• Aucun résultat trouvé

Contaminant build-up in houses

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Contaminant build-up in houses"

Copied!
17
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Contaminant build-up in houses

Manley, P. J.; Helmeste, R. H.; Tamura, G. T.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=ec1d561d-5d2d-4051-bd8b-ee1b0eb60398 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=ec1d561d-5d2d-4051-bd8b-ee1b0eb60398

(2)

Ser I

THl

N21d

National

Research Conseil national

lo *

1277

1

*

Council

Canada

de

recherches

Canada

e o 2 I

CONTAMINANT BUILD-UP IN HOUSES

by P.J. Manley, R.H. Helmeste, and G.T. Tamura

ANALYZED

Presented at

The Implementation and Effectiveness of Air l nfiltration Standards in Buildings

5th AIC Conference, October 1

-

4

1984, Reno, Nevada, USA Paper 19, p. 19.1

-

19.12

6

DBR Paper No. 1277

Division of BuHding Research

(3)

I

I

ABSTRACT

The relation between air infiltration rate and indoor air

contaminant concentrations has been investigated in a number of

air-conditioned Toronto houses with low rates of natural

ventilation whose average values were lower in summer than in

winter.

The average indoor formaldehyde, radon and radon

daughter concentrations conversely, were found to be higher in

summer than in winter.

R ~ S U M ~

La relation entre le d6bit dlinfiltration de llair et les

concentrations de polluants 21

11int6rieur dlun certain nombre

de maisons climatisdes de Toronto a fait llobjet dlune 6tude.

Ces maisons pr6sentaient de faibles taux de ventilation

naturelle dont les valeurs moyennes Qtaient plus Qlev6es en

hiver qu'en 6t6. Les concentrations moyennes de formald6hyde,

de radon et des gaz de la famille du radon

3 11int6rieur des

maisons 6taient plus dlev6es durant 116t6

que durant llhiver.

- -

__

- - - - -- 3 cp'lc"

1

I

1111

I I I I I ~ ~ I [ ~ ~

O

~!(r

0 4 8

n 111111

1111

-

-

---

---

- - - _ _

- - -

I

1

(4)

THE

IMPLEMENTATION

AND

EFFECTIVENESS

OF A I R

INFILTRATION STANDARDS IN BUILDINGS

5 t h

AIC

Conference,

October 1-4 1984,

Reno,

Nevada, USA

PAPER

19

CONTAMINANT BUILD-UP I N HOUSES

P.J. MANL,EY,l R.H. H E L M E S T E , ~ AND G.T. TAMURA~

lP.J. Manley i s a S e n i o r P r o j e c t Manager w i t h t h e c o n s u l t i n g f i r m of MacLaren E n g i n e e r s I n c . , T o r o n t o , Canada.

2 ~ . ~ . Helmeste i s an O c c u p a t i o n a l H e a l t h S p e c i a l i s t w i t h MacZaren P l a n s e a r c h I n c . , T o r o n t o , Canada.

3 ~ . ~ . Tamura i s a S e n i o r Research O f f i c e r , Energy and S e r v i c e s S e c t i o n , D i v i s i o n of B u i l d i n g R e s e a r c h , N a t i o n a l R e s e a r c h C o u n c i l of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

(5)

The r e l a t i o n between a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e and i n d o o r

c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of radon g a s , r a d o n d a u g h t e r s , a n d formaldehyde h a s been i n v e s t i g a t e d f o r b o t h summer and w i n t e r c o n d i t i o n s i n a

number of T o r o n t o h o u s e s w i t h low r a t e s of n a t u r a l v e n t i l a t i o n .

A i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s o b t a i n e d by t h e f a n d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n method

and t h e s u l f u r h e x a f l u o r i d e t r a c e r g a s d i l u t i o n method a r e

compared. Formaldehyde l e v e l s were monitored u s i n g b o t h t h e

r e v i s e d NIOSH i m p i n g e r sampling method a n d badge d o s i m e t e r s . L e v e l s of radon g a s and d a u g h t e r s were d e t e r m i n e d by a g r a b

s a m p l i n g t e c h n i q u e and by f i l m d o s i m e t e r a s w e l l f o r r a d o n

d a u g h t e r s .

Average a i r change r a t e s i n a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s were lower o v e r

t h e summer months (0.12

-

0.40 a c h ) t h a n o v e r t h e w i n t e r p e r i o d

(0.21

-

0.66 a c h ) . The a v e r a g e summer i n d o o r formaldehyde

c o n c e n t r a t i o n f o r a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s was 0.076 ppm a s compared

w i t h an a v e r a g e of 0.038 ppm i n w i n t e r . The a v e r a g e r a d o n and

radon d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s f o r a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s were h i g h e r by 44% and 32%, r e s p e c t i v e l y , d u r i n g t h e summer months t h a n d u r i n g t h e w i n t e r months.

INTRODUCTION

Prolonged e x p o s u r e t o low c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of i n d o o r a i r

c o n t a m i n a n t s c a n under c e r t a i n c i r c u m s t a n c e s b e a s e r i o u s t h r e a t

t o t h e h e a l t h of b u i l d i n g o c c u p a n t s . I n r e c e n t y e a r s c o n s i d e r a b l e

a t t e n t i o n h a s been f o c u s s e d on formaldehyde g a s e m i s s i o n s from u r e a formaldehyde foam i n s u l a t i o n a n d , i n a r e a s of h i g h n a t u r a l r a d i o a c t i v i t y , o n p a r t i c u l a t e a i r b o r n e r a d i o a c t i v i t y ( r a d o n

d a u g h t e r s ) r e s u l t i n g from r a d i o a c t i v e decay of r a d o n g a s . With

t h e i n c r e a s i n g demand f o r improvement i n a i r t i g h t n e s s o f t h e b u i l d i n g e n v e l o p e a s an e n e r g y c o n s e r v a t i o n measure, t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r s u c h c o n t a m i n a n t s t o b e p r e s e n t a t a n u n a c c e p t a b l e l e v e l , e v e n i n t h e a b s e n c e of s i g n i f i c a n t s o u r c e s , h a s i n c r e a s e d .

Formaldehyde g a s , f o r example, c a n b e t r a c e d t o s o u r c e s s u c h a s s y n t h e t i c f a b r i c s , wood p r o d u c t s , and p r o d u c t s of combustion. Radon g a s , a decay p r o d u c t of n a t u r a l l y - o c c u r r i n g n u c l i d e r a d i u n r 226, can be found t o some e x t e n t i n most s o i l s t h r o u g h o u t t h e

world. Radon emanates from e a r t h - d e r i v e d b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s a n d

can e n t e r a b u i l d i n g by t r a n s p o r t from s u r r o u n d i n g s o i l t h r o u g h c r a c k s and o p e n i n g s i n f o u n d a t i o n s .

T h i s paper p r e s e n t s a summary of t h e r e s u l t s of a m o n i t o r i n g

program d e s i g n e d t o examine t h e r e l a t i o n between i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e and i n d o o r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of r a d o n , radon d a u g h t e r s and

formaldehyde i n h o u s e s h a v i n g r e l a t i v e l y low r a t e s of n a t u r a l

v e n t i l a t i o n . It a l s o compares a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n d a t a o b t a i n e d by

t h e f a n d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n and t r a c e r g a s d i l u t i o n methods. Twelve

h o u s e s i n M e t r o p o l i t a n Toronto were t e s t e d weekly d u r i n g t h e

(6)

were

t e s t e d a l s o d u r i n g t h e summer f r o m J u l y t o September 1982; e i g h t of t h e t e n used t h e i r c e n t r a l a i r - c o n d i t i o n i n g systems e x t e n s i v e l y .

2. DESCRIPTION OF TEST HOUSES

E l e c t r i c a l l y h e a t e d h o u s e s w i t h f o r c e d warm-air s y s t e m s were

s e l e c t e d f o r t h e t e s t program b e c a u s e t h e i r a i r exchange i s n o t

augmented by a f u r n a c e chimney. Two-storey, s i n g l e - f a m i l y

d w e l l i n g s w i t h basements a n d n o u r e a formaldehyde foam i n s u l a t i o n

were s t u d i e d ; t h e i r volumes, i n c l u d i n g basements, r a n g e d from 555

t o 948 m3. A l l w e r e frame c o n s t r u c t i o n w i t h b r i c k s i d i n g , t e n y e a r s o l d o r l e s s , w i t h c e n t r a l a i r - c o n d i t i o n i n g and f i r e p l a c e s . S e l e c t i o n of t h e t w e l v e t e s t h o u s e s from a p o o l of e i g h t e e n was based on low n a t u r a l v e n t i l a t i o n r a t e , c h a r a c t e r i z e d by t h e o v e r a l l a i r l e a k a g e p r o p e r t i e s a s s e s s e d by t h e f a n d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n method (CGSB I n t e r i m S t a n d a r d 149-GP-10, "Determination of A i r T i g h t n e s s of B u i l d i n g s by t h e Fan D e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n Method"). It g i v e s t h e t i g h t n e s s o f a b u i l d i n g

e n c l o s u r e by e x h a u s t i n g a i r from t h e s t r u c t u r e and measuring t h e a i r f l o w r a t e a n d c o r r e s p o n d i n g p r e s s u r e d i f f e r e n c e a c r o s s t h e

e n c l o s u r e . A p o r t a b l e commercial e x h a u s t f a n u n i t developed by

Orr and F i g l e y l was u s e d .

3. MONITORING AND ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES

Weekly a i r sampling c o n s i s t e d of t a k i n g g r a b samples f o r

r a d o n / r a d o n d a u g h t e r s a n d formaldehyde a n a l y s i s a n d c o n c u r r e n t measurements of a i r exchange r a t e u s i n g t h e t r a c e r g a s d i l u t i o n

method. Thermohygrographs were i n s t a l l e d i n t h e 1 i v i n g room t o

measure i n d o o r t e m p e r a t u r e and r e l a t i v e humidity. Outdoor

e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s , i n c l u d i n g t e m p e r a t u r e , r e l a t i v e

humidity, wind speed and d i r e c t i o n , and a t m o s p h e r i c p r e s s u r e were

r e c o r d e d a t t h e t i m e of sampling. Door a n d window o p e n i n g s a n d

occupant a c t i v i t i e s (vacuuming, smoking, e t c . ) were n o t e d f o r e a c h s a m p l i n g p e r i o d . 3.1 A i r I n f i l t r a t i o n I n t h e t r a c e r g a s d i l u t i o n method t h e i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e can b e d e t e r m i n e d from t h e e x p o n e n t i a l d e c a y r a t e of t h e t r a c e r g a s c o n c e n t r a t i o n w i t h r e s p e c t t o t i m e . I f t h e n a t u r a l l o g a r i t h m o f t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n i s p l o t t e d a g a i n s t t i m e , t h e measurements s h o u l d f a l l on a s t r a i g h t l i n e p r o v i d e d t h e a i r change r a t e r e m a i n s c o n s t a n t . A s c a t t e r of p o i n t s i s e x p e c t e d a n d a s t r a i g h t l i n e b e s t f i t can be c a l c u l a t e d u s i n g t h e l e a s t s q u a r e s method.

(7)

The a i r change r a t e i s g i v e n by where C1 = c o n c e n t r a t i o n of t r a c e r g a s a t time t l

C2

= c o n c e n t r a t i o n of t r a c e r g a s a t t i m e t S = a i r change r a t e p e r u n i t t i m e . I n e a c h of t h e t e s t houses 50 c c of SF6 ( a s a t r a c e r g a s ) was i n j e c t e d u p s t r e a m of t h e f a n i n t o t h e r e t u r r r a i r plenum of t h e

f o r c e d - a i r h e a t i n g system. Samples were drawn a t t h e same

l o c a t i o n f o r s u b s e q u e n t a n a l y s i s o f SF6 c o n c e n t r a t i o n 30, 45, 60

and 75 min a f t e r i n j e c t i o n . During t h e sampling p e r i o d t h e

f u r n a c e f a n was s w i t c h e d t o manual mode i n o r d e r t o a c h i e v e thorough and c o n t i n u o u s mixing of a i r w i t h i n t h e s t r u c t u r e .

Connecting d o o r s , c l o s e t d o o r s , r e g i s t e r s , e t c .

,

were opened t o

a l l o w f r e e c i r c u l a t i o n of a i r . Windows, e x t e r i o r d o o r s and

f i r e p l a c e dampers were c l o s e d .

T r a c e r g a s i n j e c t i o n and sample e x t r a c t i o n from t h e r e t u r n - a i r

pleneum was a c h i e v e d u s i n g a hypodermic s y r i n g e . The t r a n s f e r of

SF6 from a g a s c y l i n d e r t o t h e 50-cc s y r i n g e was accomplished

o u t s i d e and downwind of t h e t e s t house. A c l e a n 50-c s y r i n g e a n d

n e e d l e were u s e d t o draw sample a i r from t h e r e t u r n - a i r plenum f o r i n j e c t i o n i n t o a 20-mL e v a c u a t e d g l a s s t u b e f o r temporary s t o r a g e and s u b s e q u e n t a n a l y s i s i n t h e l a b o r a t o r y w i t h a n e l e c t r o n - c a p t u r e dectector/chromatograph.

3.2 Formaldehyde

Formaldehyde l e v e l s were monitored f o l l o w i n g t h e r e v i s e d NIOSH ( N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e f o r O c c u p a t i o n a l S a f e t y a n d H e a l t h ) i m p i n g e r

sampling method developed by R.R. Miksch a t t h e U n i v e r s i t y of

C a l i f o r n i a , and u s i n g a 1-h sampling p e r i o d . Samples were t a k e n

i n t h e l i v i n g room o r d i n i n g room of e a c h h o u s e , w i t h t h e sampling

t r a i n l o c a t e d a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 m above f l o o r l e v e l . A c a l i b r a t e d

c o n s t a n t - f l o w pump was used t o draw a i r a t 1 L/min t h r o u g h a

midget impinger c o n t a i n i n g sodium b i s u l f i t e a b s o r b i n g s o l u t i o n f o r s u b s e q u e n t a n a l y s i s i n a s p e c t r o p h o t o m e t e r .

For comparison, formaldehyde badge d o s i m e t e r s c o n t a i n i n g sodium b i s u l f i t e s o l u t i o n were u s e d t o c o l l e c t s a m p l e s o v e r a s e v e r r d a y

p e r i o d . Badges were suspended a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 m above t h e f l o o r

(8)

Radon /Itadon D a u g h t e r s

Simultaneous r a d o n l r a d o n d a u g h t e r s a m p l e s were c o l l e c t e d from t h e

basement a r e a of e a c h h o u s e u s i n g a g r a b s a m p l i n g t e c h n i q u e . A l l

measurements were t a k e n a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 m above t h e f l o o r . For

r a d o n g a s sampling, s e v e r a l c h a n g e s of basement room a i r were

drawn t h r o u g h a z i n c s u l p h i d e - c o a t e d flow-through s c i n t i l l a t i o n c e l l a f t e r p a s s i n g a g l a s s f i b r e f i l t e r t o e x c l u d e d a u g h t e r

p a r t i c l e s . The radon g a s c o l l e c t e d i n s i d e t h e c e l l was a l l o w e d t o

d e c a y f o r a p p r o x i m a t e l y 4 h ( s e v e n h a l f - l i v e s o f s h o r t - l i v e d

d a u g h t e r c h a i n ) , a t which t i m e t h e d a u g h t e r s were v i r t u a l l y a t

e q u i l i b r i u m w i t h t h e p a r e n t radon. The c e l l was t h e n p l a c e d

i n s i d e a l i g h t - t i g h t c a s t l e c o n t a i n i n g a p h o t o m u l t i p l i e r t u b e c o n n e c t e d t o a s c a l e r / c o u n t e r . The a l p h a p a r t i c l e s r e s u l t i n g f r o m r a d i o a c t i v e decay i n t e r a c t w i t h t h e z i n c s u l p h i d e c o a t i n g of t h e c e l l t o produce t h e s c i n t i l l a t i o n s o b s e r v e d by t h e c o u n t i n g system. C a l i b r a t i o n of e a c h c e l l c o u n t e r s y s t e m a g a i n s t a known r a d o n s o u r c e y i e l d s a c o u n t p e r m i n u t e t o p i c 0 c u r i e p e r l i t r e (pCi/L) c o n v e r s i o n a f t e r s u b t r a c t i n g t h e p r e d e t e r m i n e d background c o u n t f o r t h e c e l l .

Radon d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s were d e t e r m i n e d by means of t h e

m o d i f i e d Kusnetz method. A high-volume a i r pump w i t h a c a p a c i t y

of 30 L/min was u s e d t o draw a i r t h r o u g h a g l a s s f i b r e f i l t e r f o r

1 0 min. The p a r t i c u l a t e r a d o n d a u g h t e r s c o l l e c t e d o n t h e f i l t e r

were t h e n c o u n t e d w i t h a p o r t a b l e a l p h a c o u n t e r i n c o r p o r a t i n g a p h o t o n u l t i p l i e r t u b e d e t e c t o r .

For comparison w i t h g r a b s a m p l i n g d a t a , t h r e e radon d o s i m e t e r s were exposed i n e a c h h o u s e (two i n t h e basement, o n e o n t h e main

f l o o r ) o v e r a four-month s a m p l i n g p e r i o d . Alpha p a r t i c l e s from

t h e d e c a y of r a d o n g a s and d a u g h t e r s bombarding a n a l p h e s e n s i t i v e p l a s t i c f i l m d e t e c t o r (mounted on a c a r d ) l e a v e r a d i a t i o n t r a c k s . A n a l y s i s of t h e d o s i m e t e r s was c a r r i e d o u t by t h e m a n u f a c t u r e r . 4 . DATA ANALYSIS 4.1 A i r I n f i l t r a t i o n F i g u r e 1 shows t h e a v e r a g e a i r change of e a c h h o u s e f o r b o t h w i n t e r and summer months, o b t a i n e d by t h e t r a c e r g a s d i l u t i o n method and t h e a i r change r a t e f o r e a c h h o u s e ; t h i s r a n g e d from

3.9 t o 7.9 a i r c h a n g e s p e r h o u r ( a c h ) , o b t a i n e d by t h e f a n

d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n method a t a p r e s s u r e d i f f e r e n c e a c r o s s t h e

b u i l d i n g e n v e l o p e of 50 Pa. From a' b e s t f i t l i n e drawn t h r o u g h

t h e p o i n t s , t h e r a t i o of a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s measured by t h e t r a c e r g a s method and f a n d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n method was 1 / 1 4 f o r w i n t e r and 1/20 f o r summer.

F i g u r e 2 shows t h e a v e r a g e i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e of e a c h h o u s e ,

(9)

0

u

2 a b R I N F I L T R A T I O N A T 5 0 P a , A I R C H A N G E S l h ( F A N D E P R E S S U R I Z A T I O N M E T H O D ] I I I I

-

W l N T E R --+-

-

S U R l h l E R

-

- 1 / / l1

.//.

.1 - 11. 5

.

8 - I I I 1 I F i g u r e 1 Comparison of a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s d e t e r m i n e d by t h e t r a c e r g a s d i l u t i o n and t h e f a n d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n methods H O U S E N U M B E R F i g u r e 2 Average a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s ( t r a c e r g a s d i l u t i o n method) ( w i t h r a n g e of two s t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n s )

(10)

t e s t i n g . I n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s f o r a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s o v e r t h e

summer months (0.12

-

0.40 a c h ) were lower t h a n t h o s e o v e r t h e

w i n t e r p e r i o d (0.2 1

-

0.66 a c h )

.

I n two h o u s e s i n which a i r

c o n d i t i o n e r s were n o t u s e d and windows were open t h e a i r change

r a t e s were much h i g h e r (1.75 a c h f o r House No. 7 , and 2 . 7 8 a c h f o r

House No. 4). The a p p a r e n t r e l a t i v e l y h i g h a i r change r a t e i n

House No. 10 i n summer may b e r e l a t e d t o a i r c i r c u l a t i o n , inasmuch

a s o n l y one of two f u r n a c e f a n s i s u s e d f o r c i r c u l a t i o n of c o o l i n g

a i r i n summer. The g r a d u a l d i f f u s i o n o f S F 6 i n t o u n c i r c u l a t e d

a r e a s would g i v e t h e e f f e c t of more r a p i d decay of t r a c e r g a s c o n c e n t r a t i o n , r e s u l t i n g i n a n i n c o r r e c t l y h i g h a p p a r e n t a i r exchange r a t e .

F i g u r e 3 p r e s e n t s a v e r a g e a i r c h a n g e s , wind s p e e d s , a n d

h e a t i n g / c o o l i n g d e g r e e d a y s f o r e i g h t a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s i n t h e summer months and f o r t w e l v e h o u s e s i n t h e p r e v i o u s w i n t e r .

A i r change r a t e s were s i g n i f i c a n t l y l e s s i n t h e summer months t h a n

i n t h e w i n t e r months when t h e r e a r e g r e a t e r i n d o o r l o u t d o o r t e m p e r a t u r e d i f f e r e n t i a l s .

SAMPLING PERIOD SAMPLING PERIO! 2 NOV 1981 TO 12 JULY 1982 TO 12 MARCH 1982 16 SEPT 1982

-

Pr I \

-

\, A I R CHANGE RATE

-

2 8 I \

-

- 2 6 - - 2 4

-

0 -0' \ - 2 2

"

,

\ 4 \ AV

-

1 ( 8 HOUSES WITH - 2 0

-

\ b AIR-CONDITIONING) V,

::-

20 ,/Omm-D~vs

-

1 8

2

0 7

-

1 6 W

,P;

rx -0 I \ A I R CHANGE

/

P., ' 0 - 1 4

2

n 1 8 - I \ 1 \ RATE

,'

- 1 2

,

I Z

'

' b

-

1 6 - I ,4

J'

-

1 0 $ I \ / / '.-0' 0 1 4

-

I o - 8 0

l WIND SPEED W I N D SPEED n

1 2 -*t\ - d l O\ /o' - 6

2

\. -ol 0 10 -

b 4

-

z (12 HOUSES) I- 8 - COOLTNG / y o - 2

S

I 6 - OEGREF-DAYS 0 4 - 2

,

I - 2

1 J I I 1 1 0 4

.

- 4

NOV DEC JAN FEB MARCH 1U1 Y AUG SEPT

F i g u r e 3 Average p e r i o d a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e , wind s p e e d and

(11)

It i s e x p e c t e d t h a t d u r i n g t h e summer when t h e t e m p e r a t u r e d i f f e r e n t i a l s a r e low t h e a i r change r a t e w i l l be due mainly t o

wind. T h e r e a p p e a r s t o b e a p o s i t i v e c o r r e l a t i o n between a i r

change r a t e and wind s p e e d f o r s e v e r a l of t h e e i g h t a i r -

c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s . I n c r e a s e d i n d o o r r e l a t i v e h u m i d i t y c a u s e s i n c r e a s e d a i r t i g h t n e s s d u r i n g t h e summer months and may a l s o b e a f a c t o r i n t h e d e c r e a s e d a i r change r a t e 4 ; w i n t e r a v e r a g e s of

r e l a t i v e h u m i d i t y ranged from 34 t o 47%, and summer a v e r a g e s r a n g e d f r o m 56 t o 65%.

4.2 Formaldehyde

The mean i n d o o r formaldehyde c o n c e n t r a t i o n s o b t a i n e d from 1-h

NIOSH measurements i n e a c h of t h e h o u s e s a r e shown on F i g u r e

4.

I n g e n e r a l , t h e r e was good agreement between t h e weekly d o s i m e t e r ( 7 d a y e x p o s u r e ) and 1-h NIOSH r e s u l t s o v e r t h e w i n t e r s a m p l i n g

p e r i o d , a s shown g r a p h i c a l l y i n F i g u r e 5. Agreement was poor when

t h e y were compared on a weekly b a s i s f o r e a c h house. The h i g h e r

i n d o o r formaldehyde l e v e l s i n a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s a p p e a r t o b e

r e l a t e d t o a l o w e r a i r change r a t e d u r i n g t h e summer months. The

a v e r a g e i n d o o r c o n c e n t r a t i o n f o r t h e a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s was

0.076 ppm, which i s t w i c e t h e w i n t e r a v e r a g e o f 0.038 ppm. The

l e v e l s of formaldehyde c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n d o o r s a p p e a r t o be

a f f e c t e d , a s w e l l , by t h o s e o u t d o o r s . Measurements d u r i n g t h e

summer t e s t s i n d i c a t e d t h a t o u t d o o r l e v e l s n e a r a highway and a

major r o a d ( d i s t a n c e of 25 t o 120 m) v a r i e d f r o m 0.014 t o

0.022 ppm, and n e a r minor r o a d s from 0.006 t o 0.008 ppm. Outdoor

l e v e l s a r e a f f e c t e d by t r a f f i c d e n s i t y s i n c e a u t o m o b i l e e x h a u s t c o n t a i n s s i g n i f i c a n t c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of formaldehyde and o t h e r a l d e h y d e s . A t p r e s e n t t h e a c c e p t e d i n d o o r l e v e l of formaldehyde i s 0.10 ppm (ASHRAE S t a n d a r d 62-81, V e n t i l a t i o n f o r A c c e p t a b l e I n d o o r Air Q u a l i t y ) . I n t h r e e of t h e t e s t h o u s e s t h i s l e v e l was exceeded i n

70% of t h e i n d o o r measurements made d u r i n g t h e summer months.

Over t h e w i n t e r months t h e same t h r e e h o u s e s a l s o had t h e h i g h e s t formaldehyde c o n c e n t r a t i o n s , h u t t h e maximum a c c e p t a b l e

c o n c e n t r a t i o n was exceeded i n less t h a n 10% of t h e measurements.

4.3 RadonIRadon D a u g h t e r s

F i g u r e 6 shows a v e r a g e d radon c o n c e n t r a t i o n s and F i g u r e 7 a v e r a g e d r a d o n d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s f o r t h e two measurement p e r i o d s . Average radon c o n c e n t r a t i o n s o v e r t h e w i n t e r p e r i o d r a n g e d f r o m 0.3 t o 2.2 p C i / ~ ; o v e r t h e summer p e r i o d t h e y r a n g e d from 0.37 t o

2.26 pCi/L. Average radon d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s o v e r t h e w i n t e r

p e r i o d r a n g e d f r o m 0.0007 t o 0.0065 working l e v e l

(WL);

c o r r e s p o n d i n g summer d a t a ranged from 0.0011 t o 0.007

WL.

Comparison o f summer a n d w i n t e r d a t a f o r t h e e i g h t a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d

(12)

H O U S E N U M B E R

Figur.e 4 . Average 1-h NIOSH formaldehyde concentrations ( i n t e r i o r ) ( w i t h range of two standard d e v i a t i o n s )

E

l

SAMPLING PERIOD CL

n 2 NOV 1981 TO 12 MARCH 1982

W

n (SEASON AVERAGE FOR EACH TEST HOUSE)

1 - H O U R N I O S H . F O R M A L D E H Y D E . P P m

Figure 5 Comparison 6f average 1-h NIOSH and 7-day dosimeter formaldehyde measurements

(13)

H O U S E N U M B E R

F i g u r e 6 Average d a i l y radon c o n c e n t r a t i o n ( w i t h r a n g e of two s t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n s ) 0 . 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ SAhlPLlNG PERIOD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 H O U S E N U M B E R F i g u r e 7 Average d a i l y radon d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s ( w i t h r a n g e of two s t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n s )

(14)

G R A B S A M P L E . R A D O N D A U G H T E R S , W L

0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 8 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 2 0

1 ' I T 1 I ' 4

SAMPLING PERIOD

3 2 NOV 1981 TO 12 MARCH 1982

(SEASON AVERAGE FOR

d

-... EACH TEST HOUSE) - 0 . 0 0 2 v;

.-

Dz U n vl n 0 n 4 0 Dz Y W I-

-

0 . 0 0 8

:

-

vl

-

0 . 0 1 0 I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 3 G R A B S A M P L E , R A D O N G A S , p C i l L RADON RADON DAUGHTERS AVERAGE E Q U I L I B R I U M FACTOR

-

0.31

F i g u r e 8 Comparison of g r a b sample and f i l m d o s i m e t e r measurements of r a d o n a n d r a d o n d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s

P

c o n c e n t r a t i o n s were g r e a t e r f o r t h e summer months t h a n f o r t h e w i n t e r months by 44 and

32%,

r e s p e c t i v e l y . The a c c e p t a b l e l i m i t f o r r a d o n d a u g h t e r s i s 0.01

WL

(ASHRAE

S t a n d a r d 62-81). The r a d o n l r a d o n d a u g h t e r d a t a showed e x p e c t e d v a r i a t i o n s i n i n d i v i d u a l s a m p l e s t a k e n a t t h e same h o u s e on d i f f e r e n t s a m p l i n g d a y s . It can be e x p l a i n e d , a t l e a s t i n p a r t , by t h e e f f e c t s of v a r i o u s m e t e o r o l o g i c a l f a c t o r s shown i n o t h e r s t u d i e s t o b e s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t i n a f f e c t i n g t h e e m i s s i o n r a t e of radon g a s from s o i l . These i n c l u d e b a r o m e t r i c p r e s s u r e , a i r and s o i l t e m p e r a t u r e ,

r e l a t i v e h u m i d i t y , and wind speed.

The a v e r a g e e q u i l i b r i u m f a c t o r ( t h e r a t i o of measured r a d o n

d a u g h t e r s t o t h e p o t e n t i a l r a d o n d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n t h a t c o u l d o c c u r when i n complete e q u i l i b r i u m w i t h t h e p a r e n t r a d o n ) d i d n o t

change s i g n i f i c a n t l y from w i n t e r (0.33) t o summer (0.30) i n t h e e i g h t a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d houses. F i g u r e 8 p r o v i d e s a comparison of a v e r a g e r a d o n and r a d o n d a u g h t e r measurements f o r e a c h h o u s e , u s i n g a g r a b sampling t e c h n i q u e w i t h d a t a o b t a i n e d from t h e f i l m d o s i m e t e r s exposed o v e r t h e w i n t e r s a m p l i n g p e r i o d . Agreement between t h e two s e t s of d a t a can be c o n s i d e r e d f a i r l y good. F i g u r e 9 s u g g e s t s t h a t c o n c e n t r a t i o n s o f b o t h formaldehyde. a n d radon g a s t e n d t o d e c r e a s e a s t h e a i r change r a t e i n c r e a s e s a n d v i c e v e r s a .

(15)

I

WINTER DATA SUMMER DATA

I

- 0 FORMALDEHYDE - A RADON \

'<

,/

- O\. RADON \ l o

-

o->:, w

-

-:z, .A"- -0 / \,-- / - - ,o FORMALDEHYDE

-

-

- L o

NOV OEC JAN FEB MARCH JULY AUG SEPT NOTE: HOUSES 4 AND 7 WERE EXCLUDED FROM AVERAGES

FOR JULY, AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER BECAUSE OF "OPEN" SAMPLING CONDITIONS EXPERIENCED

F i g u r e 9 Average m o n t h l y ' a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e and formaldehyde

and r a d o n c o n c e n t r a t i o n s

5.

SUMMARY

The p o s s i b l e c o r r e l a t i o n between a i r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e and i n d o o r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of r a d o n , r a d o n d a u g h t e r s , a n d formaldehyde i n h o u s e s h a v i n g r e l a t i v e l y low r a t e s of n a t u r a l v e n t i l a t i o n h a s been examined.

1. A i r change r a t e s measured by t h e f a n d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n method

v a r i e d f r o m 3.9 t o 7.9 a i r c h a n g e s p e r h o u r a t a p r e s s u r e

d i f f e r e n c e of 50 Pa. Averaged i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s o b t a i n e d by

t r a c e r g a s measurements o v e r t h e summer s t u d y p e r i o d ( f o r a i r

c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s ) ranged from 0.12 t o 0.40 a i r changes p e r

h o u r ; o v e r t h e w i n t e r months t h e r a t e s were h i g h e r a t 0.21 t o

0.66 a i r changes p e r hour. These measurements r e p r e s e n t 1 / 2 0

and 1 / 1 4 , r e s p e c t i v e l y , o f t h e a i r change r a t e s a s measured by t h e f a n d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n method a t a p r e s s u r e d i f f e r e n c e of 5 0 Pa. 2. The a v e r a g e d i n d o o r c o n c e n t r a t i o n of formaldehyde f o r a l l a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s , a s measured by t h e 1-h N I O S H method, was 0.076 ppm ( r a n g i n g from 0.019 t o 0.136 ppm) d u r i n g t h e summer months, a n d 0,038 ppm ( r a n g i n g f r o m 0.015 t o 0.059 ppm) f o r t h e w i n t e r months,

(16)

3. The a v e r a g e d r a d o n g a s c o n c e n t r a t i o n s f o r a l l a i r c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s d u r i n g t h e summer months r a n g e d from 0.37 t o

2.26 pCi/L; f o r t h e w i n t e r months t h e y r a n g e d f r o m 0.30 t o

2.2 pCi/L. The a v e r a g e d radon d a u g h t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s f o r a l l

a i r - c o n d i t i o n e d h o u s e s d u r i n g t h e summer months r a n g e d from

0.0011 t o 0.007

WL;

f o r t h e w i n t e r months t h e y ranged from

0.0007 t o 0.0065

WL.

4. Measurements i n d i c a t e t h q t c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of formaldehyde,

r a d o n , and r a d o n d a u g h t e r s a r e a f f e c t e d by i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e .

6. REFERENCES

1. ORR, H.W. and FIGLEY, D.A., "An e x h a u s t f a n a p p a r a t u s f o r

a s s e s s i n g t h e a i r l e a k a g e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of h o u s e s , " N a t i o n a l Research Council of Canada, D i v i s i o n of B u i l d i n g Research,

BR Note 156, 1980.

2. TAMURA, G.T.,

ASHRAE

J o u r n a l ,

25,

No. 1 0 , 1983, pp. 40-43.

3. KUSNETZ, H.L., American I n d u s t r i a l Hygiene A s s o c i a t i o n

Q u a r t e r l y ,

-

17, 1956, p. 85.

4.

YOCOM, J.E., J o u r n a l of t h e A i r P o l l u t i o n C o n t r o l A s s o c i a t i o n ,

32 No. 5 , 1982, pp. 500-520.

-9

7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The a u t h o r s would l i k e t o acknowledge t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of t h e

f o l l o w i n g k e y p r o j e c t team members: J. D e Jong, W. Cormack and

R. Whitehead of MacLaren E n g i n e e r s , and

R.

Evans of t h e N a t i o n a l

R e s e a r c h C o u n c i l o f Canada. The c o o p e r a t i o n a n d a s s i s t a n c e of

North York Hydro and t h e i n d i v i d u a l homeowners who p a r t i c i p a t e d i n t h e s t u d y a r e much a p p r e c i a t e d .

(17)

This paper, while being distributed in

reprint form by the Division of Building

Research, remains the copyright of the

original publisher.

It should not be

reproduced in whole or in part without the

permission of the publisher.

A

list of all publications available from

the Division may

be obtained by writing to

the Publications Section, Division of

Building Research, National Research

Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario,

Figure

Figure  5  Comparison  6f  average  1-h  NIOSH  and  7-day  dosimeter  formaldehyde  measurements

Références

Documents relatifs

Cette opération nécessite la prise en compte de la variété des contextes (documents administratifs ou autres) qui participent à diffuser et/ou modifier les noms

 Le Débutaniseur dans laquelle le Butane est vaporisé, accompagné d'un peu de C 3 qui n'a pas été complètement vaporisé dans le Dépropaniseur, les lourds

&#34; Generality of the Program Synthesis approach: We show prob- lems from very different domains of automated feedback gen- eration for introductory programming

electronic band structure to predict or explain the electron mo- bility based on the free electron picture and its corresponding transport properties, but neglected the fact

Paraphrasing Abelardo Morell [ 9 ], ”a camera obscura has been used ... to bring images from the outside into a darkened room”. As shown in section 2.2, in certain condi- tions, we

The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of solvent type (ethanol, methanol, acetone and water), acetone concentration (20–100%, v/v), solvent acidity

Efficiency of extraction was determined by measuring the total phenols, flavonoids, tannins, total antho- cyanin and antioxidant activity (ferric reducing power, scavenging effect

Studying this mapping, it is shown that using nonlinear decoding algorithms for single input-multiple output (SIMO) and multiple input multiple output (MIMO) systems, extra numbers