Micropropagation of Araucaria columnaris Hook.
L. Sehgal* O.P. Sehgal P.K. Khosla
DYSP University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan 173 230, India
Introduction
The genus Araucaria
comprises
severalmagnificent
evergreen forest treespecies, including
Araucaria columnarisHook.,
which has a
high
ornamental value aswell. Conventional
propagation by
seedsis slow and
inadequate
forproducing large
uniform
progenies. Cuttings
are difficult toroot and
they produce plagiotropic plants except
when taken fromapical
shoots.Successful
micropropagation
of this spe- cies has not beenreported.
The aim ofthis
study
was to useexplants
from nor-mally growing
mature trees for in vitropropagation
of A. columnaris.Materials and Methods
Tips
(3-5 mm) ofsecondary
andtertiary
lateral branches, taken from 14 yr old trees, were steri- lized in mercuric chloride (0.05%) for 1 min andcultured on
Murashige
andSkoog’s
(MS)medium
(Murashige
andSkoog,
1962), contain-ing
different concentrations of variousgrowth
*Permanent address: Gargi College, Delhi University, N.
regulators and/or other chemicals. The cultures were
kept
at 25°C under cool white fluorescent light (1.5 klux), from 40 W tubes, for 16 h eachday. At least 20 replications were used for each treatment.
Results
The
explants, initially
cultured on MSmedium
supplemented
with kinetin(5-12 pM)
andnaphthalene
acetic acid(1-3 N
M),
were est:ablished on the mediumcontaining only
kinetin(10 pM).
The esta- blishment of cultures was maximum(40-50%)
when theexplants
were col-lected in
April
andNovember,
whereas itwas low
(10-30%) during
other months ofthe year. The
development
ofaxillary
budswas obtained
by subculturing
on amedium
containing 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP,
12.5pM),
indolebutyric
acid(IBA,
1!M)
and 3% sucrose.Explants
taken inJanuary, prechilled
for1 mo at 5°C and cultured on MS medium
(containing
10uM
kinetin and 1!M IBA)
Delhi 110049, India.
*Permanent address: Gargi College, Delhi University, N. Delhi 110049, India.
produced
almost twice the shootgrowth
rate as
compared
to the ones notchilled, giving
a shootlength
of 1.5 cm in 6 wk(Table I).
Subculturing
or directplanting
on amedium
containing
kinetin(10 pM)
andthiourea
(1.3 ,uM)
enhanced the shootlength
andproduction
ofaxillary
branches(Fig. 1 The
latter wereseparated
andused for
multiplication.
Addition of 0.3%activated charcoal to the medium also indicated a faster rate of
growth (Table I).
Discussion and Conclusion
Micropropagation
of most of the conifershas
not been successful. Out of 6 or soreports
on in vitro culture of about 12 spe- cies of Araucaria(Haines
and deFossard,
1977; Maene &Debergh, 1987), only
Bur-rows
(1983)
usedcoppice
shoots frommature trees. Others have utilized ortho-
tropic
shoots fromjuvenile plants.
Recent-ly,
Handro(1986) reported
thedevelop-
ment of
axillary
shoot invitro, starting
from branches of a 20 yr old tree of A.angusti-
folia. The
only report
on A. columnaris is apreliminary study using seedling
stemsegments (Burrows, 1983).
In ourstudy, tips
of very small branchletsappearing naturally
onplagiotropic
branches of 14 yr old trees were used. In nature, these branchletshardly
show anygrowth.
In cul- ture, however, these shootsappeared
toshow normal
orthotropic growth.
InSequoia, Boulay (1979)
also obtainedorthotropic
behavior of in vitro shoots derived fromstump sprouts
of maturetrees.
Explants
from mature trees of someother conifers have also been used
(Bonga,
1981;Gupta, 1987).
The
present
studies also show that sea-son and
prechilling
ofexplants
effect sub-sequent
response in culture. Thioureaseems to
promote axillary
branches and shootgrowth,
as observedby
Maene andDebergh (1987).
Araucaria is a hard-to-root material in
culture,
and limited success inrooting
hasbeen
reported only
for onespecies
viz.,A.
cunningharnii (Haines
and deFossard,
1977;Burrows, 1983). Nevertheless,
theproduction
of shootgrowth
andaxillary
branches obtained in culture in the pres- ent
study
is animportant step
in micro-propagation. Attempts
to induce in vitrorooting
are in progress.References
Bonga J.M. (1981) Organogenesis in vitro of tis-
sues from mature conifers. In vitro 17, 511-518 8
Boulay M. (1979)
Multiplication
et clonage ra- pide du Sequoia sempervirens par la culture in vitro. In: Etudes et Recherches, AFOCEL, Domaine-de-I’Etanson, 77270Nangis,
France, 12, pp. 49-55Burrows G.E. (1983)
Organ
culture of somespecies of Araucariaceae. Anatomical aspects
of bud development. Proc. 2nd Aust. Plant Tis- sue Cult. Conf.
S’ydney.
pp. 18 8Gupta P.K. (1987) Advances in biotechnology of
conifers. Curr. Sci. 57, 629-637
Haines R.J. & de Fossard R.A. (1977)
Propaga-
tion of hoop
pine
(Araucariacunninghamii
Ait).Acta Hortic. 78, 297-302
Handro W. (198E;) Araucaria. In:
Biotechnology
in
Agriculture
&f=orestry (Bajaj
P.S., ed.), Vol 1, Trees,Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, pp. 310-315 5 Maene L. & Debergh P. (1987) Araucaria. In:Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry. (Bonga
J.M. & Durzan D.J., eds.), Vol. 3, Cell Histories,
Gymnosperms, Angiosperms
andPalms. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 176-184
Murashige
T. &Skoog
F. (1962) A revisedmedium for rapid growth and bioassays with
tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15, 473-
497