Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
Technical Note (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building
Research), 1974-02
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC : https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=a36b6d08-17f7-4b1d-bb69-656564ffd9fb https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=a36b6d08-17f7-4b1d-bb69-656564ffd9fb
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/40001200
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Artificial fireplace logs
DIVISION OF BUILDING RESEARCH
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA
TEClHIN ][CAL
NOTJE
No.
581
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
February 1974
PREPARED BY K. Sumi,
·Y. Tsuchiya, and J.F. Mathieu
CHECKED BY GWS APPROVED BY NBH
PREPARED FOR Department of Consumer and Corporate Affairs
SUBJECT ARTIFICIAL FIREPLACE LOGS
The Department of Consumer and Corporate Affairs requested the DBR Fire Research Section to examine the fire hazard that may occur as a result of the burning of artificial firelogs in sheet metal stoves and fireplaces. This request was prompted by information received from two fire departments. The Hull Fire Department reported that a fire might have resulted from the use of one of these artificial logs in a sheet metal fireplace. The London Fire Department reported that a galvanized metal liner in a log holder became completely distorted by heat released by an artificial log.
Materials Submitted
Four samples of artificial fireplace logs were submitted for examination. They are listed below along with the main caution notes and other pertinent
information provided on the labels.
1. PINE MOUNTAIN LOG. Great Lakes Carbon Corp., Chicago, Ill. Net weight 6 lb.
Caution: Use only one log at a time. Place on grate at rear of fireplace. Always use screen in front of fireplace.
2. CALIFORNIA CEDAR DURAFLAME. Duraflame Inc., Stockton, Calif. Net weight 6 lb 8 oz. Burns 3 hours. Yields more than 90,000 Btu. Made of wax, cedar sawdust and a special colouring agent.
Caution: Do not burn in sheet metal fireplace, pot-bellied stove or barbeque. Use only one log at a time.
-2-Never attempt to move or break up log after lighting. Never add "Duraflame" to any existing fire. Do not use for cooking.
3. SMOKEY BEAR FIREPLACE LOG. Husky Industries, Inc., Atlanta, Ga. Net weight 5 lb. 8 oz. Burns for 2 to 3 hours.
Caution: Burn only in properly ventilated area. Use just one log at a time.
4. 3 HOUR LOG. Nikkel Firelog Division, Sacremento, Calif. Net weight 6 lb. Burns for 3 hours.
Caution: Do not burn more than one log at a time. Not for use in stoves, sheet metal fireplaces or barbeques. Do not move or break up log after lighting. Do not use for cooking.
Procedure
The purpose of the present study was to examine the difference in burn-ing characteristics between an artificial log and conventional firewood. The heat of combustion (calorific value), density and burning rate of one of the samples (No.1) was compared with those of white birch.
The calorific value of the two materials was determined by the Parr oxygen bomb calorimeter. For sample No.1, this value was determined for both the inter ior of the log and the outer layer.
In assessing the hazard of fire logs, the rate of heat release appears to be very important. This property, which depends on the rate of burning in
addition to the calorific value, is difficult to determine for two reasons. Firstly, there is no standard test available. Secondly, a firewood having a diameter of about 4 inches will not burn in the absence of additional heat, and therefore cannot be compared to artificial logs of the same diameter that burn in regular fireplaces in 2 to 3 hours. In order to get a comparative measure of the burn-ing rate of sample No. 1 and white birch, the method used was as follows.
A specimen, approximately
It
in. byIt
in. by 2! in., was placed in a wire basket and suspended in a tubular furnace with the axis vertical. Thefur-nace was maintained at 6000
C, and the effluent gases were ignited at the top of the furnace by electric sparks. The weight loss of the specimen was monitored by the use of a transducer system. The average rate of weight loss represen-ting about 60 per cent of the loss (in which the initial and final portions were neglected) and the maximum rate of weight loss were determined for both sam-ple No. 1 and white bir ch.
,
- 3-Results
The results of the experiments are presented in Table 1.
TABLE I
BURNING CHARACTERISTICS OF ARTIFICIAL LOG AND WHITE BIRCH
Heat of Combustion,
Average Maximum cal/g
Density, Burning Burning Material g/cm3 rate, rate, Interior Exterior g/min g/min of log of log Sample 1 (PINE 8190 8260 0.65 5. 3 9.5 MOUNTAIN LOG) White 4210
--
0.50 4.5 8.0 Birch DiscussionArtificial firelog (Sample No.1) will yield substantially more heat than white birch, which was used as a standard conventional firewood in this study. The calorific value of the artificial log (8, 200 cal/g) was twice as great as that of white birch (4, 200 cal/g). The density of the artificial log (0.65 g/cm3 )
was also higher than that of white birch (0. 50 g/cm3
). The rate of burning of
the two materials under one specified set of conditions was of the same order. Thus, the rate of heat release under ideal conditions in a well-developed fire is expected to be twice as great for the artificial log.
There was very little difference in the calorific value of the artificial log whether the specimens were taken from the exterior or interior of the log.