• Aucun résultat trouvé

List of Figures

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "List of Figures"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

List of Tables

2.1 Type of possible errors in a computation. . . 18

2.2 Statistical Averageh iproperties (Assuming valid the Ergodic Principle) 23 2.3 Some One-Dimensional Symmetric Filters and their relative Transfer Functions. . . 28

2.4 Homogeneous Isotropic Spatial Filter Properties . . . 29

2.5 ResolvedTurbulent Kinetic Energy Budget . . . 34

3.1 Structures statistics Reτ=180 (Example): Trigger . . . 87

3.2 Subdivision of a Turbulent Plane Channel in three zones based on the distance from the wall. . . 91

3.3 Structures statistics Reτ=180 (Example): Enstrophy comp . . . 92

3.4 Structures statistics Reτ=180 (Example): Enstrophy in Zone 2 . . . 93

3.5 Percentage of Volume,υ,υx(Enstrophy) found in noise and structures versus total quantities; entire computational field . . . 98

3.6 Interesting Structures’ Ratios to compute . . . 105

3.7 Structures statistics Reτ=180 (Example): Volume percentage . . . 106

4.1 Distances from the wall whereE11andE22have been computed . . . . 139

5.1 Turbulent Plane Channel at equilibrium at Reτ=180. Grid Geometry for the Low Res. Channel Grid and the reference Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS). . . 165

5.2 Different Sub Grid Stress Models and accuracies for the Low Res. Channel Grid simulations. . . 165

5.3 Turbulent Plane Channel at equilibrium at Reτ = 180. Comparison between the LESsimulations of Table 5.2 respect three macroscopic quantities. . . 171

5.4 Turbulent Plane Channel at equilibrium at Reτ=180. Grid Geometry for the Medium Res. Channel Grid and the referenceDNS. . . 172

5.5 Turbulent Plane Channel at equilibrium at Reτ = 180. Comparison between theS M Fs of Low Res. Channel Grid and the current Medium Res. Channel Grid . . . 176

5.6 Turbulent Plane Channel at equilibrium at Reτ = 180. Comparison between some raw data of Low Res. Channel Grid and the current Medium Res. Channel Grid. . . 176

xix

(2)

5.7 Turbulent Plane Channel at equilibrium at Reτ = 180. Comparison

between theDand theQcriteria for the Medium Res. Channel Grid. . . 189

5.8 Turbulent Plane Channel (TPC) at equilibrium at Reτ = 180. Grid Geometry for the High Res. Channel Grid and the referenceDNS. . . . 192

5.9 Turbulent Plane Channel at equilibrium at Reτ = 180. Comparison between theS M Fs of Medium Res. Channel Grid and the biased sam- pling of High Res. Channel Grid. . . 196

6.1 Bulk Coefficients for the flow behind a BluffBody. . . 219

6.2 BluffBody: Structures’ Macroscopic Factors . . . 248

8.1 Type of possible errors in a computation. . . 283

8.2 Names and types of the external software packages used byMiOmafor theHEAD CVSbranch.. . . 293

8.3 MiOma’s file types version numbers . . . 300

10.1 MiOma TPCat equilibrium at Reτ=180 Grid Geometry . . . 348

10.2 MiOmaParallel Speed-Up Estimation for a Turbulent Plane Channel . . 351

10.3 Turbulent Plane Channel used for Inlet Conditions for the Flat Mounted Cube in a Channel . . . 361

10.4 Comparison of the dimension of the recirculation bubbles with refer- ence Simulations . . . 364

11.1 Provisional Road-Map for the next twoMiOmaPoint Releases . . . 370

11.2 Provisional Road-Map for the successive twoMiOmaPoint Releases . . 371

(3)

List of Figures

1.1 Thesis Structure . . . 4

2.1 Leonardo’s “Old Man and Water” drawing on paper. . . 9

2.2 Example of large scale Vortex Shedding . . . 13

2.3 Isotropic Turbulence Energy Spectrum . . . 16

2.4 Example of a slide rule (original idea of William Oughtred 1650 c.a.). . 19

2.5 Map of stations for meteorological measurements as proposed by Richard- son. . . 20

2.6 The sphere-teather for meteorological predictions as described by Richard- son . . . 22

2.7 Cut offWave Number ofLESalong the Energy Spectrum . . . 32

2.8 Energy exchange between resolved and unresolved fields. . . 44

2.9 Self Similar Model approach . . . 44

2.10 Shadowgraph of a mixing layer . . . 47

2.11 Moore’s Law . . . 50

2.12 Blue Gene Architecture . . . 53

3.1 Flux tube, the simplex definition, and the most ambiguous, for a “vortex”. 69 3.2 Equipotential lines and current line of an idealized vortex . . . 74

3.3 Velocity profile of an idealized vortex . . . 74

3.4 Velocity profile of the distributed vorticity vortex . . . 75

3.5 Velocity profile of the Oseen vortex . . . 75

3.6 Summary of three-dimensional incompressible flow patterns . . . 79

3.7 Iso-surfaces ofQ=5 for Turbulent Plane Channel . . . 85

3.8 PDF ofQfor Turbulent Plane Channel at equilibrium . . . 86

3.9 Iso-surfaces ofQT L=91 and 200 for a Turbulent Plane Channel . . . . 87

3.10 Percolation Effects for low Trigger Level . . . 88

3.11 Structures statistics Reτ=180 (Example): mass center distribution . . . 89

3.12 Structures statistics Reτ=180 (Example): specific Enstrophy . . . 90

3.13 Subdivision of the Vertical Wise direction in three Zones . . . 91

3.14 Choice of thresholdQT Lbased on the Probability Distribution Function (PDF) of the whole channel. . . 92

3.15 Smallest considered structure and associated volume . . . 95

3.16 Finding interior nodes of a Structure . . . 95

3.17 Vortex Core identification and construction . . . 96

xxi

(4)

3.18 Vortex Core growth simplified description . . . 96

3.19 Skin growth simplified description . . . 97

3.20 Identification Algorithm Conflicts log . . . 98

3.21 Successive steps in the structures detection and identification. . . 99

3.22 Detected Mask (blue) and Identified Structures (red) . . . 100

3.23 Structures statistics: volume in Wall Units . . . 103

3.24 Estimation of size of structures from their projections on coordinate axis 103 3.25 Histograms of the structures projections along two Cartesian Axis in Wall Units . . . 104

3.26 Turbulent Plane Channel example of PDF of Stream Wise vorticity modulus . . . 106

3.27 Turbulent Plane Channel example ofPDFof Stream Wise specific En- strophy . . . 106

3.28 Turbulent Plane Channel example ofPDF of Stream Wise convection velocity . . . 107

3.29 Turbulent Plane Channel example ofJPDF for Cartesian projections . . 108

3.30 Turbulent Plane Channel example ofJPDF for specific vorticity . . . . 108

3.31 JPDFof`x−`ycannot be use to determine the tilt angle. . . 109

3.32 Structures’ statistics, example of spatial alignment . . . 110

3.33 Convention for the incidence (α) and tilting (β) angle of the structures. 111 3.34 Structures’ statistics, example ofPDFof incidence and tilt angles (Data from Section 5.3). . . 112

3.35 Equivalent Ellipsoid for a given structure. . . 112

3.36 Volume error between the Equivalent Ellipsoid (data from Figure 5.17) and corresponding structure. . . 113

3.37 Conditional Sampling applied to the Production ofResolvedTurbulent Kinetic Energy Budget . . . 114

3.38 Conditional Sampling applied to the Dissipation ofResolvedTurbulent Kinetic Energy Budget. . . 115

3.39 Ensemble averaging simplified flow-chart . . . 119

3.40 Test structure updating process in Ensemble Averaging . . . 120

4.1 Time Stepping History for a Turbulent Plane Channel at Reτ=180 . . 130

4.2 Time Stepping History for a Turbulent Plane Channel at Reτ=395 . . . 130

4.3 Time Stepping History for a the flow behind a BluffBody . . . 131

4.4 Staggered Grid variables arrangement . . . 132

4.5 Small and large grid for 4thorder discretization . . . 135

4.6 Energy transfer coefficient ofG1(r),G2(r) andG?(r) . . . 138

4.7 Spectral behavior ofG?(r) for the first derivative. . . 139

4.8 One-dimensional Energy Spectra Comparison in Stream Wise Direc- tion . . . 141

4.9 One-dimensional Energy Spectra Comparison in Span Wise Direction . . 142

4.10 Comparison in semilogarithmic plot of Energy Spectra . . . 143

(5)

List of Figures xxiii

4.11 2ndorder discretization: Ensemble vision of the spectra at the different

stations . . . 144

4.12 4thorder discretization: Ensemble vision of the spectra at the different stations . . . 144

4.13 Collocation points for theFilteredRate of Strain Tensor and Sub Grid Scale (SGS) terms in the staggered grid. . . 146

4.14 Boundary Condition for the Modified Pressure . . . 146

4.15 Example of computational field subdivision in 3 domains . . . 148

4.16 Boundary points update at vertical interface between domains . . . 148

4.17 The Staggered Grid arrangement poses additional programming com- plexity . . . 152

5.1 The simple geometry of the Turbulent Plane Channel with the homoge- neous directions clearly indicated. . . 162

5.2 Homogeneous direction handling: grid and spatial autocorrelation co- efficient . . . 163

5.3 Comparison between the fiveLESsimulations classified in Table 5.2 . . 167

5.4 Comparison between the first four LES simulations classified in Ta- ble 5.2 . . . 168

5.5 Comparison between the first four LES simulations classified in Ta- ble 5.2 regarding the anisotropic part of the Residual Stress Tensor(a to c), ˜ε¯k(d) andDk¯ (e). . . 169

5.6 ResolvedTurbulent Kinetic Energy Budget of the first fourLESsimu- lations classified in Table 5.2 compared with theDNSone. . . 170

5.7 Mean and Root Mean Square (RMS) of velocities for Medium Res. Channel Grid with referenceDNS . . . 173

5.8 Some terms of the AnisotropicFilteredReynolds Stress Tensor for the Medium Res. Channel Grid compared with the referenceDNS . . . 174

5.9 Medium Res. Channel Grid: the six terms of theResolvedTurbulent Kinetic Energy Budget with respect to the referenceDNS. . . 175

5.10 Medium Res. Channel Grid:Single Structure DataPDF of Structures’ projections (`) along the Cartesian Axes and their Specific Vorticity components (ω?) . . . 177

5.11 Medium Res. Channel Grid case: Structures’ Distribution across the height of the channel, and their specific convection velocity. . . 179

5.12 Medium Res. Channel Grid case: Single Structure DataJPDFof Struc- tures’ projections (`) along the Cartesian Axes for the Viscous Wall Region and Log Law Region (Lower Half Channel). . . 180

5.13 “. . . alternating spanwise streaks of lower-and-higher-speed fluid . . . ”Kline [2] (VKI’s Environmental & Applied Fluid Dynamics DepartmentLES legacy code (VKILESlegacy code) &Tecplot™) . . . 181

5.14 Low speed longitudinal streaks formation mechanism . . . 182

(6)

5.15 Single Structure DataJPDFof Structures’ specific vorticity (ω?) com- ponents for the Viscous Wall Region and Log Law Region foronly the

lower half channel. . . 183

5.16 Medium Res. Channel Grid, Structures’ spatial alignment, different point of view for the Viscous Wall Region and Log Law Region for only the lower half channel.4Structure mean alignment. . . 184

5.17 Medium Res. Channel Grid, Equivalent Ellipsoid (Figure 3.35) Di- mensions, a more refined way to compute the structures sizes respect to Figure 5.10 and/or 5.12; from the Equivalent Ellipsoid the incidence and tilt angle are derivable as well. . . 186

5.18 Medium Res. Channel Grid, Example of identified structures. . . 187

5.19 Choice of thresholdQT Lbased on thePDF of the whole channel. . . 189

5.20 Medium Res. Channel Grid withDcriterion: Single Structure Data PDF of Structures’ Specific Vorticity (ω?) and Enstrophy (υ?) compo- nents . . . 191

5.21 Mean andRMSof velocities for High Res. Channel Grid with reference DNS . . . 193

5.22 Some terms of the AnisotropicFilteredReynolds Stress Tensor for the High Res. Channel Grid compared with the referenceDNS . . . 194

5.23 High Res. Channel Grid: the six terms of theResolvedTurbulent Ki- netic Energy Budget with respect to the referenceDNS. . . 195

5.24 High Res. Channel Grid case: Structures’ Distribution across the height of the channel, and their volume. . . 197

5.25 High Res. Channel Grid case: Structures’ convective velocities along Stream Wise and Vertical Wise directions. . . 197

5.26 High Res. Channel Grid: Single Structure DataPDF of Structures’ projections (`) along the Cartesian Axes and their Specific Vorticity components (ω?) . . . 198

5.27 High Res. Channel Grid case, limited to the Log Law Region: Single Structure DataJPDFof Structures’ projections (`) and specific vorticity components (ω?) along the Cartesian Axes (Lower Half Channel). . . . 200

5.28 Bottom half channel, counter-clockwise rotation . . . 201

5.29 Top half channel, clockwise rotation . . . 202

5.30 The effective number of structures available for averaging is reduced by multiple factors . . . 203

5.31 Bottom half channel, clockwise rotation . . . 204

5.32 Top half channel, counter-clockwise rotation . . . 204

5.33 Coherent Structures’ Prototype, Ensemble Flow -I- . . . 205

5.34 Coherent Structures’ Prototype, Ensemble Flow -II- . . . 206

6.1 Interaction between braid and rolls for flow at ReH=22,000, simula- tion at 4Hin Span Wise direction used for Coherent Structure investi- gation (BB4case). . . 210

(7)

List of Figures xxv

6.2 Flow Geometry and Boundary Condition for the flom behind the Bluff Body . . . 212 6.3 Multi Domain set-up for the flow behind a BluffBody . . . 215 6.4 Computational grid (only odd nodes presented for clarity sake,BB6). . 216 6.5 Close-up vision of the BluffBody grid and instantaneous Vertical Wise

Velocity for the simulation introduced in Section 6.5 (BB4). . . 217 6.6 Modified Pressure Lift Coefficient (clp) duringBB6Statistics’ Gathering. 219 6.7 Modified Pressure Lift and Drag Coefficients during BB4 Statistics’

Gathering. . . 220 6.8 Modified Pressure Coefficient (cp) Distribution around the BluffBody. . 220 6.9 Stream-lines of Time-Averaged flow field within the Computational

Field (BB6) . . . 222 6.10 Stream-lines of Time-Averaged flow field on the BluffBody (BB6). . . . 222 6.11 Wake Centerline Stream Wise and Span Wise mean and fluctuations’

RMSforBB6(solid Vertical Wise, dashed Stream Wise in (b)) . . . 224 6.12 Ensemble Vision of the comparison in the wake of the mean andRMS

of theStream WiseVelocity between theLES(BB6) and the reference experiments. . . 225 6.13 Ensemble Vision of the comparison in the wake of the mean andRMS

of theVertical WiseVelocity between theLES(BB6) and the reference experiments. . . 226 6.14 BB6Stream Wise Velocity and Fluctuations’RMSin three stations (from

top to bottom) −18,18,48 on top of the Bluff Body: comparison with the two sets of reference experiments (2DLaser Doppler Velocimetry (LDV)◦, 1DLDV)[3]. . . 228 6.15 BB6Stream Wise Velocity and Fluctuations’RMSin three stations (from

top to bottom) 88,148,178 in thenear wake: comparison with the 2DLDV set of experiments [3]. . . 229 6.16 BB6 Vertical Wise Velocity and Fluctuations’ RMS in three stations

(from top to bottom) −18,18,48 on top of the BluffBody: comparison with the two sets of reference experiments (2DLDV, 1DLDV)[3]. 230 6.17 BB6 Vertical Wise Velocity and Fluctuations’ RMS in three stations

(from top to bottom) 88,148,178 in thenear wake: comparison with the 2DLDVset of experiments [3]. . . 231 6.18 BB6Examples ofFilteredReynolds Stress Tensor ( ¯σxz) in two stations. 232 6.19 Multi Domain set-up for the flow behind a BluffBody for the Coherent

Structures investigation . . . 233 6.20 BB4Flow Visualization for the BluffBody: shedding sequence seen

from the top . . . 234 6.21 BB4Flow Visualization for the BluffBody: shedding sequence seen

from the side . . . 235 6.22 Structure identification: Span Wise rolls -I- . . . 238 6.23 BluffBody Structure identification: reference pattern . . . 239

(8)

6.24 BluffBody Structure identification: Span Wise rolls’ tracking . . . 240

6.25 BluffBody Structure identification: Span Wise rolls’ Velocities. . . 241

6.26 BB4Structures identification: histograms -I- . . . 243

6.27 BB4Structures identification: histograms -II- . . . 244

6.28 BB4Structures identification: histograms -III- . . . 245

6.29 BB4Structures identification: histograms -IV- . . . 246

6.30 Examples of Identified Structures in the wake of the BluffBody. . . 250

6.31 BluffBody Structures’ Probability Distribution Functions of projection along the Cartesian Axes and specific vorticity. . . 251

6.32 BluffBody Structures’ Probability Distribution Functions of Convec- tion Velocities and barycenter distributions along Stream Wise and Ver- tical Wise directions. . . 252

8.1 VKILESlegacy code code schematic evolution through time and de- velopers . . . 265

8.2 statcvs-xmlgenerated plots for theHEAD v1.0betabranch ofMiOma.272 8.3 Progression By module ofHEAD v1.0betabranch ofMiOma. . . 273

8.4 Cervisiaexamining the history of a file and comparing its presence on different branches. . . 273

8.5 Cervisia, with supporting software likeMeldallows for a rapid and productive peruse of theCVSrepository. . . 273

8.6 Graphical User Interface (GUI) for the MiOma Pre-Processor, safely contained in theCVSrepository. . . 274

8.7 Example of Dependency Graphs generable viadoxygen. . . 280

8.8 doxygencan provide excellent support for documenting Data-Structures.281 8.9 MiOmaSimplified Build Directory Hierarchy . . . 286

8.10 Each domain needs to posses some nodes from other domains via five ghost zones. In this figure the ghost zones for one side of one domain are illustrated. . . 296

8.11 Arrangement in memory of the three domains of the figure on the left; filled zone mean memory local to the processor, trailing ones need to be retrieved via parallel communication. . . 296

8.12 TheMiOma Solver usesGNU Scientific Library(gsl) as an in- termediate format between the data written on disk as Unidata Network Common Data Format (NetCDF) and used in memory as Portable Ex- tensible Toolkit for Scientific computations (PETSc). . . 302

8.13 MiOma utilizes MAXIMA to compute the discretized formulas for the convective terms . . . 306

8.14 Example ofOpenDXUsage for plotting Vortical Structures for aTPCat Reτ=180 . . . 311

8.15 OpenDXcan be programmed to offer user interfaces like(a)and(b) via Visual Programs made ofVisual Moduleslike(c), that allow for an interactive analysis of the data, as illustrated in(d). . . 312

(9)

List of Figures xxvii

8.16 KCacheGring analyzes a profile produced fromValgrindwith skin

Callgrind.. . . 314

8.17 TheMiOma Frame Work aims to create a Knowledge Base using an Electronic Bulletin Board onLAMP. . . 316

8.18 MiOma Bug-Tracking Example . . . 318

9.1 PETScMemory Model . . . 323

9.2 A surface Mounted Cube . . . 324

9.3 The Backward Facing Step geometry . . . 325

9.4 Load Balancing performed usingParMETIS. . . 327

9.5 OpenDXused to visualize the iso-surface of Vertical Wise velocity . . . . 327

9.6 ParMETISpartitioned graph for a Flat Mounted Cube in a Channel . . . 327

9.7 MiOma alternative approach to the Modified Pressure derivatives . . . . 329

9.8 Three-points stencil forP(and dP) derivatives . . . 330

9.9 Poisson Matrix View for Backward Facing Step . . . 331

9.10 Case of the piece wise reconstruction of the variableu. . . 336

9.11 Region of strong shear Resolved using Kurganov and Tadmor [4] High Resolution Central Schemes . . . 337

9.12 Master-Slave Parallel Communication Types . . . 339

9.13 Master-Slave Simulations in case of Flat Mounted Cube in a Channel . . 340

9.14 Slave Simulation taking advantage of Span Wise periodicity . . . 340

9.15 TheMiOmaSolver prepares theNetCDFdata for Flow Visualization in OpenDX. . . 342

9.16 OpenDXartifacts in the rendering of the domains interfaces . . . 343

9.17 MiOma handling of a special case of wall Boundary Condition, the moving wall. . . 345

10.1 MiOma Turbulent Plane Channel Span Wise-Vertical Wise plane cut Iso-Contours . . . 349

10.2 MiOma Turbulent Plane Channel Alternative Instantaneous Plane Cut views . . . 350

10.3 MiOma Turbulent Plane ChannelLES-DNScomparison . . . 352

10.4 MiOma Turbulent Plane Channel Turbulent Viscosities. . . 353

10.5 MiOma Parallel Speed-Up Estimation for a Turbulent Plane Channel . . 354

10.6 Typical flow Topology to be expected for a Flat Mounted Cube in a Channel . . . 354

10.7 Geometry and Dimensions for the case of Flat Mounted Cube in a Channel Simulation. . . 355

10.8 Ensemble Vision of the Experimental Data Set for the Flat Mounted Cube in a Channel . . . 356

10.9 Geometrical Characteristics of the Flat Mounted Cube in a Channel Simulation . . . 358

(10)

10.10Time History of the Kinetic Energy for the considered Flat Mounted Cube in a Channel simulation . . . 359 10.11Turbulent Plane Channel for Flat Mounted Cube in a Channel Inlet

Conditions Profiles . . . 360 10.12Iso-surface ofQ=5 with Iso-Contours of Span Wise at distance 0.01H

from the wall. . . 362 10.13Comparison between instantaneous and Averaged On-Plane Vectors for

the Flat Mounted Cube in a Channel . . . 363 10.14Comparison between instantaneous and Averaged On-Plane Iso-Contours

for the Flat Mounted Cube in a Channel . . . 365 10.15Stream Wise Velocity Profiles for the Flat Mounted Cube in a Channel

grouped in four groups. . . 366 10.16Stream Wise RMS Velocity Profiles for the Flat Mounted Cube in a

Channel grouped in four groups . . . 367 10.17Reference Flat Mounted Cube in a Channel Lengths . . . 368 D.1 Error graph of a real function of two variables. . . 408 E.1 Balance of the variance of the velocity fluctuations along the Stream Wise

direction compared with theDNSones. . . 413 E.2 Balance of the variance of the velocity fluctuations along the Span Wise

direction compared with theDNSones. . . 414 E.3 Balance of the variance of the velocity fluctuations along the Verti-

cal Wise direction compared with theDNSones. . . 415 I.1 MiOmaReference Visual ProgramGraphical User Interfaces. . . 516 I.2 Example of theOpenDXEnvironment on a User Desktop. . . 524

Références

Documents relatifs

Finally, although speculative, one could postulate that decreased miR-146a in RRMS myeloid cells may signal the beginning of progressive disease towards SPMS, where higher levels

Anthropological literature and oral testimony assert that Inuit gender did not traditionally fit within a binary framework. Men’s and women’s social roles were

 She  concludes  that  Prince’s  Christian  background—her  Moravian   connection—is  authentic... mentioned,  but  only

Beck described TDD as a novel approach to software development, where the programmer must first write a test that fails before writing a single line of production code [4]..

1) Conducted a regional flood frequency analysis based the on L-moments index-flood procedure for Labrador and the Island of Newfoundland, respectively. 3) Developed

Table 01: Sum-up of teaching and testing English process from the middle schools up to high schools at Biskra University………...47 Table 02: The approaches to test English

The main finding of this research is that, network selection tool is able to provide the best architecture that should be configured on the basis of given criteria (number

PYY can influence the regulation of body weight and energy homeostasis. Body weight is a key factor in determining bone density. Previou s studies have shown that