HAL Id: jpa-00247987
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247987
Submitted on 1 Jan 1994
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Novel sequence with incommensurate SA phases in a new dimesogenic liquid crystal
F. Hardouin, M. Achard, Jung-Il Jin, Jin-Wook Shin, Yong-Kuk Yun
To cite this version:
F. Hardouin, M. Achard, Jung-Il Jin, Jin-Wook Shin, Yong-Kuk Yun. Novel sequence with incommen-
surate SA phases in a new dimesogenic liquid crystal. Journal de Physique II, EDP Sciences, 1994, 4
(4), pp.627-643. �10.1051/jp2:1994152�. �jpa-00247987�
Classification
Physics
Abstrac/s61.30 61.30E 64.70M
Novel sequence with incommensurate SA phases in
a newdimesogenic liquid crystal
F, Hardouin
('),
M. F. AchardI'). Jung-II
Jin(2),
Jin-Wook Shin(2)
andYong-Kuk
Yun
(2)
(')
Centre de Recherche Paul Pascal, Universitd Bordeaux I, Av. A, Schweitzer, 33600 Pessac, France(2) Department of
Chemistry. College
of Sciences, KoreaUniversity,
Seoul 136-701, Korea(Received16 November /993, accepted in final form 10 Janua>.y J994)
Abstract. We present differential
scanning calorimetry, optical
andX-ray
diffraction measure-ments for a new
dimesogenic liquid
crystal compound (KIS). The richpolymorphism
of thiscompound includes new smectic
phases
and rare phase transitions. In particular the first observation in a purecompound
of two incommensurate SA phases as well as cholesteric and helical smecticphases
(TGB and SC*phases)
are reported. We discuss this observation in terms of the dual peculiar structural character of the molecule apolyphilic
and dimesogenic systemincluding
the concept of the central flexible spacer.1. Introduction.
For many years most of the low molar mass
liquid crystals
had to becomposed
of two blocks of different chemical nature their moleculescomprised
onesingle rigid
corecovalently
bonded to one or twoalkyl
chains in a rod-likeconfiguration.
Suchsimple
molecules are nolonger
theunique
class known to promote nematic and smecticphases. Initially keeping
the concept oftwo distinct parts (aromatic
cores/paraffinic chains),
ofparticular
interest aredimesogenic liquid crystals
which contain two similarrigid
coresjoined by
a central flexiblealkylene
spacer and attached to which are
generally
two terminalalkyl
chains[1-7].
Such dimers areoften
regarded
as modelcompounds
for semiflexible main chainliquid crystalline polymers [1- 5].
At this stage the
question
arises of thespecific
rolesplayed by
three-block molecules,instead of two, in the
mesophase
formation. Two main ways are offered to tailor-makedimesogenic
L.C. which contain three distinct andamphipatic
pans.Firstly,
we can introduce alternative sequences with a different chemical nature of the spacer with respect to the tails (orreciprocally).
Forinstance,
it hasalready
beenreported
that themesomorphic
behavior isquite
different in dimeric
compounds having highly
flexible siloxanecontaining
spacer andaliphatic
tails[8-12].
Moreover,taking
into account the fact that chemists have devised alarge variety
of
polyphilic
systems in conventional low molar massliquid crystals [13, 14],
we can alsoimagine
thesynthesis
ofdimesogenic compounds
in whichalkyl
tails arereplaced by perfluorinated (or semiperfluorinated)
chains or siloxanemoiety,
stillkeeping
analiphatic
spacer,
Secondly beyond
the notion of dimers, one can induce novelsupramolecular
systems withcompounds consisting
of twochemically
differentmesogenic rigid
units[15].
Thepolymor- phism
and the structural behavior of suchdimesogenic
LCcompounds
remain still open. Our strategy is toinvestigate
the latter situation met hereby
thefollowing dimesogenic compound
« KIS »
Cholesteryl-OCO(CH~)~O-0-CH=N-fi-CjH~
This
compound
wassynthesized.
It exhibits ahigh degree
ofpolymorphism
and all themesomorphic phases
have been studiedusing
D-S-C-,microscopy
andX-ray
diffraction.2.
Synthesis.
The
synthetic
route to KIS is shown in thefollowing
scheme~
o11
~ ~
l
~
cholesterol
_n-C4H9-fi-N=CH-0-OH (4)
,
KIS
Na~C03/DMF/135
°C6-Bromohexanoic acid
(1,
3.77x10~~mol)
was dissolved in 80 ml ofpurified thionyl
chloride and the mixture was refluxed for 4 h. The excess
thionyl
chloride was removedby
distillation under a reduced pressure
(I
Torr). To the residue(6-bromohexanoyl
chloride2)
addedslowly
at 0 °C was 3.39 x 10~ ~ mol of cholesterol dissolved in a mixture ofdry
tetrahydrofuran (50 ml) (16]
andpyridine (5 ml) [16].
The mixture was stirred at roomtemperature for 12 h under
dry nitrogen atmosphere.
At the end ofreactiqn,
the mixture waspoured
into alarge
excess(500 ml)
of 0. I M HCI. Theprecipitate
formed was collected on a filter and washedthoroughly
several times with 0.5 M sodium carbonate and distilled water.The washed crude
product
3(cholesteryl 6-bromohexanoate)
was dried at roomtemperature (0.
I Torr). It was thenrecrystallized
three times fromdry n-pentanol
and dried at 40 °C in avacuum oven.
Compound
4 wasprepared separately [15] by refluxing
for 3 h the ethanol solution(140 ml)
of4-hydroxydebenzaldehyde (0.125mol)
and4-n-butylaniline ~(0,125mol).
The reactionmixture was cooled to 0 °C and the
product
4(N-(4-hydroxybenzilidene)4-n-butylaniline)
thus obtained wasrecrystallized
from ethanol.The final
compound
KIS,N-[4-(6-cholesteryloxycarbonyl) pentyloxy)-benzylidene]-4-n-
butylaniline,
wassynthesized by reacting compound
3 withcompound
4,Compound
4(1,42 x10~~ mol)
was dissolved in 100 ml ofdry N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) [16],
Compound
3(1.42 x10~~mol)
and 1.0 g of sodium carbonatewere mixed with DMF
solution of
compound
4. The mixture was stirred for 12 h at1)5
°C underdry nitrogen
atmosphere.
Afterbeing
cooled down to room temperature, the reaction mixture wasslowly poured
into alarge
excess of distilled water. Theprecipitate
formed was washed with cold ethanol. The finalproduct
wasrecrystallized
fromn-pentanol.
Thepurity
ofcompound
KIS thusprepared
was checkedby high
pressureliquid chromatography,
elementalanalysis
and IRabsorption.
3.
Experimental
results.3,I THERMAL ANALYSIS AND OPTICAL INVESTIGATIONS. The thermal behavior of the KIS
compound
wasinvestigated using
a Perkin Elmer DSC7. Onheating,
we first observed at85 °C a
single peak corresponding
to themelting point
with alarge
transitionenthalpy
(25.5 J/g).
On furtherheating,
theclearing point
is alsoclearly
evidenced at 192 °C with asignificant enthalpy change (4.9 J/g) (Fig. I),
Over the temperature interval between these two
peaks,
very accurate DSCexperiments
enabled us to detect, both on
heating
andcooling,
five additional small heatpeaks suggesting
five
enantiotropic phase
transitions(Fig,
?), We mustpoint
out that theenthalpy
excesses are so weak that thesepeaks
are noteasily
detectedby calorimetry.
From these studies, it was found that the best conditions to detect this sequence were a low rate°C/mn)
ofheating
andcooling
and alarge sample weight (25 mg).
We can note that somepeaks
are very closetogether
andpartially overlap,
and thus it is notpossible
togive
separateenthalpies.
Ih anycase these
enthalpy
values are very low (~ 0.2J/g
), and a very weakhysteresis
was observedon
cooling
for the different transitions (AT ~ 0.5 °C ).Thus, the DSC
thermograms
lead to thefollowing
sequence8~ 'C <44~ 'C 149'C >~ ~ 'C 16~'C
Crystal
- Phase = Phase 2 = Phase 3 = Phase 4 =16s 'c >92 'c
Phase 5 = Phase 6 =
Isotropic liquid
At this step, an initial
phase
identification was carried outby
thermaloptical microscopv (using
apolarizing
Leitzmicroscope equipped
with a Mettler FP52 hotstage).
~ I
1
~
Sae 2
1
~ 14
14
75 ioo izs
Fig.
I. DSCthermogram
ofcompound
KIS at theheating
rate of 5 °C/min.j
~~~~
I .Phase
f
~~~
3
~ (/
Ph°'e ~6
al ~ ~°~~
5
Phd« I Phdse 4
~
* Phdse
3 6
~
2
o
» 5
uJ
b) ~ ~~~
Fig. 2. -DSC thermograms for the
heating
(a) and cooling (b) of compound KIS (rate I "C/min)suggesting
the phase sequence indicated in the next. Note that in this figure the energy scale isconsiderably expanded by comparison
withfigure
1.Cooling
from theisotropic liquid
resulted in the formation of an iridescent cholestericphase,
either in the form of cholesteric fan defects or of a
Grandjean plane
texture.. For the
subsequent
observations, the substrate was treated with analigning
agent(rubbed polyimide) resulting
in the formation of a cholestericplanar
texture.The transition from the cholesteric to Phase 5 was mediated
by
the onset ofslight
striations and this Phase 5 also exhibits aGrandjean
texture(Plate1
166°C)
similar to that of thecholesteric
phase.
Moreover, when theplanar
texture of Phase 5 was rotated between crossedpolarizers,
no extinction could beobtained,
which istypical
of a helical structure. One can also note that thepitch length
increasesconsiderably
at the cholesteric-Phase 5 transition andbecomes too
long
for the reflection to occur in the visible range.On
cooling,
at 164.5°C,
focal conics of Phase 4 grow at the expense of theplanar
texture of the Phase 5.Subsequent cooling produced
very subtlechanges
in this focal conic fan texture at the Phase 4- Phase 3 transition the Phase 4 texture seems
slightly
broken(Plate
2 158°C)
by comparison
with that of Phase 3,showing
asimple
smooth fan texture(Plate
3 lsl°C).
,
, --=.
. "'~~
~
'"
' l.;)(
j<,
(/= f)jj',
'
~~~~'#
~,~/~3 f $-I.'
' ~ '~
/j'~ '~~ ''
'
. ~
,,@,=.j~
.) ~~ "
~
/
_~'
mf~"~~~
4W ~~i 11 ~ '~
W
.(-~o_
+ ~ ]l'-'~
~
~ j
~ '
,
W '
' ~ _ _,'
j~ ,
Plate 3. Plate 4.
~ ~
V
1<.
» ~"
~ '4
Plate 5.
Microphotographs
of KIS under crossed polars. Magnification x400. Plate1: 166°C, Phase 5 Plate 2: 158 °C, Phase 4 Plate 3 : 151 °C, Phase 3 Plate 4 147 °C~ Phase 2 Plate 5 : 140 °C, Phase I.Only
subtle changes are observed in the focal conic texturethrough
the different phases. Phase 4 and Phase 2 textures appearslightly
broken and have afuzzy
aspect by comparison with the Phase 3 and Phase I ones.The focal conic defects are
kept
whencooling through
the Phase 3- Phase 2 and Phase 2
-
Phase I transitions Phase 2, like Phase
4,
exhibitsslightly
broken focal comics(Plate
4 : 147°C)
and Phase I, as Phase 3, a fanshaped
texture(Plate
5 140 °C).Thus, these
microscopic
observationsgive
direct evidence toidentify
thephases
to 4 assmectic
phases
and thus we can label them asSl,
52, 53 and 54.. If we now observe between crossed
polarizers
anunaligned sample
(I.e. with no surface treatment), ahomeotropic
texturespontaneously
appears with the onset of the 54phase.
Cooling down,
thishomeotropic (or pseudo homeotropic)
texture iskept
without anychange
till the SI
phase.
Thus,according
to these observations, the four smecticphases
I to4)
appearto be like uniaxial media where the molecules are on average
parallel (SA)
orsymmetrically disposed (SC*)
with respect to theviewing
direction. In the latterhypothesis,
the helicalpitch
must be
reasonably
short (less than I ~Lm) asusually
observed for cholesterol derivatives, andin this sense no dechiralisation lines can be observed
by microscopic
observations ofplanar
textures. This could also
explain
thefuzzy
aspect ofplates
2 and 4. Further identifications ofthe different smectic
phases
need a structuralanalysis.
At last, we can note that Phase 5, which is located between a cholesteric and a smectic
phase
(54 ), has a texture whichclosely
resembles that of TGBphases [17, 18].
In any case, structuralevidence for
distinguishing
Phase 5 from a cholesteric will begained by X-ray
diffractionexperiments.
3.2 X-RAY DIFFRACTION STUDIES. The identification of the different
liquid crystalline
phases
was carried outusing
the characteristic features ofX-ray
diffraction patterns.X-ray scattering experiments
wereperformed using
aCUK~
radiation of an 18 kWrotating
anode
X-ray
generator. A flatpyrolitic graphite (002)
monochromator delivered a0.5 x
0.smm~
beam onto thesample.
The scattered radiation was collected on a two dimensional detectorImaging
Plate system. Thesample
to the detector distance was 830 mmthrough
helium in order to lowerabsorption
and diffusion. The instrumental resolution inreciprocal
space was aboutAqi1.4
x10~~ l~'
FWHM in both vertical and horizontaldirections
(q
is the momentum transfer vector q =4 H sin 9/A
).
Thesample-detector
distance could be reduced to 200 mm toinvestigate
the wideangle region.
Lindemann tubes (~fi
= mm were filled
by capillarity
athigh
temperatures without analignment procedure
and sealed underdry atmosphere.
Thecapillary
tube was introduced in an400
90°c
300
a
zoo a *
ioo
0
0.7 0.9 1.I 1.3 1.5 1.7
Q
Fig.
3. Intensityprofiles
at wide angle of the X-raypowder
diffraction pattern of phase at 90 °C.oven whose temperature
stability
was ± 10 mK. The tube axis was vertical andperpendicular
to the beam.
Exposure
times were 15 min.As shown
ii figure 3,
above themelting point
andthroughout
themesomorphic
range, theintensity profiles
in the widescattering angle region
show a broad diffuse band centered atq = 1?8
l~
=
? gr/4.9
l~' corresponding
toonly
apositional liquid-like
short range order within the smecticlayers.
Thisintensity profile
isweakly
temperaturedependent. Although
not verypronounced,
theasymmetric shape
of theintensity profile might correspond
to thepossible
existence,according
to the molecular structure, of two nearestneighbour
molecular distances in theplane
of thelayers
as yetreported
for otherpolyphilic
systems[19].
Thus all the smectic
phases
understudy
have to be referred to as« fluid smectics » and not lamellar 3D
crystalline phases.
We now describe the thermal evolution of the
X-ray
diffraction patterns in the smallscattering angle region through
the sequencepreviously
evidenced bothby
calorimetric andmicroscopic
observations.1 600
178°c soo
400
300
zoo
ioo
0
o-I O-Z 0.3 0.4
a)
Q
700
170°C
~~~
)
~~~
~~~
300
zoo
loo
o-I
~~ Q
Fig.
4.
a)
at °C~ b) at 170 °C near the N* - Phase 5 ransition(non limited resolutionAt
high
temperatures in the cholestericphase,
the diffraction pattern exhibits aclearly
broadring (larger
than theresolution)
of radius q=
0.150
l~
'(corresponding
to41.61
latticespacing),
whoseintensity
increases near the N*- Phase 5 transition
(Figs.
4a and4b).
Inspection
offigure
4b indicateslarge
smectic fluctuations in the cholestericphase.
In Phase 5, the
ring
narrows. Thescattering
vector of the maxima remainedunchanged
q =
0.150
A~'.
Theintensity
isspread uniformly
over thering.
The smectic character ofPhase 5 is evidenced
by
the observation of one resolution limitedX-ray peak (Fig. 5).
Combined to the
microscopic
observations, it appears reasonable toassign
thisphase
to be a TGB one.On
cooling
below 164 °C in the 54phase,
theX-ray
diffraction patterns in the smallangle region equally
show onering (Fig.
6 theintensity profile
indicates a resolution limitedpeak)
the radius of which increases from q =
0.150
l~'
at 164 °C to q
=
0.153
l~
'at 151 °C. The
temperature
dependence
of this first order diffraction maximumcorresponds
to a small diminution of thelayer spacing
from41.81to
411
withdecreasing
temperature, and this indicates the existence of a fluid tilted smecticphase
of SC* type, which is in agreement with theoptical
texture. We can note infigure
6 that theintensity
over thering
is notperfectly
uniform
indicating
aslight
deviation from atypical X-ray powder'diffraction
pattern of a smecticphase.
At 150 °C, in the temperature range of the 53
phase
detected from the DSCthermogram (Fig. 2),
theX-ray
pattem exhibits two veryunexpected
andstriking
features..
Firstly,
thesample spontaneously
orientates(Fig. 7a) leading
to oneprincipal
domain with smecticplanes lying horizontally
(and to a lower extent in the vertical directiongenerated
by
a second domain of minorimportance).
Such markedanisotropy
of the molecularorganization
isclearly
observedby
the presence of one set of three meridional reflections(resolution limited).
.
Secondly,
these three collinear modulations aresimultaneously
condensed with incom-mensurate wave vectors at the
position
qj=
0.143
l~',
qj=
0.175
l~
' and q3 = 0.319l~
'in the
reciprocal
space, as shown in theintensity profile (Fig.
7b).They correspond
in the realspace to different
periodicities
ofwavelengths 43.81, 35.81
and201 respectively.
According
tomicroscopic
observations(which strongly
suggest a smectic Aphase)
and to this~
i~~o~~~~
. 500
*.
300 zoo
ioo
0
o-I
Q
a)
1 600
160°C
500
~
* .
400
.
*
,
300
,
*
a zoo
i
6.
rresponding tensity (b).
X-ray analysis,
Phase 3 can now be claimed to be an incommensurate SAphase.
Indeed, the spontaneouspreferred
orientation of thesample
in theX-ray
beamprovides unambiguously
the relative orientation of the qj, q~ and q3 vectors which appear to be collinear in onesingle
domain.
Although
themosaicity
istypically
a fewdegrees
the absence of off-axis reflections rules out any additional translational order in theplane
of thelayers
and hence this 53phase
cannot be a biaxial
antiphase (I,
A~~~,[20]. However,
the law of conservation of vectors is also satisfied q3 = q, + q~ over the small temperature interval of the 53phase. Thus,
thiscondition
initially
set for biaxial lockins[21, 22]
seems necessary to the formation of thelayers
even in an incommensurate SA
phase
in which the three vectors are collinear.JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUEII -T 4 b'4 APRIL IQ94 4
S,
a)
1 ,
,
0°C
.
a
.
a
a
,
a
.
*
a a
a
~ . a
. 1
a 0
Fig.
7. a) X-ray diffraction pattern <n the small angle region in the 53 phase at lso °C. The ,ample spontaneoudy orientateslead<ng
to one principal domain with ~mectic planes lying horizontally. b) Corresponding intensity profilealong
the vertical direction.Cooling
further downthrough
the 53 -521>.a>isiiion,
the orientation of thesample
isdisrupted.
In addition, theX-ray
pattern of the 52phase
in the smallangle region displays
tworings (Fig. 8a)
with c6mmensurate wavevectors(Fig. 8b).
These are the first and second orderBragg
reflections on thelayers.
The fundamental q vector extends from q=
0.153
l~'
at 149 °C to 0,155
l~
' at 145 °C. Thus in the real space, thelayer spacing
isslightly depressed
from
41h
to40.51
withdecreasing
temperature this behaviour, in agreement with theoptical
observations, suggests onceagain
the occurrence of a fluid tilted smecticphase,
that is to say, the identification of the 52phase
to aSt phase.
At lower temperatures, with the onset of the SJ
phase~
three wave vectors qj,a)
600
,
145°C
soo ~.
300 400
.
zoo
<
ioo
0
u-I -Z
b) Fig.
1 600
140°C
500
(
400
f
~~~
zoo
j
a
,
I
oo
u-I
Q
Fig. 9. Intensity profile in the Sl phase showing three wavevectors qj, q~ and q, : q~ appears like a shoulder on the qj
peak
near the 52- Sl transition (140 °C).
incommensurate wave vectors
(Fig,
10b) andkeeping
in mind thecorresponding microscopic
textures, we have
assigned
thisphase
SI to be a one-dimensional modulated incommensurate smectic Aphase.
The two reflections connected to qj and q3 show relative intensities of about the same order ofmagnitude,
while the third reflectioncorresponding
to the wavevector q~ appears as a satellite of weakerintensity
around qj. It isimportant
to note that the sum of thevalues of the wave vector values q, and q~ remain constant and
equal
to the q~ value over thelarge
temperature range of the Slphase.
One can also note that qj decreases withT from 0.153
l~'
at 144 °C to 0.143l~'
at 90 °C and this last value obtained at lowtemperature in Sl
corresponds
to the qjposition
in the 53phase.
All theseX-ray
resultsstrongly
suggest that the Slphase
and the 53phase
are the same type of incommensurate SAphase.
This is also in agreement with thesimilarity
of theiroptical
textures.In addition, the
largest periodicity (~441),
whichcorresponds
to the wavevector q,, canprobably
be connected to the molecularlength
of KISii 461
measured with SASMmodels in the most extended
conformation). Taking
into account thelarge
difference ofmolecular area of the two
mesogenic
parts we can assume a head-to-tail arrangement with acomplete overlapping
of the molecules such an arrangement wouldsatisfy
spacefilling
conditions as well aslayering periodicity.
Moreover, one can note that thisperiodicity
islarger
in the two incommensurate
phases
than in theSt phases (which
is also consistent with theoccurrence of SA-like incommensurate
phases),
and if we assume the sameoverlapping
inSA,~~ and
S/ phases,
tiltangles
can be evaluated fromX-ray
results : 20-?2° are found in bothS/ phases
with respect to the SA~~~phase (S31.
The smallest
periodicity
found in the incommensurate SAphases
~'~ 20it
could~3
correspond
either to thelength
of thecholesteryl moiety
or to thelength
of the aromatic mesogenincluding
a part of the spacer(see Fig.
II).
From a molecularpoint
of view, thislayered
superstructure,corresponding
in fact to asublayer
order, couldoriginate
from thesimilarity
of the twomesogenic
groupslengths.
Atlast,
the q~ satellite appears like asignature
connected to the
-incommensurability
and which could not beassigned
to a molecularcharacteristic
length.
we can summarize the
X-ray
resultsthroughout
the smectic range from the evolution of the wavevectors qreported
infigure
12 as well as of theperiodicities
in the real space infigure
13.=~dmeW~__
"
,
",,
~ ~
" '
.i
~Q
~
~~
) -
,
''
j
~ i
-- _ ~
.
)i
,
'~i/
._
~
~w '~~
~ a)
500
00 .
:
300
.
.
.*
.
. :
l 00
0
~'~
~'~
been ading
~ °'~~
. q I
. q 2
O O O O ~
O q 3
0.28
+
qi
+q2
0,18 .
s2 ~~ 54 55
145 155 165
a)
d
(1)
50~Q
o
30
o d2
o d3
20 o
52 ~~ 54 55
10
145
al T (°c)
d
(I)
5040
~
° o
o
o 30 o
Sl
io
do 90
T b)
Fig.
13.
no
particular
reference to the effect that these moleculargeometries
(orothers)
have on the stabilization of the incommensurate fluid smecticphases.
In these incommensurate SA
phases,
thecoexisting
wavevectors are notindependent
:they satisfy
ageneral additivity
rule for the formation of the smecticlayered
structures. This one-dimensional lock-in condition can
bring
out the Prost and Barois « frustated smectics » modelpredicting
incommensurate SAphases [22, 24-26].
In essence, thisphenomenological
model is based on the existence of two naturalperiodicities
and their molecularorigines
are notnecessarily
those ofpolar
systems,Basically,
the existence of two incommensurate intrinsicperiodicities
can be envisionned at themicroscopic
level from head to tailphysical
associations ofpolar
molecules asinitially
noticedby
Prost[27]
or from distinctsmectogenic
groupschemically (and partially) coupled
as it is the case here. In terms ofelasticity,
if thesublayer
order
(q3) corresponds
to ahigher
stiffness than thelayering
order(q,
), the modelpredicts
thata satellite
(q2)
can be visible around q, and hence q3 = q, + q~ and our results corroborate this condition.In fact, some
analogous
behavior betweenpolar
systems and KIScompound
can bepointed
out
I)
incommensurate «monolayer
» fluctuations in a«
partial bilayer
» SAphase
have been evidenced in a purepolar compound [28]
and it)
assuming
that the 53 and Slphases
are the same incommensurateSA,~~ phase,
theanalogy
may be also extended to the reentrantphenomenon,
very common inpolar
systems.On the other
hand,
we can note that the incommensurate SAphases previously reported
inbinary diagrams
ofpolar compounds [29-32]
have beenrecently proved
to bemerely
coexistences of two SA
phases [33-35].
In the
light
of the new resultspresented here,
this argument cannot be put forward. First of all the present system is a purecompound
instead of a mixture.Secondly,
the SIphase
existsover a
large
temperature range andthirdly
asignificant discontinuity
of the wavevectors is observed at the transitions towards the Sl and 53phases.
Finally,
in thisregard
of the first observation ofSA,~~ phases
in KIS, we stress that thedependence
of the formation of such incommensuratephases
upon molecular parameters is still unclear in fluidcomplex. Physical chemistry investigations
arecurrently
in progress onseveral
homologues
of KIS to solve in part thisproblem.
This effect isjust
one of the manyexciting phenomena
that willprobably
be unearthed in incommensurate fluid smecticliquid crystals.
Acknowledgments.
J. I. Jin wishes to express his thanks to the
Ministry
of Education,Republic
of Korea, for the support of this research(project
n 93-323) in the fiscal year of 1993through
the Basic Sciences Research institute of KoreaUniversity.
F. Hardouin and M. F. Achard are
highly grateful
to Dr. P. Barois and Pr. G.Sigaud
forsome invaluable
suggestions
and for severalimportant
discussions.References
[1] Griffin A. C., Britt T. R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103 (1981) 4957-4959.
[2] Blumstein R. B., Stickles E. M., Mol. C>.ysi. L<q.
Ciysi.
82 (1982) lsl.[3]
Buglione
J. A., Roviello A.,Sirigu
A., Mol. C>=vsi. Liq. Cryst. 106 (1984) 169-185.j4] Blumstein R. B., Poliks M. D.~ Stickles E. M.~ Blumstein A.. Voiino F., Mol. C>.yst. Liq. Ciyst.
129 (1985 375-407.
[5]
Sigaud
G., Yoon D. Y., Griffin A. C., Macromolecules16 (1983) 875.[6] Jin J. J., Park J. H., Mol. C>.yst. Liq. C>.yst l10 (1984) 293.
[7] Emsley J. W., Luckhurst G. R., Shilstone G. N..
Sage
I., Mol. Crvst. Liq. C>.vst. 102 (1984) 223.j8]
Aguilera
C., Bemal L., Polymer Bull. 12 (1984) 383-388.[9] Creed D.~ Gross J. R. D.~ Sullivan S. L., Griffin A. C., Hoyle C. E.. Mol. Cryst. Liq C>.yst 149
(1987) 185-193.
[10]
Ozcayir
Y., Lai X., Ratto J., Blumstein A., Mol. Ciyst. Liq. Ciyst. 185 (1990) 75-87.[I ii Jo B. W., Choi J. K., Bang M. S., Chung B. Y., Jin J. I., Chem. Mater. 4 (1992) 1405.
[12] Hardouin F., Richard H., Achard M. F., Liq. Cry-it- 14 (1993) 971.
[13] Tournilhac F. G., Bosio L., Simon J., Blinov L. M.,
Yablonsky
S. V.. Liq. Crust. 14 (1993) 405.[14]
Ibn-Elhaj
M., Coles H. J., Guillon D., Skoulios A., J. Phys. II Fr>.a>ice 3 (1993) 1807.[15] Jin J. I., Kim H. S., Shin J. W.,
Chung
B. Y., Jo B. W., Bull. Ko>.ea Chem. Soc. Il (1990) 209.[16] Perrin D. D., Armarego W. L. F., Purification of laboratory Chemicals, 3rd ed, (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1988).
[17]
Goodby
J. W., Waugh M. A., Stein S. M., Chin E., Pindak R., Patel J. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. ill(1989) 8119.
[18] Nguyen H. T., Bouchta A,, Navaiiies L., Barois P., Isaert N.,
Twieg
R. J., Maroufi A.. Destrade C., J. Phys. II Fra>ice 2 (1992) 1889.j19] Blinov L. M., Lobko T. A., Ostrovskii B. I., Sulianov S. N., Toumilhac F. G., J.
Phys.
/ France 3 (1993) 121.[20] Hardouin F., Levelut A. M., Achard M. F., Sigaud G., J. Chim. Phvs. 80 (1983) 53 and references therein.
[21] Barois P., Coulon C., Prost J., J. Phi-s. Lent. France 42 (1981) L-lo?.
[22] Prost J., Barois P., J. Chim. Phys. 80 (1983) 65.
[23] Freizdon Ya. S., Tropsha Ye. G., Tsukruk V. V., Shilov V. V., Shibaev V. P., Lipatov Yu. S., J.
Polym. Chem. (USSR) 29 (1987) 1371.
[24] Barois P., Prost J., Lubensky T. C., J. Phys. Franc-e 46 (1985) 391.
[25] Barois P., Phys. Rev. A 33 (1986) 3632.
[26] Barois P.. Pommier J., Prost J., Solitons in Liquid Crystals, L. Lam and J. Prost Eds. (Springer- Verlag, New York, 1992) p. 19i.
[27] Prost J., a) J. Phys F>.ance 40 (1979) 58 b)
Liquid
Crystal of One and Two-Dimensional Order, W. Helfrich and G. Heppke Eds. (Springer, Berlin, 1990) p. 125.[28] Hardouin F., Levelut A. M.. Sigaud G., J. Ph_vs. Fra>ice 42 (1981) 71.
[29] Ratna B, R., Shashidhar R.,
Raja
V. N.. Phj<s. Rev. Left. 55 (1985) 1476.[30] Shashidhar R., Ratna B. R., Liq C>.yst 5 (1989) 421.
[31] Ratna B. R., Shashidhar R., Raja V. N., lncommensurite Crystals,
Liquid Crystals
and Quasi-Crystals,
J. F. Scott and N. A. Clark Eds. (Plenum, New York, 1987) p. 259.[32] Das P., Ema K., Garland C. W., Shashidhar R., Liq. Ciyst. 4 (1989) 581.
[33] Kumar S., Chen L., Surendranath V., Phi-s. Ret,. Lent. 67 (1991) 322.
[34] Patel P., Kumar S., Europhys. Lent. 23 (1993) 135.
[35] Patel P., Chen Li, Kumar S., Phys. Ret>. E 47 (1993) 2643.