• Aucun résultat trouvé

Théories des bornes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Théories des bornes"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

D IAGRAMMES

J. R

OSICKÝ

Théories des bornes

Diagrammes, tome 2 (1979), exp. no5, p. R1-R3

<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=DIA_1979__2__A5_0>

© Université Paris 7, UER math., 1979, tous droits réservés.

L’accès aux archives de la revue « Diagrammes » implique l’accord avec les conditions gé- nérales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impres- sion systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fi- chier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.

Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques

http://www.numdam.org/

(2)

Diagrammes, Vol. 2 , 1979-

THEORIES DES BORNES.

Chapitre J: An algebraic description of ordinals.

J. Rosicky.

The class ON of ail ordinals will be described as a cer- tain free algebra in the category of classes. It gives a way to consider ordinals in more gênerai situations than in sets.

We will work in a given model of the Godel-Bernays set theo- ry. Dénote by Cl the category of ail classes in this model with mappings which are classes as morphisms (of course, Ce is not a category in our model), Having a class A , P(A) will dénote the class of ail non-empty subsets of A . Then

P: Ce > CZ is a functor where P(f) , for a mapping f : A > B , is given by the direct images (so, we hâve P(f)(x) = £ f ( x ) / x € x ] , f or any X £ P(A) ) .

Under a complète semilattice in Cl we will mean a par- tially ordered class such that each non empty subset has a su- premum. It is well known that complète semilattices are precise- ly couples (A,h) where A £ Cd and h: P(A) > A is a mapping such that h( \ x } ) = x , for any x 6 A , and

h( U 3£ ) = h( { h(X) / X € 36 } ) , for any non-empty subset

ï Ç P(A).

(3)

R 2

A triple (A,f,h) will be called an o-algebra if A € Ce , (Afh) is a complète semilattice and f: A ^ A a mapping such that h( S x,f(x) } ) = f(x) (i. e. x 4f(x) ) > f o r ajCïy x € A. A mapping t: A > A1 is a homomorphism of o-algebras

(A,f,h) and ( A S f S h1) if t;f = f1 and hf.P(t) = t.h . We hâve an o-algebra (ON,u,s) where u(x) a x + 1 , for any x € O N , and s(x) = sup X , for any X C P(ON) .

THEOREM. (ON,u,s) is a free o-algebra over one gênerator.

Proof• We will prove that 0 freely générâtes ON as an o-al- gebra. Let (A,f,h) be an o-algebra and a € A . We hâve to show that there is a unique homomorphism t: ON -> A of o-alge- bras such that t(o) = a.

Define t by a transfinite recursion as follows: t(o) = a , t(x+l) = f.t(x) , for any x £ O N , and t(x) = h.P(t)(x) (hère x is understood as a set of ail smaller ordinals), for any li- mit x € ON . If x €_ ON , then t will dénote the restriction

x

of t on x+1 Ç ON . To see that t is a homomorphism of o-al- gebras it suffices to verify that each t : x+1 > A is a homomorphism of partial o-algebras (i. e. préserves ail exis- ting opérations). At first, we show that each t préserves ~ . Indeed, if t does it then t A as wel3 because

' x x+1

t(x+l) = f.t(x) > t(x). If x is limit, the induction step is évident•

It is clear that if t is a homomorphism of partial o-algebras then t . as well. Assume that x is limit and t a homo-

x+1 y morphism for any y < x . Then h.P(t)(X) = t.s(X) for any

X £ P(x+1) such that s(X) < x . If s(x) = x , then either x is the greatest élément of X or X is cofinal with x . Sin- ce t préserves ^ $ the same alternative holds for t(x) and P(t)(x). In the first case, h.P(t)(X) = t(x) is immédia- te and in the second one h.P(t)(X) = h.P(t)(x) = t(x) by the

(4)

H 5

construction of t . Since t(x) = t.s(x) , t is proved to be a homomorphism.

The uniqueness of t is évident.

Remark. The just identified ordinal ob.ject ON , which is comple- tely determined by "the calculus of the functor P " , may be compared with the natural number object in toposes (which is the f ree unary algebra over one générât or) •

suivre J

Références

Documents relatifs

An elementary topos (or topos for short) is a category E that is cartesian closed, has finite limits, and a representable subobject functor.. Definition 11.3 (Elementary topos

Since the tangent model structure is a left Bousfield localization of the Reedy model structure, it suffices to show that its right adjoint ∗ ∶ M Ð→ TM sends fibrant objects to

Toute uti- lisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale.. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention

64 As well as three representatives of the Banking Commissioner (Albert Dondelinger, Jean-Nicolas Schaus and Charles Stuyck), it was composed of André Coussement, a representative

We give in the subsections below a quick overview of the mathematical objects involved here, namely random measurable sets, positivity, perimeter, and realisability problems, and

The correct statement of the enrichment and/or depletion testing problem leads to a unique exact null distribution of the number of DE genes belonging to the GO category of

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces the fundamentals of category theory, Section 3 discusses works from the literature that deal with category

The multiplicative structure (tensor product and its adjoint) can be defined in any locally cartesian closed category, whereas the additive (product and co- product) and exponential (