• Aucun résultat trouvé

Analysis and Comparison of Probability Transformations for Fusing Sensors with Uncertain Detection Performance

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Analysis and Comparison of Probability Transformations for Fusing Sensors with Uncertain Detection Performance"

Copied!
11
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01058338

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01058338

Submitted on 26 Aug 2014

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License

Analysis and Comparison of Probability

Transformations for Fusing Sensors with Uncertain Detection Performance

Edwin El-Mahassni, Samuel Davey, Jonathan Legg

To cite this version:

Edwin El-Mahassni, Samuel Davey, Jonathan Legg. Analysis and Comparison of Probability Trans-

formations for Fusing Sensors with Uncertain Detection Performance. Third IFIP TC12 International

Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI) / Held as Part of World Computer Congress (WCC), Sep

2010, Brisbane, Australia. pp.89-98, �10.1007/978-3-642-15286-3_9�. �hal-01058338�

(2)

!

! " !

# $# % & !

! "! &

" "!

!'!&("

" "&

! " "

" " !

# " "&

"

! " #

$

#%!$##

&'℄

)

*+ &,-℄

.

/ /

(3)

0 )

/

1 &2℄ $ *$+&34℄

* + 1

1 &2℄

5

5/ #

&2℄

&6℄

$

# $

$ 7,

/1-

12

$ /

16 / $

$83

#

1 *$$)+ *

+!

9 * +:;8*+

*+ *+

<#

'

= $

* + >

? $$) $

*+:

*+

*+ *'+

$ &2℄

#

1&2℄

(4)

:

:

&2℄

*'+:

*

+

*;+: *'

+ *

+

*+: *

+ *,+

:

*'+@*'+@*

+*'+*'+

*+ ?

#

< $ $$)

1 *+

9

#

:

:

* +:;)

*;+ *'+

A $

#

/&6℄5

&6℄

! &6℄7 )=*)=+.

. B

&6℄ 1 0 &C

D℄!

< :

/)

$ 0

0 *+*+*+<

*+*+ A

*+ *+

) = *+

(5)

)= *+

/ &-℄8

7 *+ ;6 *+ :

*+ *+:*+@*+ *+: *+:;6

) # $ /

A

$ 8

*+:

*+@*+

'@*+

A 8

*+:*+@

*+ *-+

8 $E&';℄

A

/ B 1 F

*B1F+ 5 Æ /0 B1F A

0 &CD''℄ 8

*+:

*+*'@,+@*+

*+@*+@,

;

*+ :;&CD℄5 *+ 0

*+ *+:'

<

*+*+

:*+*+ *+ *+ *+ *+

(6)

8 *+;6 *+

*+A

*+

'*+

'@*+

*+@*+*+@*+' *+

*+ *+;6

1*+;6*+*+ *+: *+:;61

;6*'@*++*+@*+ *+

*+

*+*+

*+@*+

*+@ '

,

*+

&'@*+℄

*+

*+ )

*+

*+

*+@ '

,

*+

&*+@*+@,℄*+&'@,℄@*+

8 1

*+

*+ *+*+

) , #

A

-

>

$ 1 / $

G

< # $

&',℄

< /

#

#

* + *

+

*

(7)

#

# *

+

0 &

℄ /

*

+:

'

:;

:'

*2+

*

+:

'

:;;

:;'

'

:';

:''

*6+

# # *

+ *

+

*

+

* :'+ *: ;+

*

+

*3+

*

+ $ H

7

*

+ *

+

:

*

+

:

*

+ *

+

*

+ *

+ *

+

:

*

+ *

+

*

+ *

+ *

+

*4+

(8)

!*4+ !*2+

*

+ *

+

:

*

+*'

+

:;

*

+

:'

:

'

:;

:'

:

*C+

*4+! *6+

*

+ *

+ *

+

:

'

:;;

:;'

'

:';

:''

:

*D+

1 /

$

!

1 *3+ /

8

8 /

*:'''+:

@*'

+

*';+

$

)

#

:

:

:',

**''++:

**''++:

**''++:

**''++:

**''++

H #

A 8 $

*+

$

(9)

:

Ê

**''++Ê

**''++

8/ -7

*

+

*'

+

*

+

Ê

*'

+

**''++Ê

**''++

< $

!

1 / 0

$

1

8 #

:;6 )

*

+:

;

:

*

@

+ *

+

8' $

$

$

!/

:;C

:

;,6)

A ! - 8 /

$ $

$

9/

&;-;4℄ )

8

,

$

!/

A

(10)

f MAX d MAX

0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5

0.8 0.82 0.84 0.86 0.88 0.9 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1

−0.1

−0.08

−0.06

−0.04

−0.02 0 0.02 0.04

# # ,'!

f MAX d MAX

0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5

0.8 0.82 0.84 0.86 0.88 0.9 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1

−0.1

−0.08

−0.06

−0.04

−0.02 0 0.02 0.04

# # , "

(11)

" # $

1

/

/< !/

$ 5 !

A

$ $ #

A $

$

B#

& 4 " &5 # 4 !' + "

" # 4 !'& +"

$+%6" &*&$ %07-3$)331%

)& " &,&58 # &*&

#)37).0$2/1%&

-& 8& " 20/&

.& & *& &5 9 ! :

, " & ,& & +

4 !' ", $ 4,%)/07)0)$)332%

& ; " &+& &59 "

! 4 !'+ " & "

9-27.0$)33/%

/& " ,&5 +" # &

&, ..07.1$223%

0& " ,&5 "<

" & ,& 1 +& : & = "

&,&>"#& " ,&$ % ?",&

+)2)7)20$22)%

1& < *&" 9&54 !,"#

" && + "9$)331%

2& < *& " 9&5 "

"9&+ ='" 9& < *&$ %,

, '$)332%

3& # ,&(,&5"" " , ,

,& 0 +& "&@&

!: $+@:)33-%-07.2$)33-%

& *&5 " , " + $,+%

+ +" +" # 6

, , , & ,& +& " 9

)007)1-$)33)%&

)& # *& &"&9& &5# $)333%= &

Références

Documents relatifs

Laboratory analysis of Martian analogues for comparison with CRISM observations for detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.. EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019, Sep 2019,

3a, 3b and 3c draw these unit areas for Lyon, Milan and Naples, respectively, together with CDR-unit areas classified as office-related (i.e., OF, OR, CM and OC) in Sec.

The needs of high energy physics experiments have brought usual commercial CMOS sensors to the ability of detection single (charged) particle at high frame rate, above 1000

Given the same ratio of guard interval (GI), the DVB-T outperforms DTMB in terms of signal to noise ratio (SNR) in Gaussian and Ricean channels, while DTMB behaves better

From the Galileo E1 OS signal structure, a bit sign transition (the data bit for the data component and the secondary code for the pilot component) can occur at

La figure 3 pr´esente les r´esultats calcul´es en utilisant la mesure de dissemblance S 1 dite de Jaccard entre les images 1 et 2 lorsqu’elle sont sujettes `a un bruit additif de

Since the LSS of Fig. 4 has no input output performance signal, we will use the Hierarchical Robust Stability Analysis Algorithm of Remark 4.1. Furthermore and as we have seen,

In this chapter, we have tried to show that while probability theory properly cap- tures uncertainty due to the randomness of precisely observed phenomena, the rep- resentation