• Aucun résultat trouvé

arXiv:0908.2023v1 [math.GT] 14 Aug 2009

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "arXiv:0908.2023v1 [math.GT] 14 Aug 2009"

Copied!
11
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

arXiv:0908.2023v1 [math.GT] 14 Aug 2009

FENGLUOANDJEAN-MARCSCHLENKER

Abstrat. Weonsideravolumemaximizationprogram to onstruthyperbolistrutures ontriangulated

3-manifolds,forwhihpreviousprogresshas leadtoonsiderangleassignmentswhihdonotorrespond toa

hyperboli metrion eahsimplex. Weshowthat ritialpointsofthe generalized volumeareassoiated to

geometristruturesmodeledontheextendedhyperbolispaethenaturalextensionofhyperbolispaeby

thedeSitterspaeexeptforthedegenerateasewhereallsimpliesareEulideaninageneralizedsense.

Thoseextendedhyperbolistruturesanrealizegeometriallyadeompositionofthemanifoldasonneted

sum,alongembeddedspheres(orprojetiveplanes)whiharetotallygeodesi,spae-likesurfaesinthedeSitter

partoftheextendedhyperbolistruture.

1. Introdution

1.1. TheCasson-Rivinprogramanditsextension. Thereareseveralwaystoonstruthyperbolimetris

onanideallytriangulated3-manifoldwithtorusboundary. Themostprominentones areThurston'salgebrai

gluingequationsand Casson-Rivin'sangle struture. Intheangle strutureapproah, onerst introduesthe

notionofangles onthetriangulationanduse theLobahevskyfuntion to denethevolumeof atetrahedron

withangleassignments. In[Luo07℄,Casson-Rivin'sanglestrutureprogramisextended tolosedtriangulated

3-manifold. The volume of angle struture is dened and theritial points of the volume is investigated in

[Luo07℄.

The goal of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the ritial points of the volume and a

naturalextensionofthehyperbolispaebythedeSitterspae. It turnsoutmanyoftheritialpointshave

geometrimeaningintermsofgeometristruturesbasedonthis extendedhyperbolispae.

1.2. Volumemaximizationon triangulated

3

-manifolds.

Denition1.1. Let

M

bealosed3-manifold,andlet

T

beatriangulationof

M

. Reallthatthetriangulation

T

is obtained as follows. Take a nite set of disjoint Eulidean tetrahedra

s 1 , ..., s N

and identify all their

odimension-1faesinpairs byanehomeomorphisms. Thequotient spae

M

inheritsanaturaltriangulation, denotedby

T

. Awedgeof

T

isaouple

(e, s)

,where

s

isasimplexof

T

and

e

isanedgeof

s

intheunidentied

spae

N i=1 s i

. The set of wedges of

T

will be denoted by

W (T )

, while the set of verties, edges, 2-faes and

3-simpliesof

T

willbe denotedby

V (T), E(T ), F (T )

and

S(T )

respetively.

The main ingredient in Casson-Rivin'sangle struture is based onthe observation that the vertex link of

anidealhyperbolitetrahedronis aEulidean triangle. In ourextension, weobservethat thevertexlink ofa

ompattetrahedronin thehyperboli,spherialorEulidean3-spaeisaspherial triangle. This promptsus

toproposethefollowingdenition.

Denition1.2. An angle strutureon

T

isafuntion

θ : W (T ) → (0, π)

suhthat:

for eah edge

e

of

T

,the sum of the

θ(w)

overthe wedges of the form

w = (e, s), s ∈ S(T )

,isequal to

,

for eah

s ∈ S(T )

andeahvertex

v

of

s

,

θ(e 1 , s) + θ(e 2 , s) + θ(e 3 , s) > π

,wherethe

e i

are the3edges

of

s

adjaent to

v

,

foreah

s ∈ S(T )

andeahvertex

v

of

s

,

θ(e 1 , s)+ θ(e 2 , s) < θ(e 3 , s)+π

,andsimilarlyforpermutations of

1, 2, 3

.

Date:v1Aug2009.

J.-M.S.waspartiallysupportedbytheANRprogramRepsurf:ANR-06-BLAN-0311. F.L.waspartiallysupportedbytheNSF:

nsf-dms0604352.

(2)

Wedenote by

AS(T )

the spaeof angle assignmentson

T

.

Thegeometrimeaningoftherstonditionisthat,ifthegeometristruturesonthesimpliesanbeglued

alongthefaes(thisisdisussedbelow)thentheanglesaddupattheedgessothatthereisnosingularitythere.

Theseondandthethirdonditionsmeanthatforeahsimplex thelinkofeahvertexisaspherialtriangle.

Itisquitepossiblethat,insomeases,

AS (T )

mightbeempty,howeverallmanifoldsdoadmitatriangulation forwhih

AS(T )

isnon-empty[KL℄.

There is a well-dened manner, explainedin [Luo07℄ and realled in setions 4-5, to assoiateto an angle

assignment

θ ∈ AS(T )

a number whih is, in a preise way, a generalized volume. This denes a funtion

V : AS(T ) → R

. This volume is dened in terms of anaturalextension of theShläi formula, so that it automatiallyveriesthisidentity.

If

θ 0

isaritialpointof

V

in

AS(T )

suh thatalltheanglesassignedtoallsimpliesof

T

arethedihedral

angles of a hyperboli simplex, then, thanks to the Shläi formula, the lengths of an edge in the wedges

ontainingit math, sothat the faesof the simplies anbeglued isometriallyand

θ 0

denes ahyperboli

metrion

M

. Oneofthe mainpointsofthis paperisthat anextension ofthisstatementholds when

θ 0

does

notassigntoallsimpliesof

T

thedihedralanglesofahyperbolisimplex.

1.3. Extendedhyperbolistrutures. Thereisarathernaturalextensionofthehyperbolispaebythede

Sitterspae,usedforinstanein[Sh98,Sh01℄inapolyhedralontextsomewhatreminisentofthearguments

followedhere. Weall

HS 3

thisextendedhyperbolispae, sothat

HS 3

ontainsanopensubsetisometri to

the3-dimensionalhyperbolispaeandanotheropensubsetisometritothequotientofthedeSitterspaeby

theantipodalmap.

Givena3-dimensionalmanifold

M

,anHS-strutureon

M

isageometristrutureloallymodelledon

HS 3

.

Thisisexplainedin setion2.

1.4. The main result. The main result presented here is that most ritial points of the volume

V

on the

interiorof

AS(T )

haveanaturalinterpretationintermsofHS-strutures.

Theorem1.3. Let

θ ∈ AS(T )

bearitial pointsof

V

. Then oneof the following applies.

(1)

θ

orrespondstoaspherialmetrion

M

(foreahsimplexof

T

,theanglesarethe anglesofaspherial

simplex,andthose simplexan begluedisometrially along theirfaes, yielding aspherial metri),

(2)

θ

orrespondstoan HS-strutureon

M

. If this extendedhyperboli struturehasade Sitterpart, then

itontainsatotallygeodesi surfae homeomorphi to

S 2

or

R P 2

,whih isnormal surfaein

T

,

(3) all simplies in

T

are either Eulidean or ipped Eulidean (see below). The volume

V (θ)

is then a

non-negativeintegermultiple of

2

. Ifatleastonesimplexisipped,then

V > 0

and

(M, T )

ontains

anormalsurfaehomeomorphi toasphere oraprojetive plane.

Therstaseshouldbelear,andanhappenonlyif

M

isdieomorphieitherto

S 3

orto

R P 3

. Intheseond

ase, thetotally geodesispae-likesurfaes in thede Sitterparts of the HS-struturerealizegeometriallya

deomposition of

M

in irredutible parts, eah of whih arries a hyperboli metri. The third ase is quite speial,presumablyitanouronlyinveryspei ases,see below.

1.5. Geometri interpretation. The rst idea in Theorem 1.3 is that onsidering HS-strutures radially

simplies the way in whih one an nd hyperboli strutures on 3-manifolds by a ritial point argument.

Indeed,if

M

isreduible,theremightstillbearitialpointof

V

on

AS(T )

,orrespondingnottoahyperboli metri(whihisimpossibleif

M

isreduible)buttoaHS-struture,withadeSitterpartorrespondingtoeah inompressiblespherein

M

.

Thereishoweveralimittothisargument,asitstands. GivenaHS-struture

h

on

M

,thesetofitshyperboli

points isadomain

N ⊂ M

on whih therestritionof

h

denes aomplete hyperbolimetri. ThedeSitter

parts of

h

are topologiallyeither produts of

S 2 × R

or produts ofa projetiveplane by aninterval. This means that eah onnetedomponent ofthe boundary of

N

hasto beeither asphere oraprojetiveplane,

(3)

1.6. Further possible extensions. The onstrutionof HS-strutures assoiated to ritial points of

V

on

AS(T )

suggeststhat afurtherextensionof thespae ofangleassignments

AS(T )

shouldbepossible,allowing

forinstanefor angleassignmentssuhthat thesumofanglesatavertexofasimplex isequalto orlessthan

π

. Suhanglesassignmentswouldorrespondsgeometrially(atritialpointsof

V

)to triangulationswith at least onevertex in the de Sitterpartof the HS-struture obtained. This line of investigation is notpursued

here.

2. Extendedhyperboli strutures

2.1. The extended hyperboli spae. One way to dene this extension is to onsider a stritly onvex

quadri

Q

intheprojetive3-spae

R P 3

. Giventwodistintpoints

x, y ∈ R P 3 \ Q

,let

D

betheprojetiveline

ontaining

x

and

y

. If

D

intersets

Q

,let

a, b

bethepointsbetween

D

and

Q

,hosensothat

a, x, y, b

ourin

thisyliorderon

D

. ThendenetheHilbertdistanebetween

x

and

y

as

d H (x, y) = 1

2 log[a, b; x, y ] ,

where

[·, ·; ·, ·]

denotestheross-ratio. If

D

doesnotinterset

Q

,usethesameformulawith

a, b

replaedbythe

omplexintersetionsofthelineontaining

x, y

with

Q

. Thisdenesadistane inwhihtheballboundedby

Q

anbeinterpretedasaprojetivemodelof

H 3

,whiletheoutsideitaprojetivemodelofthequotientofthe

deSitterspae

dS 3

bytheantipodalmap. Inpartiular,

d H (x, y)

anbe:

realandnegative,if

x, y

arein theballbounded by

Q

,andthisdenes inside

Q

aprojetivemodelof

thehyperboli 3-dimensionalspae(knownastheKleinmodel).

real and positive,if

x, y

areoutside theball bounded by

Q

and the line joining them intersets

Q

in

twopoints. Thislineisthentime-likein

dS 3

.

in

i(0, π)

, if

x, y

are outside

Q

and the line ontaining them does not interset

Q

, this line is then

spae-likein

dS 3

.

in

iπ/2 + R

,if

x

isinside theballboundedby

Q

and

y

isoutsideit.

• 0

,ifthelinejoining

x

and

y

istangentto

Q

. This lineisthenalight-likein

dS 3

.

Thesameonstrutionalsoworksin dimension2,yieldingtheextendedhyperboliplane

HS 2

.

2.2. Thedouble over. Itissometimeshelpfultoonsiderthedoubleover

HS ˜ 3

of

HS 3

. Itisdieomorphi

to

S 3

,andhastwohyperboliomponentseahisometrito

H 3

,andonedeSitteromponentisometritothe

full deSitterspae

dS 3

. The sameworksin anydimension.

HS ˜ 3

isomposed oftwoopiesof thehyperboli

3-spae,andofaoneopyofthewholedeSitterspae.

2.3. Extendedhyperbolistrutures. AnHS-strutureonalosed3-dimensionalmanifold

M

isageometri

strutureloally modeledon

HS 3

,withtransformationgroup

P SL(2, C )

.

If

h

is anHS-strutureon

M

, theset ofpoints of

M

where

h

is loallyhyperboli isanopensubsetof

M

,

whihwedenoteby

M H

, andtherestritionof

h

to

M H

isaompletehyperbolimetri. Similary,theset of

points of

M

where

h

is loally modeled on thede Sitter spaeis an open subsetof

M

, for whih weuse the

notation

M dS

. Then

M H ∪ M dS

isdenseis

M

,anditsomplementisasurfae.

3. Triangles

3.1. The osine formula.

Denition3.1. We all

cosh

therestrition ofthe funtion

x 7→ (e x + e −x )/2

to

R <0 ∪ [0, iπ] ∪ (iπ + R >0 )

.

With thisdenition,

cosh

isabijetionfromitsdomainofdenition to

R

.

Lemma3.2. Let

α 1 , α 2 , α 3

be the (interior) anglesof a hyperboli triangle,and let

a 1 , a 2 , a 3

be the length of

the opposite edges. Then

(1)

cosh(a 1 ) = cos(α 1 ) + cos(α 2 ) cos(α 3 )

sin(α 2 ) sin(α 3 ) .

(4)

3.2. The triangle inequality. Considernowatriangle in

S 2

, of angles

α 1 , α 2 , α 3

. It is asimpleexeriseto

hekthat thoseanglessatisfythefollowingequation:

(

T I 1

)

α 2 + α 3 < α 1 + π

Usingtheexterioranglesratherthantheinteriorangles,thisequationanbewritten as

(π − α 1 ) < (π − α 2 ) + (π − α 3 ) ,

whihisthetriangleinequalityforthedualtrianglein thesphere.

3.3. AlassiationofMöbiustriangles. Following[Luo93℄,weonsiderhereageneralizationofthenotion

ofspherial(orhyperboli) triangle.

Denition3.3. AMöbiustriangleisatriple

(α 1 , α 2 , α 3 ) ∈ (0, π) 3

. GivenaMöbiustriangle,itsedgelengths

are theomplex numbers

(a 1 , a 2 , a 3 )

denedbyEquation (1 ), withthe denition of

cosh

given above.

Therationalefortheterminologyusedhereisthat,foranytriple

(α 1 , α 2 , α 3 ) ∈ (0, π) 3

,thereexistsatriangle

intheomplexplaneboundedbythreeirles,uniqueuptoMöbiustransformation,sothatitsinneranglesare

the

α i

's. Theonstrutionsusedbelowarehoweverbasedmostlyontheextended hyperboliplaneandonreal projetivegeometry,ratherthanomplexprojetivegeometry. HoweverstikingtothetermsMöbiustriangle

shouldbehelpfultothereaderinsofarasitislosertothepreviousworksonthesubjets,e.g. [Luo07℄,[Luo93℄.

Lemma3.4. Let

T = (α 1 , α 2 , α 3 )

beaMöbius triangle,let

s = α 1 + α 2 + α 3

,andlet

a i

bethe edge lengthsof

T

. Exatlyoneof the followingve asesapplies.

(1)

T

isspherial:

s > π

,andthe triangle inequalities

(T I 1 ), (T I 2 ), (T I 3 )

hold. Then

a 1 , a 2 , a 3 ∈ i(0, π)

.

(2)

T

ishyperboli:

s < π

. Then the triangle inequalities

(T I 1 ), (T I 2 ), (T I 3 )

hold, and

a 1 , a 2 , a 3 < 0

.

(3)

T

isEulidean:

s = π

. Thenthe triangle inequalities

(T I 1 ), (T I 2 ), (T I 3 )

hold,and

a 1 = a 2 = a 3 = 0

.

(4)

T

isipped hyperboli:

α 2 + α 3 > α 1 + π

(orsimilarlyafter apermutationof

1, 2, 3

). Then

a 1 < 0

while

a 2 , a 3 ∈ iπ + R >0

.

(5)

T

is ipped Eulidean:

α 2 + α 3 = α 1 + π

(or similarly after apermutation of

1, 2, 3

). Then

a 2 = a 3 = iπ

and

a 1 = 0

.

The proof (whih is elementary) is based on two preliminary statements. Let

α 1 , α 2 , α 3 ∈ (0, π)

, and let

s = α 1 + α 2 + α 3

.

Sub-Lemma3.5.

If

α 2 + α 3 < π

,then

cosh(a 1 ) < 1

(resp.

> 1

) ifandonly if

s > π

(resp.

s < π

).

If

α 2 + α 3 > π

,then

cosh(a 1 ) < 1

(resp.

> 1

)if andonlyif

(T I 1 )

holds(resp.

α 2 + α 3 > π + α 1

).

Sub-Lemma3.6.

cosh(a 1 ) > −1

if andonlyif either

α 2 > α 3

and

(T I 3 )

holds, or

α 3 > α 2

and

(T I 2 )

holds.

Proofof Lemma 3.4 . Supposerstthat thethreetriangleinequalitieshold. Then

T

isin oneoftheases(1),

(2)or(4)dependingon

s

. Notealsothatif

(T I 1 )

doesnothold,thenlearlyboth

(T I 2 )

and

(T I 3 )

aresatised.

So

T

isinase(3)ifthere isequalityininequality

(T I 1 )

,or(5)otherwise.

Inase(1),

cosh(a 1 ) < 1

by Sub-Lemma3.5, and

cosh(a 1 ) > −1

by Sub-Lemma3.6, so

a 1 ∈ i(0, π)

bythe

denition of

cosh

used here. Thesameholds ofoursefor

a 2

and

a 3

. Inase(2), Sub-Lemma 3.5showsthat

cosh(a i ) = 1

for

i = 1, 2, 3

sothatallthe

a i

arezero. Inase(4),therstaseofSub-Lemma3.5,

cosh(a 1 ) > 1

,

sothat

a 1 < 0

byourdenitionof

cosh

,andthesameappliesto

a 2

and

a 3

.

Inase(3), theseond pointin Sub-Lemma3.5 showsthat

cosh(a 1 ) = 1

,while Sub-Lemma3.6showsthat

cosh(a 2 ) = cosh(a 3 ) = −1

, sothat

a 2 = a 2 = iπ

. Thesameargumentappliesto ase(5), then

cosh(a 1 ) > 1

while

cosh(a 2 ), cosh(a 3 ) < −1

,sothat

a 1 < 0

while

a 2 , a 3 ∈ iπ + R >

.

ThefollowinglemmashowsthattheedgelengthsdeterminetheshapeofaMöbiustriangle.

Lemma 3.7. Let

A = (α 1 , α 2 , α 3 )

and

B = (β 1 , β 2 , β 3 )

be two Möbius triangles whih are not Eulidean or

ippedEulidean. Ifthe orrespondingedgelengthsof

A

and

B

arethe same, then

α i = β i

for all i.

Theprooffollowsfromtheosinelawthat

(2)

cos(α 1 ) = − cosh(a 1 ) + cosh(a 2 ) cosh(a 3 )

sinh(a 2 ) sinh(a 3 ) .

(5)

3.4. Geometrirealization oftriangles. ThelassiationofMöbiustrianglesin Lemma3.4hasanatural

interpretation in termsof trianglesin the extendedhyperboliplane

HS ˜ 2

. There is nointerpretation needed forspherial,Eulidean or hyperbolitriangle, but ippedhyperbolitriangleorrespondto trianglesin

HS ˜ 2

withonevertexandtwointheother.

Suppose

t

issuhaippedhyperidealtriangle,with verties

v 1 , v 2 , v 3

,with

v 1

inoneopyof

H 2

and

v 2 , v 3

in the other. Let

α i

be theangle of

t

at

v i

,

1 ≤ i ≤ 3

. Those angles anbe understood byipping

t

,that

is, onsidering the triangle

t

with verties

v 1 , v 2 , v 3

, where

v 1

is the antipode of

v 1

in

HS ˜ 2

.

t

is a usual

hyperbolitriangle, anditsanglesare

β 1 = α 1

,

β 2 = π − α 2 , β 3 = π − α 3

. Sine

t

isahyperbolitriangle,its

anglessatisfy

β 1 + β 2 + β 3 < π ,

whihtranslatesas

α 1 + π < α 2 + α 3 ,

theinversetriangleinequalityfor

t

. Similarly,

t

satisesthetriangleinequality,

π + β 2 > β 1 + β 3

and

π + β 3 > β 1 + β 2 ,

whihtranslatesas

α 1 + α 2 < π + α 3

and

α 1 + α 3 < π + α 2 .

Thisshowsthat

(α 1 , α 2 , α 3 )

isaippedhyperbolitriangle,aordingtoLemma 3.4. Thesameargumentan

beusedbakwards,toshowthatanyippedhyperbolitriangleinthesenseofLemma3.4isthetripleofangles

ofaippedhyperbolitrianglein

HS ˜ 2

.

FlippedEulideantrianglesan beunderstoodin thesamewaybut bytaking alimit. TheusualEulidean

triangles an be onsidered aslimits of hyperboli triangles of diameter going to zero atually, a blow-up

proedureisneessary,sinewhatwereallywanttoonsideraresequenesofdegeneratinghyperbolitriangles

forwhih theangles,andthereforetheratiooftheedgelengths,hasalimit. Thisanalso bedoneforipped

hyperbolitriangles,withvertiesonvergingeither toapointintheoneopyof thehyperboli planeof

HS ˜ 2

orto itsantipodein theother opy.

Puttingthistogether,weobtainthefollowingstatement.

Lemma3.8. Let

T = (α 1 , α 2 , α 3 )

beaMöbius triangle.

(1) If

T

isspherial, thereisatriangle

t ⊂ S 2

,uniqueuptothe ationof

O(3)

,withangles

α 1 , α 2

and

α 3

.

(2) If

T

is hyperboli, there is a triangle

t ∈ H 2

, unique up to the hyperboli isometries, with angles

α 1 , α 2 , α 3

.

(3) If

T

is Eulidean, there is a triangle

t ⊂ R 2

, unique up to isometries and homotheties, with angles

α 1 , α 2 , α 3

. In other terms, there is a sequene of hyperboli triangles

(t n ) n∈ N

in

H 2

, with angles

α 1,n , α 2,n , α 3,n

onvergingto

α 1 , α 2 , α 3

,respetively.

(4) If

T

is ipped hyperboli, thereis a

t ∈ HS ˜ 2

,withone vertexin oneopy of

H 2

andtwoin the other,

with angles

(α 1 , α 2 , α 3 )

. Itisuniqueuptothe ationof

O(2, 1)

on

HS ˜ 2

.

(5) If

T

isippedEulidean,thereisasequeneofippedhyperbolitriangles

(t n ) n∈ N

in

HS ˜ 2

,withangles

α 1,n , α 2,n , α 3,n

onvergingto

α 1 , α 2 , α 3

,respetively.

4. Three-dimensional simplies

4.1. AngleSystem. Wenowonsider3-dimensionalsimplies,andassign toeahwedgeanangle,asfollows.

Denition4.1. Suppose

s

isatetrahedron. Thenananglesystemon

s

isafuntion

θ : {(e, s)|e

isanedgeof

s} → (0, π)

so that forthree edges

e i , e j , e k

ending at a vertex

v

of

s

, the 3 angles

θ(e i , s), θ(e j , s), θ(e k , s)

are the

inneranglesofaspherialtriangle. Let

AS (s)

bethespaeofallanglesystemson

s

. An angled3-simplexisa

3-simplextogetherwithananglesystem.

If

T

is atriangulationof alosed 3-manifold

M

, ananglesystemon

T

isafuntion

θ

denedontheset of

allwedges

{(e, s)|e

isanedgeofatetrahedron

s}

sothat

foreahedge

e

of

T

,thesumofthevaluesof

θ

onthewedgeshaving

e

astheiredge isequalto

,

foreah3-simplex

s

in

T

,therestritionof

θ

to allwedgesin

s

formsananglesystem.

(6)

In thepaper[Luo07℄, the geometri prototypeof an angled 3-simplex is theMöbius tetrahedron. Namely

a topologial tetrahedron in

R 3

bounded by four 2-spheres of inner angles less than

π

. However, there are

angled 3-simplex whih annot berealized asaMöbius 3-simplex. Our main observation is that, in termsof

HS-geometry, these angled 3-simplies all haveageometri meaning. Furthermore, the edge lengths,volume

and Shläi formulaanbegeneralizedtothe HS-geometry. These generalizationsareexatlythe underlying

geometrimeaningoftheorrespondingnotionsdened in[Luo07℄.

4.2. Fae angles.

Denition 4.2. Let

α = (α 12 , · · · , α 34 ) ∈ AS(s)

. The fae angles of

α

are the numbers

β ijk ∈ (0, π)

dened,

for

{i, j, k, l} = {1, 2, 3, 4}

,bythe formula

cos(β jk i ) = cos(α il ) + cos(α ij ) cos(α ik ) sin(α ij ) sin(α ik ) .

Thegeometrimeaningof thefaeangleis asfollows. Aordingtothedenition,atthe

i

thvertex

v i

,the

angles

α ij , α ik , α il

arethe inner angles ofa spherialtriangle

A jkl

, whih anbe onsidered asthelink

v i

in

thetetrahedron. Thenthefaeangle

β i jk

isthe

jk

-thedgelengthof

A jkl

. Bydenition,faeanglesarethenin

(0, π)

.

4.3. Edge lengths. Using the faes angles, we make eah odimension-

1

fae of an angled tetrahedron

s

a

Möbiustriangle. Thus, bylemma3.2, weandenefor eah edgein eahfae,anedge length. Thefollowing

isprovedin[Luo07℄.

Lemma4.3. If

L

isan edge of atetrahedron

s

with an angle systemand

D 1 , D 2

are twofaes of

s

having

L

asan edge,thenthe lengthof

L

in

D 1

isthe sameasthatin

D 2

.

Thusthefollowingiswelldened.

Denition 4.4. Let

α = (α 12 , · · · , α 34 ) ∈ AS(s)

. The edge lengths of

α

are the numbers

(l ij ) i6=j

dened as

follows:

l ij

isthe lengthof theedge

ij

inthe twofaesof

T

adjaent tothe verties

i

and

j

.

4.4. A lassiation of simplies. It is now possible to desribe a lassiation of 3-dimensional angled

simplies. It is slightly more elaborate than the orresponding lassiation for Möbius triangles, beause

simpliesanbeippedin twoways,dependingonwhetheroneortwovertiesareinoneoftheopiesof

H 3

in

HS ˜ 3

. Here isthe denition of theip at thei-th vertex of

α ∈ AS(s)

. See[Luo07℄ for moredetails. The

ippedsimplex

α = (α 12 , ..., α 34 )

hasangles

α ij = α ij

for

j 6= i

and

α jk = π − α jk

for

j, k 6= i

. Geometrially, if

v 1 , v 2 , v 3 , v 4

arethevertiesofaspherialsimplex,thentheippedsimplex(abouttherstvertex

v 1

)isthe

spherialsimplexwithverties

−v 1 , v 2 , v 3 , v 4

where

−v 1

istheantipodalpointof

v 1

.

Lemma4.5. Let

α ∈ AS(s)

. Afterapermutationof

{1, 2, 3, 4}

,

α

isof exatly oneofthe following types:

(1) spherial: allfaes of

T

arespherial triangles, andalledge lengthsarein

i(0, π)

.

(2) hyperboli: all faes of

T

are hyperboli triangles,andall edge lengthsarein

R <0

.

(3) ipped hyperboli: thefae

(234)

isahyperbolitriangle,whilethefaesadjaenttothe vertex

1

are

ippedhyperbolitriangles. Thelengthsofthe edges

(12), (13), (14)

arein

iπ + R >0

,whilethe lengthof the other edges arein

R <0

.

(4) doubly ipped hyperboli: all faes of

T

are ipped hyperboli triangles, the lengths of the edges

(12)

and

(34)

arenegativenumberswhilethe lengthof the otheredgesare in

iπ + R >0

.

(5) Eulidean: allfaes of

T

areEulidean triangles,alledge lengthsare zero.

(6) ippedEulidean: thelengthoftheedges

(12), (13), 14)

areequalto

,whilethelengthsof

(14), (24), (34)

arezero.

(7) doubly ipped Eulidean: the lengthsof

(12), (34)

are zerowhileall otheredgeshave length

.

Theterminologyisbased,asfortriangles,ontheideaofippingahyperbolisimplex: thismeansreplaing

oneof its verties, say

v 1

, byits antipode in

HS ˜ 3

. The dihedral anglesat allthree edges notadjaent to

v 1

are thenreplaedby theiromplement to

π

, andthe eeton theedgelengthsis asdesribedin Lemma 4.5.

Doublyippingahyperideal simplexmeansreplaingtwovertiesbytheirantipodesin

HS ˜ 3

.

(7)

Proofof Lemma 4.5 . Let

α ∈ AS(s)

,let

v 1 , v 2 , v 3 , v 4

bethevertiesof

s

. Weonsiderdierentases,depending

onthelengthsoftheedgesof

s

andinpartiularofitsfae

(v 1 , v 2 , v 3 )

.

(1)

(v 1 , v 2 , v 3 )

is aspherialtriangle, i.e., itsedge lengthsarein

i(0, π)

. Lemma 3.4, applied tothe three

otherfaesof

s

,showsthat thelengthsofthethreeotheredgesof

s

arealsoin

i(0, π)

,itfollowsthat

s

isspherial.

(2)

(v 1 , v 2 , v 3 )

is hyperboli. Then its edge lengthsare negative, and onsidering Lemma 3.4 showsthat

thereareonlytwopossibilities.

(a)

(v 2 , v 3 , v 4 )

is hyperboli, that is, its edge lengths are negative. Then, again by Lemma 3.4, the

lengthoftheedge

(v 1 , v 4 )

isalsonegative,so that

s

ishyperboli.

(b)

(v 2 , v 3 , v 4 )

isippedhyperboli,thatis,thelengthsoftheedges

(v 2 , v 4 )

and

(v 3 , v 4 )

arein

iπ+ R >0

. Thenthelengthof

(v 1 , v 4 )

isalsoin

iπ + R >0

,sothat

s

isippedhyperboli.

(3)

(v 1 , v 2 , v 3 )

isippedhyperboli,weansupposewithoutlossofgeneralitythatthelengthof

(v 1 , v 2 )

is

in

R >0

andthelengthsofthetwootheredgesarein

iπ + R >0

. Twoasesarepossible.

(a)

(v 1 , v 2 , v 4 )

ishyperboli,itthenfollowsfromLemma3.4that

s

isippedhyperboli.

(b)

(v 1 , v 2 , v 4 )

isippedhyperboli,itthenfollowsfromLemma3.4that

s

isdoublyippedhyperboli.

(4)

(v 1 , v 2 , v 3 )

is Eulidean, sothat all itsedges have zerolength. Lemma 3.4 then shows that there are

twopossibleases.

(a)

(v 1 , v 2 , v 4 )

isEulidean. Thenalledgesof

s

havezerolength,and

s

isEulidean.

(b)

(v 1 , v 2 , v 4 )

isippedEulidean,sothat

(v 1 , v 4 )

and

(v 2 , v 4 )

havelength

. Inthisase

s

ifipped

Eulidean.

(5)

(v 1 , v 2 , v 3 )

isippedEulidean,weansuppose withoutlossofgeneralitythat

(v 1 , v 2 )

haszerolength

zerowhilethelengthsoftheothertwoedgesareequalto

. Thereareagaintwoasestoonsider.

(a)

(v 1 , v 2 , v 4 )

is Eulidean,sothatallitsedgelengthsarezero,anditeasilyfollowsthat

s

is ipped

Eulidean.

(b)

(v 1 , v 2 , v 4 )

is ipped Eulidean, sothat the edges

(v 1 , v 4 )

and

(v 2 , v 4 )

havelength

. Then

s

is

doublyippedEulidean.

Aordingto thelemma, there arethree typesofangled simplies: Eulidean, hyperboliand spherial. A

angledsimplexisofEulidean(orhyperboli)typeifitanbeippedto aEulidean(orhyperboli)simplex.

A spherialtype simplexis thesameasaspherialsimplex. Thetypeofasimplex anbe determinedbythe

lengthofanyofitsedges.

Corollary 4.6. Suppose

e

isan edgeof anangledsimplex oflength

l(e)

. Then

s

isof

(1) Eulidean type ifandonly if

l(e) ∈ {0, iπ}

,

(2) hyperboli typeif andonlyif

l(e) ∈ R <0 ∪ {iπ + r|r ∈ R >0 }

,

(3) spherial type ifandonly if

l(e) ∈ i(0, π)

.

In partiular, if

e

and

e

aretwoedges ofan angledsimplex

s

,thentheir lengths

l(e)

and

l(e )

areinthe same

subsetlistedabove.

4.5. Combinatorisof thespae of simplies. Thelassiationgivenin Ÿ4.4anbeinterpretedinterms

oftheHS-geometryasfollows,asforMöbiustrianglesinLemma 3.8. Let

s

beasimplex,andlet

α ∈ AS(s)

.

(1) If

α

is spherial,the

α ij

arethedihedralanglesofauniquesimplexin

S 3

.

(2) If

α

is hyperboli,the

α ij

arethedihedralanglesofauniquesimplex in

H 3

.

(3) If

α

ishyperboli,the

α ij

arethedihedralanglesofauniquesimplexin

HS ˜ 3

,withthreevertiesinone

oftheopiesof

H 3

andoneintheother.

(4) If

α

ishyperboli,the

α ij

arethedihedralanglesofauniquesimplexin

HS ˜ 3

,withtwovertiesin one

oftheopiesof

H 3

andtwoin theother.

(5) If

α

is Eulidean, the

α ij

are the dihedral angles of an Eulidean simplex, unique up to homothety.

Theyarealso limitsofsequenesofanglesofhyperbolisimplies.

(6) If

α

is ippedEulidean,itisthelimitofasequeneofanglesofippedhyperbolipolyhedra.

(8)

(7) Similarly, if

α

is doubly ipped Eulidean, it is the limit of a sequene of angles of doubly ipped

hyperbolipolyhedra.

Considernow

AS (s)

asthespaeof6-tuplesofanglesin

(0, π)

satisfyingsomelinearinequalities. Itontains somesubdomainsorrespondingtothedierenttypesofsimplies. Itisinterestingtoonsidertheombinatoris

ofthisdeompositionof

AS (s)

. Thedenitionsshowlearlythat anyontinuouspathgoingfromasimplexof

spherialtypeto asimplex ofhyperbolitypehas to gothroughasimplex ofEulidean type. Moreover,the

only way to gofrom ahyperboli simplexto adoubly hyperbolisimplex is throughspherial simplies, and

similarlyfordoubly hyperbolisimplies.

5. The generalized volume

5.1. The Shläi formula. Thelast partof thepiture onsidered hereisthe generalizedvolume, whih is

denedforthesimpliesintheextendedhyperbolispae. Thereareseveralywaystodeneit,weuseherethe

Shläiformula,whihwerstreallforusual (spherialorhyperboli)simplies. Wereferto[Mil94,Vin93℄

foraproof.

Lemma 5.1. For any one-parameter family of spherial (resp. hyperboli) simplies, its volume

V

satises

2dV = P

e Im(l e )dα e

(resp.

2dV = P

e l e dα e

).

Notethatthelengthsonsideredherearethosedenedabove,sothattheyarein

(0, π)

forspherialsimplies,

andin

R <0

forhyperbolisimplies.

5.2. Thegeneralizedvolume. Thepreviouslemmaleadstoafairlynaturaldenitionofareal-valuedvolume

overthespaeofangledsimplies.

Denition 5.2. Let

s

be a tetrahedron and let

ω

be the

1

-form (Shläi 1-form) dened on

AS(s)

by

2ω = P

e (Re(l e ) + Im(l e ))dα e

.

Notethat theShläi1-formisaontinuous1-formdenedonthe6-dimensionalonvexpolytope

AS (s)

.

Itisprovedin[Luo07℄ that,

Lemma5.3.

ω

islosed.

Remarkthat

ω

vanishesonthesubspaeofEulideansimplies.

Denition5.4. The generalizedvolume

V : AS(s) → R

isthe primitive of

ω

whih vanishes onthe Eulidean

simplies.

There is another possibility, namely to dene the volume as a omplex-valued funtion, dening

ω

as

(1/2) P

e l e dθ e

. Thedenitionhosenhereserveswellforourpurposes.

Note that

V

orresponds to the usual volume on spherial and hyperboli simplies by Lemma 5.1. The

volumeofEulideansimpliesiszerobydenition. However,thevolumeofippedanddoublyippedEulidean

simplexesarenotzero.

Lemma5.5. Let

α ∈ AS(s)

.

(1) Supposethat

α

isippedEulidean,withthelengthsoftheedgesadjaentto

v 1

equalto

andthe other

lengthsequal to

0

. Then

V (α) = π(α 12 + α 13 + α 14 − π) .

(2) Supposethat

α

isdoubly ippedEulidean,with

l 12 = l 34 = 0

andthe other lengthsequal to

. Then

V (α) = π(α 13 + α 14 + α 23 + α 24 − 2π) .

Note that in eahasethe volume, without thefator

π

, is equalto the areaofa spherialpolygon this

willbeusefulbelow.

Proofof Lemma 5.5 . Fortherstase,onsiderasmalldeformationthatinreasesslightlythe

α 1i

,

2 ≤ i ≤ 4

.

This deforms

α

intoa spherialsimplex

α

, with verties

v 2 , v 3

and

v 4

verylose to theantipode of

v 1

. The

(spherial)Shläiformula,appliedtoa1-parameterformuladeformingthissimplextoasegmentoflength

π

,

showsthatthevolumeofthissimplexisequalto

π(α 12 + α 13 + α 14 − π)

,andtheresultfollowsfor

α

.

(9)

Thesameargumentworksintheseondase,theorrespondingspherialsimplex nowhas

v 1 , v 2

verylose

andalmostantipodaltoboth

v 3

and

v 4

.

Thereisaquitedierentwaytodenethisvolume ofdomainsintheextended hyperbolispae,interms

ofananalytiontinuation[CK06℄.

5.3. Smoothness. Foralosed triangulated3-manifold

(M, T )

,thevolume

V

ofanangle system

x ∈ AS(T )

isthesumofthevolumeofitsangled3-simplexes. Thus

v : AS(T ) → R

isa

C 1

smoothfuntion. Moreoverit

isrealanalytioutsidetheset ofEulideantypesimplies.

6. Critial points

ThissetionontainstheproofofTheorem 1.3.

6.1. Gluing onditions. Suppose

(M, T )

is aonneted triangulatedlosed 3-manifold so that

AS(T ) 6= ∅

.

Wewillonsiderthevolumeoptimization

V : AS(T ) → R

.

Lemma6.1. Let

θ 0 ∈ AS (T )

bearitial pointof

V

on

AS(T )

. Then, for eah edge

e

of

T

,the lengthsof

e

for allthe simplies ontainingitare equal.

Thisfollowsfromthedenitionof

ω

. Bythelassiationlemma4.5andtheonnetivityof

M

,weseethat

thetypesofanytwo3-simplexesin

T

in

ω

arethesame.

If

ω

isaloalmaximumpointof

V

,thenitannothappenthat all3-simpliesin

ω

areEulideansimplies.

Indeed,ifotherwise,thevolumeof

ω

iszero. However,ifweperturb

ω

slightlyin

AS(T )

toobtainanewpoint

ω

, then allsimplies in

ω

an be hyperboli and spherialsimplies. Thus

V (ω ) > V (ω)

whih ontradits

theloalmaximumondition.

AordingtoLemma3.7,fornon-Eulideantypesimplies,edgelengthsdeterminetheisometrytype. Sowe

obtain,

Corollary 6.2. Suppose

ω

is not of Eulidean type. The faes of the simplies an be glued isometrially.

Furthermore,

θ 0

denes inthis wayeitheraspherial strutureor aHS-struture

h

on

M

.

Indeed,therearetwopossibilities. Namelyeither allsimplieesin

ω

areofspherialtype,ortheyareallof

hyperbolitype. Inthespherialtypease,allsimpliesare spherialandaregluedbyisometries sothat the

sumofanglesaroundeahedgeis

. Thusweobtainaspherialmetrion

M

. Intheasewhereallsimplies

areofhyperbolitype,byLemma4.5,werealizeeahsimplexin

ω

asageometritetrahedronin

HS ˜ 3

sothat

theirfaesanbegluedisometrially. Thus,weobtainanHS-strutureon

M

. Indeed, therearetwosubases

whihouldour. Intherstase,allsimpliesarehyperboli. Thusweobtainahyperbolimetrion

M

. In

theseond ase,somesimplexisaipped hyperboli. Thenweobtainan HS-strutureon

M

bygluing these

geometritetrahedrain HS-geometry.

Notethat allvertiesof

T

areinthehyperbolipartofthisHS-struture.

6.2. Normal spheres in HS-strutures. Continuing the proof of Theorem 1.3, we onsider here an HS-

struture

h

on

M

, along with a triangulation

T

with all vertiesof

T

in the hyperbolipart of

h

. Suppose

moreoverthatthedeSitterpart

M dS

for

h

isnon-empty. Let

M 0

beaonnetedomponentof

M dS

.

Then

M 0

isgeodesiallyomplete,soitisisometrieithertothedeSitterspae

dS 3

ortoitsquotientbythe

antipodalmap (see[Mes07,ABB

+

07℄). Therefore anyplane inthe tangentspae to

M 0

at apointis tangent

toa(unique)totallygeodesispae-likeplanein

M 0

,whihishomeomorphieither to

S 2

(intherstase)or

to

R P 2

(intheseondase). Eahofthosetotallygeodesisurfaesisanormalsurfaeinthetriangulation

T

of

M

.

This simple argument shows that eah onneted omponent of the de Sitter part of

h

orresponds to a

normalsurfaein

(M, T )

.

(10)

6.3. NormalspheresforEulidean ritialpointsof

V

. Inthissetionweonsiderthesamequestionas

in Ÿ6.2, about normalsurfaes in

(M, T )

, but for ritialpoints of

V

forwhih allsimplies are of Eulidean

type. The argumentsare ofthesomehowsimilarbut are lessgeometri andmoreombinatorial, beausethe

geometristruturesonthesimpliesannotbegluedtoobtainageometristrutureofEulideantypeon

M

.

WehaveseeninŸ5.2thatto eahipped(resp. doublyipped)Eulideansimplex

s

in

T

anbeassoiated

aspherialtriangle(resp. aquadrilateral). Theedgesofthistriangle(resp. quadrilateral)areassoiatedtothe

2-faesof

T

whih haveexatlytwoedges oflength

. Eah suh fae bounds twosimplies whih are both

either ipped or doubly ipped. It follows that thetriangles (resp. quadrilaterals)an be glued along their

edgesto obtainalosedsurfae

Σ

(whih ingeneralisnotonneted)howeverthisgluingannot ingeneral

beisometriforthespherialmetrissinethelengthsoftheedgesdonotmath. Moreover,thevertiesofthe

triangulationof

Σ

orrespondtotheedgesof

T

oflength

.

Remark6.3. Theanglesof the triangles(resp. quadrilateral) ateah vertexsumupto

.

Proof. Theanglesofthetriangles(resp. quadrilateral)adjaenttoeahvertexof

Σ

areequalto theanglesof

thesimplies of

T

at theorrespondingedgeof length

. Thoseangle sumupto

bydenition of aangle

strutureon

T

.

Corollary6.4. Eahonnetedomponentof

Σ

ishomeomorphieithertothesphereortotheprojetiveplane.

The sumof the areasof thefaesof

Σ

isaninteger multipleof

.

Proof. Let

Σ 0

beaonnetedomponentof

Σ

,let

F 0

bethesetofits2-faes,andlet

V 0

bethesetofitsverties.

Given

f ∈ F 0

and

v ∈ V 0

, wewrite

v ≃ f

if

v

isadjaentto

f

,inthisaseweall

θ f,v

theangleof

f

at

v

.

Let

a(f )

betheareaofthefae

f

of

Σ

. Foreahfae

f ∈ F 0

of

Σ 0

,wehavebytheGauss-Bonnetformula

X

v∈V 0 ,v≃f

(π − θ f,v ) = 2π − a(f ) .

Summingoverthefaesof

Σ 0

yieldsthat

X

f∈F 0

 X

v∈V 0 ,v≃f

(π − θ f,v )

 = 2π#F 0 − X

f∈F 0

a(f ) .

The number of wedges in the triangulation of

Σ 0

is twie the number of edges, whih we denote by

#E 0

.

Therefore

X

f∈F 0

X

v∈V 0 ,v≃f

π = 2π#E 0 .

Moreovertheanglesofthefaesat eahvertexsumupto

,sothat

X

f∈F 0

X

v∈V 0 ,v≃f

θ f,v ) = 2π#V 0 .

UsingthedenitionoftheEulerharateristi,weobtainthat

X

f∈F 0

a(v) = 2π#V 0 − 2πE 0 = 2πF 0 = 2πχ(Σ 0 ) ,

andbothparts oftheorollaryfollowimmediately.

Corollary 6.5. At aritial pointof

V

whereall simplies areof Eulidean type,

V

is aninteger multiple of

2

.

Proof. Lemma5.5showsthatthevolumeofeahipped(resp. doublyipped)simplex isequalto

π

timesthe

areaoftheorrespondingtriangle(resp. quadrilateral)in

Σ

. Sothetotalvolume is

π

timestheareaof

Σ

, so

thatitisanon-negativeintegermultiple of

2

.

(11)

7. Further questions

Themainpointpresentedhereisthatextendedhyperbolistrutureshaveanaturalrolewhenonstruting

geometri strutures on manifolds by maximization of volume over triangulated manifolds. This leads to a

numberofquestions,forwhihanswerswouldpresumablyhelpmakeprogressontheunderstandingofgeometri

strutureson3-manifolds.

Question7.1. IfM isaonnetedsumof several hyperboli3-manifolds, does Msupportan HS-struture?

Another,moregeneralquestion,iswhethertheonstrutionsonsideredhereanbeextendedtoenompass

angles strutureswith someidealverties. This wouldmean allowingangle strutureson simplies forwhih

the sumof theangles at avertexis equalto, rather than lessthan,

. Ourhopeis that suh ideal verties

wouldpermitritialpointsofthevolumetorealizetorusdeompositionsofnonatoroidal3-manifolds.Another

possibility,addingsomeexibilitytotheonstrution,wouldbetoallowforvertiesinthedeSitterpartofthe

extendedhyperboli spae.

Another natural question is of ourse to understand the ritial points of

V

on the boundary of

AS(T )

,

hopefullyshowingthat thoseboundaryritialpointsorrespondtoollapsings.

Alast,moretehnialquestion,iswhetherexisteneofaritialpointof

V

on

AS(T )

forwhihallsimplies

are ofEulidean typehastopologial onsequeneson

M

. Forinstane, if allsimplies areEulidean (rather

than only of Eulidean type), does it follow that

M

admits an Eulidean metri or more generally is

M

a

onnetedsumofSeifert beredspaes? Thisis notobvioussinetheanglesofthesimplies addupto

at

the edges of

T

, but theedge lengths donot math so that thefaes of the simplies annot beisometrially glued.

Referenes

[ABB

+

07℄ LarsAndersson, ThierryBarbot,RiardoBenedetti,FranesoBonsante,William M.Goldman,FrançoisLabourie,

KevinP.Sannell,and Jean-MarShlenker.Notes on: Lorentzspaetimes ofonstanturvature [Geom.Dediata

126(2007),345;mr2328921℄byG.Mess.Geom.Dediata,126:4770,2007.

[CK06℄ YunhiChoand Hyuk Kim.Volume of

C 1,α

-boundary domaininextended hyperboli spae. J.Korean Math.So., 43(6):11431158,2006.

[KL℄ A.KitaevandFengLuo.Existeneofanglestrutureson3-manifolds,inpreparation

[Luo93℄ FengLuo.TriangulationsinMöbiusgeometry.Trans.Amer.Math.So.337(1993),no.1,181193.

[Luo07℄ FengLuo.Volumeandanglestrutureson3-manifolds.AsianJ.Math.,11(4):555566,2007.

[Mes07℄ GeoreyMess.Lorentzspaetimesofonstanturvature.Geom.Dediata,126:345,2007.

[Mil94℄ JohnMilnor.TheShläidierentialequality.InColletedpapers,vol.1.PublishorPerish,1994.

[Sh98℄ Jean-MarShlenker.Métriquessurlespolyèdreshyperboliquesonvexes.J.DierentialGeom.,48(2):323405,1998.

[Sh01℄ Jean-MarShlenker.ConvexpolyhedrainLorentzianspae-forms.AsianJ.Math.,5(2):327363,2001.

[Vin93℄ E.B.Vinberg,editor.GeometryII,GeometryofSpaesofConstantCurvature,volume29ofEnylopaediaof Mathe-

matialSienes.Springer,1993.

F.L.: DepartmentofMathematis,RutgersUniversity,Pisataway,NJ08854,USA.

J.-M.S.: InstitutdeMathématiquesdeToulouse,UMRCNRS5219,UniversitéToulouseIII,31062Toulouse

edex9,Frane.

Références

Documents relatifs

Yinlong Qian, Jing Dong, Wei Wang, and Tieniu Tan, ”Deep Learning for Steganalysis via Convolutional Neural Networks,” in Proceedings of SPIE Media Watermarking, Security, and

Seemingly inescapable consequences of the physiologist's account of perception appear to demolish not just the credentials of some other theory of perception, but the

We prove that energy minimizing Yang–Mills connections on compact homogeneous 4-manifolds are either instantons or split into a sum of instantons on passage to the adjoint bundle..

In Section 4, we deal with the case where the matroid is 4–connected up to separators of size 4, and in Section 5 we complete the proof of Theorem 1.2.. Section 5 begins with

 They will take the child URGENTLY to the health facility, if the sick child has any of these danger signs (Picture 1):?. o Is unable to breastfeed or stops

To help bridge the knowledge gap on noma and to improve early diagnosis, detection and management of cases at primary health care level in countries contending with the disease,

• Watch out when a child’s mouth is closed and he/she hypersalivates and emits fetid breath with a putrid smell, regardless of whether he/she has fever or not. Signs and symptoms

C, SnssNr{aNN: Normal bundles for codimension 2locally flat imbedd- ings. E.: Affine structures in