach

Tilkin, Caroline, PhD Candidate, Health and Society Interfaculty Unit, De Winter, Mélanie, PhD Candidate, Social Sciences Faculty Research, Ketterer, Frédéric, PhD, Sociologist, Primary Care & Health Research Unit,

Etienne, Anne-Marie, PhD, Professor of Health Psychology, Health and Society Interfaculty Unit, Vanmeerbeek Marc, MD, PhD, MPH, Professor of General Practice/Family Medicine, Primary Care & Health

Research Unit &

Schoenaers, Frédéric, PhD, Professor of Sociology, Innokare Consortium Coordinator, Uliège, Liège, Belgium

(Contact: ctilkin@uliege.be, Psychology, Speech and Language Therapy, and Education, University of Liège, Quartier Village 2, Rue de l’Aunaie, 30-32 (B38 b), 4000 Liège, Belgium)

Introduction. The current increase in chronic illnesses poses new challenges for European countries in

terms of integrated care. In Belgium, a reform of the healthcare system has been launched through a joint plan entitled “Integrated Care for Better Health” in support of chronic patients. This exploratory study investigates how this reform impacts on the different levels of the care production chain, from policy makers to practitioners and patients, thanks to the collaboration of 3 research units. More specifically, we decided to consider patient empowerment, often defined as a key issue in the field of healthcare, and to study how it could influence each level of care management in the Belgian healthcare system.

Methods. Each research unit investigated a particular dimension of the main topic, and combined

different data collection methods in order to achieve a multidisciplinary point of view. The methods used were interviews about the reform process (n=21), focus groups (n=7) and direct field observations (n=38), qualitative interviews with health professionals, caregivers and chronic patients in triads (n=23), and thematic literature reviews (n=3) concerning all these aspects, but also focusing on the significant personal traits of chronic patients. Our common background were the local pilot projects launched in the context of the reform.

Results. Our preliminary results demonstrate that patient empowerment does not always encompass the

same scientific reality. At an institutional level, this concept is linked to the authorities’ wish to support at-home care for chronic patients. At a therapeutic level, the role of the caregivers in maintaining the patient’s autonomy, but also the social conditions of his/her life, is a salient component of empowerment. Eventually, results from the literature reviews describe how individual and personal features such as identity, and specifically survivor identity, can influence patient empowerment and his/her behaviour in the healthcare system.

Discussion. This multidisciplinary research suggests that patient empowerment is not sufficiently

clearly defined at each level of the care production chain. Therefore, this limitation could impede the implementation of the healthcare reform by creating misunderstandings, as it doesn’t seem to always allow the ideal management of chronic conditions.

Conclusions and lessons learned. Our research illustrates the importance of determining a common

meaning in terms of the main healthcare concepts, and the need to shed light on the importance of multidisciplinary points of view.

Limitations. A limitation of the study was the coordination of three research projects with different

objectives, and the various conceptions that depend on the specific epistemology of each team.

Suggestions for future research. The long-term monitoring of the empowerment actions with regard

to each pilot project at different level of the reform appears to be crucial. A second phase will allow us to extend this knowledge, but also to develop training efforts to improve the degree of collaboration between health professionals and caregivers, and to create a tool to assess more precisely the identity of chronic patients.

Keywords: patient empowerment, chronic illness, integrated care, care management, multidisciplinary

Références

Documents relatifs

La coordination entre le me´decin ge´ne´raliste et le me´decin du travail est indispensable pour favoriser la reprise du travail et une e´ventuelle adaptation de poste, mais il

In 2017 the WHO Global TB Programme formulated new recommendations for the treatment of drug-susceptible TB and for patient care and support of all people with TB

PRB reports personal fees from Aptalis, personal fees from Astra-Zeneca, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Chiesi, personal fees from GSK,

The Ontario Renal Network, a provincial government agency that manages the delivery of CKD services in Ontario, created the KidneyWise clinical tool kit (avail- able

• Implementation of the chronic care model encourages adoption of clinical practice guidelines, empowers care providers to proactively identify patients in need of

Main  outcomes  measures  Score on the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire, which evaluates the patient’s perspective on the care

If this happens, remove gloves, perform hand hygiene, safely remove face shield in the designated area and wash face with soap and water.. Report the incident to

Finding solutions to drive sustainable cancer care through greater efficiency is the core mission of All.Can, which was established to explore waste and inefficiencies in