• Aucun résultat trouvé

Study of Snowslides at Bersimis No. 2 Development, Quebec

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Study of Snowslides at Bersimis No. 2 Development, Quebec"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Technical Note (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building Research), 1959-07-01

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la

première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/20338510

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at Study of Snowslides at Bersimis No. 2 Development, Quebec

Schaerer, P. A.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC: https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=ab0966b8-f1cb-4863-9402-65dd80d3ac14 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=ab0966b8-f1cb-4863-9402-65dd80d3ac14

(2)

DIVISION OF BUILDING RESEARCH

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA

TEe 1HIN ][ CAlL

NOTJE

No.

284

H. G. Acres and Co.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

PREPARED BY P. Schaerer

PREPARED FOR

CHECKED BY

FOR INTERNAL USE

APPROVED BY RFL

DATE July

1959

SUBJECT Study of Snowslides at Bersimis No. 2

Development, Quebec

The following comments are based on the letter and the

enclosed plans sent by H. G. Acres and Company on the

22

June

1959.

From the topography of the hill behind the intake,

snow-slides may be expected. Snow could slide easily on the steep

hill-side with

45°

or more slope angle. Slides may occur either after

heavy snowfalls キセ・ョ the new snow slides on the old surface, or in

spring when the melting snow slides on the ground. The gate hoist

is close to the mountain and any slide from the slope would hit the structure.

There is no information available on the snow accumulation in this area and there is no information as to whether or not

avalanches occur at this place or in the neighbourhood. We do not

know if there is enough snow to create snowslides. From published

snow observations (1, 2,

3)

the following maxima for the snow cover

in the Bersimis area may be assumed:

Maximum snow depth:

4

feet

Mean density of snowcover: 0.30 (approx. 20 pounds per cubic

foot)

Maximum depth of new snow in one snowfall:

12

inches

(1) Gold, L. Wo and G. P. Williams. Some results of the snow survey

of Canada. National Research Council, Canada, Division of

Building Research. June

1957.

NRC

4389

(2) Williams, G. P. Variability of physical characteristics of snow

cover across Canada. Association Internationale diHydrologie

Scientifique, Union Geodesique et Geophysique Internationale,

Assemblee Generale de Toronto

1957.

Gentbrugge

1958,

Tome

IV,

po

158-165.

(Reprint NRC

4826)

(3) Pearce, D.C. and L. W. Gold. The Canadian snow survey, 1947-1950.

National Research Council, Canada, Associate Committee on Soil

(3)

2

-The wind has a great influence in the bUilding up of an

avalanche. With the prevailing wind from the south and west the snow

feposit would not be high and not enough snow would accumulate for slides; wind from the north and east may deposit more snow in the

slope above the water intake. Only observations in the field could

show the influence of the wind on the snow accumulation.

If the above-mentioned deductions on the snowcover and snowfall are correct, then avalanches may be expected.

POSSIBILITY OF AVALANCHES

From the information available, a profile of the avalanche

slope was drawn (Fig.

I).

1) A slab of dry, new snow can slide on an unstable internal

snow-layer during the winter months.

Maximum depth of the slab: 24 inches

Density of the sliding snow: 0.15

According to Dr. A. Voel1my (4) the avalanche will have a speed of

55 feet per second on the 45° slope. The avalanche would probably

get airborne on the top of the niche cut for the hoist; the snow, mixed with air, can hit the structure and the gate at any place above

the ground which is in the trajectory. If the avalanche hits the

structure, it might have the following dimensions: Depth:

Width: Density: Velocity:

8 feet

width of the structure

approx. 5 pounds per cubic foot 55 feet per second

The pressure caused by this avalanche would have a duration of not more than 10 seconds.

2) On very hot days in spring or with rain, the complete snowcover

might slide down on the steep rocky ground.

The following avalanche could be expected: Depth:

Width: Density: Velocity:

4

feet

width of the structure 20 pounds per cubic foot 60 feet per second

(4) Voe1lmy, Dr. A. Ueber die Zerstoerungskraft von Lawinen.

(4)

3

-This avalanche would follow the ground, might hit the structure on the bottom and might pile up the snow to a height of 23 feet (Voellmy)

=

1150 pounds per square foot

D: Density of snow

v: Velocity

g: gravitational acceleration

Pressure on the gate could be:

2

D -

v

Ph = 2 g

There might be a pressure in upward direction:

AVALANCHE DEFENCE

Supporting Structures (Fig. 2)

The slope area above the gate could be covered with supporting structures retaining the snow in the accumulation area. The structures have to be little higher than the deepest snow to be expected.

Distance between structures measured on the slope: 120 feet.

The avalanche slope is 700 feet long, therefore 6 lines of structures would be required.

Width of the slope to be covered: estimated 200 feet.

Total length:

6

lines at 200 feet, 1200 linear feet.

The structure would have to support a pressure from creeping and sliding snow of 600 pounds per linear foot.

The supporting structures can be fences of steel, timber; a combination of steel and timber, aluminum, prefab. concrete; or

nets of steel or nylon between steel or aluminum posts. There are

no foundation problems as the structures could be anchored in the rock.

Diverting Wedge (Fig. 3)

A wedge might be constructed above the gate hoist, which

would divert the avalanche to both sides. The angle between the

avalanche and the diverting dam should not exceed 15°.

The dam of the wedge might be built as a wall of concrete, sheetpiles anchored on rails driven into the rock, or it might be excavated from the rock.

(5)

4

-The pressure on the wall from the avalanche might be: P

=

D

x v

2

2 g sin セ = 1150 sin セ Ib p sq ft

セZ angle between avalanche and wall

Friction on the wall: F

=

f x P f: 0.70 for concrete, rock

f: 0040 for metal or wood surface

2

PD =l'3hDv g x · < rsln

2

The following questions would have to be answered before the construc-tion of a wedge is considered:

Will the avalanche do any damage on either side of the gate hoist?

Is the construction of the wedge possible in the steep, rocky hillside?

Roof (Fig. 4)

If the distance is small, a roof might be constructed between the rockface and the gate hoist structure, diverting the sliding snow over the structure.

The roof would have to be designed for the following loads:

1) Static Load from snow and moving avalanche:

P:

120 pounds per

square foot

2) Dynamic force when the snow is deflected by the roof:

h: depth of snow: 4 feet

D: density of snow: 20 pounds

per cubic foot

v: velocity of slide: 60 feet

per second

c-:

angle of deflection

P

n

is the force on I-foot length of the roofo

3) Frictional Load: F = 0.5 x weight of the moving snow

F: 40 pounds per square foot

The roof would have to be supported by the hoist structure, requiring a change in the design of the structure.

(6)

5

-Based on the above mentioned figures, study can be made as to which defence is the most economical.

Before any consideration is given to the construction of any type of defence the following information should be obtained from meteorological records or from snow observations:

1) maximum snowdepth and density of the snowcover 2) maximum depth of new snow in one snowfall (over a

period of three days)

3) prevailing wind, prevailing wind during snowfalls.

In the coming winter, the following observations should be made at the location of the possible avalanche:

1) snowdepth at different points on the hill above the intake 2) accumulation of drift snow

3) avalanches at this place; do avalanches occur on other

hillsides in the neighbourhood; if so, what is their location, exposure and slope angle.

Considering the fact that almost nothing is known about the snow and the occurrence of avalanches, it might not be wise to

attempt to build any avalanche defence in this summer. Close

observations should be made at least during one winter before final

decisions are made. Without avalanche protection works, it would

be essential to keep the slope above the gate house under constant observation while snow was on the ground next winter.

(7)

OTUW DIVISION OF BUILDING RESEARCH. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL C ADA

APPROX 450

GATE

HOIST

FIGURE I

PROFILE

OF

SLOPE

ABOVE

GATE

HOIST

TITLE

DRA;\/!'o . i lIlE'. KI:O AIJPRf)\'l:.D £,c Lf

(8)

,

Clj\li510N OF BUilDING reseaイセch • NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL ,'M:r

MAX SNOW DEPTH RIGID STRUCTURE MAX SNOW 4' DEPTH

STRUCTURE WITH NET

POST (PI PE)

SNOWPRESSURE

S PARALLEL SLOPE: 600 LB/FT

a

PERPENDICULAR SLOPE: 90 LB/FT W WEIGHT OF SNOWPRISM

FIGURE 2

SUPPORTING STRUCTURES

TITLE

(9)

OTTAW:\

divセsゥon

OF BUiLDING

fセesearch

• NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL '. ANADA

I

J セ

AVALANCHE

WALL セf P

HOIST

GATE

P:PRESSURE PERPENDICULAR TO WALL

F:

FRICTION ON WALL

FIGURE 3

PLAN OF WEDGE

or[ZZGN|nゥZᄋセg ゥGセッN r I - I

i

-I

ZMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMセMMMM⦅Q l Gtセe (' 1.°.", 5Cf.Lf

(10)

'·r·"---D-\-'-'

セilャGN

C_I'_8_11_'L.LJINGI-;ESEI\RCH"_;_N_A110NA-L RESEARCH

cOUr:C\L---!

I

I

I

j

P: STATIC LOAD PO: DYNAMIC FORCE F: FRICTION

P HOIST GATE "---ANGLE OF ROOF AS STEEP AS POSSIBLE

FIGURE 4

SECTION OF ROOF

rtTLE <". ", ' セ

('l....,

I

I

aRt.T' ...

I

,

I ..""

I'···

I""

i

'

L - -_ _- ' -_ _セ . . L __ _

-I.._,._'_ _

L...-

-.J

Figure

FIGURE I PROFILE OF SLOPE ABOVE GATE HOIST
FIGURE 2 SUPPORTING STRUCTURES
FIGURE 3 PLAN OF WEDGE
FIGURE 4 SECTION OF ROOF

Références

Documents relatifs

L’étude sur les formateurs et formatrices en entre­ prise menée à l’IFFP (voir encadré) a mis en évidence la variété des compétences réunies sous l’appellation soft

Clearly, more research on the applica- tion of sparsity checks in the strong nonlinearity regime is needed, especially when linearized inversion is used as the initial

Reasons for doubting the force of this route to social externalism. • As before, might dispute Burge’s claims about how we should ascribe content in such cases. • As before, even if

I would like to suggest another expla- nation for the findings reported by Drs Peleg and Shvar tzman in “Case report: Cutaneous nerve entrapment.” 1 Although cutaneous nerve

The Trial to Reduce IDDM in the Genetically at Risk (TRIGR) study is an international randomised double-blind controlled intervention trial that was designed to establish

- Section 2: Presentation of the Standard Living survey in Cameroon: ECAM Section 3: Presentation of the Survey on Employment and Informal Sector - Section 4: A brief review on

effectiveness, staff requirementss status and co-ordination of agencies concerned with human resources programmes; (d) assessed the state of manpower and employment planning data

These 124 individuals were excluded from subsequent analyses to increase the specificity of cancer diagnoses, except in model 2b, which aimed at optimizing the