• Aucun résultat trouvé

Disclosures How the research began Overview

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Disclosures How the research began Overview"

Copied!
11
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

CU Expo June 2013

Stephen Darcy, MD, CCFP, FCFP Family Physician

Peter Jordan Community Representative Lisa Bishop, BScPharm, ACPR, Pharm D Pharmacist

Sinthuja Suntharalingam, MD Resident in Psychiatry

The Community Alliance: A community-school-university partnership to explore mental health and addiction

services to support youth and young adults

Overview

How the research began

Principles of CBPR

Group exercise

Discussion on barriers/challenges/solutions

Questions & Discussion

Disclosures

Funding:

Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research (NLCAHR) development grant

Janus training level I grant

Summer Undergraduate Research Awards

CIHR Health Professional Student Research Award

Memorial University School of Pharmacy research grant.

In-Kind contribution:

The Primary Healthcare Research Unit

How the research began

Concerns raised by parents of youth affected by substance abuse during clinic visits

Observation in clinic of late diagnosis of MH disorders and subsequent consequences

Clinicians met to discuss approach of issue

Research component

Community information night

Approached community leaders to discuss collaboration

Community-based participatory research

(2)

Principles of Community-Based Participatory Research

I s r e a l B , e t a l . A n n u R e v P u b l i c H e a l t h 1 9 9 8 ; 1 9 : 1 7 3 - 2 0 2

1. Recognizes the commu nity a s a u nit of

id entity.

2. B u il ds on str engths a nd r esou r ces within the commu nity.

8 Principles of CBPR

Isreal B, et al. Annu Rev Public Health 1998; 19:173-202

(3)

The Community at Present

University Community Health Centre

Local Community Board

Local school (K-9)

Churches

Pharmacy

3. Fa cil itates col l a borativ e pa r tner ships in a l l pha ses of the r esea r ch.

8 Principles of CBPR

Isreal B, et al. Annu Rev Public Health 1998; 19:173-202

Research Team

Health Centre researchers

Physicians (family physicians, resident learner)

Pharmacist

Social worker

Community board members

(4)

Community Alliance Degrees of Stakeholder Engagement in Research

Collaboration but researcher

driven No

engagement

Recruitment from community organization Secondary

data analysis, basic science

Participatory research Community

placed research

Partners involved in all aspects of research Partner is

sponsor on researcher defined project

K Culhane-Pera and Michelle Allan, North American Primary Care Research Group 2008

Community-Based Participatory Research

“In it’s fullest expression, the researcher-community partnership creates a team for decision making throughout the research process, from developing the question; collecting, analyzing, and interpreting the data; and developing conclusions to disseminating the results.”

- Ann C. Macaulay

Ann Fam Med 2007; 5:557-560

4. Integr a tes knowl ed ge a nd a ction f or the mu tu al b enef it of a l l pa r tner s

8 Principles of CBPR

Isreal B, et al. Annu Rev Public Health 1998; 19:173-202

(5)

Community Project Exploring the

expansion of community mental health & addictions services to support youth and young

adults Chart Audit

A description of youth

& young adults and their use of opioid and

stimulant drugs

Survey A community based survey to determine the MH&A needs of youth and young

adults

Focus Groups Determining the

community’s perceptions of MH&A

among youth and

young adults

5 . Pr omotes a co -l ea r ning a nd

empower ment pr ocess tha t a ttend s to socia l inequ ities.

8 Principles of CBPR

Isreal B, et al. Annu Rev Public Health 1998; 19:173-202

Co-learning Opportunities

1.

Attend Community board meetings

2.

Held 2 community information nights

Planning meetings

Debriefing sessions after community meetings 3.

Academic workshop on CBPR with community

representation & input

4.

Direct feedback from community members

6. Inv ol v es a cycl ica l a nd iter a tiv e pr ocess

8 Principles of CBPR

Isreal B, et al. Annu Rev Public Health 1998; 19:173-202

(6)

7. A d d r esses hea l th f r om b oth positiv e a nd ecol ogica l per spectiv es.

8 Principles of CBPR

Isreal B, et al. Annu Rev Public Health 1998; 19:173-202

Positive health model

Isreal B, et al. Annu Rev Public Health 1998; 19:173-202

8 . D isseminates f ind ings a nd knowl ed ge ga ined to a l l pa r tner s.

8 Principles of CBPR

Isreal B, et al. Annu Rev Public Health 1998; 19:173-202

(7)

Summary of Timeline to Date

2012 Feb Identification of problem Spring

2012 Meeting with

community leaders 1st Community meeting Summer

2012 proposals Funding Chart Audit

completed Survey & FG design Fall

2012 Finalize survey &

FG protocol Ethics for survey Winter

2013 Ethics for FG Literature

review Apply for summer student funding Spring

2013 2

nd community

meeting Distribution of survey Focus

groups

Summary of Anticipated Timeline

Summer

2013 survey info Collect Complete FG

Compete systematic review

Fall 2013 Compile results Present to

community Develop community based action plan

Winter 2014

Plan for program evaluation

Apply for funding

Summer/

Fall 2014 Implementation Program evaluation

Clarification & Questions?

(8)

Activity

What challenges do you see in implementing the principles of CBPR?

If possible, identify potential solutions to the challenge.

Comment on as many principles as you can, at least 2-3 per person.

At end, place ideas on appropriate poster board.

15 minutes

Principle # Challenge:

Potential Solution:

Cards

8 Principles of CBPR

1. Recognizes the community as a unit of identity.

2. Builds on strengths and resources within the community.

3. Facilitates collaborative partnerships in all phases of the research.

4. Integrates knowledge and action for the mutual benefit of all partners.

5. Promotes a co-learning and empowerment process that attends to social inequities.

6. Involves a cyclical and iterative process

7. Addresses health from both positive and ecological perspectives.

8. Disseminates findings and knowledge gained to all partners.

Challenges

(9)

1. Recognizes the community as a unit of identity.

Each community is different as a result of their own unique histories, demographics, cultures and lifestyles.

It is necessary to obtain as much information as possible of the historical and emotional aspects of the community to help gauge the best approach to obtaining and applying relevant information.

2. Builds on strengths and resources within the community.

Some communities may or may not have an

organized group (preferably in a leadership role) that would be a point of contact for researchers to draw upon for guidance and expertise.

In our situation there was a well-established Board of community representatives/leaders who were willing to work in conjunction with the researchers towards the best possible outcome.

3. Facilitates collaborative partnerships in all phases of the research.

Matching appropriate people (skill sets) with required tasks

Ensuring adequate communication/ understanding between partners during technical phases eg. research instrument selection, etc.

Dove-tailing goals and objectives

Managing primary and secondary outcomes

Keeping the “long view” (vision)

Keeping momentum

Sensitivity to community skill sets

Utilizing a broad range of skill sets (technical/

organizational/ etc..)

4. Integrates knowledge and action for the mutual benefit of all partners

Developing concrete initiatives from research data

Community expecting “action” before obtaining the

knowledge

(10)

5. Promotes a co-learning and empowerment process that attends to social inequities.

There is a level of trust that must be reached between the community and the researchers in order to achieve this goal. This can be difficult if the community demographics are not the same as those of the researchers (education level, comfort level, feelings of inadequacy)

It is important for researchers to clearly express their desire to help, and not simply “study” the community.

Individuals are more open to express their thoughts/concerns when they are treated as equals.

Working in close conjunction with established community groups helps to bridge this gap

6. Involves a cyclical and iterative process

Time consuming - extended involvement with the community

May test the sincerity and integrity of outside researchers before true participation occur

Must be willing to demonstrate commitment to the project and the community

Willingness to continue through difficult times

May mean revisiting issues several times

Gives community members time to contemplate and seek advice before giving an answer

Meet with research team regularly

Research timelines may be extended - need flexibility of timelines

7. Addresses health from both positive and ecological perspectives.

Lacking understanding of the context in which the community is making decisions about their health and welfare.

Acquire knowledge about community - research

Collaborate with community

Focusing on negative aspects of the community-lack of community intake, past failures of similar projects

Identify assets within the community

Utilize its strengths

Barriers within the community - stigma

Identify and address them

8.Disseminates findings and knowledge gained to all partners.

Soliciting interest from the larger community to discuss community action plan

Addressing needs of all partners (board, school, health centre, community members)

Obtaining funding from funding bodies

Sustaining program within community

(11)

Questions /Comments?

Références

Documents relatifs

La recherche-action veut être une sorte de (re)découverte du doute, une alternative à la méthode scientifique ou, encore, comme affirme Fals Borda (1981), une prise

Example 1: Participatory research with young women at an allotment project A young women’s group runs an allotment in a UK city4. The

Elisa Michel, Maria Belen Carbonetto, Charlotte Urien, Emilie Lhomme, Stephane Guezenec, Isabelle Hue, Simon Rousselot, Olivier Rué, Xavier.. Dousset, Judith Legrand,

Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers

Using the case study of designing a research project on the Transition movement, it looks to the prevalent use and praising of community as a vehicle for social innovation,

To discover the leaders of a community, we first find the leader for each event that the community conducts and then find the leader set of the community based on the discovered

From our perspective, the mobilisation of knowledge coming from the university and the community-based organisations, initiated at the earliest stages of the creation of the

The well known concept of eingenvector centrality for graphs is extended to weighted multi-hypergraphs and we present a model instantiation for centrality analysis in