R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
B. G OLDSMITH
A note on products of infinite cyclic groups
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 64 (1981), p. 243-246
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1981__64__243_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1981, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
Cyclic Groups.
B.
GOLDSMITH (*)
Introduction.
In his book
[2],
Fuchs introduces the notion of asubgroup
X of aSpecker
group Pbeing
aproduct
and goes on to establish a Lemma[2,
Lemma
95.1]
whichyields
a useful characterization of thequotient
and enables an easy derivation of Nunke’s characterization of
epimorphic images
of theSpecker
group[4]. Unfortunately
this Lemmais incorrect as we show in section 1. In section 2
by suitably strengt- hening
thehypothesis
weregain
a characterization of thequotient.
Throughout,
all groups areadditively
written Abelian groups and our notation follows the standard works of Fuchs[1], [2].
00
§
1.Suppose P = fl
is aSpecker
group, then Fuchs de-00
fines a
subgroup X
of P to be aproducts
if for every m, then= i
m-th coordinates of almost all Xn are 0 and X consists of all the formal
sums I
To avoid confusion with the usualmeaning
ofproduct (i.e.
X is aproduct
if it isisomorphic
to a cartesianproduct
of infinitecyclic groups)
we denote aproducts (in
the sense ofFuchs) by ~ *
and reserve the
symbol fl
for the more usualmeaning.
LEMMA 1. If Y is an
endomorphic image
of P then Y is aproduct (in
the sense ofFuchs).
(*)
Indirizzo dell’A.: Dublin Institute ofTechnology,
Kevin Street, Dublin 8, Irlanda.244
PROOF. Let (X: P -~. P be an
endomorphism
with Im (x = Y. Let in denote theprojection
of P ontoen~,
andset,
foreach n,
Yn == enrx.Since is
slender,
the map P - maps almostall ei
tozero i.e. 0 for all but a finite number of indices i.
Thus for every n, the n-th co-ordinates of almost all Yi are zero and
00
so the set of is a in .P.
i=l
Now
by
For each n == 1, 2, ..., ann
andfJnn
map P into a slender group and agree on00
S
= @ e i~ .
Hence (Xnn = for all n. So a =#
and Y = 1m (X =i=1 oo
=
*(~/~?
and thus Y is aproduct (in
the sense ofFuchs).
’L=1
COUNTER-EXAMPLE. With
00
Then and this is a
complete
module over thering J2
ofi=l
2-adic
integers.
Moreover the torsion submodule of thisquotient
isnot dense in the 2-adic
topology.
Hence it has a direct summandJ2
and ifx~
is dense in .H then is divisible. Choosey E P
such
that y
maps onto x modulo Y and let X =y, Y).
Then cer-tainly X
isisomorphic
to P and hence is anendomorphic image
of P.By
Lemma 1 X is aproducts (in
the sense ofFuchs).
However00
which contains the divisible
subgroup
How-i=i
ever if the conclusion of Lemma 95.1 in
[2]
were correct thenPIX
would be reduced. So X is
clearly
acounter-example
to thequoted
Lemma.
Ack%owledgenae%t.
The abovearguments
arose frominteresting
discussions with Peter Neumann and Adolf Mader. The main idea in the
counter-example
isessentially
due to the former.§
2. In this sectionby introducing
anappropriate topological concept
we canregain
some information aboutquotients.
Let P =00
and
topologize
P with theproduct topology
of the discretei = 1
topology
on eachcomponent.
We refer to thistopology simply
as00
the
product topology
on P. Thesubgroups Pn
are a basisof
neighbourhoods
of zero. i=nPROPOSITION 2. If X is a
subgroup
of P which is closed in theproduct topology
then(ii)
isisomorphic
to a cartesianproduct
ofcyclic
groups.PROOF. Part
(i)
is a well-known result due to Nunke[3].
Heshows that there are elements xn in .X with
( c~ ) xi = 0
for(b) xn =
0 if andonly
if xn =0; (c) Xn
divides Un for all u in X nPn . (Subscripts
denotecomponents
in theproduct P.)
Moreover if X isclosed,
In
establishing (ii)
we letdn = xn
in order tosimplify
notation.Notice that it follows
easily
from theproperties (a), (b), (c)
that if* yn~ also,
thenyn = dn
andxn+1- yn+,
is amultiple
ofSuppose a
E P isgiven by a
=( a1,
a2 ,...)
then we may writeAlso
where where where
Define a map q from P onto the cartesian
product
of thecyclic
groups oforder di by 99(a)
==(817
-2Y ..., 8n,...).
We mustverify
that 99 is a well-definedhomomorphism. Suppose X = ~ * ~yn~
then sinceyi =
= d1
weget
that r, and 81 areuniquely
defined.Now =
(r2-r1k)d2+
82(some
k EZ)
andso 8, is defined as before. Note that and so
by property (c)
is amultiple
ofd3 . Making
this substitu-tion one
easily
obtains that s3 modd3
and sos3 is defined as before.
Repeating
thistype
ofargument easily gives that (p
is well defined.Moreover (p
iseasily
seen to be ahomomorphism.
Finally Ker 99
= ...= 0}
i-e-if a E Ker q
then246
Hence where
Z(di)
is to beinterpreted
as Z ifd2 =
0.Given
Proposition
2 one caneasily
recover the characterization ofhomomorphic images
of P(Nunke [4]
or Fuchs[2, Prop. 95.2]).
COROLLARY 3.
Every epimorphic image
of P is the direct sum of a .tcotorsion group and a direct
product
of infinitecyclic
groups.PROOF. Let K be a
subgroup
of P and let K be the closure of K in theproduct topology.
FromProposition 2,
X is aproduct,
say_
00
_
K
== l *xi>
andP/K
is aproduct
ofcyclic
groups. Let P =P2
i=1
where
P,, P2
are theproducts
of the with 0 anddn = 0 respectively.
Then andPijk
isalgebraically compact
since00
it is a
product
of finitecyclic
groups. Since is contained inK,
_ _
the
quotient X/K
is cotorsion and this combined withP1/K being
cotorsion
implies P1/.K
is also cotorsion[1,
54(D)].
REFERENCES
[1] L. FUCHS,
Infinite
AbelianGroups,
Vol. I, Academic Press, New Yorkand London, 1970.
[2] L. FUCHS,
Infinite
AbelianGroups,
Vol. II, Academic Press, New Yorkand London, 1973.
[3] R. J. NUNKE, On direct
products of infinite cyclic
groups, Proc. Amer.Math. Soc., 13 (1962), pp. 66-71.
[4] R. J. NUNKE, Slender groups, Acta Sci. Math.
Szeged,
23(1962),
pp. 67-73.
Manoscritto