• Aucun résultat trouvé

Local aortic stiffness estimated by a bioelectrical impedance technique

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Local aortic stiffness estimated by a bioelectrical impedance technique"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Artery Abstract Template

Font = Times New Roman, Arial or Symbol ONLY Font size = 11 point minimum, single spaced

Maximum word count = 250 words plus up to 2 figures or tables (longer abstracts WILL be rejected).

Adding a table or graph to your abstract will reduce the number of words you can submit.

Please do not alter the size of this template. If you do your abstract may be rejected.

If you have any problems please contact the Secretariat, Hampton Medical Conferences, on:

+ 44 (0)20 8979 8300

M. COLLETTE, A. HUMEAU, C. CHEVALIER, G. LEFTHERIOTIS

Title:

(don’t enter authors names here)

Local aortic stiffness estimated by a bioelectrical impedance technique

Abstract: To date, aortic stiffness is evaluated by the reference tonometric technique via the pulse wave velocity (PWV) measured in two points (i.e. regional aortic stiffness): the carotid and the femoral arteries. Based on a bioelectrical

impedance signal processing recorded at the chest level, we have developed a new method for the determination of the aortic stiffness in one point (i.e. local aortic stiffness). The local aortic stiffness (AoStiff) was computed from two basic indices: The aortic flux resistance (AoRes) and the aortic distensibility (AoDist) indices.

The study was carried out on 129 consecutive patients at rest (89 men, mean age 50 ± 13) recruited on the occasion of a vascular screening for

atherosclerosis. Carotid-femoral PWV was determined by a trained operator and bioelectrical impedance signals were recorded at the chest for 2 min for AoStiff, AoRes and AoDist determination. Brachial arterial blood pressure was taken at the same time. Relationship between AoStiff index and PWV was evaluated by linear regression.

A Pearson’s correlation coefficient of r=0.79 was found between both variables (95% confidence interval 0.71-0.85; P<0.0001; AoStiff= 0.06*PWV+0.21).

Our results show that the local and the regional methods can provide a reliable estimate of the aortic stiffness. The variability between both variables is likely explained by differences between the local and the regional elastic properties along the aortic tree.

Références

Documents relatifs

Thus the aim of this work is to 1) develop a simpli- fied model of the aorta flow, 2) to parametrised the geometry of the aorta based on clinical description, 3) to assess the

Pulse Wave Monitoring for Arterial Stiffness Detection Using a Simple Portable Tonometer.. Gaelle Lissorgues, Alexandre Bongrain, Lionel Rousseau, Nadia Madaoui, Amandine Testi,

In addition, we analyze the effect of the measurement noise and the truncation error on the estimation of the stiffness, and provide a guideline for the tunning of the

Critical Observations on the German Specifications for the Calculation of the Supporting Beams of Two-Way Slabs and Proposals for a New Method of Calculation.

2 DGVO: Danach findet die Verordnung auch auf die Verarbeitung der Daten von Personen („betroffene Personen“), die sich in der Union befinden, Anwendung, wenn

Using parameterisations for surface snow density, pore close-off density and tortuos- ity, in combination with a density-depth model and data of a regional atmospheric climate

2'3

[r]