• Aucun résultat trouvé

The Reduced Compton Wavelength and the Energy-Position/Momentum- Time Uncertainties

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "The Reduced Compton Wavelength and the Energy-Position/Momentum- Time Uncertainties"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02541575

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02541575

Submitted on 14 Apr 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

The Reduced Compton Wavelength and the Energy-Position/Momentum- Time Uncertainties

Pavle Premovic

To cite this version:

Pavle Premovic. The Reduced Compton Wavelength and the Energy-Position/Momentum- Time Uncertainties. The General Science Journal, The General Science Journal, 2018. �hal-02541575�

(2)

1

The Reduced Compton Wavelength and the Energy-Position/Momentum- Time Uncertainties

Pavle I. Premović

Laboratory for Geochemistry, Cosmochemistry and Astrochemistry e-mail: pavleipremovic@yahoo.com

The Compton scattering is an elastic collision of the x-ray or gamma photons with free electrons (or loosely bound valence shell electrons). This scattering is demonstrated in Fig. 1. In this communication we are combining Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and the Compton scattering.

Note, that some of the expressions (including their derivations) of this communication can be found in modern physics textbooks.

Figure 1. Schematic representation of Compton scattering, in which an incoming photon scatters from an electron at rest.

The electron of the rest mass me has the rest energy of Er = mec2. The Compton scattered electron (hereinafter the Compton electron) posses a relativistic kinetic energy, the relativistic speed υe and the linear momentum pe = meυe.

Before scattering, let the photon moves along the positive x-axis having an energy E0 = hν0, frequency ν0, wavelength λ0 and linear momentum p0 = hν0/c, where h ( = 6.63 × 10-34 J s) is the Planck constant and c (= 2.99792×108 m s-1) is the speed of light. After scattering, the photon moves at an angle θ off the x-axis with an energy E = hν, frequency ν, wavelength λ and momentum p=hν/c.

The conservation of linear momentum of the electron after the collision yields,

pe2

= p02

+ p2 - 2p0pcosθ.

(3)

2 The conservation of energy gives,

(pec)2 = ( hν0 – hν)2 + 2mec2(hν0 – hν).

Combining these two expressions leads to the standard Compton formula λ – λ0 = (h/mec)(1 − cosθ).

Here h/mec is called the standard Compton wavelength of the electron, λc, and it has value 2.43 10-12 m. This formula supposes that the scattering occurs in the rest frame of the electron. The energy hν0 of the incident photon with this wavelength is equal to the rest mass energy mec2 of the electron. In the following discussion, we will take the reduced Compton wavelength λrc = ћ/mec (= 3.87 × 10-13 m), where ћ (= h/2π =1.05 × 10-34 J s) is the reduced Planck constant.

If the Heisenberg uncertainty principle holds for the Compton electron1 then

ΔpeΔxe ≥ ħ.

This inequality can be expressed as:

ΔpeΔxe = aħ ... (1),

where a ≥ 1. In this case, quantum mechanics predicts that the uncertainty in position of the Compton electron Δxe must be greater than the reduced Compton wavelength ħ/mec or Δxe > λrc = ħ/mec.2 Accordingly, we can write

Δxe = αћ/mec ... (2) where α > 1.

If the uncertainty in energy Δpe of the Compton electron is higher than mec then the uncertainty in its energy ΔEe (> mec2) would be high enough to create an electron-positron pair. Suppose that

Δpe = bmec ... (3),

where b ≤ 1. Thus for the Compton electron the momentum-position expression we can be written as

ΔpeΔxe = bαħ ... (4)

1This is a crucial assumption. In general, it is worth mentioning that the lower limit of ћ/2 for ΔpΔx is rarely attained; more usually ћ even h.

2Since the standard Compton wavelength λc (= h/mec) and the de Broglie wavelength (λDB = h/meυ) are both greater than λrc (= ħ/mec). So, if Δxe > λDB or > λc then Δxe > λrc.

(4)

3 with bα = a, see equation (1).

By differentiating the relativistic equation for the total energy Ee of the Compton electron Ee2

= (pec)2 + (mec2)2, we obtain

ΔEe = υeΔpe ... (5).

If we multiply both sides of equations (5) with Δxe and using equation (4) we get

ΔEeΔxe = υeΔpeΔxe = bαħυe ... (6).

According to Special relativity, the speed of the Compton electron υe cannot be greater than c. It is reasonable to assume that 1 ≤ a ≤ 23 and that υe is relativistic when is = or > than 0.5c. In this case bαυe < 2c. So equation (6) can be rewritten

ΔEeΔxe < 2ћc ... (7).

Recently, employing the uncertainty relation for momentum-position, we have derived the same energy-position uncertainty expression for a relativistic particle with the speed υ ≥ 0.5c [1]. This derivation was based on the same two assumptions as above for the Compton electron, and these are A) the speed of light c is independent of the motion of the observer, as postulated by Special relativity and B) 1 ≤ a ≤ 2.

We also derived expression for the momentum-time position for a relativistic particle with the speed υ ≥ 0.5 c [1]:

ΔppΔt > ħ/c ... (8).

The energy time-uncertainty relation for the Compton electron is

ΔEeΔt ≥ ħ ... (9).

As we derived above ΔEe = υeΔpe. So, relation (9) can be rewritten υeΔpeΔt > ħ ... (10).

Since the speed of the Compton electron υe after interaction with the photon cannot be greater than c. In this case (10) we arrive at

ΔpeΔt > ħ/c.

Thus, inequality (8) holds for the Compton electron.

As we pointed out in footnote 1 the value of ħ/2 is seldom attained; the values ħ and h are more common. Thus, the energy-position expression [7] can be written as ΔEeΔxe < ћc or ΔEeΔxe < 2hc.

Similarly, the momentum-time expression [8] can be reformulated as ΔpeΔt > ħ/2c or ΔpeΔt > h/c.

3 It is reasonable to expect that 1 < α ≤ 2.

(5)

4 Reference

[1] P. I. Premović, The Energy-position and the momentum-time uncertainty expressions. The General Science Journal, March 2018.

Références

Documents relatifs

This paper analyzes the historical emergence of a set of conceptions about people living in mountains and the invention of a corresponding human type - the montagnard in

4, we construct explicitly an infinite set of rank 2(n + 1) tensors U (n,n) that we call weak n-superenergy tensors because they have almost all the good properties of

overseas departments and territories, hydroelectricity, marine energy, bioenergy, solar power and photovol- taics, thermal solar power, wind power, the energy produced from

Hardware Diagnostic Reference Manyal - This manual provides a functional description and detailed operating instructions for diagnostic programs.. System Operator~s

The hierarchical perspective is an original method of representing the three-dimensional space on a flat surface, which characterises the art of Ancient Egypt and a considerable part

constraints on low energy Compton scattering parameters in terms of upper bounds on the cross sections above photoproduction threshold,.. is shown to give optimal

Indeed, a great many theoretical calculations are available for the total and valence CP’s of this atom, mostly within the framework of the IA, using different

This design, which has never been used for gamma-ray space telescopes, maintains the advantages of a Compton telescope (high-energy response, low background, wide field of view)