• Aucun résultat trouvé

Title: “Another type of television” Author: Vlad Manoliu How to cite this article:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Title: “Another type of television” Author: Vlad Manoliu How to cite this article:"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Title: “Another type of television” 

Author: Vlad Manoliu 

How to cite this article: Manoliu, Vlad. 2005. “Another type of television”. Martor 10: 65. 

Published by: Editura MARTOR (MARTOR Publishing House), Muzeul Țăranului Român (The  Museum of the Romanian Peasant) 

URL:  http://martor.muzeultaranuluiroman.ro/archive/martor‐10‐2005/     

 

Martor (The Museum of the Romanian Peasant Anthropology Review) is peer‐reviewed academic journal  established in 1996, with a focus on cultural and visual anthropology, ethnology, museum studies and the dialogue  among these disciplines. Martor review is published by the Museum of the Romanian Peasant. Its aim is to  provide, as widely as possible, rich content at the highest academic and editorial standards for scientific,  educational and (in)formational goals. Any use aside from these purposes and without mentioning the source of  the article(s) is prohibited and will be considered an infringement of copyright. 

     

Martor (Revue d’Anthropologie du Musée du Paysan Roumain) est un journal académique en système peer‐review  fondé en 1996, qui se concentre sur l’anthropologie visuelle et culturelle, l’ethnologie, la muséologie et sur le  dialogue entre ces disciplines. La revue Martor est publiée par le Musée du Paysan Roumain. Son aspiration est de  généraliser l’accès vers un riche contenu au plus haut niveau du point de vue académique et éditorial pour des  objectifs scientifiques, éducatifs et informationnels. Toute utilisation au‐delà de ces buts et sans mentionner la  source des articles est interdite et sera considérée une violation des droits de l’auteur. 

             

Martor is indexed by EBSCO and CEEOL. 

(2)

65

We really enjoyed the moment when private televisions appeared. And that is because at the same time we could watch something different from the twin-brother-like news bulletins we were used to. A TV channel was saying one thing, while another was saying something different. The broadcasters were more or less clumsy at the be- ginning. But all in all, we could say that we had the possibility to watch pieces of news which weren’t always respectful with those holding the power, thus sharing with us things which had been un- conceivable until 1990. We were being told all sorts of things about cinema stars, about the open- ing of various shops in Paris or London or about gossips dealing with Romanian politicians. Even if, at the beginning, this type of news was pretty feeble (because Iliescu’s adulation took a bit longer), yet, they gave us the possibility of gradu- ally getting used to having our own opinions about the leaders of our country. If right after 1990 Ili- escu was regarded as a necessary evil, by the end of the decade, the informed people would laugh at him, would signal and imitate him…

The multitude of news represented one of the first contacts with the freethinking. Those televi- sions proved helpful by presenting us the same man (or the same events) from various angles or points of view. In order to be able to do it, they started making use of the money provided by ad- vertisements. When the first commercials had been broadcast, my wife and I would watch TV

while enjoying the show. Our daughter from Ger- many was laughing at us, saying: ‘How can you be happy when somebody stops the movie three or four times to tell you nonsense?’ We used to minutely watch them, sometimes paying attention to very bad commercials (because they used to be very bad). We would just sit there, not so much seeing the display of some more or less important products, but simply enjoying the freedom of hav- ing commercials, in other words, the indepen- dence that those commercials granted to the re- spective televisions. They didn’t depend on the government finance anymore. They had their eco- nomic independence, hence the independence of saying something different from what those hold- ing power really wanted them to. We were able to watch on our televisions, what, before 1990 we had been able to watch only when travelling abroad.

Of course that in the mean time we also learned how to get angry and, by the end of the decade, we used to change the channel while com- mercials were broadcast, but we used to watch them at the beginning. I think that this is another characteristic of the ‘90s. Bit by bit we got used to the freedom of the televisions, freedom which had also much to do with the money provided by com- mercials.

Translated by Raluca Vîjîiac

Another type of television

Vlad Manoliu

Références

Documents relatifs

The ‘old man’ and ‘old woman’ make no sound when parading except when they stop to persuade a householder to accept the team to play in his courtyard.. At this point they

The conclusion I drew after hav- ing visited the first halls is: “se la farina è ar- gento, la semola è oro” (if ordinary flour is like silver, the flour used for making pasta –

the museum stands for ‘the effort made by a family who has shown for over 40 years a special interest in collecting the traditional heritage of the Romanian villages that belong to

Many objects he has collected are exhibited today in the }ara Cri[urilor Museum of Oradea, the Agriculture Museum of Slobozia and the Village Museum of Bucharest.. ‘When I have two

Martor   (The  Museum  of  the  Romanian  Peasant  Anthropology  Review)  is  a  peer‐reviewed  academic 

Therefore, the entire paradox of the Roma- nian Peasant Museum comes to life: as a muse- um of the Romanian peasant, it is a museum of the authentic peasant; as such, it is in fact

Immediately after 1989, the students had gradually started to become conscious of the fact that the faculty belonged neither to the teachers, nor to the state, existing through

Martor   (The  Museum  of  the  Romanian  Peasant  Anthropology  Review)  is  a  peer‐reviewed  academic