• Aucun résultat trouvé

Some Further Notes on the Energy-Position/Momentum-Time Uncertainty Expressions for a Non-Relativistic Particle

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Some Further Notes on the Energy-Position/Momentum-Time Uncertainty Expressions for a Non-Relativistic Particle"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02570245

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02570245

Submitted on 11 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Some Further Notes on the

Energy-Position/Momentum-Time Uncertainty Expressions for a Non-Relativistic Particle

Pavle Premovic

To cite this version:

Pavle Premovic. Some Further Notes on the Energy-Position/Momentum-Time Uncertainty Expres- sions for a Non-Relativistic Particle. The General Science Journal, The General Science Journal, 2018.

�hal-02570245�

(2)

1

Some Further Notes on the Energy-Position/Momentum-Time Uncertainty Expressions for a Non-Relativistic Particle

Pavle I. Premović

Laboratory for Geochemistry, Cosmochemistry and Astrochemistry e-mail: pavleipremovic@yahoo.com

Abstract. A brief discussion related to the energy-position and the momentum-time uncertainty relations is presented.

Key words: energy-position uncertainty, momentum-time uncertainty, non-relativistic particle.

We recently introduced [1] the energy-position uncertainty and the momentum-time uncertainty expressions for a non-relativistic particle:

ΔEΔx < ћc (the energy-position uncertainty) … (1) ΔpΔt > ћ/c (the position-time uncertainty) … (2),

where ћ (= h/2π = 1.05 × 10-34 J s)1 is the reduced Planck’s constant, h is the Planck’s constant (6.63 X 10-34 J s), and c (= 2.99792×108 m s-1) is the speed of light. These expressions are derived from two Heisenberg’s uncertainty relations:

ΔpΔx ≥ ћ (the momentum-position uncertainty) ... (3) ΔEΔt ≥ ћ (the energy-time uncertainty) ... (4).

Our derivation of the expression (1) is based on the two assumptions: the speed of a non- relativistic particle v < 1/2c and ΔpΔx ranges from ћ up to 2ћ.

If the energy uncertainty is defined as ∆E2 = v∆p, one can then easily derive the expression (1).

According to Special relativity, v < c, so ∆x/v > ∆x/c. We can now write the following series of the expressions: ΔEΔx/c < ΔEΔx/v = vΔpΔx/v = ΔpΔx. Since ΔpΔx ≥ ћ, we get

1The value ћ, h/2 and h are the most common values but the absolute minimal value is ћ/2.

2The total energy of a non-relativistic particle E = mc2 + Ek, where m and Ek (= 1/2mv2) are, respectively, its rest mass and kinetic energy. Hence, ΔE = ΔEk < 1/2mv2 . Thus, for a non-relativistic particle with a speed v < 1/2c → ΔE < 1/8 mc2. Of note: in previous version of this communication the author erroneously wrote respectfully instead respectively.Please, accept his apology.

(3)

2 Energy-position uncertainty relation: ΔEΔx < ћc … (5).

The strong nuclear force is one of the four basic forces in nature (the others being gravity, the electromagnetic force, and the weak nuclear force) and it is the strongest one. However, this force also has the shortest range, holding together nucleons: a proton and a neutron. The strong nuclear force is created between these nucleons by the exchange of particle called the pion.

The pion has a rest mass energy ΔE = mc2 = 140 MeV = 2.24 X 10-11 J. When the proton transfers its pion to the neutron, the neutron “borrows” the pion rest mass energy of 140 MeV.

That energy produces a force between these two nucleons. According to the expression (5), the distance between them must then be < 1.5 X 10-15 m., which is about inner nuclear distances. For comparison, the proton size is about 8.4 X 10-16 m.

Dividing the inequality (5) with Δx, we get ΔE < ћc/Δx. Obviously, ћc/Δx cannot be equal zero because then ΔE would be less than zero or negative Thus, 0 < ΔE < ћc/Δx. Similar reasoning indicates that 0 < Δx < ћc/ΔE.

The inequalities (3) and (5) can be written as ΔpΔx = aћ, where a ≥ 1 and vΔpΔx < ћc.

Substituting ΔpΔx with aћ in vΔpΔx < ћc we get aћv < ћc or av < c. For a non-relativistic particle with a speed v < 1/2c, v = bc/2, where b < 1. Now av = abc/2 < c or ab < 2. This last inequality is only possible if and only if a 2. Thus, for a non-relativistic particle is the following inequality is right:

2 ≥ a ≥ 1 … (6).

In general, for a non-relativistic particle with a speed v < c/q, where q < 2, ΔEΔx < ћc is only possible for q ≥ a ≥ 1.

Depending of the values of various Planck’s constants, now we can write for ΔpΔx the following limits (ћ/2 ≤ ΔpΔx ≤ ћ; ћ ≤ ΔpΔx ≤ 2ћ; h/2 ≤ ΔpΔx ≤ h, and h ≤ ΔpΔx ≤ 2h) and inequalities (ΔpΔx ≥ h > h/2 > ћ > ћ/2).

Dividing the expressions (3) and (4), we get ΔpΔx/ΔEΔt = v/v =1 or ΔpΔx = ΔEΔt. So, for v <

1/2c, ΔEΔt also ranges ћ to 2ћ, as ΔpΔx. In this case we can write the following limits (ћ/2 ≤ ΔEΔt ≤ ћ; ћ ≤ ΔEΔt ≤ 2ћ; h/2 ≤ ΔEΔt ≤ h, and h ≤ ΔEΔt ≤ 2h) and inequalities (ΔEΔt ≥ ћ > ћ/2

> h > h/2).

In our previous report [1], we derive the expression (2) using a simple mathematical procedure.

For the sake of readers we will repeat this derivation. The expression (4) can be written as ΔEΔt

= vΔpΔt ≥ ћ. Dividing vΔpΔt ≥ ћ with v we get ΔpΔt ≥ ћ/v. Because v < c, ћ/v > ћ/c, we arrive at Momentum-time uncertainty relation: ΔpΔt > ћ/c … (7).

As we stated above, we can written the inequality (3) as ΔpΔx = aћ, where 2 ≥ a ≥ 1. The inequality (7) can be written as ΔpΔt = dћ/c, where d > 1. Dividing these new equations, we get that v = (a/d)c. In the case of non-relativistic particle with a speed v < 1/2c, after a little algebra, we get d >4. So, for a non-relativistic particle:

(4)

3 ΔpΔt > 4ћ/c … (8).

Thus, depending of the values of various Planck’s constants, now we can write for ΔpΔt the following limits (ΔpΔt > 2ћ/c; ΔpΔt > 4ћ/c; ΔpΔt > 2h, and ΔpΔt > 4h ) and inequalities (ΔpΔt >

4ћ/c > 2ћ/c > 4h/c > 2h/c).

Reference

[1] P. I. Premović, The Energy-position and the momentum-time uncertainty expressions. The General Science Journal, March 2018.

Références

Documents relatifs

All these methods are based in the use of effective ”in medium” nucleon-nucleon interactions. These range from the fully empirical SM-CI interactions, whose one and two-body

This experiment would be a crucial test on the weak neutral current con- tribution to the nucleon-nucleon weak interaction Performances and preliminary test results are

pv ), while this destructive contribution is absent in the front-form case. A few further comments may provide better insight on the above results. First, in spite of

In the non relativistic limit this correlation energy involves polarization propagators (or interactions) only in the spin-isospin channel: the pion exchange interaction is of

Using this scheme we are in position to study in a particularly simple way direct observable consequences of both partial chiral symmetry restoration such as dropping of the sigma

1: (color online) Neutron specific heat divided by the temperature in the three shallow layers calculated with the band theory (solid thick line) and with different approxima-

Indeed, we have just seen that the concept of world-line distribu- tion function only makes sense because the particle distribution function is a Lorentz-scalar, and it was proven

Note, that some of the expressions (including their derivations) of this communication can be found in modern physics textbooks. Schematic representation of