READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Contaminant build-up in houses
Manley, P. J.; Helmeste, R. H.; Tamura, G. T.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=ec1d561d-5d2d-4051-bd8b-ee1b0eb60398 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=ec1d561d-5d2d-4051-bd8b-ee1b0eb60398Ser I
THl
N21d
National
Research Conseil national
lo *
1277
1
*
Council
Canada
de
recherches
Canada
e o 2 I
CONTAMINANT BUILD-UP IN HOUSES
by P.J. Manley, R.H. Helmeste, and G.T. Tamura
ANALYZED
Presented at
The Implementation and Effectiveness of Air l nfiltration Standards in Buildings
5th AIC Conference, October 1
-
4
1984, Reno, Nevada, USA Paper 19, p. 19.1-
19.126
DBR Paper No. 1277
Division of BuHding Research
I
I
ABSTRACT
The relation between air infiltration rate and indoor air
contaminant concentrations has been investigated in a number of
air-conditioned Toronto houses with low rates of natural
ventilation whose average values were lower in summer than in
winter.
The average indoor formaldehyde, radon and radon
daughter concentrations conversely, were found to be higher in
summer than in winter.
R ~ S U M ~
La relation entre le d6bit dlinfiltration de llair et les
concentrations de polluants 21
11int6rieur dlun certain nombre
de maisons climatisdes de Toronto a fait llobjet dlune 6tude.
Ces maisons pr6sentaient de faibles taux de ventilation
naturelle dont les valeurs moyennes Qtaient plus Qlev6es en
hiver qu'en 6t6. Les concentrations moyennes de formald6hyde,
de radon et des gaz de la famille du radon
3 11int6rieur des
maisons 6taient plus dlev6es durant 116t6
que durant llhiver.
- -
__
- - - - -- 3 cp'lc"1
I
1111
I I I I I ~ ~ I [ ~ ~
O~!(r
0 4 8n 111111
1111
--
---
---- - - _ _
- - -I
1THE
IMPLEMENTATIONAND
EFFECTIVENESSOF A I R
INFILTRATION STANDARDS IN BUILDINGS5 t h
AICConference,
October 1-4 1984,Reno,
Nevada, USAPAPER
19CONTAMINANT BUILD-UP I N HOUSES
P.J. MANL,EY,l R.H. H E L M E S T E , ~ AND G.T. TAMURA~
lP.J. Manley i s a S e n i o r P r o j e c t Manager w i t h t h e c o n s u l t i n g f i r m of MacLaren E n g i n e e r s I n c . , T o r o n t o , Canada.
2 ~ . ~ . Helmeste i s an O c c u p a t i o n a l H e a l t h S p e c i a l i s t w i t h MacZaren P l a n s e a r c h I n c . , T o r o n t o , Canada.
3 ~ . ~ . Tamura i s a S e n i o r Research O f f i c e r , Energy and S e r v i c e s S e c t i o n , D i v i s i o n of B u i l d i n g R e s e a r c h , N a t i o n a l R e s e a r c h C o u n c i l of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
The r e l a t i o n between a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e and i n d o o r
c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of radon g a s , r a d o n d a u g h t e r s , a n d formaldehyde h a s been i n v e s t i g a t e d f o r b o t h summer and w i n t e r c o n d i t i o n s i n a
number of T o r o n t o h o u s e s w i t h low r a t e s of n a t u r a l v e n t i l a t i o n .
A i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s o b t a i n e d by t h e f a n d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n method
and t h e s u l f u r h e x a f l u o r i d e t r a c e r g a s d i l u t i o n method a r e
compared. Formaldehyde l e v e l s were monitored u s i n g b o t h t h e
r e v i s e d NIOSH i m p i n g e r sampling method a n d badge d o s i m e t e r s . L e v e l s of radon g a s and d a u g h t e r s were d e t e r m i n e d by a g r a b
s a m p l i n g t e c h n i q u e and by f i l m d o s i m e t e r a s w e l l f o r r a d o n
d a u g h t e r s .
Average a i r change r a t e s i n a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s were lower o v e r
t h e summer months (0.12
-
0.40 a c h ) t h a n o v e r t h e w i n t e r p e r i o d(0.21
-
0.66 a c h ) . The a v e r a g e summer i n d o o r formaldehydec o n c e n t r a t i o n f o r a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s was 0.076 ppm a s compared
w i t h an a v e r a g e of 0.038 ppm i n w i n t e r . The a v e r a g e r a d o n and
radon d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s f o r a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s were h i g h e r by 44% and 32%, r e s p e c t i v e l y , d u r i n g t h e summer months t h a n d u r i n g t h e w i n t e r months.
INTRODUCTION
Prolonged e x p o s u r e t o low c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of i n d o o r a i r
c o n t a m i n a n t s c a n under c e r t a i n c i r c u m s t a n c e s b e a s e r i o u s t h r e a t
t o t h e h e a l t h of b u i l d i n g o c c u p a n t s . I n r e c e n t y e a r s c o n s i d e r a b l e
a t t e n t i o n h a s been f o c u s s e d on formaldehyde g a s e m i s s i o n s from u r e a formaldehyde foam i n s u l a t i o n a n d , i n a r e a s of h i g h n a t u r a l r a d i o a c t i v i t y , o n p a r t i c u l a t e a i r b o r n e r a d i o a c t i v i t y ( r a d o n
d a u g h t e r s ) r e s u l t i n g from r a d i o a c t i v e decay of r a d o n g a s . With
t h e i n c r e a s i n g demand f o r improvement i n a i r t i g h t n e s s o f t h e b u i l d i n g e n v e l o p e a s an e n e r g y c o n s e r v a t i o n measure, t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r s u c h c o n t a m i n a n t s t o b e p r e s e n t a t a n u n a c c e p t a b l e l e v e l , e v e n i n t h e a b s e n c e of s i g n i f i c a n t s o u r c e s , h a s i n c r e a s e d .
Formaldehyde g a s , f o r example, c a n b e t r a c e d t o s o u r c e s s u c h a s s y n t h e t i c f a b r i c s , wood p r o d u c t s , and p r o d u c t s of combustion. Radon g a s , a decay p r o d u c t of n a t u r a l l y - o c c u r r i n g n u c l i d e r a d i u n r 226, can be found t o some e x t e n t i n most s o i l s t h r o u g h o u t t h e
world. Radon emanates from e a r t h - d e r i v e d b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s a n d
can e n t e r a b u i l d i n g by t r a n s p o r t from s u r r o u n d i n g s o i l t h r o u g h c r a c k s and o p e n i n g s i n f o u n d a t i o n s .
T h i s paper p r e s e n t s a summary of t h e r e s u l t s of a m o n i t o r i n g
program d e s i g n e d t o examine t h e r e l a t i o n between i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e and i n d o o r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of r a d o n , radon d a u g h t e r s and
formaldehyde i n h o u s e s h a v i n g r e l a t i v e l y low r a t e s of n a t u r a l
v e n t i l a t i o n . It a l s o compares a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n d a t a o b t a i n e d by
t h e f a n d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n and t r a c e r g a s d i l u t i o n methods. Twelve
h o u s e s i n M e t r o p o l i t a n Toronto were t e s t e d weekly d u r i n g t h e
were
t e s t e d a l s o d u r i n g t h e summer f r o m J u l y t o September 1982; e i g h t of t h e t e n used t h e i r c e n t r a l a i r - c o n d i t i o n i n g systems e x t e n s i v e l y .2. DESCRIPTION OF TEST HOUSES
E l e c t r i c a l l y h e a t e d h o u s e s w i t h f o r c e d warm-air s y s t e m s were
s e l e c t e d f o r t h e t e s t program b e c a u s e t h e i r a i r exchange i s n o t
augmented by a f u r n a c e chimney. Two-storey, s i n g l e - f a m i l y
d w e l l i n g s w i t h basements a n d n o u r e a formaldehyde foam i n s u l a t i o n
were s t u d i e d ; t h e i r volumes, i n c l u d i n g basements, r a n g e d from 555
t o 948 m3. A l l w e r e frame c o n s t r u c t i o n w i t h b r i c k s i d i n g , t e n y e a r s o l d o r l e s s , w i t h c e n t r a l a i r - c o n d i t i o n i n g and f i r e p l a c e s . S e l e c t i o n of t h e t w e l v e t e s t h o u s e s from a p o o l of e i g h t e e n was based on low n a t u r a l v e n t i l a t i o n r a t e , c h a r a c t e r i z e d by t h e o v e r a l l a i r l e a k a g e p r o p e r t i e s a s s e s s e d by t h e f a n d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n method (CGSB I n t e r i m S t a n d a r d 149-GP-10, "Determination of A i r T i g h t n e s s of B u i l d i n g s by t h e Fan D e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n Method"). It g i v e s t h e t i g h t n e s s o f a b u i l d i n g
e n c l o s u r e by e x h a u s t i n g a i r from t h e s t r u c t u r e and measuring t h e a i r f l o w r a t e a n d c o r r e s p o n d i n g p r e s s u r e d i f f e r e n c e a c r o s s t h e
e n c l o s u r e . A p o r t a b l e commercial e x h a u s t f a n u n i t developed by
Orr and F i g l e y l was u s e d .
3. MONITORING AND ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES
Weekly a i r sampling c o n s i s t e d of t a k i n g g r a b samples f o r
r a d o n / r a d o n d a u g h t e r s a n d formaldehyde a n a l y s i s a n d c o n c u r r e n t measurements of a i r exchange r a t e u s i n g t h e t r a c e r g a s d i l u t i o n
method. Thermohygrographs were i n s t a l l e d i n t h e 1 i v i n g room t o
measure i n d o o r t e m p e r a t u r e and r e l a t i v e humidity. Outdoor
e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s , i n c l u d i n g t e m p e r a t u r e , r e l a t i v e
humidity, wind speed and d i r e c t i o n , and a t m o s p h e r i c p r e s s u r e were
r e c o r d e d a t t h e t i m e of sampling. Door a n d window o p e n i n g s a n d
occupant a c t i v i t i e s (vacuuming, smoking, e t c . ) were n o t e d f o r e a c h s a m p l i n g p e r i o d . 3.1 A i r I n f i l t r a t i o n I n t h e t r a c e r g a s d i l u t i o n method t h e i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e can b e d e t e r m i n e d from t h e e x p o n e n t i a l d e c a y r a t e of t h e t r a c e r g a s c o n c e n t r a t i o n w i t h r e s p e c t t o t i m e . I f t h e n a t u r a l l o g a r i t h m o f t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n i s p l o t t e d a g a i n s t t i m e , t h e measurements s h o u l d f a l l on a s t r a i g h t l i n e p r o v i d e d t h e a i r change r a t e r e m a i n s c o n s t a n t . A s c a t t e r of p o i n t s i s e x p e c t e d a n d a s t r a i g h t l i n e b e s t f i t can be c a l c u l a t e d u s i n g t h e l e a s t s q u a r e s method.
The a i r change r a t e i s g i v e n by where C1 = c o n c e n t r a t i o n of t r a c e r g a s a t time t l
C2
= c o n c e n t r a t i o n of t r a c e r g a s a t t i m e t S = a i r change r a t e p e r u n i t t i m e . I n e a c h of t h e t e s t houses 50 c c of SF6 ( a s a t r a c e r g a s ) was i n j e c t e d u p s t r e a m of t h e f a n i n t o t h e r e t u r r r a i r plenum of t h ef o r c e d - a i r h e a t i n g system. Samples were drawn a t t h e same
l o c a t i o n f o r s u b s e q u e n t a n a l y s i s o f SF6 c o n c e n t r a t i o n 30, 45, 60
and 75 min a f t e r i n j e c t i o n . During t h e sampling p e r i o d t h e
f u r n a c e f a n was s w i t c h e d t o manual mode i n o r d e r t o a c h i e v e thorough and c o n t i n u o u s mixing of a i r w i t h i n t h e s t r u c t u r e .
Connecting d o o r s , c l o s e t d o o r s , r e g i s t e r s , e t c .
,
were opened t oa l l o w f r e e c i r c u l a t i o n of a i r . Windows, e x t e r i o r d o o r s and
f i r e p l a c e dampers were c l o s e d .
T r a c e r g a s i n j e c t i o n and sample e x t r a c t i o n from t h e r e t u r n - a i r
pleneum was a c h i e v e d u s i n g a hypodermic s y r i n g e . The t r a n s f e r of
SF6 from a g a s c y l i n d e r t o t h e 50-cc s y r i n g e was accomplished
o u t s i d e and downwind of t h e t e s t house. A c l e a n 50-c s y r i n g e a n d
n e e d l e were u s e d t o draw sample a i r from t h e r e t u r n - a i r plenum f o r i n j e c t i o n i n t o a 20-mL e v a c u a t e d g l a s s t u b e f o r temporary s t o r a g e and s u b s e q u e n t a n a l y s i s i n t h e l a b o r a t o r y w i t h a n e l e c t r o n - c a p t u r e dectector/chromatograph.
3.2 Formaldehyde
Formaldehyde l e v e l s were monitored f o l l o w i n g t h e r e v i s e d NIOSH ( N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e f o r O c c u p a t i o n a l S a f e t y a n d H e a l t h ) i m p i n g e r
sampling method developed by R.R. Miksch a t t h e U n i v e r s i t y of
C a l i f o r n i a , and u s i n g a 1-h sampling p e r i o d . Samples were t a k e n
i n t h e l i v i n g room o r d i n i n g room of e a c h h o u s e , w i t h t h e sampling
t r a i n l o c a t e d a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 m above f l o o r l e v e l . A c a l i b r a t e d
c o n s t a n t - f l o w pump was used t o draw a i r a t 1 L/min t h r o u g h a
midget impinger c o n t a i n i n g sodium b i s u l f i t e a b s o r b i n g s o l u t i o n f o r s u b s e q u e n t a n a l y s i s i n a s p e c t r o p h o t o m e t e r .
For comparison, formaldehyde badge d o s i m e t e r s c o n t a i n i n g sodium b i s u l f i t e s o l u t i o n were u s e d t o c o l l e c t s a m p l e s o v e r a s e v e r r d a y
p e r i o d . Badges were suspended a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 m above t h e f l o o r
Radon /Itadon D a u g h t e r s
Simultaneous r a d o n l r a d o n d a u g h t e r s a m p l e s were c o l l e c t e d from t h e
basement a r e a of e a c h h o u s e u s i n g a g r a b s a m p l i n g t e c h n i q u e . A l l
measurements were t a k e n a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 m above t h e f l o o r . For
r a d o n g a s sampling, s e v e r a l c h a n g e s of basement room a i r were
drawn t h r o u g h a z i n c s u l p h i d e - c o a t e d flow-through s c i n t i l l a t i o n c e l l a f t e r p a s s i n g a g l a s s f i b r e f i l t e r t o e x c l u d e d a u g h t e r
p a r t i c l e s . The radon g a s c o l l e c t e d i n s i d e t h e c e l l was a l l o w e d t o
d e c a y f o r a p p r o x i m a t e l y 4 h ( s e v e n h a l f - l i v e s o f s h o r t - l i v e d
d a u g h t e r c h a i n ) , a t which t i m e t h e d a u g h t e r s were v i r t u a l l y a t
e q u i l i b r i u m w i t h t h e p a r e n t radon. The c e l l was t h e n p l a c e d
i n s i d e a l i g h t - t i g h t c a s t l e c o n t a i n i n g a p h o t o m u l t i p l i e r t u b e c o n n e c t e d t o a s c a l e r / c o u n t e r . The a l p h a p a r t i c l e s r e s u l t i n g f r o m r a d i o a c t i v e decay i n t e r a c t w i t h t h e z i n c s u l p h i d e c o a t i n g of t h e c e l l t o produce t h e s c i n t i l l a t i o n s o b s e r v e d by t h e c o u n t i n g system. C a l i b r a t i o n of e a c h c e l l c o u n t e r s y s t e m a g a i n s t a known r a d o n s o u r c e y i e l d s a c o u n t p e r m i n u t e t o p i c 0 c u r i e p e r l i t r e (pCi/L) c o n v e r s i o n a f t e r s u b t r a c t i n g t h e p r e d e t e r m i n e d background c o u n t f o r t h e c e l l .
Radon d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s were d e t e r m i n e d by means of t h e
m o d i f i e d Kusnetz method. A high-volume a i r pump w i t h a c a p a c i t y
of 30 L/min was u s e d t o draw a i r t h r o u g h a g l a s s f i b r e f i l t e r f o r
1 0 min. The p a r t i c u l a t e r a d o n d a u g h t e r s c o l l e c t e d o n t h e f i l t e r
were t h e n c o u n t e d w i t h a p o r t a b l e a l p h a c o u n t e r i n c o r p o r a t i n g a p h o t o n u l t i p l i e r t u b e d e t e c t o r .
For comparison w i t h g r a b s a m p l i n g d a t a , t h r e e radon d o s i m e t e r s were exposed i n e a c h h o u s e (two i n t h e basement, o n e o n t h e main
f l o o r ) o v e r a four-month s a m p l i n g p e r i o d . Alpha p a r t i c l e s from
t h e d e c a y of r a d o n g a s and d a u g h t e r s bombarding a n a l p h e s e n s i t i v e p l a s t i c f i l m d e t e c t o r (mounted on a c a r d ) l e a v e r a d i a t i o n t r a c k s . A n a l y s i s of t h e d o s i m e t e r s was c a r r i e d o u t by t h e m a n u f a c t u r e r . 4 . DATA ANALYSIS 4.1 A i r I n f i l t r a t i o n F i g u r e 1 shows t h e a v e r a g e a i r change of e a c h h o u s e f o r b o t h w i n t e r and summer months, o b t a i n e d by t h e t r a c e r g a s d i l u t i o n method and t h e a i r change r a t e f o r e a c h h o u s e ; t h i s r a n g e d from
3.9 t o 7.9 a i r c h a n g e s p e r h o u r ( a c h ) , o b t a i n e d by t h e f a n
d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n method a t a p r e s s u r e d i f f e r e n c e a c r o s s t h e
b u i l d i n g e n v e l o p e of 50 Pa. From a' b e s t f i t l i n e drawn t h r o u g h
t h e p o i n t s , t h e r a t i o of a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s measured by t h e t r a c e r g a s method and f a n d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n method was 1 / 1 4 f o r w i n t e r and 1/20 f o r summer.
F i g u r e 2 shows t h e a v e r a g e i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e of e a c h h o u s e ,
0
u
2 a b R I N F I L T R A T I O N A T 5 0 P a , A I R C H A N G E S l h ( F A N D E P R E S S U R I Z A T I O N M E T H O D ] I I I I-
W l N T E R --+--
S U R l h l E R-
- 1 / / l1.//.
.1 - 11. 5.
8 - I I I 1 I F i g u r e 1 Comparison of a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s d e t e r m i n e d by t h e t r a c e r g a s d i l u t i o n and t h e f a n d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n methods H O U S E N U M B E R F i g u r e 2 Average a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s ( t r a c e r g a s d i l u t i o n method) ( w i t h r a n g e of two s t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n s )t e s t i n g . I n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s f o r a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s o v e r t h e
summer months (0.12
-
0.40 a c h ) were lower t h a n t h o s e o v e r t h ew i n t e r p e r i o d (0.2 1
-
0.66 a c h ).
I n two h o u s e s i n which a i rc o n d i t i o n e r s were n o t u s e d and windows were open t h e a i r change
r a t e s were much h i g h e r (1.75 a c h f o r House No. 7 , and 2 . 7 8 a c h f o r
House No. 4). The a p p a r e n t r e l a t i v e l y h i g h a i r change r a t e i n
House No. 10 i n summer may b e r e l a t e d t o a i r c i r c u l a t i o n , inasmuch
a s o n l y one of two f u r n a c e f a n s i s u s e d f o r c i r c u l a t i o n of c o o l i n g
a i r i n summer. The g r a d u a l d i f f u s i o n o f S F 6 i n t o u n c i r c u l a t e d
a r e a s would g i v e t h e e f f e c t of more r a p i d decay of t r a c e r g a s c o n c e n t r a t i o n , r e s u l t i n g i n a n i n c o r r e c t l y h i g h a p p a r e n t a i r exchange r a t e .
F i g u r e 3 p r e s e n t s a v e r a g e a i r c h a n g e s , wind s p e e d s , a n d
h e a t i n g / c o o l i n g d e g r e e d a y s f o r e i g h t a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s i n t h e summer months and f o r t w e l v e h o u s e s i n t h e p r e v i o u s w i n t e r .
A i r change r a t e s were s i g n i f i c a n t l y l e s s i n t h e summer months t h a n
i n t h e w i n t e r months when t h e r e a r e g r e a t e r i n d o o r l o u t d o o r t e m p e r a t u r e d i f f e r e n t i a l s .
SAMPLING PERIOD SAMPLING PERIO! 2 NOV 1981 TO 12 JULY 1982 TO 12 MARCH 1982 16 SEPT 1982
-
Pr I \-
\, A I R CHANGE RATE-
2 8 I \-
- 2 6 - - 2 4-
0 -0' \ - 2 2"
,
\ 4 \ AV-
1 ( 8 HOUSES WITH - 2 0-
\ b AIR-CONDITIONING) V,::-
20 ,/Omm-D~vs-
1 82
0 7-
1 6 W,P;
rx -0 I \ A I R CHANGE/
P., ' 0 - 1 42
n 1 8 - I \ 1 \ RATE,'
- 1 2,
I Z'
' b-
1 6 - I ,4J'
-
1 0 $ I \ / / '.-0' 0 1 4-
I o - 8 0l WIND SPEED W I N D SPEED n
1 2 -*t\ - d l O\ /o' - 6
2
\. -ol 0 10 -b 4
-
z (12 HOUSES) I- 8 - COOLTNG / y o - 2S
I 6 - OEGREF-DAYS 0 4 - 2,
I - 2
1 J I I 1 1 0 4.
- 4NOV DEC JAN FEB MARCH 1U1 Y AUG SEPT
F i g u r e 3 Average p e r i o d a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e , wind s p e e d and
It i s e x p e c t e d t h a t d u r i n g t h e summer when t h e t e m p e r a t u r e d i f f e r e n t i a l s a r e low t h e a i r change r a t e w i l l be due mainly t o
wind. T h e r e a p p e a r s t o b e a p o s i t i v e c o r r e l a t i o n between a i r
change r a t e and wind s p e e d f o r s e v e r a l of t h e e i g h t a i r -
c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s . I n c r e a s e d i n d o o r r e l a t i v e h u m i d i t y c a u s e s i n c r e a s e d a i r t i g h t n e s s d u r i n g t h e summer months and may a l s o b e a f a c t o r i n t h e d e c r e a s e d a i r change r a t e 4 ; w i n t e r a v e r a g e s of
r e l a t i v e h u m i d i t y ranged from 34 t o 47%, and summer a v e r a g e s r a n g e d f r o m 56 t o 65%.
4.2 Formaldehyde
The mean i n d o o r formaldehyde c o n c e n t r a t i o n s o b t a i n e d from 1-h
NIOSH measurements i n e a c h of t h e h o u s e s a r e shown on F i g u r e
4.
I n g e n e r a l , t h e r e was good agreement between t h e weekly d o s i m e t e r ( 7 d a y e x p o s u r e ) and 1-h NIOSH r e s u l t s o v e r t h e w i n t e r s a m p l i n g
p e r i o d , a s shown g r a p h i c a l l y i n F i g u r e 5. Agreement was poor when
t h e y were compared on a weekly b a s i s f o r e a c h house. The h i g h e r
i n d o o r formaldehyde l e v e l s i n a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s a p p e a r t o b e
r e l a t e d t o a l o w e r a i r change r a t e d u r i n g t h e summer months. The
a v e r a g e i n d o o r c o n c e n t r a t i o n f o r t h e a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s was
0.076 ppm, which i s t w i c e t h e w i n t e r a v e r a g e o f 0.038 ppm. The
l e v e l s of formaldehyde c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n d o o r s a p p e a r t o be
a f f e c t e d , a s w e l l , by t h o s e o u t d o o r s . Measurements d u r i n g t h e
summer t e s t s i n d i c a t e d t h a t o u t d o o r l e v e l s n e a r a highway and a
major r o a d ( d i s t a n c e of 25 t o 120 m) v a r i e d f r o m 0.014 t o
0.022 ppm, and n e a r minor r o a d s from 0.006 t o 0.008 ppm. Outdoor
l e v e l s a r e a f f e c t e d by t r a f f i c d e n s i t y s i n c e a u t o m o b i l e e x h a u s t c o n t a i n s s i g n i f i c a n t c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of formaldehyde and o t h e r a l d e h y d e s . A t p r e s e n t t h e a c c e p t e d i n d o o r l e v e l of formaldehyde i s 0.10 ppm (ASHRAE S t a n d a r d 62-81, V e n t i l a t i o n f o r A c c e p t a b l e I n d o o r Air Q u a l i t y ) . I n t h r e e of t h e t e s t h o u s e s t h i s l e v e l was exceeded i n
70% of t h e i n d o o r measurements made d u r i n g t h e summer months.
Over t h e w i n t e r months t h e same t h r e e h o u s e s a l s o had t h e h i g h e s t formaldehyde c o n c e n t r a t i o n s , h u t t h e maximum a c c e p t a b l e
c o n c e n t r a t i o n was exceeded i n less t h a n 10% of t h e measurements.
4.3 RadonIRadon D a u g h t e r s
F i g u r e 6 shows a v e r a g e d radon c o n c e n t r a t i o n s and F i g u r e 7 a v e r a g e d r a d o n d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s f o r t h e two measurement p e r i o d s . Average radon c o n c e n t r a t i o n s o v e r t h e w i n t e r p e r i o d r a n g e d f r o m 0.3 t o 2.2 p C i / ~ ; o v e r t h e summer p e r i o d t h e y r a n g e d from 0.37 t o
2.26 pCi/L. Average radon d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s o v e r t h e w i n t e r
p e r i o d r a n g e d f r o m 0.0007 t o 0.0065 working l e v e l
(WL);
c o r r e s p o n d i n g summer d a t a ranged from 0.0011 t o 0.007
WL.
Comparison o f summer a n d w i n t e r d a t a f o r t h e e i g h t a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d
H O U S E N U M B E R
Figur.e 4 . Average 1-h NIOSH formaldehyde concentrations ( i n t e r i o r ) ( w i t h range of two standard d e v i a t i o n s )
E
l
SAMPLING PERIOD CLn 2 NOV 1981 TO 12 MARCH 1982
W
n (SEASON AVERAGE FOR EACH TEST HOUSE)
1 - H O U R N I O S H . F O R M A L D E H Y D E . P P m
Figure 5 Comparison 6f average 1-h NIOSH and 7-day dosimeter formaldehyde measurements
H O U S E N U M B E R
F i g u r e 6 Average d a i l y radon c o n c e n t r a t i o n ( w i t h r a n g e of two s t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n s ) 0 . 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ SAhlPLlNG PERIOD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 H O U S E N U M B E R F i g u r e 7 Average d a i l y radon d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s ( w i t h r a n g e of two s t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n s )
G R A B S A M P L E . R A D O N D A U G H T E R S , W L
0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 8 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 2 0
1 ' I T 1 I ' 4
SAMPLING PERIOD
3 2 NOV 1981 TO 12 MARCH 1982
(SEASON AVERAGE FOR
d
-... EACH TEST HOUSE) - 0 . 0 0 2 v;
.-
Dz U n vl n 0 n 4 0 Dz Y W I--
0 . 0 0 8:
-
vl-
0 . 0 1 0 I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 3 G R A B S A M P L E , R A D O N G A S , p C i l L RADON RADON DAUGHTERS AVERAGE E Q U I L I B R I U M FACTOR-
0.31F i g u r e 8 Comparison of g r a b sample and f i l m d o s i m e t e r measurements of r a d o n a n d r a d o n d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s
P
c o n c e n t r a t i o n s were g r e a t e r f o r t h e summer months t h a n f o r t h e w i n t e r months by 44 and
32%,
r e s p e c t i v e l y . The a c c e p t a b l e l i m i t f o r r a d o n d a u g h t e r s i s 0.01WL
(ASHRAE
S t a n d a r d 62-81). The r a d o n l r a d o n d a u g h t e r d a t a showed e x p e c t e d v a r i a t i o n s i n i n d i v i d u a l s a m p l e s t a k e n a t t h e same h o u s e on d i f f e r e n t s a m p l i n g d a y s . It can be e x p l a i n e d , a t l e a s t i n p a r t , by t h e e f f e c t s of v a r i o u s m e t e o r o l o g i c a l f a c t o r s shown i n o t h e r s t u d i e s t o b e s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t i n a f f e c t i n g t h e e m i s s i o n r a t e of radon g a s from s o i l . These i n c l u d e b a r o m e t r i c p r e s s u r e , a i r and s o i l t e m p e r a t u r e ,r e l a t i v e h u m i d i t y , and wind speed.
The a v e r a g e e q u i l i b r i u m f a c t o r ( t h e r a t i o of measured r a d o n
d a u g h t e r s t o t h e p o t e n t i a l r a d o n d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n t h a t c o u l d o c c u r when i n complete e q u i l i b r i u m w i t h t h e p a r e n t r a d o n ) d i d n o t
change s i g n i f i c a n t l y from w i n t e r (0.33) t o summer (0.30) i n t h e e i g h t a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d houses. F i g u r e 8 p r o v i d e s a comparison of a v e r a g e r a d o n and r a d o n d a u g h t e r measurements f o r e a c h h o u s e , u s i n g a g r a b sampling t e c h n i q u e w i t h d a t a o b t a i n e d from t h e f i l m d o s i m e t e r s exposed o v e r t h e w i n t e r s a m p l i n g p e r i o d . Agreement between t h e two s e t s of d a t a can be c o n s i d e r e d f a i r l y good. F i g u r e 9 s u g g e s t s t h a t c o n c e n t r a t i o n s o f b o t h formaldehyde. a n d radon g a s t e n d t o d e c r e a s e a s t h e a i r change r a t e i n c r e a s e s a n d v i c e v e r s a .
I
WINTER DATA SUMMER DATAI
- 0 FORMALDEHYDE - A RADON \'<
,/
- O\. RADON \ l o-
o->:, w-
-:z, .A"- -0 / \,-- / - - ,o FORMALDEHYDE-
-
- L oNOV OEC JAN FEB MARCH JULY AUG SEPT NOTE: HOUSES 4 AND 7 WERE EXCLUDED FROM AVERAGES
FOR JULY, AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER BECAUSE OF "OPEN" SAMPLING CONDITIONS EXPERIENCED
F i g u r e 9 Average m o n t h l y ' a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e and formaldehyde
and r a d o n c o n c e n t r a t i o n s
5.
SUMMARY
The p o s s i b l e c o r r e l a t i o n between a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e and i n d o o r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of r a d o n , r a d o n d a u g h t e r s , a n d formaldehyde i n h o u s e s h a v i n g r e l a t i v e l y low r a t e s of n a t u r a l v e n t i l a t i o n h a s been examined.
1. A i r change r a t e s measured by t h e f a n d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n method
v a r i e d f r o m 3.9 t o 7.9 a i r c h a n g e s p e r h o u r a t a p r e s s u r e
d i f f e r e n c e of 50 Pa. Averaged i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s o b t a i n e d by
t r a c e r g a s measurements o v e r t h e summer s t u d y p e r i o d ( f o r a i r
c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s ) ranged from 0.12 t o 0.40 a i r changes p e r
h o u r ; o v e r t h e w i n t e r months t h e r a t e s were h i g h e r a t 0.21 t o
0.66 a i r changes p e r hour. These measurements r e p r e s e n t 1 / 2 0
and 1 / 1 4 , r e s p e c t i v e l y , o f t h e a i r change r a t e s a s measured by t h e f a n d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n method a t a p r e s s u r e d i f f e r e n c e of 5 0 Pa. 2. The a v e r a g e d i n d o o r c o n c e n t r a t i o n of formaldehyde f o r a l l a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s , a s measured by t h e 1-h N I O S H method, was 0.076 ppm ( r a n g i n g from 0.019 t o 0.136 ppm) d u r i n g t h e summer months, a n d 0,038 ppm ( r a n g i n g f r o m 0.015 t o 0.059 ppm) f o r t h e w i n t e r months,
3. The a v e r a g e d r a d o n g a s c o n c e n t r a t i o n s f o r a l l a i r c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s d u r i n g t h e summer months r a n g e d from 0.37 t o
2.26 pCi/L; f o r t h e w i n t e r months t h e y r a n g e d f r o m 0.30 t o
2.2 pCi/L. The a v e r a g e d radon d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s f o r a l l
a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s d u r i n g t h e summer months r a n g e d from
0.0011 t o 0.007
WL;
f o r t h e w i n t e r months t h e y ranged from0.0007 t o 0.0065
WL.
4. Measurements i n d i c a t e t h q t c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of formaldehyde,
r a d o n , and r a d o n d a u g h t e r s a r e a f f e c t e d by i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e .
6. REFERENCES
1. ORR, H.W. and FIGLEY, D.A., "An e x h a u s t f a n a p p a r a t u s f o r
a s s e s s i n g t h e a i r l e a k a g e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of h o u s e s , " N a t i o n a l Research Council of Canada, D i v i s i o n of B u i l d i n g Research,
BR Note 156, 1980.
2. TAMURA, G.T.,
ASHRAE
J o u r n a l ,25,
No. 1 0 , 1983, pp. 40-43.3. KUSNETZ, H.L., American I n d u s t r i a l Hygiene A s s o c i a t i o n
Q u a r t e r l y ,
-
17, 1956, p. 85.4.
YOCOM, J.E., J o u r n a l of t h e A i r P o l l u t i o n C o n t r o l A s s o c i a t i o n ,32 No. 5 , 1982, pp. 500-520.
-9
7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The a u t h o r s would l i k e t o acknowledge t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of t h e
f o l l o w i n g k e y p r o j e c t team members: J. D e Jong, W. Cormack and
R. Whitehead of MacLaren E n g i n e e r s , and
R.
Evans of t h e N a t i o n a lR e s e a r c h C o u n c i l o f Canada. The c o o p e r a t i o n a n d a s s i s t a n c e of
North York Hydro and t h e i n d i v i d u a l homeowners who p a r t i c i p a t e d i n t h e s t u d y a r e much a p p r e c i a t e d .