HAL Id: jpa-00246580
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00246580
Submitted on 1 Jan 1992
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Transport properties of the isostructural organic conductors Cu(L)I with itinerant charge carriers
strongly coupled to Cu2+ localized spins
G. Quirion, M. Poirier, C. Ayache, K. Liou, B. Hoffman
To cite this version:
G. Quirion, M. Poirier, C. Ayache, K. Liou, B. Hoffman. Transport properties of the isostructural organic conductors Cu(L)I with itinerant charge carriers strongly coupled to Cu2+ localized spins.
Journal de Physique I, EDP Sciences, 1992, 2 (5), pp.741-751. �10.1051/jp1:1992177�. �jpa-00246580�
Classification
Physics
Abstracts72.20M 72.15Q 75.20E
Transport properties of the isostructural organic conductors
Cu(L)I with itinerant charge carriers strongly coupled to Cu2+
localized spins
G.
Quirion (I),
M. Pointer(I),
C.Ayache (2),
K. K. Lieu(3)
and B. M. Hoffman(3)
(')
Centre de Recherche enPhysique
du Solide,D6partement
dePhysique,
Universit6 deSherbrooke, Sherbrooke,
Qu6bec,
JlK2Ri, Canada(2)
D6partement
de Recherche Fondamentale de la Matibre Condens6e, Laboratoire deCryophysique,
C-E-N-G., 38041 Grenoble, France(3)
Department
ofChemistry
and Materials Research Centre, NorthwestemUniversity,
Evanston, Illinois 60201, U-S-A-(Received
16 October J991,accepted
infinal form
J3 January 1992)Abstract- We report the microwave and transport
properties
of the isostructuralorganic
conductors
Cu(L)I
(L =phthalocyanine ~pc), tetrabenzoporphyrinato (tbp), triazatetrabenzopor- phyrinato (tatbp)).
In thesecompounds
themagnetic
moments (S=1/2)
of the Cu2+ ions arefound to be
strongly coupled
to the conduction electrons which results in dramatic effects on the transport properties. Whereas the conductivity at room temperature is found to be metallic, it decreasesby
several orders ofmagnitude
below 100 K and shows alarge positive magnetoconduc- tivity.
These effects are discussed in terms ofscattering
of the free carriersby
the localizedspins (Cu2+,
S =1/2). At low temperatures(T«10
K), we have also observed that the microwaveconductivity
is enhancedrelatively
to the dc one and itgenerally
decreases with themagnetic
field ; over the same temperature range the dielectric constant increases with the field. These effects at low temperature are rather believed to be related to a new relaxafiion mechanism between the chain of localized and the itinerantspins.
I. Introduction.
The
study
ofquasi-one-dimensional organic
conductors has revealed a widevariety
ofinteresting
features in thepast
few years(Peierls distortion,
CDW andSDW).
Anothermajor
advance inorganic
metal research came with the stabilization of asuperconducting
state in the(TMTSF)2X
salts(X
=
PF~, ASF~, Cl04, etc.) [Ii
and morerecently
in theorganic family (BEDT-TTF)~X (X
=Re04, I~, Cu(SCN)2) 12-4]. Although
the search forhigh
criticaltemperature (high-T~) superconductors
is the maingoal
in theinvestigation
oforganic conductors,
it is worthwhile to draw attention toorganic
conductors which exhibit some unusualproperties. Among them,
the(perylene)~ M(mnt)~ (with
M=
Pt, Pd) family [5, 6]
has got its own
reputation
due to thepossibility
ofhaving
a ID electron gascoupled
to a chain of localizedspins (S
=
1/2).
In thesecompounds,
it has beenproposed
that thespin-Peierls
distortion observed on the
M(mnt)2
stacks induces a metal-insulatorphase
transition on theperylene
stacks.Cu(pc)I (copper phthalocyanine iodide) [7]
is anotherexample
of a ID electron gascoupled
to a chain of local moments
(S
=
1/2).
The main difference between thiscompound
and theperylene
salts is that forCu(pc)I
the itinerant and localizedspins
are both on the same stack.Although
themagnetic
and EPR measurements[7-9]
have revealed that the localspins
on theCu2+ sites are
strongly coupled
to the conduction holes associated with the pcring,
no metal- insulatorphase
transition is observed. However thisstrong coupling
seems to have dramatic effects on the transportproperties
whereas theconductivity
is found to be metallic down to 100K,
it decreasesby
several orders ofmagnitude
at lowertemperatures II 0]. Moreover,
thepositive magnetoconductivity
observed at lowtemperatures suggests
that thishuge
conduc-tivity drop
results from amagnetic scattering
processinvolving
the local moments. This assertion is alsosupported by
theconductivity
measurements realized on theCu~Nii _~(pc)I alloys ill -13].
In thesecompounds,
where a fraction of theparamagnetic
Cu2+(S
=
1/2)
ionsare
replaced by diamagnetic
N12+(S
=0) ions,
it has been shown that theconductivity
maximum is shifted toward lower temperatures as the local moment concentration x is
reduced. In these unusual
conductors,
new types ofphenomena
are also observed at lowertemperatures (T~BK).
Forexample,
thedisappearance
of the EPRsignal
without any associated loss ofparamagnetism [8]
coincides with the enhancement of the microwaveconductivity (16.8 GHz)
relative to the dc measurement[12].
These anomalies have therefore been ascribed to a newtype
of relaxation mechanism between the free carriers and the localmoments mediated
by
the RKKY interaction(Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yoshida).
Although
wealready
know thatCu2+
local moments areresponsible
for thepeculiar physical properties
observed forCu(pc)I
andCu~IQij _~(pc)I ill, 12],
more information is needed to characterize thephysical
parameters involved in thesephenomena.
Inparticular
itwould be
interesting
to estimate the relevance of the Cu-Cuspacing
on the observedproperties.
This has beenpartly
done inCujNii _~(pc)I compounds [I1, 12]
where the mean Cu-Cu distance could beeasily
varied upondoping.
Anotherpossible
way ofdoing
this is tostudy
isostructuralcompounds
likeCu(L)I
in which the latticeparameters
can bechanged
via the modification of theligand (L). Fortunately,
the chemicalflexibility
of theporphyrin macrocydes provides
thisopportunity. Up
to now, three variants of theporphyrinic
skeleton have been examined for this purpose,tbp (tetrabenzoporphyrinato),
pc(phthalocyanine)
andtatbp (triazatetrabenzoporphyrinato) macrocycles [14, 15].
In this paper we report the
transport properties (thermoelectric
power, dcconductivity
and microwaveconductivity
16.8GHz)
of the isostructuralcompounds Cu(L)I (L
=
tbp, tatbp, pc)
as a function oftemperature.
We also present the microwaveconductivity
and dielectricconstant as a function of
magnetic
field.Although
that some of the results obtained forCu(pc)I
andCu(tatbp)I
have beenpublished
in some extentpreviously [10-13,
17,27],
its inclusion in the present paper is suitable as we wish to present a survey of the transportproperties
within thefamily.
The results found in these isostructuralcompounds
reinforce the trend foundpreviously
in theCu~Nii_~(pc)I alloys [I Il.
The metallic character of thesecompounds
isclearly
established and themagnetic scattering
of carriersby
local moments is confirmed. Alarge positive magnetoconductivity
is measured for allcompounds
andfrequency
effects are observed at lowtemperatures.
As for theCu~Nii _~(pc)I alloys [I II,
thesepeculiar properties
are discussed in terms of itinerant-localizedspins
interaction and indirectexchange
interaction between local moments which seems to beextremely
sensitive to Cu-Cu distance.2. Structural and
magnetic properties.
The
magnetic properties
of theCu(L)I organic
conductors~L
= pc,tbp
andtatbp)
arealready
well documented
(Nuclear Magnetic
ResonanceNMR,
ElectronicParamagnetic
ResonanceEPR, magnetic susceptibility) [7-9, 16, 17]. Here,
we summarize the earlier structural andmagnetic analyses
realizedby Ogawa
et al.[7-9]
and Liou et al.[17]
in order tohelp
the discussion of the transportproperties.
AllCu(L)I compounds presented
here have been found to be isostructural thenearly planar Cu(L)
molecules form linear metal-over-metal stacksseparated by
linear chains ofIi
ions.Here,
the iodine chainsprovide
thepartial
oxidation
(1/3)
of theCu(L)
stacks to ensure a metallic character. Thecharge
carriersbelong
to the gr molecular orbitals of the
ligand ring (L
=tbp, tatbp, pc)
and theresulting
bandfilling
is
5/6.
Thepeculiar aspect
of thesecompounds
comes from the fact that the center of theligand (L)
isoccupied by
thepararnagnetic
Cu2+ ion(d9,
S =1/2),
whichgives
rise to anarray of localized
spins coupled
to ID electron gas. The coexistence of the itinerant and localizedspins
is confirmedby
themagnetic susceptibility
measurements which show a Curie-Weiss contribution associated with the localized
spins
and atemperature independent
component
(Pauli-like)
X« associated with the itinerant carriers. Down to 10 K the results arenormally
well-fitted tox(T)
=
~~§
~ + x«.(1)
The deduced Curie constant C confirnls that there is
effectively
one S= 1/2
spin
per copperion. The Weiss
temperatures
o whichprovide
an estimation of the Cu-Cu interaction arerespectively (-
4.0 ± 0.IK)
and(-
6.9 ± 0.3K)
forCu(pc)I
andCu(tatbp)I. Moreover,
the NMRspin-lattice
relaxation measurements[9]
indicate that directexchange
interactionbetween Cu
spins (J/k~
~ 0.3K)
is an order ofmagnitude
less than that inferred from thesusceptibility
measurements.Consequently,
it has beensuggested
that thislarge
Cu-Cu interaction arisesprimarily
from indirectexchange coupling
of the RKKYtype.
This result issupported by
the EPRspectrum [12]
which exhibits asingle axially symmetric
line thatpossesses a temperature
dependent g-value (bottleneck regime).
All themagnetic
measure-ments discussed here
clearly
indicate the existence of a strongcoupling
between local anditinerant
spins
in theCu(L)I compounds.
3.
Experimental
and results.3.I THERMOELECTRIC POWER MEASUREMENTS. -The thermoelectric power data were
obtained
using
an apparatus similar to the one describedby
Chaikin and Kwak[18].
Thesamples
were mounted on 17 ~Lm puregold
wires and contacts were madeusing gold paint.
A slowaltemating
temperaturegradient
with a maximumtemperature drop
of I K wasapplied along
the easy conduction axis. Thetemperature gradient
was measured with standardChromel-Au
(0.07-at.f6 Fe) thermocouples.
With thisapparatus,
wedirectly
obtained thethermoelectric power S of the
sample,
the small contribution of thegold
leads(SA~ w I
~LV/K ) [26] being neglected.
As shown in
figure I,
thetemperature dependence
of the thermoelectric power ofCu(tatbp)I
andCu(tbp)I
are very similar ; it exhibits two distinctquasi-linear regions
for T above or below 60 K. ForCu(pc)I,
a linearregion
is also observed athigh temperatures
but contrary to the others it is almost constant below 150 K. We believe that this difference is not intrinsic to the material butlikely
related to the poorquality
of theCu(pc)I crystals.
Visualinspection
of thesecrystals frequently
revealedpurple
reflectionsindicating
the presence ofan
insulating phase Cu(pc).
60
tatbp 50
40 tbp
q~
~ 3Q
w PC
~a
20 p
a a
lo
~ o o
O
loo 200 300
T(K)
Fig.
I. Thermoelectric power as a function of temperature for the isostructuralorganic
conductors Cu(L)I.Cu(pc)I
(D),Cu(tatbp)I
(Zi) andCu(tbp)I
(Q).According
to thetight-binding
bandmodel,
the thermoelectric power of a one-dimensional metal may be derived from the Boltzmannequation
:gr~k(
Tcos
(~rv/2) r,(g)
~
3 e 2
tjj
sin~ (
w v/2
)
~ T(8 )
t~
~~~
where tj is the transfer
integral (4
tj is thebandwidth), k~
and erespectively
the Boltzmann constant and the electroniccharge,
v=
2 p the number of conduction electrons per site
and p the
degree
of oxidation(p =1/3). Finally, r(8)
andr'(8)
arerespectively
thescattering
time and its energy derivative. Thethermopower
dataclearly
indicate that the bandstructure is similar for the three
compounds,
moreover apositive
S value iscompatible
with a5/6 filling
of thegr molecular band. If we
neglect
the contribution fromscattering
(r'Iv ),
a linear fit above 100 K(200
K forCu(pc)I) yields
for thelongitudinal
bandwidth 4 tjj = 1.2 ± 0.IeV,
a valuecommonly
found inorganic
conductors. For the moment, thechange
ofslope
observed around 60K is attributed to the contributionarising
from thescattering
processes r '/r(
e).
3.2 MicRowAvE CONDUCTIVITY. -The microwave
conductivity technique requires
noelectrical contact to the
crystal
and isexceptionally
welladapted
forneedle-shape samples.
These measurements were carried out
using
the standardcavity perturbation technique [19].
A
rectangular cavity operating
at 16.8 GHz is used in aTEio2
transmission mode. Thesample
is located in aregion
of maximum electric field with the needle axis of thesample parallel
to the field. The resonancefrequency
shiftAf/f
and the variation of thequality
factorA(1/2 Q) following sample
insertion are used to determine the microwaveconductivity
anddielectric constant
according
to thequasistatic approximation applied
to anelongated ellipsoid sample [20]. Sample's geometry
and absoluteconductivity
value ensure that the skin-depth regime
was never reached for these threecompounds
at alltemperatures.
In
figure 2,
thetemperature dependence
of the microwaveconductivity (16.8 GHz)
ispresented
for the threeCu(L)I crystals.
The absolute values at 300 K aregiven
in table I ; the lowerconductivity
ofCu(pc)I
isagain
believed to reflect the poorerquality
of thiscompound.
Nevertheless, the
temperature dependence
is very similar for allcompounds
: from 300 K down to atemperature T~,
where a broad maximum isobserved,
theregime
is metallicbelow
T~
theconductivity
decreasesby
orders ofmagnitude
down to atemperature
Tp
below which theconductivity
isnearly
constant. In the samefigure,
the full linecorresponds
to data obtained with amagnetic
field of 8 Teslaapplied perpendicular
to theconducting
axis(transverse magnetoconductivity).
For now on, thesubscript
M and Prespectively
refer to the maximum ofconductivity
and theapparition
of aplateau
on theconductivity
at low temperatures. In the metallicregime (T~ T~),
no measurable mag-netoconductivity
is observed forTp
~ T~
T~,
apositive magnetoconductivity
is observed with anincreasing amplitude going
fromCu(pc)I
toCu(tatbp)I
and toCu(tbp)I.
ForCu(pc)I
the
magnetoconductivity
at 10 K isonly
2 fib, this iswhy
it is not visible infigure 2, compared
to 15 fib for
Cu(tbp)I.
BelowTp,
themagnetic
fielddepresses
theplateau
and shifts it to lower temperatures ; as it will be shownfurther,
themagnetoconductivity
reveals many structures for thistemperature
range.~3
~2
I
~
~~ i u
I 'i
U 10°
cZ
d io~~ T
P
~~-2
~~-3
lo loo 400
T(K)
Fig.
2. Microwaveconductivity
(16.8 GHz) as a function of temperature for the isostructuralorganic
conductors Cu(L)I at two
magnetic
fieldamplitudes
H=
0T
(symbols)
and H=
8T (full line).
Cu(pc)I
(D),Cu(tatbp)I
(Zi) andCu(tbp)I
(Q).3.3 DIELECTRIC CONSTANT.-Tl~e dielectric constant may
only
be measured at lowtemperatures
when theconductivity
hassensibly
decreased. This iswhy
the data shown infigure
3give
the temperaturedependence only
below 20 K. As for theconductivity,
the dielectric constant decreases withdecreasing
temperature and aslope
variation is observed aroundTp.
When amagnetic
field of 8 Tesla(solid
line inFig. 3)
isapplied,
the dielectric constant increases for the threecompounds.
Its appears also that the absolute value of e scales with thecorresponding conductivity (see Tab.1).
Table I. Various parameters extracted
Jkom
the temperaturedependence of
the microwave datafor
the isostructuralorganic
conductorsCu(L)1.
cu(pc)I cu(tatbp)I cu(tbp)I
Cu-Cu 3.213 ± 0.002
distance*
«~oo~ 67 ± 310 ± 10 220 ± 10
«~~ 0.21 ± 0.01 0.75 ± 0.02 1.3 ± 0.I
e~~ 180 ± 10 630 ± 5 300 ± 100
T~
150±20 90±5 83±5Tp
8.0 ± 0.2 6.5 ± 0.2 3.3 ± 0.2TJpR
8 6 ~ 5* See OGAWA M. ei al., Phys. Rev. B 39 (1989) 10682.
4000
/ 1'
a
/~ y
f
l000 ~f~Afli
I &A~
~P I'
O
AA /
~
'i / G(
o°~l'
/ynn° / Tp
n
II
loo
I lo 40
T(K)
Fig.
3. Microwave dielectric constant (16.8 GHz) as a function of temperature for the isostructuralorganic
conductors Cu(L)I at twomagnetic
fieldamplitudes
H= 0 T
(symbols)
H= 8 T (full line).
Cu(pc)I
(D),Cu(tatbp)I
(Zi) andCu(tbp)I
(Q).3.4
FREQUENCY
EFFECTS. -In order to understand the nature of the microwave conduc-tivity,
we compare infigure
4 thetemperature dependence
of the dc and microwave conductivities ofCu(tatbp)I
obtained at 13.5 GHz[from
Ref.[27]]
and 16.8 GHz. Between~~ 3
lo ~
Cu(tatbp)I
) iol
~i
e 10° '
~
10~l '
l
lo-2
lo loo 400
T(K)
Fig.
4. Normalizedconductivity
« (T)/« (300 K) ofCu(tatbp)I
as a function of temperature at tllree differentfrequencies. f
=
27 Hz (---), 13.5 GHz ) and 16.8 GHz (D).
10 K and 300
K,
the two sets of data remain ingood
agreement. However as thetemperature
is further decreased a
large
deviation is observed: the microwaveconductivity nearly
saturates whereas «~~ continues to decrease down to 2 K. The saturation of the microwave
conductivity
isclearly
afrequency effect,
thehigher
thefrequency
thehigher
theconductivity (see Fig. 4).
Similarfrequency
effects are also observed inCu(pc)1 [12]
andCu(tbp)I
andthey
have also been observed in the
Cu~Nii_~(pc)I alloys.
In all thesecompounds
thesharp
departure
of the microwave data from the dc ones occursapproximately
at the temperatureTp.
It is worthwhile to mention here that the anomalous behavior observed in thistemperature
range is also visible on the EPR linewidth whichdiverges [12, 17]
at atemperature T~pR
close toTp.
In tableI,
both temperaturesTp
andT~pR
are listed for theCu(L)I compounds.
All these resultsclearly
establish that theconductivity
maximum iseffectively
related to a transport process for whichmy «
I,
whereas theconductivity
enhancement observed below
Tp
is ascribed to somefrequency dependent
mechanism. Forthese reasons, the data will now be discussed
according
to the two relevanttemperature
ranges, T~
Tp
and T~
Tp.
3.5 MAGNETIC MELD EFFECTS. The microwave
conductivity
has been measured at fixedtemperatures
as a function of themagnetic
field up to 10 Tesla. For the temperature range T ~Tp,
themagnetoconductivity obeys
aH~
power law for the three
compounds.
Anexample
of this is
presented
infigure
5 forCu(tbp)I.
Thiscompound
has been chosen because it shows thelargest positive magnetoconductivity.
The data can be well fitted(solid
line inFig. 5) by
the relation
~"~~~
=
(l
+A~~j (3)
"
(0)
TYwhere
y =
2.1 ± 0.I and A
=
0.24 ± 0.01 K
~/T~.
o.6
o.5
O.4 Cu(tbp)1
(
' O.3
~
$
0.2
o-I
O-o
0 20 40 60 80 loo
H~(Tesla)~
Fig.
5.Magnetoconductivity
Am (H)/« (0) ofCu(tbp)I
as a function of H~ at selected temperatures.T
= 12 K (D), 10 K (m), 8 K (Zi) and 6 (A) the solid lines represent the fit obtained from
equation
(3).We must recall that a similar field
dependence
has been observed for theCu~Nii_~(pc)I alloys [I Ii-
For T~
Tp,
themagnetic
fielddependence
of theconductivity
is not sosimple
since itseems to show many
components.
Forexample,
infigure 6a,
theconductivity
ofCu(tbp)I
at2 K increases at low
field,
decreasesslowly
for H~ 4
T,
reaches a minimum and increasesagain
athigher
fields. The minimum decreases inamplitude
and shifts to lower fields as theio.o
a) Cu(tbp)I
t
b
i.o
O
b) i
% f ~ o So
# aw
2 4 6 8 lo
~esla)
Fig.
6. -Microwaveconductivity
(a) and dielectric constant (b) ofCu(tbp)I
as a function of H at selected temperatures. T = 1.9 K(D),
3 K (m), 4 K (Zi).temperature
is increased. The minimum seems to be the result of twocompeting mechanisms,
thepositive magnetoconductivity varying
withH~
as it is observed for T
~
Tp
and anegative
one at low fields ; the
negative component
isprogressively depressed
eitherby increasing
thetemperature
or the distance between Cuneighbors. Effectively,
this minimum is observed athigher
field inCu(pc)I
andCu(tatbp)I
where the lattice distance is shorter. Infigure 6b,
we also compare the fielddependence
of the dielectric constant. We observe that the dielectricconstant starts to be field
dependent approximately
at the same field as theconductivity
does.This indicates that the microwave data are
probably
not related to ohmic losses as it wasalready pointed
outby
the observation offrequency
effects in thistemperature
range.4. Discussion.
Conductivity
and thermoelectric power measurements indicate that theCu(L)I compounds
have the same band structure. The fact that the
conductivity presents
a non-metallic characterbelow
T~
cannot be related to aphase
transition. The temperaturedependence
of theconductivity
is rather similar to that found inorganic
conductors likeQn(TCNQ)2
and NMP-TCNQ 129]
where it has beenconvincingly
demonstrated that disorder induced localizationleading
to non-metallicconductivity
at lowtemperatures. However,
we have todisregard
thistype
of localization as it cannotexplains
the observation oflarge positive magnetoconductivity
in these
compounds.
We rather believe that this non-metallic behavior is related to thescattering
of free carriersby
Cu~+ local moments(S
=
1/2) along
the chain. The maximum in theconductivity
would then result from thecompetition
betweenphonon
diffusion andmagnetic scattering,
this last mechanismbeing
dominant as the thermal fluctuations arereduced. This assertion is
supported by
EPR and NMR measurements[7-9]
which showed astrong coupling
between free carriers and localizedspins. Moreover, conductivity
measure-ments realized on the
Cu~Nii _~(pc)I alloys
have shown that theconductivity
maximum iseffectively
related to the concentration x of local moments ; the maximum ispushed
to lowertemperatures
as x is reduced[11-13]. Although
the Cu-Cu distance inCu(tbp)I
is notavailable,
the same trend is also observed in theCu(L)I compounds
;T~
decreases as themean Cu-Cu
separation
is increased(see
Tab.I).
If this result isvalid,
we can expect that the lattice parameteralong
the chain inCu(tbp)I
islonger
then the one inCu(tatbp)I
andCu(pc)I.
Themagnetic scattering
is also confirmedby
the observation of apositive magnetoconductivity;
for this case an extemalmagnetic
fieldpartially
freezes thespin degrees
of freedom and therefore reduces thescattering
rate. As shown infigure 2,
amagnetic
field of 8 Tesla has adecreasing
effectgoing
fromCu(tbp)I
toCu(tatbp)I
and toCu(pc)I.
Thisclearly
indicates that thestrength
of themagnetic scattering
mechanism between itinerant and localizedspins
isstrongly dependent
upon the Cu-Cuseparation.
It is very
tempting
to invoke aKondo-type
mechanism in order toexplain
the observation of apositive magnetoconductivity. However,
neither thelogarithmic temperature dependence
nor the
magnetic
fielddependence (HIT
)~ for themagnetoresistivity generally
associated toimpurity
Kondo[21, 22] scattering
are observed in thesecompounds.
In fact the Kondoimpurity scattering
should not be used to fit our data as we aredealing
with concentratedmagnetic
systems.Moreover,
the «localization» of the free carriersby
the presence of localizedspins
must be understood in relation with thedimensionality
of these conductors : one-dimensionalsystems
arenaturally
unstable and RKKYinteraction,
which is inferred from the EPR linewidthII 2],
isexpected
to be moresingular
in one dimension that in threedimensions. For the moment, even if some authors
[23-25]
have studied thecoupling
between localizedspins
and conductionelectrons,
no theoretical result could be used in order toanalyze
ourconductivity
data.At the lowest temperatures
(T
~Tp),
the microwaveconductivity
isfrequency dependent.
Following
therapid
decrease of theconductivity
due tomagnetic scattering,
afrequency dependent plateau
is observed for allcompounds.
As it has been shownagain
forCujNii ~(pc)I alloys
II-13],
thisplateau
seems also to be related to thestrength
of thespin- spin
interaction or to the average Cu-Cuseparation (Tp
decreases withx)
here the sametrend is also observed in the
Cu(L)I compounds (Tp
decreases as the Cu-Cu distance isincreased,
see Tab.I).
In order toexplain
thisfrequency
effect in close relation with the presence of localizedspins,
we invoke theopening
of a new relaxation channel for the free and localizedspins
belowTp.
We may then argue that an efficient energy transfer between bothmagnetic systems
willgive
rise to this relaxation mechanism. Such a mechanism would thenexplain why
theconductivity
and the dielectric constant arehighly magnetic
fielddependent.
This relaxation effect could alsoexplain
the anomalies seen in EPR[12],
I.e. thebroadening
of the linewidth belowTp
and thefrequency dependence
of the g factor. The fact that the EPR linewidth is broaden without any loss ofsusceptibility
indicates that the localizedspins
transfer their energy to the freespins through
this relaxation channel. If this relaxationmechanism can
explain
the anomalies observed in EPR and microwaveconductivity
measurements for T~
Tp,
we can expect that the characteristicfrequency
of this relaxationmechanism must be in the
gigahertz
range(frequency
at which both measurements arerealized).
5. Conclusion.
The
physical picture
thatemerged
from these results is that the localizedspins play
adominant role on the
transport properties
of thesequasi-one-dimensional
conductors.Although
theseorganic
conductors retain theirquasi-one-dimensional
character down to 2K,
the free carriers are, in a sense, « localized »by
the local moments array ; this is confirmedby
the very
large positive magnetoconductivity
observed. Infact,
if one couldapply
astrong enough magnetic field,
one should be able to restore the metallicconductivity.
Such aspectacular
and unusualconductivity
enhancementby
amagnetic
field is believed to be related to thedimensionality
of the system. It is alsoconjectured
that this strongcoupling
between the two
spin
systems isresponsible
for theopening
of a new relaxation channel for temperatures belowTp.
This relaxation channelprobably
mixes the response function of bothspin systems
whichgives
rise to an additional energyabsorption
in the microwave and EPR measurements at thetemperature Tp.
The resultspresented
here also indicate that these newscattering
and relaxation mechanisms are bothextremely
sensitive to the Cu-Cu distance.For the moment, few
things
are known about thetransport properties
of one-dimensional Kondo lattice[23-25]
system. We believe that themagnetoconductivity
resultspresented
herereinforce the trend found
previously
in theCu~Nii_~(pc)I alloys, giving strengthened
evidence for an unusual effect in this
family
oforganic conductors,
that must drive the attention of theoreticians.Acknowledgements.
The authors
acknowledge
fruitful discussions with C. Bourbonnais as well as hishelpful suggestions,
we are alsograteful
to M.Castonguay
for technical support. This work wassupported by
the Natural Sciences andEngineering
Research Council and Fonds de Formation de Chercheurs et d'Aide h la Recherche andby
the Solid StateChemistry Program
of the National Science Foundation Grant No. DMR 8519233.
References
[I] JtROME D. et al., J.
Phys.
Lett. 41(1980)
L95.[2] PARKIN S. S. P, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50
(1983)
270.[3] URAYAMA H, et al., Chem. Lett. 55
(1988).
[4] YAGUBSKII E. B, et al., JETP Lett. 39 (1984) 12.
[5] HENRIQUES R. T. et al., J.
Phys. Colloq.
France 45 (1984) C17-5197.[6] HENRIQUES R. T. et al., J.
Phys. Colloq.
France 47 (1986) C19-4663.[7] OGAWA M. et al., J. Am. Chem. Sac. 109
(1987)
II IS.[8] OGAWA M. et al.,
Phys.
Rev. Lett. 57(1986)
l177.[9] OGAWA M. et al., Jpn. J. Appl.
Phys.
26 (1987) BD4.[10] QUIRION G, et al., J.
Phys. Colloq.
France 49 (1988) C8-1475.[I ii QulRioN G, et al.,
Phys.
Rev. B 43(1991)
860.[12] OGAWA M, et al.,
Phys.
Rev. 839(1989)
10682.[13] QUIRION G. et al.,
Synth.
Met. 41-43(1991)
2653.[14] HOFFMAN B, and IBERS J. A., Acc. Chem. Res. 16
(1983)
15.[15] PALMER S. M, et al., Mol.
Cryst. Liq. Cryst.
125(1985)
1.[16] GODFREY M. R. et al.,
Synth.
Met. 29 (1981) F51.[17] LIOU K. K, et al.,
Inorg.
Chem. 28(1989)
3889.[18] CHAIKIN P. M. and KWAK J. F., Rev. Sci. Jnstrum. 46 (1975) 218.
[19] BURANOV L. I. and SCHEGOLEV I. F., Prib. Tekh.
Eskp.
2 (1971) 171.[20] QmRION G. et al., Solid State Commun. 64
(1987)
613.[21] KONDO J.,
Prog.
Theor.Phys. (Kyoto)
32(1964)
37.[22] KONDO J., in Solid State
Physics,
F. Seitz et al., Eds. 23 (Academic, New York, 1967).[23] DONIACH S.,
Physica
91B (1977) 231.[24] JULIEN R., FIELDS J. N. and DONIACH S.,
Phys.
Rev. B16 (1977) 4889.[25] CARON L. G. and BOURBONNAIS C.,
Europhys.
Lett. ii (1990) 473.[26] BARNARD R. D., in
Thermoelectricity
in metals andalloys (Taylor
& Francis Ltd, London, 1972) p. 192.[27] QUIRION G, et al.,
Phys.
Rev. B 37(1988)
4272.[29] ZUPPIROLI L., in Low-Dimensional Conductors and
Superconductors,
D.J6rome and L.G.Caron, Eds. (Plenum Press, New York and London, 1987) p. 307.
Mathematical Methods for Scientists and
Engineers
Linear and Nonlinearsystems
P. B. KAHN
(Wiley, 1990)
469 pages, £ 43.65.Le lecteur
frangais
risque d'dtre un peusurpris
par ce livre aussi peu formel quepossible
surquelques
m6thodes
math6matiques
couramment (ou mains couramment) utilis6es. Si le niveau du fond del'ouvrage
est bien celui d'un d6but de secondcycle
universitaire ou depremibre
ann6e d'dcoled'ing£nieurs,
aupremier
abord, la forme semblebeaucoup plus
d16mentaire. On peut en retirerl'impression d'apprendre
lesmath6matiques
« sun le tas » tant le texte estparsem6 d'exemples
et d'exercices sans que l'on sache vraiment ok ceux-ci s'arrdtent et okreprend
le cours. Le contenu global lui-aussi vient comforter cetteopinion.
Qu'on enjuge.
Le livre comporte deux parties, ddd16es l'une aux
systbmes
lin£aires et l'autre aux non lin£aires. Lapremibre partie,
plut6t d6structur6e, commence par un brefchapitre
derappels
divers,puis
passe h la th60rie des matrices dans le contexte leplus simple ~pour
les d6monstrations, tout estdiagonalisable),
h la fonction Gamma, h un peud'analyse
lin6aire, h I'£valuation de sommes etd'int6grales,
et se terminesur les
propri6t6s asymptotiques
desdquations
diff6rentielles lin6aires du second orate.Les choses
s'arrangent
dans la deuxi~mepartie,
nettementplus
coh£rente, centrde sur l'6tude des oscillateurs non lin6aires.Aprbs
une introduction sun l'incontoumable oscillateurhannonique,
unint6ressant
dclairage
est donn6 sur la notion de tenure s£culairequi
permet de mieuxcomprendre
les m6thodesd'approximation
£tud16es dans leschapitres
suivants, Poincar6-Lindstedt (ch. 10), moyennage (ch. II), dchellesmultiples
(ch, 12). Le livre se termine sur une introduction h la transition vers le chaos par doublement dep6riode.
Compar6
au mot « m£thode », le mot «technique
» a malheureusement chez nous un sens un peup6joratif.
Je crois pourtant qu'il seraitplus appropri6
en tout cas d£routerait-il moins le lecteurqui,
auvu du titre, pourrait s'attendre h un texte moins « terre h terre
», N6anmoins, je ne crois pas
qu'il
faillepour autant « snober
» ce livre
qui,
d'une part, donne un £clairage 6minemmentpratique
h nombre dequestions
souventplac6es
dans un contexte trop abstrait notamment dons le cursusfrangais
et, d'autre part,r£pond parfaitement
aux besoins de celuiqui,
hors d'un encadrement universitaire, cherche h seformer h la
pratique math£matique indispensable
pour Waiter proprement bien des situations courantesen
physique
et en sciences del'ing6nieur.
Il faut aussi rendrehommage
aux efforts de l'auteur pour faciliter le travail individuel, Sans revenir surl'adaptation remarquable
de la formegrin£rale
del'ouvrage
h cetobjectif,
nous noterons parexemple
que dons la table des matibres,aprbs
le tide dechaque chapitre,
il aplac6
un court r6sum£ des motivations et des r6sultatsqui
y sontd6velopp6s,
oudons la
bibliographie
les ouvrages mentionn£s sont comment£s si bien que l'on salt leur niveau et le type derenseignement qu'on
peut y trouver pourcompl£ter
sa formation.Paul MANNEVILLE.
Journey
intolight.
Life and science of C. V. RamanG. VENKATARAMAN
(Indian Academy
ofSciences, Bangalore, 1988)
570 pages,photographs (black
and white andcolour).
It is a rare
pleasure
to have in your hands a book like this one,providing
athorough
andpassionate
description
of the life and work of one of the mostoutstanding physicists
of this century, Sir C. V.Raman. The controversial temperament of Raman
gives
apiquant
flavor to the book, and its beautiful presentation makes it very attractive to read,The book starts with a brief historical
description
of the birth andgrowth
of Westem Science in India, until the second half of the XIX century, followedby
a summary of Raman'syouth,
He was bom in 1988, in the town of Tiruvanaikkaval, in South India. In his
early
days, heproved
to bea very
bright
student,winning
several awards. He spent four years at thePresidency College
of Madras, where his flare forphysics
started todevelop.
It was also at thisCollege
that hepublished
his first paper,on the
subject
ofunsymmetrical
diffraction oflight,
thusstarting
on one of the fields which would remain of hisprimary
interestthroughout
his life.Chapter
2 of this book describes theseearly
years ofRaman's life,
including
his marriage, in alight
andpleasant
tone, which is also utilized in many other parts of the text, as inChapter
3, where his access and stay at the Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science (IACS), in Calcutta, are sketched,Chapter
4extensively
describes Raman's vast fields of workduring
his stay at Calcutta,starting
with vibrations, musical instruments (violin,piano,
and Indian instruments, like the mridangam, tabla, tambura and veena), andmoving
on toOptics (oblique
diffraction, curvilinear apertures, coronae and halos), and thengradually switching
into morespectroscopic subjects,
likeoptical anisotropy
and Kerr effect, There is a mathematicaldescription by
the author on some of the processes mentioned above, which,although
of interest tospecific
readers, breaks a little the lead andrhythm
of the story for thenon-specialist.
However, these mathematical sections, which appear also in laterchapters
of the book,are
tagged
with asymbol
(*) atbeginning
and end, to facilitate theirskipping by
readers not interested in them,A good
opportunity
isprovided
in thischapter
to remark thechanges
in scientificjargon,
from those days till our present communications. One of Raman'scolleagues,
Chuckerbutti, in a paperdescribing
the diffraction effects which are
responsible
for colours of heated metals, writes « colours start at about a reddish or violettish tint,,, On still furtherheating,
rather at ahigh
temperature, the colour is almost white.,, The colours exhibited at thisrepetition
are very rich and gorgeous.,. », Thisgives
such apleasure
to read, that the author of this book is warmly thanked forpicking
out such pieces of text. Afeeling
of thrill and wonder also arises from thedescription
of some of Raman'slaboratory experiences
:they
carried outapparently simple experiments, by
means of all sort of ready at handequipment
: spare parts of abicycle,
apiece
of wire and anelectromagnet, sunlight
illumination ofoptical
setups. And yet he was able to drawimportant physical
conclusions,explain
facts not yet understood, and make clearadvances in the field.
Chapters
5, 6 and 7 areentirely
dedicated to the Raman effect. Thelaboratory experiences
that led to thediscovery
of thisfeeble scattering,
or scattering with afrequency shift,
as it was first called, are narrated as extracts from the diary of Raman's student (at the time), K. S. Krishan, and are verythrilling
to follow. The author has selected amoving description by Lady
Raman of the Nobel Prize award ceremony in Stockholm, in December, 1930.Whereas the basic
physics
of the Raman effect,given
inChapter
6, seems to appear a bit short on the quantum mechanical basis, and thepolarization
effects remain somewhat unclear, the newphenomena
that have come up after the advent of lasers are very
neatly pictured
inChapter
7.Although they
arewell known, it is worth
recalling
some of the techniques based on the Raman effect when excited bymeans of
high
power lasers : non lineartechniques,
like CARS or SRS (Stimulated RamanScattering),
Raman laser, Raman
microprobe,
and more.Roman's life was never easy. Soon after his great success at the Calcutta IACS, he was forced to leave this institution,
mainly,
as it seems, as a result of the envy he raised on some of hiscolleagues,
withwhom he never
compromised
to avoid confrontations. He then moved toBangalore,
where he wasappointed
Director of the Indian Institute of Science(IISC),
a cosy and easygoing
Institute, where little research wasbeing
done at the time. He wasimmediately
set forchanges, aiming
to convert the IISC intoa center
for
excellence. This led him into several troubles, like theresignation
of two Professors, a severeshortage
of funds, and theopposition
of the establishment, all of themfinally giving
rise to the creation of a Committee, intendedoriginally
to review the situation at IISC, but which inpractice
acted with theobvious purpose of
forcing
Raman out. This waseventually accomplished,
since four years after hisappointment,
Ramanquit
theDirectorship
of the Institute, to continue with his own research as Professor ofPhysics.
All this is described atlength
in the first part ofChapter
8; the second part isendeavoured to the research that he carried out
during
his stay at IISC, until his retirement at 60 years of age.Chapters 9 and 10 describe in detail the Raman-Nath theory, Raman's most
outstanding
research contribution from hisBangalore
times, and the controversy that confronted him and Bom, based on a different theoreticalapproach
to latticedynamics,
in which Raman stood on the wrong side.Chapter
II is a short one, dedicated to the Indian Academy of Sciences, foundedby
Raman, which has so grown with time as to become a successful scientific institutiontoday,
where alarge
deal of Indian researchcontributions are
published
in ten separate themejoumals.
After retirement, he created his own Institute, the Raman Research Institute, also in Bangalore, where he could dedicate himself to research on his favourite
subjects. Unfortunately,
he did not appear to be able toenjoy
this situation all the time, as his moodschanged dramatically,
from acomplete
dedication to science, at the
beginning,
to a stage of reclusion and almosthostility
to the world atlarge,
to
finally
a new change thatbrought
him back full of zest to the task ofeducating
young students andstimulating
them to do science. In this respect, the book collects some excerpts from Raman's radio broadcasts, which touched on many differentsubjects
:physics
for thelayman,
soil, water, sea shells,etc. The
reading
from these broadcasts is veryexciting,
and onceagain
the author is to bepraised
for hisintelligent
selection.Raman was cremated in the
gardens
of his Institute, which he had himselfdesigned,
and that he loveddearly.
Asingle
tree,pictured
in one of the beautiful colourphotographs
of the book, marks theplace
of his cremation, as was his wish.One of this book's
highest
values lies in its constantpledge
in favour of basic research, asubject
which constitutes a permanent struggle betweenpoliticians
of almost any time and country, and the scientificcommunity.
The book includes several pages of Notes, full of anecdotes, which contribute to enliven the text, as well as the manyphotographs
and pictures that areinterspersed
in its pages.Rafael ESCRIBANO.