• Aucun résultat trouvé

Agroforestry: tree roots impact on soil microorganisms

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Agroforestry: tree roots impact on soil microorganisms"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01837367

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01837367

Submitted on 5 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Agroforestry: tree roots impact on soil microorganisms

Juliette Bodez, Yogan Monnier, Isabelle Bertrand, Amandine Erktan, Awaz Mohamed, Jean-Luc Maeght, Alexia Stokes

To cite this version:

Juliette Bodez, Yogan Monnier, Isabelle Bertrand, Amandine Erktan, Awaz Mohamed, et al.. Agro-forestry: tree roots impact on soil microorganisms. EcoSummit 2016 Ecological Sustainability: Engi-neering Change, Aug 2016, Montpellier, France. �hal-01837367�

(2)

Young

Channels presence Apex history Decaying

Last apex time Old

Global biomass Channels history

1Bender, S. Franz, Cameron Wagg, and Marcel G. A. van der Heijden. 2016. ‘An Underground Revolution: Biodiversity and Soil Ecological Engineering for Agricultural Sustainability’. Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

2Plassart, Pierre, Marthe Akpa Vinceslas, Christophe Gangneux, Anne Mercier, Sylvie Barray, and Karine Laval. 2008. ‘Molecular and Functional Responses of Soil Microbial Communities under Grassland Restoration’. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 127 (3–4): 286–93.

3Heijden, Marcel G. A. van der, and Cameron Wagg. 2012. ‘Soil Microbial Diversity and Agro-Ecosystem Functioning’. Plant and Soil 363 (1-2): 1–5.

4Kuzyakov, Yakov, and Evgenia Blagodatskaya. 2015. ‘Microbial Hotspots and Hot Moments in Soil: Concept & Review’. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 83 (April): 184–99. 5WONG, M.L., and J.F. MEDRANO. 2005. Real-time PCR for mRNA quantitation. Biotechniques 39: 75.

6Campbell, C. D., S. J. Chapman and al.. 2003. A Rapid Microtiter Plate Method To Measure Carbon Dioxide Evolved from Carbon Substrate Amendments so as To Determine the Physiological Profiles of Soil Microbial Communities by Using Whole Soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69 (6): 3593–99.

And fine tree roots history impact?

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 18S DN A co py number /gsoil

3

Group 2 (G2): +++ historical effect

+++ present decaying roots

Group 4 (G4):

+++ historical effect +++present old roots

Group 5 (G5):

+ historical effect

+++ present young roots

Group 1 (G1):

+++ historical effect (ancient young impact) +/-present roots

Tree roots surface increased significantly microorganisms potential respiration.

5

Rhizospheric soil

Non rhizospheric soil 1m 1m h ttp :// v ign e tte 2 .w ik ia. n o c o o k ie. n e t h ttp :// re flec tim .fr /s e a rc h /c a n ta l/ +c a rte +f ra n c e

Agroforestry: tree roots

impact on soil microorganisms

ECOSUMMIT

2016

>

CONCLUSION

> CONCLUSION

Background & aims

Agroforestry mixes annual culture or permanent pasture with permanent trees which is

widely known to improve soil biodiversity, especially macro and micro fauna1, as

compared to monoculture2. However, the specific role of fine tree roots on microbial

community is still poorly known in field conditions3. Microorganism community (biomass,

activity and Bacteria/Fungi ratio) is supposed to evolve with roots dynamic and

morphological characteristics (“hot spots”, “hot moments”4). We focussed here on the

presence effect of fine tree roots on the microbial communities in an agroforest field, in France. We hypothesized that the microbial communities are influenced by the roots characteristics, but also by the soil past events (apex history, months with roots…).

Bodez, J. 1 Monnier, Y. 1 Bertrand, I. 2 Erktan, A . 1

Mohamed, A.1 Maeght, J-L. 3 Stokes, A.1 1INRA UMR AMAP, Montpellier, France

2 Cirad UMR Eco&Sols, Montpellier, France 3 UMR 242 IEES-Paris c/o SFRI Vietnam

Tree roots presence induced bacteria (16S DNA) and fungi (18S DNA) positive correlation or “synergism” as compared to its in non rhizospheric soil.

j.bodez@esitpa.fr

1

2

16S (bacteria) DNA copy number is not significantly different between the 5 Groups.

5

18S (fungi) DNA copy number is significantly lower for

Group 5 (young roots) than for Group 1 (ancient young roots effect) and Group 2 (decaying roots).

4

We highlighted 5 different groups according to historical and morphological roots variables.

3

Ratio 16S/18S is significantly higher for Group 5 (young roots) than for Group 2 (decaying roots), which is related to its significantly different fungi relative quantity (18S).

6

4

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 16S DN A co py number /gsoil b a ab Ra tio Bacteria/Fungi

6

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5

Methods & Analysis

Field site & Sampling

Continental climate 530m Cantal region, France

12 y/o Hybrid walnuts intercropped Silty soil/ 5°-10° slope

with permanent pasture

10 samples soil per tree (X5) in rhizospheric and non rhizospheric soil

Cla re Cam e ro n M ic ro re s p p o s te r Microorganism substrate induced respiration SIR quantified by Microresp 6

Carbon Dioxide evolved measurement from Carbon

substrate amendments

®

Results & Discussions

What about root biomass and microorganisms?

5

Analysis

Relative quantification of bacteria (16S DNA) and fungi (18S DNA)

by Real time PCR5

Xo=Xn/an

Xo :Initial DNA copy number

Xn: DNA copy number after n cycles n: Number of cycles Cycles Fluor es ce nce (AU)

Identification of groups of samples by cluster analysis followed by SIMPER analysis and visualisation by Principal Component Analysis

Tree roots temporal dynamics and

morphological characteristics determined by image analyses (scans & WinRhizo )

Sampling of 5mm3 of

unchanged soil in rhizospheric

and non rhizospheric area (June 2016)

Manual scan localization

Monthly scan profile during 2 years By Epson perfection V370-4800dpi Charged Coupled device technology (From Sept 2014 to June 2016)

Diameter(D), Length(L) and Surface(S) roots measured by WinRhizo S=π*D*L Decaying Old Total Group 3 (G3): +++ historical effect (ancient mixed impact) + present mixed roots

b ab a b ab ab ab No effect PC1=35% PC2=22%

1

Ev olved C O 2 (µg/g soil) Root Surface (cm²)

Potential respiration & root surface 16S & 18S correlation

2

18S DNA copy number/gsoil

16S DN A co py number /gsoil p< 0.001 p>0.05 r=0.65 Non rhizospheric soil Rhizospheric soil p=0.016 r=0.53

Conclusion

Fine tree roots in agroforestry system impact microorganisms in soil by increasing their potential respiration and inducing a positive correlation between them. Permanent trees also significantly impact fungi relative quantity and bacteria/fungi ratio according to its roots morphology, roots age and especially roots past events.

Perspective

Further investigations are needed to understand the mechanisms of aggregate stability enrolling bacteria and fungi ratio near tree roots compare to herbaceous roots in agroforestry systems.

Références

Documents relatifs

* Biological affected-side knee moment impulse and hip positive work was shown to decrease during late stance knee flexion for six amputee participants wearing

To deter- mine which components of the tree cover composition (species), structure (density, richness, Shannon, Pielou) and agroforest floor (litter more ground cover) best explain

Soil samples in the 0-20 cm soil layer were tested for chemical composition (soil organic matter, pH, total N, available P, exchangeable K, Ca and Mg), soil communities

The Edaphic Environment: Impact of Olive Trees on the soil beneficial interaction between Durum Wheat roots and Am Fungi..

Shade tree species impacts on soil nutrient availability and food web in conventional and organic coffee agroforestry..

A history of at least 1 lateral ankle sprain (1-yr old or greater), episodes of “giving way”, feelings of instability (≥4 “yes” responses on AII), and self-reported ankle

A model that links intrinsic permeability to petrophysical parameters gives values in the order of 10&#34;20 m2, corresponding to hydraulic conductivities in the order of

Megachile sculpturalis nest in significantly larger holes than native bees (P=0.032