ETH Library
The nuclear and the cytoplasmic granulosis viruses of Adoxophyes orana F.v.R. (Lep., Tortricidae)
separation, biochemical characterization, pathogenesis and infectivity
Doctoral Thesis Author(s):
Drolet, Jacques Publication date:
1989
Permanent link:
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-000510338 Rights / license:
In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted
This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection.
For more information, please consult the Terms of use.
Diss. ETH No. 8899
The nuclear and the cytoplasmic granulosis viruses of Adoxophyes
oranaF.v.R. (Lep., Tortricidae): Separation,
bioehemical characterization, pathogenesis and infectivity
Dissertation submitted to the
SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ZÜRICH
for the
degree
ofDoctor of Natural Sciences
presented by Jacques
DroletM.Sc. Universite
Laval,
Quebec bornJuly 3,1956
Citizen ofCanada
accepted
on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. G.Benz,
examiner Prof. Dr. P.Lüthy,
co-examiner1989
CatE
49
Summary
The electron
microscopical
studies of Schmid etal.(1983)
indicated that thegranulosis
ofAdoxophyes
oranaF.v.R.,
found in the Valais(Switzer¬
land),
followed two differentpaths
indifferentfatbody
cells:(i)
theclassic form of
granulosis
virusdevelopment
where thesynthesis
of thevirus occurs in the nucleus and later in the "nuclearfield"
(nuclear type) (Wäger
andBenz, 1971)
and(ii)
anatypical
form where the nucleus does not show any transformation and thevirogenesis
occurs in thecytoplasm
(cytoplasmic type) (Benz, 1979). By infecting
Ist instar larvaewith the contentsof individual fatbody
cells of infected 5th instarlarvae,
twotypes
of virus have been
separated.
TheSeparation
was stable forat leastthreegenerations.
Thepathogenesis
wasfollowed atthe tissue Ievel withphase-contrast microscopy.
The method enables the Observation of arelatively high
number of cells which is essential tostudy
thedynamics
ofthe infection in the cell
population
at thetissue Ievel.Thecharacterization of thetwo
types
was made withSDS-polyacrilamide gel electrophoresis
and restriction endonucleaseanalysis.
Thebanding
ofthe
proteins
showed adifference in 5major proteins
between thetwotypes
of virus
(SDS-PAGE).
Thisdifferencewas notfound atthe DNA Ievel when studied with restriction endonucleaseanalysis.
Somehypotheses
areproposed
toexplain
thisdiscrepancy.
The rates ofvirus
production
in the fatbody
were 2.6 and 1.9 for thecytoplasmic
and the nucleartype respectively
when the infection wasdone with the natural mixture of thetwotypes,
i.e. theproportion
found in deadlarvae infected with thetwo
types. However,
the rates ofvirusproduction
foreach virus
type
was inferiorto thesevalues when the infection wasdone with an artificial mixture of the two
types (cytoplasmic
: nuclear= 1 :1).
This shows theimportance
of theproportion
of each virustype
in theSuspension
used forinfecting
the larvae and theadvantage,
atleastatthetissue
Ievel,
ofthe ratio of thetwo virustypes
found in the natural mixture.The effect of the
temperature
on thedevelopment
of the infectionwasdifferent foreach
type: high temperatures
reduce the rate ofdevelopment
ofthe nuclear
type
while lowtemperatures
have the same effecton thecytoplasmic type.
Infection with
high
concentrations(10.8
inlog10)
gave a lowerproportion
of infected fat
body
cells atthe end of the larvaldevelopment
thaninfection with lower
(6.8
inlog-jg)
concentrations. This may indicate anegative
effect ofhigh
virus doses on the virusyield
per larva.Bioassays
weremade tocompare theinfectivity
of thetwotypes
of virus at differenttemperatures.
In orderto diminish thevariability
of thevirus-host
system,
thefollowing
factorswere standardized: thestorage time,
the time ofextraction of the virus afterinfection,
theestimation of the virusconcentration,
and the volumeingested
per larva. The naturalmixture had a
LC50
of 3.03 x107
GV/ml at25°C.Compared
to thisvalue,
thecytoplasmic type
of virus hasonly
0.63 times thispotency
and the nucleartype
0.54times(%2
«7.0,
a ¦0.05).
Thepersistence
ofthe mixture in the naturalpopulation
can therefore beexplained.
The effect ofthe
temperature
on theLC50
is notsimply explained by
the51
rate ofvirus
production. High
and lowtemperatures
actas stress factorson the insects in a process
parallel
to the infection which may kill theinsect, although
the infection rate itself is hindered whencompared
to theone observed for middle
temperatures.
The
LT^qS
ofthetwotypes
ofvirus were similar but influencedby
thetemperature: high temperatures
reduced theLT5Q.
The effect of theinfection with
high
concentrationswas to raise the LT50compared
to theinfection with low
concentrations,
inagreement
with the results obtained at thetissue Ievel.Resume
L' etude de
microscopie electronique
executee par Schmid etal.(1983)
aindique
que lagranulöse d'Adoxophyes
orana F. v.R.,
trouveeau Valais(Suisse),
suivaitdeuxtypes
dedeveloppement
differents dansdifferentes cellules du corps gras:(i)
la formeclassique
dedeveloppement
de lagranulöse
oü lasynthese
du virusdebutedans le noyau et sepoursuit
dans lechamp
nucleaire(type-nucleique) (Wäger
etBenz, 1971)
and(ii)
une formeatypique
oü le noyau ne revele aucune transformationet oü lavirogenese
seproduit
dans lecytoplasme (type-cytoplasmique).
Les deuxtypes
de virusontete separes en infectant des larves de
premier
Stade aveclecontenu decellules individuelles
provenantde
larves infectees de5e
Stade. LaSeparation
s'est revelee stable pourau moins trois passages. LaPathogenese
a et§ suivie au niveau du tissue ä l'aided'un
microscope
äcontrastedephase.
Cette methodepermet
l'observation d'un nombre relativementgrand
decellulescequi
est necessaire ä l'etude de ladynamique
de l'infection dans lapopulation
de cellules des corps gras de l'insecte.La caracterisation des deux
types
a eteeffectuee parPelectrophorese
desproteines
surgel
depolyacrilamide (SDS- PAGE)
etpar uneanalyse
de l'ADNpar enzymes de restriction. Une difference au niveau de
cinq proteines
majeures
estobservee entre les deuxtypes
de virus.Cependant, Panalyse
del'ADN n'apu mettre en evidence aucunedifference entre les deux
types
de virus. Deshypotheses
sontdiscutees pourexpliquer
ces resultats.Les taux de
production
du virusdans le tissu sont de 2.6 et 1.9 pour letype-cytoplasmique
etletype-nucleique respectivement, lorsque
l'infection esteffectueeavec uneSuspension
dumelange
natural des deuxtypes
de53
virus. Le
melange
naturel est laproportion
trouveedans une larve morteinfectee par les deux
types
de virus.Cependant,
lestauxdeproduction
dechaque type
de virus sont inferieurs äcesvaleurslorsque
l'infection est effectuee avecuneSuspension
dumelange
artificiel des deuxtypes
de virus(cytoplasmique
:nucleique
= 1:1).
Ceci montrerimportance
de laproportion
de
chaque
virus dans laSuspension
utilisee pour l'infection des larves etl'avantage,
toutau moins au niveau de l'infection dutissu,
de laproportion
trouvee dans le
melange
naturel.L'effetde la
temperature
sur ledeveloppement
de l'infection estdifferent pourchaque type
devirus: les hautestemperatures
reduisent le taux dedeveloppement
dutype nucleique
alors que les bassestemperatures
ont lememe effet surle
type cytoplasmique.
Lors d'infections ädoses elevees
(10.8
enlog^),
laproportion
de cellulesdu corps gras infecteesä la fin du
developpement
larvaire est inferieure äcelle observee lors d'infections ädoses
plus
basses(6.8
enlog-jn)
cequi
demontre un effet
negatif
des hautes concentrationssur laproduction
devirus par larve.
Des bioessaisont ete effectues pour comparer la virulence des deux
types
de virusä destemperatures
differentes. Dans le but de reduire la variabilite inherente aucomplexe virus-höte,
les Clementssuivants ont eteuniformises: le
temps
deconservation,
letemps
d'extraction du virus apresinfection,
Testimation de la concentration du virusetlevolume deSuspension ingere
par larve. Lemelange
naturel a une concentration lethale moyenne(CL50)
de 3.03 x107
GV/ml ä25°C. Compare
äcettevaleur,
letype
cytoplasmique
a0.63 fois cette infectivite et letype nucleique
0.54fois(statistiquement
differentavec*2
=7.0,
a =0.05).
L'infectiviteplus
eleveedu
melange
naturelexplique
done enpartie
lapersistence
des deuxtypes
devirus sur le terrain.
Le taux de
developpement
du virus dans le corps grasn'explique
pas ä lui seul l'effet de latemperature
sur laCL^q.
Des facteurs de stressagissant
sur
l'insecte,
tel hautes etbassestemperatures, agissent
aussiparalleles
äl'infection
elle-meme,
cequi
se manifeste par une mortalite larvaire accentuee, endepit
d'un Processus d'infection ralentie parrapport
äcelui observe pour lestemperatures
intermediaires.Le
temps
de mortalite moyen(TM^q) correspondant
aux deuxtypes
devirusest
eomparable
maisdepend
de latemperature:
les hautestemperatures
diminuent leTMgn.
En conformite avec les resultats obtenus au niveau del'infection du corps gras, l'effet d'une infection ä dose eleveeestde
prolonger
leTM^q comparativement
äcelui obtenu lors d'une infection ädose