• Aucun résultat trouvé

The Poynting vector is therefore given by: S= e2 16π20c|n∧(n∧β

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "The Poynting vector is therefore given by: S= e2 16π20c|n∧(n∧β"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Electrodynamique S´erie 13: Thomson Scattering 2015

We discuss here the Thomson scattering of a point particle by an incoming electro- magnetic monochromatic wave. The radiation fields are given by:

E= e 0c

1 R

n(nβ)˙

, B= e

0c2 1 R

h n

(nβ)˙ n i

, (1)

where R is the distance between the observer and the particle. The Poynting vector is therefore given by:

S= e2

16π20c|n(nβ)|˙ 2 n

R2, (2)

so the emitted power per unit solid angle is:

dP

dΩ = e2

16π20c|n(nβ)|˙ 2. (3)

The incoming electric field of the incident wave can be written as:

E= E0ei(k·x−ωt)+ c.c. =E0ei(k·x−ωt)+ c.c. =

2(Re)E0cos(k·xωt)2(Im)E0sin(k·xωt), (4) where E0 is now a real constant and satisfies the conditions:

·= 1, ·k= 0. (5) The equation of motion for the free particle is therefore:

mv˙ =e(E0ei(k·x−ωt)+ c.c.), (6)

from which one can derive ˙β. The incoming energy flux can be derived from the Poynting vector, Sin= 20c|E0|2 = 20cE02, from which we find the cross section as:

dΩ = 1

Sin

dP

dΩ = e2 16π20c

1 20cE02

e mc

2

|n(nE)|2. (7)

The quantity |n(nE)|2 must be averaged over time and over the initial polarization of the electromagnetic wave. Averaging over time, we get:

|n(nE)|2 = |nh

n(E0ei(k·x−ωt)+e−i(k·x−ωt) i

|2 =

2 (n(nE0))·(n(nE0)) = 2E02|n(n)|2. (8) We can rewrite the last result using

[n(n)]i=ijknjklmnlm = (δilδjm−δimδjl)njnlm= (n·)nii = (δij−ninj)j. (9) Averaging over polarizations, we then find:

<|n∧(n∧)|2>=<ij−ninj)jik−nink)k >= (δij−ninj)(δik−nink)< jk> . (10)

(2)

Now, lives in the plane orthogonal to the wave vector of the electromagnetic wave;

assuming the wave is propagating in the z direction, z = (0,0,1), must be a vector in the (x, y) plane. If the incoming wave is not polarized, then< jk > must be the most symmetric tensor in the (x, y) plane, so we can write:

< jk >=a(δjkzjzk), (11)

where ais a constant that can be obtained by noticing thatδijij = 1. So we have:

1 =δij < ij >=a(31) = 2a, (12)

so that a= 1/2. We have finally that the average over polarizations can be written as:

< jk >= 1

2jkzjzk). (13)

We can now compute the average over time and polarization of the quantity in Eq. (9):

<|n(n)|2 > = (δijninj)(δiknink)1

2jkzjzk) = 1

2jknjnk)(δjkzjzk)

= 1

2(311 + (n·z)2) = 1

2(1 + cos2θ).

(14) Putting together the results so far obtained in Eq. (7), we find:

dΩ = e4 16π2c4(0m)2

1

2(1 + cos2θ). (15)

The total cross section is easily found from the previous expression:

σtot= Z

dΩ dΩ =

1 0

2 e2 mc2

2

3 . (16)

In the case of the electron, the quantity r0= e2

0mc2 = 2.82·10−13cm (17)

is called classical electron radius.

2

Références

Documents relatifs

However, we have shown that in the electron MHD (electromagnetic) range kc/ω pe ≃ 0.3 to 30, the Taylor hypothesis is valid for the permanent fluctua- tions in the magnetosheath: f 0

While the peak-to-average ratio is equal to 3.6 for the single WEC (even though its power output is limited to 1 MW), it is equal to 1.9 for the wave farm. This decrease in the

• We detail how this algorithm can be used for digital shape analysis. We show how to detect convex/concave/inflexion zones onto a digital surface... • For some well-identified

Touzi, “Target Scattering Decomposition in Terms of Roll- Invariant Target Parameters,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol.. Huynen, Phenomenological Theory

Then, the theory is applied to the case of electromagnetic scattering by the so called periodic layered media, I-e- one-dimensional periodic (ID) structures made up of

where v is the velocity vector of the fluid, u is the fluid velocity with respect to the shock wave, T is the temperature, s is the specific entropy, the indices tg and n indicate

We expect the changes in probe traveltime to be caused by the opening and closing of those fractures which have the normal to the crack face aligned with the P-wave probe

The hypothesis of a unique event of colonization out from the native area is consistent with the microsatellite clustering analysis at the global scale suggesting two main