Alexandridis C.
in
Baourakis G. (ed.).
The Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union: New market trends Chania : CIHEAM
Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes; n. 29 1998
pages 175-181
Article available on lin e / Article dispon ible en lign e à l’adresse :
--- http://om.ciheam.org/article.php?ID PD F=CI020509
--- To cite th is article / Pou r citer cet article
--- Alexandridis C. Agricu ltu ral research in th e Eu ropean U n ion , th e framework programme IV ( 1994-1998) . In : Baourakis G. (ed.). The Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union: New market trends. Chania : CIHEAM, 1998. p. 175-181 (Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes; n. 29) ---
http://www.ciheam.org/
http://om.ciheam.org/
-
Agronomist, SpeciaZist in Animal
Directorate of of Agriculture Uiion
The conduct of is of the Union (EU),
and it has an to play in
efficiency of Of own
but of of
facilities can be if and
be
which of Tl-.e
commission, on both and
of now in of common
of if not
but action against them be beyond the ability of any one nation.
that mentioned the
and initial attempts to set up a
1960s. The in the late 1960s, into (hog
and
-
two hadclose as
of 1971 the heads of of
to meet to advise the Commission on how to with
June 1974, of
given
to run (1976-1978) and
funding by the Council.
In 1990-1994, Community
budget specific
<Competitiveness of and management of A
to of the 80 50
million ECUs of with the Commission, was 1996.
1991 the and
and the 1992-1994 than 125
million ECUs the of 189
on
EU and
development is
2.
Following of of Community activities in the field
of and
was adopted 1994. is of (1994-1998)
and has a budget of 13.1
and of specific
Activity Funding in
l. and comunication technologies Telematics
Communication fechnologies technologies
and materials technologies Standardization, measurements and testing
and climate science and technology Life science and technologies
Biotechnologies
Biomedicine und health Agriculture andpsheries
safety
426
898 671 2057 2 32.5 1818 307
907 243
674
588 358 728 2403
176
Confrolled themonuclearfision 895
Transport 256
Transport 256
Targeted socio-economic research 147
Targeted socio-economic research 147
~
Activity 2.
Activity 3.
OF
Activity 4. OF
OF
of the specific out
in the costs of is not 50%
of total the and mobility of is
of up to 100%).
establishments which do not have analytical systems of budget of 100% of the allowable additional costs.
M in the costs of
itself, but meetings,
up to 100%)
M up to 100%
of
3. OF
aims in the food
of and
and its links with the input
adapt to changing Community
policies and it of
and and
The itself on the
Chains 2.
3. and
5.
Objectives by
This of and consolidation at
sought by building upon national and and
activities in any of the by the both food and non-
and Objectives
These involve specifications which have to do and legislative analysis, and
in any of by the
specific as follows:
Analysis of social and ethical issues and mobility of scientists
and publication of
Funding of and
of the
The biomass and bioenergy chain 1.2 The <<green), chemical and polymer chain 1.3 The foresty-wood c h i n
2.
Chemical and physical processes 2.2 Bioprocessing
2.3 Control system 3.
3.1 Consumer nutrition and well-being
3.2 and optimised food materials and nutritious food products
178
3.3 Advanced and optimised technologies and processes 3.4 Generic food science
4.
optimisation of methods, sysfems and primary production chains. Agrinzlture-environment
analysis and impact assessment 4.2 Quality policy
Diversìjication
4.4 Animal and plant health, animal weyare
4.5 forests
Complementary activities by in support of DG
‘
5.
5.1 of environmentalfactorss on aquatic resources impact offisheries and aqua-culture 5.3 Biology of speciesfor optimisation ofaqu-aculture 5.4 Socio-economic aspects of tkfishing industry 5.5
is open to all in of
the EU of
.
in this without financial the Community is also
*
Legal entities established and out activities in*
Legal entities established and out activities aand with the Community
the activities of this
*
on condition that is in the ofCommunity policy, and of Community
and any State associated with is in
of CEEC and the limited
Community financial may be made available, in conditions to
3.2 of
Confomzity with the scope and objectives of the programme Trans-national collaboration
must be at least two an
to
to that
Scienfzjîc and technical excellence and novelty
5 character
Scient@, technical and economic benefits
R dinzension
Quality of management
!H for exploitation of results Technical competence
81 Clear and immediate relevance to Community policies orientation
QuaZity
and integrated approach W Technology assessment (socio-economic impact)
sector participation M size and duration
in addition to the the following
met:
H and risks
sufiCient to allow demonstration A large economic potential
H Comparative advantages
180
of producers and users
3.3. Evaluation and seledion of proposals
of to
follows:
of eligibility of by Commission staff W Confidential evaluation of by
R l of the Commission and of a
of to fund
W Examination of on
S Final selection by the Commission of of the
of the evaluation and selection to the