The
productivity
P, i.e. numbevof piglets
weanedper
sow andper
year, estimatedby
progres- sivemultiple regression
from the variables, isexpressed by :
x l
= mean
prolificacy,
x 2
= losses from birth to
weaning (p. 1 ( 0 ),
x 3
=
w!caning-conccption
interval(days),
X 4
-
weaning
age(days).
Thus, the
gain
of onepiglet
weaned per sow and per year can be obtained in thefollowing
way :- either
by increasing
theprolificacy by o.;j8 piglet
at birth- or
by reducing,
either the losses from birth to
weaning by
!.9 p. 100or the
weaning-conception
intervalby
io.9days
or the age at
weaning by
io.9days.
For one week
gained
at eachreproductive cycle,
the numericalproductivity
isimproved by 0.6! piglet.
Theimprovement
ofpiglet production depends
on a series of coherent measures and thepossible margin
of progress remainslarge
in the Frenchpig
herds.Effects of month of farrowing, litter order and genetic type of the mother
onthe components
of
sowproductivity in French farms
C.
LEGAULT, J.
DAGORN* D. TASTUStation de
Génétique quantitative
etappliquée,
I. N. R. A., C. N. R. Z., 7835ù.1 ouy
en.1 osas
* Institut
technique
duPorc, 149,
rue del3ercy,
7557.9 Paris Cedex 12Data collected in French farms were
analysed
in order to estimate the effects of month offarrowing,
litter order andgenetic type
of the female on thecomponents
of sowproductivity.
In the first
study, 17 6 6 01
litters were classifiedaccording
to their month of birth( 12 levels),
litter order
( 7 levels)
andgenetic type
of the sow( 4 levels)
and submitted to a least squares ana-lysis.
Thegreatest
litter sizes at birth were observed inJanuary ( 0 . 2 6 piglet
more per litter than inJuly
andAugust) ; Inversely,
thegreatest
litter sizes atweaning corresponded
to birth inJune (
0 .
34 piglet
more per litter than inDecember). Weaning-conception
interval was mdays longer
when
farrowing
tookplace in June
ascompared
tofarrowing
in December. Moreover, this interval wasdays longer
inprimiparous
than inmultiparous
sows.In the second
study,
21 m litters were classifiedaccording
to herd(88 levels),
litter order(6 levels)
andgenetic type
of the sow(Large
White,Large
White XLandrace,
Landrace XLavge
White and
Landrace)
and submitted to the sameanalysis
aspreviously.
At least twogenetic types
were
represented
in each herd. Heterosis effect was estimatedby
the relativesuperiority
of theaverage of the two
reciprocal
crossesrelatively
to the average of theparental
breeds. The hete- rosis effect was : 3, 4, 18 and 6 p. 100respectively
for litter size atbirth,
atweaning, weaning conception-interval
and numericalproductivity
of the sow(number
ofpiglets weaned/sow/year).
Differences between
reciprocal
crosses were low. Theweaning-conception
interval was almostindependent
of the litter size(v
= —0 . 03 )
and veryslightly
associated with lactationlength (v
= —0 . 0 6).
Productivity of sows in France
as affected by housing conditions, equipment of farrowing pens and age
at weaning
A. AUMAITRE,
J. M.
PEREZJ.
CHAUVEL*Station de Recherches sur
l’Élevage
des Porcs, I. N. R. A., C. N. R.Z.,
78350
Jouy
enJosas
*Institut
technique
duPorc, 149,
vue deBercy,
75579 Paris Cedex 12Two series of data were used in this
study :
the first one concernedperformance recordings
of 247
4 6 2
litters ofpiglets
born between19 6 5
and 1973 in allregions
of France and the second oneproceeded
from the results of the Nationalcomputerized
programme foranalysis
of on-the-farmsow records
concerning performances
of 2y 130 litters born between 1969 and 1974.Mean losses of
piglets ( 2 . 13 piglets
lost per litter between birth andweaning,
calculated from135 5
o8 data) represent ig,8
p. roo of the total number of animals born(ro,8 piglets/litter).
Theselosses reach a maximum in
badly
heat conditionedfarrowing
houses( 2 . 27
per litter in huts heated withlamps,
z.y infarrowing
houses withoutlamp heating
and 2.03 infarrowing houses
heated withlamps). Among
all devices used for the internalarrangement
of the pens, thefarrowing
railappears to be the less favourable
system ( 2 . 30 piglets lost)
and thataccording
to which the sowsare blocked or attached, the most favourable one
( 2 . 03 piglets
lost perlitter).
These resultsempha-
size the
importance
of the efforts to be made withrespect
to intevnalavvangement
and thermicprotection
offarrowing
houses.The mean age at
weanivcg
of thepiglets
hasregressed
from 61days
in19 6 5
to3 8 days
in 1973, i. e. a mean reduction of 3.7days
per year. Inaddition,
for theperiod 19 6 9 - 1974
taken as a whole, one fourth of the litters observed was weaned before 31days, indicating
a very marked trend towards veryearly weaning
ofpiglets
in thepractice
of Frenchpig production.
This trendis
particularly
clear inlarge
herds(ioo
sows andmore).
The interval between
weaning
andconception
isgenerally abnormally long ( 22 days).
Thisinterval is
excessively lengthened ( 45 days)
in the case of tooearly weaning
before idays
or too lateweaning
after the age of 5odays (i
p. roo of the sows are not fertilized 2months after wea-ning).
On the otherhand,
thepercentage
of fertilized animals idays
afterweaning
varies little(68
p. 100 on anaverage)
forweanings
between 16 and ¢gdays.
The age at
weaning
has avcry small (but active)
influence on the litter sÓ’ : thus, the meannumber of weaned