ﺔﺗﺆﻣ ﺔﻌﻣﺎﺟ
ﺺ
) ( 2905 . ﺔـﻘﻳﺮﻄﺑ ﺎﻫ
ﺔ ) ( 582
. :
: :
(Cheney, 1982)ﺎﻬ ﻤﻤﺻ
) . ( 3.97 .
ﺎـﻤﻛ
) ( 3.94
. ﺔ
) 0.829
( .
Organizational Identification of Faculty Staff at the Jordanian Public Universities and its Relationship to their Sense of Security
Abstract
The Purpose of this study was to examine the Organizational Identification of the faculty staff at the Jordanian public universities, and its relationship to their sense of security
The population of the study consisted of all 2905 Jordanian faculty members, appointed on full-time basis at the Jordanian public universities. The sample of the study (n. 582) was randomly selected.
Two instruments were developed for data gathering; the first instrument, a portfolio of respondents, is an OIQ which was first designed by Cheney (1982). The second is a questionnaire of the sense of security instrument.
The results of the study indicated that the degree of Organizational Identification was high (3.97). It also indicated that the sense of security among the participants was high (3.94) additionally.
The results revealed a positive correlations between the Organizational Identification and the sense of security (correlation coefficient was 0.829).
. ،
.
ﻢﻴﻠﻌﺘﻠﻟ ﺔﺴﺳﺆﻣ
. ، ﺑ
ﺔـﺌﻴﻬﺘ
ﲔﻨﻣﺆﻣ
، ﻰﻠﻋ
، ، ﺎﻬ . ﺎﻬﻘﻴﻘﺤﺘﻟ
. ﺎ
ﻦﻣ ﺾﻌﺑ ،
ﺔ ﺮﻌﺸ ﺗ ﺔﻌﻣﺎﳉ
ﻦﻣ
.
. .
ﻷﺎﺑ
، ﻠ ﻪﻠﺜﳝ ﺎﳌ
(Ryff & Keyes, 1995,
p.720-722)
.
.
. .
2003 ) .( 6
1995 ) - 1
.( 3
.
ﺖﻓﺪﻫ
: . 1
. 2 . 3 )
0.05 α
≤(
ﺔﻴﻠﺒﻘﺘـﺴﳌ .
: . 1
. . 2
.
. 3
. . 4
.
: : ﻲﻤﻴ
. :
ﺲﻔ
. :
. :
:
2006 ﻲﻌﻣ 2007 /
. يﺮﻈﻨﻟا بدﻷا
: :
(Organizational Identification)(Hant & Morgan, 1994)
. .
(Ashforth & Mael, 1989. p21)
) (
) ( .
(Johnson, Johnson & Heimberg,
1999, p160)
: .
(Duncan,
2002, p.3)
:
.
(Hall, Schnider &
Nygren, 1970, p177)
. .
(Johnson, Johnson & Heimberg, 1999, p160-162)
: . 1
. . 2
. ) . 3
. (
: .
.
.
(Glynn,1998)
. :
(Sense of Security)
. .
. : ﻖﻳﺪﺼﺘﻟ
) .( 1979
.
(Maslow)
) ،ﲔﺴﺣ 1987
.( 106 1978 )
(
ﻪﻧﺄﺑ
:
ﻖﻠﻘ ) .
1985 ( 193
. ( 39 2002 )
.
.
.
(Ryff & Keyes, 1995, p.720-722)
. ﲔﻠ
) ،ﻢﺷﺎﻫ .( 1986
) .
1989 ( 123
: 1983 )
- 49
.( 50
.
2003 ) .( 213
(Maslow, 1970)
" :
(The Need Hierarchy Theory)
"
: 1943
2005 )
( 45
) .( 238 - 237 2002
ﺎـﳑ ،
) ،ﺮﺑﺎﺟ
.( 1986
(Reitz, 1981)
.
2002 ) - 36
.( 37 ) ﻮ
( 1985 .
،
،ﻢﻴ
) (
.
) : ـﻫ 1403 ( ﻦ 91 ) ( 71 )
( ﻦـﻣ
.
:
. .
) . ( 1983 ﺖ
) ( 296
) ( 126 )
( 25
) ( 14
.
(Elizur, 1994)
"
: ."
) ( 16 )
( 24
.
. ( 1995 )
. .
ﺲ
/ 1994 1995
. 1420 273 )
( .
: .
(Tornyay, 1996)
:
. ( 1998 ) :
. . ( 435 )
: ﻖـﻴﻘﲢ
. :
. : : .
. :
. .
(Johnson, Johnson &
Heimberg, 1999) (Cheney)
) ( 1300
ﺎﻤﻈﻨﻣ .
. ﺑ ( 2000 ) ﺔ.
) ( 1983
. )
( 235
) ( 103 )
( 132 ،ﺔﺒﻟﺎﻃ
. .
. .
)
2000 Knippenberg & Schie,
( ﺑ ﻓﺪـﻫ ﺖ
)
.( :
.
(Nelson, 2002)
. ـﻴﻓ
،ﻪ . ﺎ ﺬﻫ ﺪﻤﺘﺳ
ﻣﻮﻬﻔﻣ ﺢﻴﺿﻮﺗ ﻞﺛﺎﻤﺘﻟ
، ﺖﻣﺪﻗ
ﻚﻟﺬﻛ ،ﲔ ﻣﻮﻬﻔ ﻢﻴﻴﻘﺘﻟ
ﻂﻄﺨ
.
(Jeffry, 2002).
(Puurula & Lofstrom, 2003)
.
175 )
( : .
. ﺖ ( 2003 )
) ( 400 ،ﻮﻀﻋ
. ( 2005 )
.
ﻦﻣ :
. .
) ( 670
) ( 14
) .(
:
ﻦﻣ . :
) ( 2005
) ( 675
. ﻦﻋ
. ﻣ
) ( 2003
)
( 2005
ﻊﻣ
1995 ) ﻲ (
ﻊـﻣ
ﺔ .
: ﲢ .
. .
، ) ،
( ) / 2006 .( 2007
2905 ) ( 8 )
( )
(. 2007 622 )
(
ﻮﻀﻋ . (% 21 )
622 ) . (
591 ) ( ﺎﻬﻨﻣ ﻂﻘﺳ
9 ) ) (
( 582
، 94
: ﻲـﻤﻴ : 1
(Organizational Identification Questionnaire
"OIQ")
ﻤﻤﺻ ﺎﻬ
(Cheney, 1982)
ﺔﻴﻧﺎﻜﻣﺈﺑ
ﻬﻔﻴﻴﻜﺗ ﺎ ﺎ
.
(Security Feeling Questionnaire): 2
(Ryff and Keyes, 1995)
) ( 1983 )
( 1995
) .( 1995 ﻤﻬﺿﺮﻋ ﰎ
ﺎ ﻠ ﻰﻠﻋ
ﺤ
ﻮ ﺔﻣﻼﺳ ﻦﻋ
) ( 20
) (% 80
) ( 23
ﻦﻣ ﺔﻴﺋﺎ ) ( 43
. .
)
Likert
( )
( 5 :
)
( 5
4 ) ( 3 )
( 2 )
( 1 )
( .
(test-retest)
ﺔﻨﻴﻋ ﻰﻠﻋ 20 )
( ﺔـﺌﻴﻫ ﻮﻀﻋ
.
. ( 0.91 )
-
(Cronbach's Alpha)0.93 ) ( . 0.91 )
( -
(Cronbach's
Alpha)
1 )
(
:
ﺿﺮﻋ
: ﺎﻣ :
ﻟ ﻦﻋ ﺔﺑﺎﺟﻺ )
( 2 :
) ( 2 ﺔ
) 4.186 (
0.745 ﻊﻔﺗﺮﻣ 1
) (
3.886 0.773
ﻊﻔﺗﺮﻣ 3
) (
3.887 0.787
ﻊﻔﺗﺮﻣ 2
3.97 ﻊﻔﺗﺮﻣ 0.74
) ( 2 )
( 3.97
) ( 0.74
"
) "(
) 4.186 (
) 0.745
( "( ) "
) 3.887 (
) 0.787
( ) "
ﺔﻛﺮﺘﺸﻣ ﺺﺋ "(
) 3.886
( .( 0.773 )
: : : 1 3 )
( :
3
) 0.745 (
ﲔﺒﻳ ﺎﳑ
"
"
)
( ( 4.32 )
) ( 0.88
) (
) ( 4.02
، .( 0.99 )
: 2 :
) ( 4
:
4 ) (
"
"
3.886 ) (
، " " ( 0.773 )
)
( ( 4.37 )
0.81 ) (
) (
3.886 ) (
1.06 ) .(
: 3 :
5 )
( :
) ( 5
"
"
) 3.887
( " " ( 0.787 )
)
( ) ( 4.40 )
( 0.84
)
( ( 3.62 )
) .( 1.07
: ﺎﻣ
. )
( 6
.
124
،،،،،،
. 18 4.45
0.71 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 1
ﺔ
. 16 4.40
0.72 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 2
ﺔ
. 20 4.34
0.74 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 3
ﺔ
. 25 4.32
0.81 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 4
ﺔ
. 21 4.30
0.80 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 5
ﺔ
. 23 4.24
0.80 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 6
ﺔ
. 19 4.22
0.77 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 7
ﺔ
. 15 4.22
0.83 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 7
ﺔ
ﺔﻌ 17 4.21 .
0.82 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 9
ﺔ
. 31 4.20
0.77 ﺔﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 10
. 12 4.19
0.78 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 11
ﺔ
. 13 4.18
0.86 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 12
ﺔ
. 32 4.13
0.77 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 13
ﺔ
. 27 4.07
0.85 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 14
ﺔ
. 8 4.06
0.88 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 15
ﺔ
. 24 4.05
0.88 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 16
ﺔ
. 11 4.04
0.88 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 17
ﺔ
. 4 4.04
0.86 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 17
ﺔ
. 14 4.02
0.94 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 19
ﺔ
. 7 4.01
0.89 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 20
ﺔ
. 1 3.99
0.82 ﺔﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 21
. 9 3.99
0.87 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 21
ﺔ
. 33 3.95
0.85 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 23
ﺔ
. 26 3.93
1.01 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 24
ﺔ
. 2 3.91
0.88 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 25
ﺔ
37 3.89
1.10 ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 26
ﺔ
ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 27 1.01 3.84 . 30
ﺔ ﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ 27 0.88 3.84 . 5
ﺔ 27 0.94 3.84 . 22
ﺔﻌﻔﺗﺮﻣ
) ( 6 )
( 3.94
. " ( 39 ) ( 3.16 ) ﲔﺑ ﻦ "
) ( 4.45 )
" ( 18
ﻲﻣﺎﻬﻣ ."
) ( 4
) ( 39
) ، 41 ، 42 ( 43
) 18 ( 16
: . )
α 0.05
>( ﲔﺑ
) ( 7 .
) ( 7
0.779
** 0.765
** 0.824
** 0.829
** α ) **
0.01
>(.
) (، 7
)
(
ﺎﻬﺘﻤﻴﻗ 0.779 ) (
ﺔ α )
0.01
>( ( 0.765 ) ( )
α ) 0.01
>( )
( ﺖﻐﻠﺒﻓ 0.824 )
( ( 0.01
>α )
0.829 ) (
.
ﺎﺗ
: : . 1
3.97 ) ( 5 )
( .
.
. ﻳ
2005
. :
) ( 3.94 .
.
. ﻤﻛ
. ) . ( 1995
. )
( 2005
ﲔﺛﻮﺤﺒ
. . 2
:
ﺔﻬﺟ ﻦﻣ
ﲔﺒﺗ ﺔ
0.829 ) (
.
: . 1
. . 2
. . 3
:
.
: )
ـﻫ1403
".(
"
، )
(3 -61
.36 )
.(1998 )
(13 )
(1
: -58
.85
) .(1986 .
: .
) .(1987 :
) (15 )
(3 -103 .128
)
" .(1983
"
،
) (10 -47
.56
) .(2003 :
ﻪﺗﺎﻘﻴﺒﻄﺘﻟ .
)
" .(2005
"
، )
( :
.
) .(1985 )
(12
) (11 -199 .219
) .(2002 ﻢﻠﻋ
: 2 .
) .(2002 :
،1
: .
) .(1995
"
"
، ) (
.
2000)
" .(
"
،
: -157
.177 2002)
.(
ﺮﺼﻣ ، : ﺎﻄﻨﻃ ﺔﻌﻣﺎﺟ .
1978) .(
. 2005) 1 .(
: .
1985) .(
: .
1979) .(
. : .
2005)
".(
"
، )
( .
1989)
" .(
."
9 ، 35) 100 ( 127- .
2003) .(
. : .
1986) .(
: .
2007) .(
/2006
- 2007 .
: Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. A. .(1989)."Social identity theory and the
organization", Academy of Management Review, 14, p.20-39.
Cheney, George. (1982). “On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification”, Communication Monographs. 50: 342-362.
Duncan, J. E. .(2002)."Organizational Identification: An Insight in to
Elizur, Dov. .(1994). "Gender and Work Values: A comparative Analysis", Journal of Social Psychology, 134 (2), P.201-212.
Glynn, M. A. (1998).”Individuals’ need for organizational identification (nOID): Speculations on individual differences in the propensity to identify”, In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in Organizations: Building theory through conversations, P.238-244, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hall, D. T., Schnider, R. B. & Nygren, H. T. .(1970). "Personal Factor of Organizational Identification", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.15, p. 176-190.
Hant, S. D. & Morgan, R. M. .(1994). "Organizational Commitment:
One of Many Commitment or Key Mediating Construct", Academy of Management journal, Vol. 37, No. 6, p. 1568-1587.
Jeffry, T. P. .(2002). Explaining the Varying Effects of Organizational Identification on Cooperation: The Moderating Role of Subgroup Reputations", Working Papers, Harvard Business School, Morgan Hal, 333.
Johnson, W. L., & Johnson, A. M., & Heimberg, F. .(1999). "A Primary- and Second-Order Component Analysis of the Organizational Identification Questionnaire", Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 59, No.1, P.159-170.
Knippenberg, Daan van, Schie, Els C. M. Van. (2000). “Foci and correlated of organizational identification”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137-147.
Maslow, A. (1970).”Motivation and personality. Harper and Row.NY.
Nelson, Natalie. (2002),” Reengineering Identity: A Case Study of Multiplicity and Duality in Organizational Identification”, Management Communication Quarterly, V.16 N.1, p5-38.
Puurula, Arja & Lofstrom, Erika .(2003). "Development of Professional Identity in SMEs". Paper Presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) "Accountability for Educational Quality: Shared Responsibility" (84th, Chicago, IL, April 21-25.2003.
Reitz, H. J. .(1981). Behavior in Organizations, (5ev. ed) Homewood, IL: Richard. D. IRWIN.
Ryff, C. & Keyes, C. (1995). “ The Structure of Psychological well- being Revisited”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 69 (4): 719-727.
Tornyay, R. .(1996). "Dealing With Tenured Faculty", Educational Researches Information Center, Vol. 18.No. 2, P.38.
