Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur: Building Research Note, 201, p. 16, 1983-03
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Computed Energy Consumption for New and Existing High- Rise
Residential Buildings : Suggested Norms and Potential Reductions
Latta, J. K.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC: https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=06b26d73-7d75-4f59-ab34-1ea6579d648c https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=06b26d73-7d75-4f59-ab34-1ea6579d648c
COPiPUTED EmR# CONSUMPTIOH
FOR NEW AND EXISTING HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL BUI LDlEJGS SUGGESTED NORMS AND POTENTIAL REDUCTIONS
J.K. Latta
A model apartment b u i l d i n g was developed based upon existing surveys
of such b u i l d i n g s and computer slmlations carried out to deterdne the
independent effects of climate and size on its energy consumption. Tbe
Meriwether Energy System Analysis program used
had
previously been calfbrat- ed by simulating four exfsting buildings of b o r n energy consumption. Fromt h e s e r e s u l t s , data were developed which enabled a norm to be derived far
the energy consumption of any high rise apartment building at any location in Canada. The p o s s i b l e reductions fn energy consumption that w a d d result from the implementation of some fnexpensive modifications in the four
When work started in 1916 an the preparation of a code for energy
conservation
in
buildings, a preference was expressed for a p e r f o m n c e type of code that would free the designer to be innovative and to manipulate allfacets of the design to the best advantage. Under any such code, both the required performance, and the method of verifying that the level of perfor-
mance has been achieved, mst
be
specified.To
promote energy conservation, the required performance nust set a l i m i t on the energy needed to operateany given building. This is co-mmonly referred to as the energy budget, and is given as a quantity of energy per year for each unit that defines building s i z e ; usually t h i s is gross floor area but t h e number of apartraents
was found to be preferable w i t h residential occupancies- This quantity will
vary with the occupancy. The Standing C o d t t e e on Energy Conservaf ion in
Buildings, set up undec the Associate Committee on the National Building Code, established Vser Task Grwps to ensure that the energy budgets w e r e
r e a l i s t i c . Studfes were carried out an of Eice buildings, schools, and high rise residential bufldtngs.
Unfortunately, the secand basic requirement of a performance type of
code
-
a nethod of vertification-
does not yet exist in an acceptable £ o m .The h s o c i a t e Committee thue decided that it could not issue a performance code a t this t'lmo. A prescriptive code, the Measures for Energy Conserva-
tion in Hew Buildings, had been i s s u e d in 1978 and is currently being revised, Oa the ather hand, the Associate C o d t t e e recommended that the results of the work on energy budgets should be publtshed by DBR to advfse designers
and
operators of buildings on reasonable energy consumpti onfor
coaventional energy conserving d e s i g n s .
It
is recognizedthat
lower values can be achievedwith
more advanced designs.This publtcation Is one of three giving suggested norms of the energy consumption of offices, schools, and hdgh rtsc r e s i d e n t i a l buildings. The term "energy budget" has been avoided because of f t s association with a mandatory requirement.
INTRODUCT EON
Energy consumptfon of apartmeor buildings, eqreesed as energy used
either per square e t r e of floor area or per apartlment, shms a great
variation between buildings, even in the same location and subject to roughly - t h e same weather conditions.
Table
1 summarizes the results ofsurveys by varfws organizations
in
canadal of the gross energy consump-Lion of apartment b u i l d i n g s , Consumption
ranges
from a maximm of 305~ ~ / ( A p t * a ) t o a minimum of 39 ~ J / ( A p t d a ) .
In many countries a t t e m p t s have been made to develop norms for
reasonably attainable levels of
eaerw
consumption in buildings with various occupanctes, sometimes w i t h a vAew to s e t t i n g such levels as maximum permis-s t b l e v a l u e s , at l e a s t f o r the destgn a€ new buildings. Recause b u l l d t n g s
l a s t a Long t l m e , d e c a d e s i n most casca and mlllenta I n t h e u l t i m a t e , it IR
probably more important to get reaeonable L e v e l s of c o n a m p t i a n for e x i s t i n g b u i l d i n g s . Unfortunately, thfa 1s IRIIC~I more d i f f i c u l t : rhan detexmlning what
I s reasonable for new buildings; u s u a l l y one reaorta to h t s t o r i e a l d a t a and
p o s s i b l e reductions £ram that l e v e l of consumption.
This Note presents the results of sow Canadian studies of energy
consmnption o f apartment buLldings and g i v e s
a
meaxas of d e t e d n i n g areasonable, but not necessarily optimum, level for new buildings. It also
gives some indication of reductions
in
consumption that mightbe
e f f e c t e d in e x i s t i n g buildings by various changes f n operating procedures and equipment that require l i t t l e or no expenditure of money.EHERGY CONSUMPTION OF
MEW
APARTME:HT BUILDINGSThe energy consumption mf a building is normally considered t o include
.l energy required to maintain conditions s u i t a b l e for human occupancy and
provide f o r normal human activity, but t o exclude e n e r a required for
some production process carried out: w i t h i n the b u i l a n g . In an apartment building there is no such production process and so all the energy required
far heatlng, cooling, operating elevators, ventf latirtg arid lighting p l u s
that used by the renants €or cooking, lighting and operating domesEic appliances, mid be included.
Butlding energy cansumption is affected by a multitude of factors,
including weather, amount
sf
insulation, size of windms, type of W A C syatem, and leakiness of the envelope. Wost of these are under the control of the designer and should be mnfpulated by him t~ produce the most energyeffrteient d e s i g n p o s s i b l e , Many combinations of these factors w i l l give a
low energy consumption and not all of them will be applicable in a l l cases.
In
order that the designer mayhave
freedom to develop a suitable design in any specific case, it is necessary t o adopt values that represent reasonableenergy conserving practice when determining a reasonable l e v e l of energy
consumption f o r a new building. The requir-nts of the Measures for
Enerw
Conservation in New Buildings, published
in
19782, w e r e considered to be such values and sa the consumption arrived at in this study represents normal good practfce of the late 1970's. basigns that embody moreinnovative features should achieve a much lower value, as rnar~y are r aportedly dai ng.
On the other hand some factors are beyond the control of the d e s i g n e r
and these shauld also be taken i n t o account fa determining a reasonable
level of energy consumption for a given building. For this study, the t w o variables assumed t o be outside of the c o n t r o l of the designer werle the
climate and the size of
the
building.Methodology
The methodology used was t o "calibrate" the computational method by
comparing the computed energy consumption of fmr existing buildirtgs wfth
their known consumption. One of the four buildings w a s then .chosen as
representing a t y p i c a l a p a r t e n t building and the computer were
modified so that they represented a building that m e t the requirements of the Measures far !Suer= Conservatfon in New Building6
1978~.
It was thenused as a modal building for studying the effects of clfmate and s i z e treated as independeht variables. N b a t t e q t was made to investigate the tnceractton between them, Details of the study3 are glven -In Appendix A.
The mdel butlding w a s a 21 storey building contathing 231 apartments
and w a s considered to
be
locatedin
Montreal for the a i a l a t i o n s relating to size. A t t e n t i m was given to the effects ofventilatiorl
on the amount ofa i r
that i n f i l t r a t e s into the building. It was concluded that, with an a i rsupply to the corridor
and
an exhaust from each apartment, air d i d noti n f i l t r a t e at
the
lower
floors, rise through the building and e x f i l t r a t e a tthe upper floors
as
Is the casewith
the more open construction of officebufldings. Air infiltrated into and was exhausted from
the
samespar tment"
.
ResultsIt was concluded t h a t the energy consumptloa of an aparrtlbent b u € l . d i n g
could be divided i n t o four categories: kenant use., butldtne; s e r v i c e s ,
apartment heatimg and garage heating. Tenant Use
T h i s includes a l l the energy used within an apartment for lighting, cooling, operaZion og t e l e v i s i o n s e t s , refrigerator and small appliances as
well as that used for heating dnmestic hot water and for cooking. Bnilding Services
Building services comprise all those items needed to operate the
building other than the replacement of heat l o s t to t h e outsfda. Included
are exterfor lighting, lighting of public spacks, and the operation of elevators, fans and pumps, and c l o t h ~ s washers and dryers. Swiaming p o o l s
and saunas also come in t h i s category but are kept separate since they are
The energy required for some i t e m , such as corridor lighting, w i l l vary w i t h the number of apartments; for others, such as lobby lkghring, it
will not.
Apartment Heating
Although there is no physical connection between them, in Montreal t h e
sum of the i n t e r n a l and solar heat galns over the year was roughly equal to
the conductive heat losses through the envelope, The balance between these two factors In other loeattons was not investigated but since the Measures specify that the thermal resistance of the envelope s h a l l vary with the s e v e r i t y of the climate, probably the difference between
them is
seldomlarge. Thus the heating requtrement of an apartment building depends
prtmarity on the amount
OE
a i r passing through the b u i l d i n g , which in turn,1s coattolled by the ventilatfon system3 and so is reLated t o the number of apartments rather than to the overall dimensfons of the building.
With a constant rate of ventilation per apartment and a constant inside
temperature, the heating requirement can be expressed as a linear r e l a t i o w
ship with degree days.
It
also f o l l o w s thar the heating requirement should be zero at zero degree days.Garage Heating
The garage heating requirement a l s o varies linearly with the degree
days but equals zero t o approximately
1250
DDC below 18°C because of a lower internal temperature of 13OC.Determination of the
Enerm
Norm forNew Buildin&s
The energy norm for a gPven building should be expressed In terms of energy d e l i v e r e d t o the building
since
this metered energy can be comparedt o rhe calculated norm. Thus, account must be caken of the seasonal
eEEiciencies of t h e various itma of conversion equipment, which can be taken as 100% €or e l e c t r i c i t y bat only about 70X or less for o i l or g a s .
Heating requirements can be met using gas, o i l , or electricity, but e l e c t r i c i t y is used almost exclusively for a l l other requf renwnts. Heating is required For domestic hot water and the g w i d n g pool in addition to the apartment and garage heatlng, so t b calculated energy requirement for rhese items must be divided by the seasonal efficiency
of
theconversion
equipmeneto dertve an energy norm i n terms o f delivered energy,
The energy norm for a given b u t l d l n g can be obtained by determining t h e energy requirement for its various components {from Table 2), dividing each by the appropriate seasonal efficiency of the equipment and adding the resulting quotients. An example of the use of t h i s is given in Table 3,
Table
4 g i v e s
the energy consumptfan norms for the model building inseveral locations i n Canada both wlth e l e c t r i c heat: and w f t h o i l or gas
heat. Comparing the values for recorded energy consumption glven in Table 1 wlth the n o r m f o r t h e Location shaws t h a t t h e minimum v a l u e s are o f t e n
lower, indicating that; the norms are reasonably attainable. On the locller hand, the average values are well above the norms in most cases, indtcatlng
that a considerable amount of energy c o d d
b~
saved i f all. hutldings w e r ebu-flt t o the n s m , The exception to this is the average masumption of the e l e c t r i c a l l y heated Ontario Rousing Corporation buildings in Ottawa. These buildings do nor have garages and the supply and exhaust ventilation faos are operated for a total of m l y n i n e hours p e r day, with an additional low
temperature shut-off- Wbile by no means Xdentical, this is similar t o
Variation 4 i n Appendix l3, where the bathroom exhaust runs continuously but the c o r r t d o r supply and the kitchen exhaust operate for a t o e a 1 nf six: hoar:: per day. Under Montreal weather condlt$ons, that v a r i a t i o n saved 2 1 - 6
GJ/(Apt-a) relative to the norm where the fans run cantCnuousLy. D e d u c t i n g
t h i s savFng, and the
8.4
GJ/(Apt-a) required to heat one garage space per apartment, from the norm of 76 GJ/ ( ~ ~ t ; - a) f o r an e l e c t r t c a l l y heatedb u l l d i r ~ g in Montreal gives a f i e M norm of 46 GJ/(Apt*a), which I s less than the consumptlon of a l l but three of the O t t a w a buildings. OtLawa has 4674 Degree Days Celsius and Montreal
4472,
ENERGY CONSERVATION IN EXISTING RUTWIHGS
In
e x i s t i n g buildings, thereare
many more factors that cannot reasonably be changed, compared t onew
buildings. The p o t e n t i a l forreducing energy consumption in existing buildings was investigated by
artalyaiug the
four
apartment buildings considered in thfs study to determine the effect on energy consumption of changes in operating pracedures and minor changea in equtpment. Such changes included time scheduling and rebalancing the ventilation system, reducing the temperature and t l m escheduling Che recirculation of domestic hot watrer, i n s t a l l a t i o n of law flow
shower heads and faucet aerators, reducing the garage temperature and the lightlng of p u b l i c space-
The results of the various analyses (Appendix A) fndicated
that
energyconsumption of the b u i l d i n g could be reduced by between 8 and 14% through
the implementation of
l o w
cost measures. Some i n d i v f d u a l measures gave savings of over 20%. Purther analysis of the e f f e c t s of modifications to the v e n t i l a t i o n system (Appendix B) showed that greater savings are possible but at greater cost, and not a l l of these modifications are possible withany given building, Actual target values of energy consumption €or existing b u i l d i n g s have not been determined and i t may not be p o s s i b l e to d e t e r m i n e
representative values because o f the great variation 111 f a c t o r s tllat can
reasonably be changed in e x i s t i n g b u i l d i n g s . There are, however,
substantial energy savings t o be made by implementing energy conserving
procedures which can be fdentified
by
making an energy audit of the building.1, A.H. Elrdahdy. Annual Energy Consumptf.on Data of Apartmat: Buildings,
N a t i ~ n Z i l Research Council of Canada, Division o f Building Research, Buildfng Rsearch Note Wo. 181, Ottawa, 1982.
2, Measures For Energy Conservation i n New Bulldings 1978, Associate Committee on the N a t i o n a l Ruildtng Code, National Research Council
of
Canada, fittawa, 1978. W C C Nn. 16.574.
3 . Slone, C h a l i f o u r , Marcotte, et A s s . , 4 Srudy of the E f f e c t s of S o m e Parameters on
the
Energy ConsumptLon of Apartment Buildings. Preparedfor National Research Counctl of Canada, Division of Building Research, O t t a w a , 1980.
4. J.K. Latta- A Field Study of Infiltration-Induced Variati,ona in the Heating of Apartments, National Research Council of Canada, D i v i s i o n of B u i l d i n g Research, Building Research Note
No.
202, Ottawa.5. L- Jones. The Analyst as a Factor in the Prediction af Energy
knsrmop t i o n . Second International CII Symposium on Energy Conservation in the Built Environment. Copenhagen, 1979. 313-321. NRCC 18488.
4 . Energy Conservation ImpLLcations a f Master Metering, Vnlume 1 6 2.
Y I d w e s t Research K n s t Ltutc, October 1975.
7. Ontario R e s i d e n t t a l and Commercial Energy Demand Study, Ontario Ministry
of Energy, Toronto, 1978.
8 . How you U s e the Energy you Use, Conserve Energy Publication, Ontario Hydro, O t t a w a , 1976.
9. C.Y. Shaw and
G.T.
Tamura. The Calcu1a.tfon of Air Infiltration RatesCaused by Wind and Stack Action of T a l l Buildings, National Research
TABLE I . SUMMARY
OF
RECORDED ENERGY CC)NSUHBTIOH OFAPARTMENT BU I LDXNGS
Energy Consump tion
Sample
CJ/
( A p t - a)Group Size Maximum Minimum Average
Ontargo Boustng 1975
Corporation (Toronto] 1976 1977 1978
O n t a r i o Hydro
Apartments (~ontreal Area) Ontario Housing 197
7
Corporation (Ottawa) 13
1978
l ~ e e Discussion.
TABLE 2. COMfONENT ENERGY RBQUXRIEMEMTS
Tenant Use
Lights
,
cooking, appliances domes ti^ hot waterBuilding Services Canstants
1
tghting, motors, etc.swimming pool requiremnc
Variable with number of apartments
SO Apartments 12.6 G J / ( A p t - a )
100 Apartments
10.8
~ ~ / ( A p t = a )200 Apartments 7.9
G J / ( A ~ ~ - ~ )
300 Apartments 6.8 GJ/(Apt* a)
400 Apartments 6.5 G J / ( ~ p t * a )
Intermediate values can be o b t a i n e d
by interpolation
Heating Requirements
ApartmenL [U.0085 X (DDC)] GJf(Apt0a)
Garage
[0.0026
X (DDG)-
3 - 2 4 ] GJ/(Car space=a) DDC = Degree Days C e l s i u s below 18°CTABLE 3. EXAMPLE
The energy norms Eot the model building
in
Montreal with 231 apartmntsand one garage space per apartment, but: without a s w i d n g p o o l , can be
computed as fallows, both for an a l l electric building and for a gas heated
building, assuming a seasonal efficiency of 70% for the gas f f r e d e q u i p e n t .
Energy Requirement
G J I
( A p t a) Electric Hen t Gas Heat Tenant U s eB
ui lding S e r v i c e s Lights, etc Mot water 180 Const. = - = 0.8 23 1Variables (by interpolatton) = 7.6
%eatfng - Apartment 0.0085 x
4472
= 38.0 ( % 0 , 7 ) = 54.3-
Garage (0.0026 x4472)-3.24
= 8.4 ( + O . f ) = 12.0 -.Total 75.5 99.3
'rhRLE 4. ENERGY CONSUMPTION N O W FOK TiiE MODEL APARThfENT BUILDING*
DDC G J I ( A p t - a)
ALI Electric O i l or Gas Heating
Vancouver 3005 Edmonton 5590 Regina 5 9 2 1 WFnnipeg 5887 Toronto 6082 Montreal
4472
Fredericton 4899 Iia 1 i f ax 4 123 Charlt~ttetown 4623 St. John's 4802 - (70Z eff .) 76The energy consumption of any building is a£ fected by a number of factors: weather, materials used fn its construction, type of mechanical and electrical s y s t e m installed, number of hours of occupancy during whf c h condftioned space I s necessary, nrethod of operation, and quality oE
maintenance. Same of these the designer can control, others he cannot. The effect of this great variety of factors is
shown
in
the repartedenerw consmption of about 200 apartment buildings across Canada, which had
energy consumptions ranging from 305 GJ/ [Apt. a) t o 39 GJ/ (Apt. a). With such
a variation, the effect
oE
any one variable on actual energy consumptioncould not be determined by examining existing consumptions; computer
evaluation of the effect of selected variables
was
necessary. However, results obtained using existing calculation procedures vary widely, both with the analysis program, kcause of d i f f e r e n t program subroutines, andwlth the analyst because oE differences i n judgement as to the cfirrect inplit: values. The energy aaalysis program used to derive the energy coosumpelon formulae was "calibrated" by matching the calculated energy consumptions of
our buildings with
their
measured cansmptions, as determined from their b i l l i n g s . Then with designer-selected factors held constant, climatic d a t a and building s i z e could be varied to study t h e i r effect on the total energyconsumption of a model bullding.
It
was assumed that the way these factorsaffected the energy consurrrption of a model bufldtng t y p i c a l of most new
buildings in i t s d e s i g n and operation, would also Indicate the way they would affect the enerm consumption of any n e w building.
The procedure then was to select four extstfng apartr~ent b u i l d i n g s with knawa energy cansumptiom and to simulate their performance using the
Meriwether Energy Systems Analysis program. Because documentation of
operational procedures was, at b e s t , minimal, it was
d l £
ficuft t o simulate the actual manner in whlch the bufldings were operated. I& m e s t : cases,o p e r a t i n g procedures were determined by c l o s e examination of the data given by the operator and any discrepancies were discussed w i t h him. Where data were n o t available, a reasonable method of operation was assumed.
Attempts were also made to match the monthly energy consumption. Thls
proved d i f f i c u l t as w e l l , and may have been due in p a r t to actual energy
consumption values n o t being recorded on the calender months. Some
adjustment t o them became necessary* When the c a l c u l a t e d annual consumption
was within 5% OE that retarded, and any major v a r i a t i o n s in monthly values
could n o t he eliminated by further crlnputation because of the impassibtl-lty nf determtolng appropriate i n p u t v a l u e s , the program l r ~ p u t s Mere c o n s i d e r e d
acceptable.
The characteristics
of
over 400 buildings were reviewed to select one af the four buildings as a model b u i l d i n g . It was concluded that an average 0'1: typical building wouldbe
of 14 or 15 storeys in height with 11 or 12bedroom and
6Z
three bedroom. None of the four buildings f i t t e dthis
d e s c r i p t i o n exactly but one of them, alkhmgh of 2 1 storeys, was reasonably close. Since the s i z e of the building was to be varled during the course
of
the study by changfng the height, t h i s was nota
serious concern, andwith
some adjustment in the layout of the apartments,i e
was dhosenas
the model building, Where the curoputer inputs d i d not already coasply with thecequt rements of the Measures for Energy Conservation
in
New ~uildings l,
theywere modified as
if
the building d i d conform. Further analyses of the modelb u i l d i n g were made to determine the ef Eects of changes in c l i m a t e and s i z e
an its energy requirements.
The energy requf remnts of the building were separated into four categories: tenant use, b u i l d i n g services, apartment: heating and garage heating. Tenant use includes all electrical energy for lfghting, cooking,
telev&sien and small appliances, and energy used for domestic water. To select a r e a l i s t i c average value for tenant electrical use, the i n d i v i d u a l e t e c t r i c t t y constunptlans for one buildlng with individual lwtering w e r e
examLi~ed and reports artd publications oE t h e Midwest Reseprch 1nstltute6, the Ontario Minis t r y of energy7, and Ontario ~ y d r o ~ were consulted.
Building serflees Include f i g h t h g of lobby, corridor, exterior and p u b l i c spaces, laundry facilities, e l e v a t o r s , pumps, supply
aud
exhaust fans.A p a r t m n t heating includes the heating required t o offset transmission and infiltration loads as well as energy used t o condition the a f c supply to the
corridor, The garage load includes
r k
t o t a l energy consmed by the heating, ventilating and llghting of the garage,The energy consumption of a building is normally given in term!$ of the
energy d e l i v e r e d t o the h l l d i n g , s i n c e this is what is recorded at the meter. This quantity will vary n o t only wlth the construction of the
building but with the type of conversion equipment used, particularly the heating equipment. Buildings that are otherwise i d e n t i c a l will require dffferent quantities of d e l t v e r e d energy depending upon whether they use
e l e c t r i c i t y for heating as opposed t o oil or gas, because of their dtfferent conversion efficiencies within the buildlrtg. To overcoue t h i s problem in the development of energy narms, the required output of the conversion
equipment, rather than the fnput, was conputed. S u i t a b l e adjustment Eactors could then be applLed t o the hearing requirements ta allow Enr the
efffciency of the equipmedt.
A major p o r t i w of the heating requirement of a building is that needed to heat the ventilation and infiltration a i r passing
through
it. The effect of infiltration on the heating requirement was s t u d i e d theoretically using mthematical equations developed for off ice bulldings9 but w i t h correctionsa p p l i e d for relatively leaky walls w i t h openable wi~~dows and ttghter tnterior d i v i s i o n s . In addition, a f i e l d study considered variations
in
heating requirements with height4
.
It was concluded that infiltrationinduced by stack effect and d u d pressures was overridden by the demands of
the bathroom and kitchen exhaust fans. Thus the quantity
of
a i r passingthrough an apar.t:mnt
is
controlled by the v e n t i l a t i o n system and is notAttention was
then
directedtowards
the possible energy savlngs thatc w l d be made
by rrodifyingthe
supply and exhaust ventilation system. The results of this studyare
given in Append-Lx B. Theyare
not incorporated in the heating requirements used inthe
d e t e w i n a t l a n of the enerm swrces, since such variationsfrom
the basic v e n t i l a t i o n system are not common,The model building, with its basic ventLlation system of an air supply
of 35 L/s to the corridor and a total exhaust from the apartments of 7 1 L/S, was then used to examfne the energy requirements under the weather
conditions of Vancwver, Saskatooa, Montreal and S t . John's, N f l d . The computer inputs were adjusted for each location in conformity w i t h the r e q u i r e n t s of the Measures2. The height of the bulld3ng was a l s o varied between
7 and 35
storeys at each location.P i n a l l y , the p o t e n t i a l for energy conservation in existing apartment
buildings was investigated by analysing the effects of reasonable changes that could lx implemented
In
the original four buildings. This w a s done under Montreal weather canditions only. The results are given in T a b l e sA1
TABLE AL Reductions in Energy Cansumption as a Result of Low Cost Enerey Conservation Pieasures.
Six
Storey Building, 142 Apartments,Montreal.
Cooservation measures implemented
1. Domestic hot water temperature reduced from 51°C t o 46°C 2. Domestic hot water recirculation shut o f f from
11:W
p.m. -7:00 a . m ,
3, Central kitchen exhaust fans run only from
7:3Q
-
9:30 a . m . , 11:00 a.m. - 1:00 p . m . , and 4 ~ 4 0-
4:30 p.m.4. C e n t r a l t o l l e t exhaust Eans s h u t o f f Prom L1:00 p.m. - 7 : 0 0 a - m , Usage Tenant But l d i n g services Heating apartment Garage As found, modif i c a t i a n s
,
GJI
( ~ p t - a ) G J / ( A P ~ * ~ ) X reduction TotalTABLE A2 Reducttons in Energy Cansumption as a Result of L w C o s t Energy
Cowervation Measures. 21 Starey Building, 252 Apartmnts, M n t real.
Conservation measures implemented
1. Domestic hot
water
temperature reduced from 54'C t o 46'C2 . Domeetic hot water recirculation shut off from
1l:OO
p.m. - 7 : 0 0 a.m.3. Toffet exhaust fans
shut
off from midnight to 6 : 0 0 a.m.4,
Kitchen exhaust fans shut off from 9:00 p.m.-
7:CQ
a . m .5. Corridor supply fan shut o f f from 9 : 0 0 p.m.
-
7:00 a.m.6 . Kitchen exheast rebalanced to 35 L/S per apartment from
47
L/sp e r apartment
7. Corrido=' supply reduced t o
24 L/S per
apartment from 35 L/S perapartment
8 . Swimmiag pod1 supply untt shut off from 10:00 p.m.
-
9:30 a.m.9,
Swimming pool exhaust fan controlled with a humidistatLO.
Corridor, lobby and exterlor lighting reduced by 15% 11. Garage temperature reduced from 21°C to 1OUC.Usage Building services Resting apartment Garage After As found modifications
TABLE
A3
R~ductions inEnergy C o ~ ~ s m p t i b b as a Result ofLOW
Cost: Energy Conservation Measures4 23 Storey Building, 252 A p a r m n t s , Montreal.Conservation measures implemented
I . Domestic hot water temperature reduced from 60°C to 46°C
2. Domestic hot water recirculation shut off from 11:QO p.m.
-
7 : 0 0 a.m.3. Central kitchen exhaust fans
run
only from 7:30-
9:30 a . m . ,11:OQ a.m.
-
2:OQ p.m. and 4 : 3 0-
7:30 p.m.4. Central t o i l e t exhaust fans shut off from midnight to 7 : 0 0 a . m .
5 . Corridor supply operated on same time schedule as kitchen
e x h a ~ s t f a n s
6 . Corridor supply reduced to 24 L / s per apartment f r o m 35 L/S per apartment
7.
S w i d n g pool exhaust fan controlled with a humidistat8. Corridor, lobby and exterior lighting reduced by 1SX 9 . Garage temperature reduced from 21°C t a 1O0C1
Usage Tenant Ruildlng services Heating apartment Garage Total As found GJ/(Apt*a) Mter modifications GJ/(Apt*a) % reduction
TABLE
A4
reduction^ i n Energy Consumption as a Result of Low Cost EnergyConservation Measures. 10 Storey Building, 227 Apartments, Montreal.
Conservation measures implemented
1. Domestic hot water temperature reduced from 60°C to 46°C
2. Doraestic hot water recirculation shut off from 11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m.
3. Central kitchen exhaust fans run only from 7:30
-
9.30 a . m . , 11:OO a . m .-
2:00 p.m. and 4:30-
7:30 p.m.4. Central toilet exhaust fans ,shut off from midnight to
7:QO
a . m .5. Garage temperature reduced fr- 21°C to 1 0 ° C -
Usage Tenant Building services Heating apartment Garage As found GJ/ (Apt a) After modifications G J / ( A ~ ~ * a) X reduction
REDUCTIONS I N ENERGY CONSUMPTION
IN
TKE MODEL BUILDINGLOCATED
IN
MONTREAL AS A RESULT OF CHANGES TO THEVENTILATIOM
SYSTEMThe vent2lation system in the model building supplied fresh air to the
corridors at a rate of 35 L / S per apartment and exhausted stale a i r from the
kltchen and bathroom of each apartment a t a cmbined rate of 71 L/s. The
difference of 36 L / s per apartment is considered to be mde up by infiltra-
tlan. Various changes to this basic method of ventTlat1on were fnvestigated t o determine t h e i r effect on the energy c o n 8 u q t i o n
of
the building.Basic Case
S u p p l y to the corridor of 35 L/S running for 24 hours per day. Exhaust from che k i t c h e n of 47 L / s and the bathroom of 24 L/S running for 24 hours p e r day.
Variation 1
As per the basic case, with the addlrion of an air-to-air heat
exchanger with a 50X efficiency to preheat
the
supply a i r .Variation 2
As per the basic case, but with the exhaust discharging into the garage, which I s maintained at 13°C.
Variation 3
Supply t o the corridor reduced to 28 L / s per apartraent and exhausts from the kitchen and bathroom reduced to 38 L/S and 19 t / a per apartment tespect i v e l y
.
Variation b
As per the basic case, w i t h time scheduling of the corridor supply and k i t c h e n exhaust so that, they run far a t o t a l of fi hours per day. The t o i l e r exhaust ran continuously
-
Variation 5
Supply t o the corrldor &f 17 L/S per apartment running continuously- Exhaust froa the kitchen and bathroom with small individual fans operating on demand only, i . e., when the room was occupied.
RESULTS
Variation Saving, GJ/(Apt*a)
1 8.6
.2 7 - 9