• Aucun résultat trouvé

Highlights: Quaking in our foundations: would Canadian buildings stand?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Highlights: Quaking in our foundations: would Canadian buildings stand?"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=b52a7baf-8527-4884-8138-0e497c37c16f

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=b52a7baf-8527-4884-8138-0e497c37c16f

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Highlights: Quaking in our foundations: would Canadian buildings

stand?

(2)

Quaking in our foundations — would

Canadian buildings stand?

June 01, 2011— Ottawa, Ontario

The world watched in horror in March this year when the biggest earthquake on record in Japan triggered a tsunami that destroyed huge areas of the country's coast, took more than 18,000 lives and caused one of the world’s worst nuclear disasters. Could better building codes have helped stave off damage?

“Probably not,” says NRC structural engineer Dr. Hossein Mostafaei. “Although the disaster began with the earthquake, most of the damage was from the tsunami. When it comes to quakes and standards for new construction, Japan probably has the most rigorous building code in the world.”

Dr. Mostafaei, an expert in earthquake-resistant building design, studied in Tokyo. He learned a great deal about seismicity (the frequency and distribution of earthquakes), how quakes affect structures, and how design can counter the effects of shaking. At NRC, he applies that knowledge to improve Canadian buildings.

“Fortunately, our National Building Code does not need to account for the same levels of seismicity as Japan,” says Dr. Mostafaei. “Its requirements are designed for Canada’s relative seismic hazard.”

The Code’s provisions for earthquake resistance in large buildings are the result of the work of a highly qualified committee of building contractors, consultants, seismologists, researchers and university professors.

Thanks to the Geological Survey and Natural Resources Canada, the Code incorporates precise long-term data on the seismicity of various regions of Canada. “Each province or region can take this local data into account in their own provincial codes,” adds Dr. Mostafaei.

Although British Columbia and Quebec are more prone to quakes than other provinces, as a whole Canada faces a low probability of serious devastation.

(3)

Map courtesy of Natural Resources Canada

Stronger requirements for lateral load resistance

A key objective of the National Building Code of Canada (NBC) is to ensure that buildings can adequately resist lateral loads from natural hazards to maintain safety. Lateral loads are the horizontal forces exerted on structures by winds and earthquakes.

Cathy Taraschuk, a structural engineer at the Canadian Codes Centre at NRC, specializes in structural design. She explains that Part 4 of the Code deals with the lateral load resistance requirements for large buildings, while Part 9 deals with the requirements for residential buildings and smaller, non-residential buildings.

“Canadian homes and other small buildings are generally light wood-frame construction,” says Taraschuk. “The damage that resulted from recent earthquakes in California and Japan shows that light wood-frame buildings must have walls constructed and connected in a way that ensures an acceptable minimum performance under earthquake loading.”

In addition to changes made to the design and construction of light wood-frame buildings since the 1960s, the requirements in Part 9 of the 2010 NBC have been strengthened with respect to both seismic and wind loads.

Most of the new Part 9 requirements apply to higher risk areas of Canada, mainly the Pacific Coast of British Columbia. They include the use of wall panels that are constructed in such a way that they can transfer lateral loads to the levels below. These wall panels form planes known as braced wall bands that are continuous horizontally and vertically throughout the building, and extend from the foundation to the roof framing.

(4)

Saving lives

For both homes and larger buildings, the main goal of the Code’s seismic design provisions is to prevent building collapse to save lives. A building must remain intact long enough for people to get out safely.

Chilean house damaged by a magnitude 8.8 earthquake that shook the country on February 27, 2010.

“The requirements for large buildings far exceed the requirements for single family homes,” says Taraschuk. “There are special provisions for buildings essential to the provision of services following a disaster, such as hospitals, power stations, schools and other large buildings.”

As many disaster stricken nations know, earthquakes last only seconds but their shockwaves can be felt for many years. Thanks to extensive, long-term research on seismicity and the high standard set by our National Building Code, new Canadian buildings will be safer than ever.

Related information

 Kobe quake holds lessons for building scientists

 NRC codes and evaluation program

 NRC expertise to improve infrastructure assessments

 NRC leads Canadian team to investigate Taiwan quake damage

 Possible breakthrough in earthquake-resistant timber construction

(5)

Références

Documents relatifs

/ La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur. For

Possible and necessary winners correspond to simple existential and universal quan- tification, or, in epistemic logic terms, to possibility and knowledge: x is a necessary winner if

muscle activity used to calculate CCI1(t). c) normalized EMGs of the agonist and antagonist muscles, and the overlap between the two muscles used to calculate CCI2(t). d)

A ”Gaussianization” method for audio signals based on the embedding of an imperceptible signal to force the speech input to be Gaussian is proposed in section 3.. Si- mulation

In the case where the human is the communication instiga- tor, schemes are those of figures 5(a) and 5(b). In this case the main difference is that before the communicative act

Grain protein content and grain yield by plant measured in faba bean plants treated with different doses of vermicompost.. Morphological and reproductive traits

Our study shows that blood concentrations of hydroxychloroquine are associated with disease activity in children with systemic lupus erythematosus.. It suggests that