• Aucun résultat trouvé

Tree and litter composition influences soil macrofauna in multi-strata agroforestry systems of Talamanca, Costa Rica

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Tree and litter composition influences soil macrofauna in multi-strata agroforestry systems of Talamanca, Costa Rica"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

©

Agnès Eyhéramendy

(2)

141 4th World Congress on Agroforestry

Strengthening links between science, society and policy 20-22 May 2019Le Corum, Montpellier, France Book of Abstracts

L04.1_O.01

Tree and litter composition influences soil macrofauna in multi-strata Rousseau G.1 (luigisour@yahoo.com.br), Celentano D.1, Deheuvels O.2, Somarriba E.3

1 Agroecology, Maranhão State University, São Luis, Maranhão, Brazil; 2 CIRAD, Lima, Peru; 3 CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica

Humanity is facing a rapid decline in global biodiversity, caused mainly by tropical forest de-forestation for industrial and smallholder agriculture. However, smallholder agriculture lands-capes host areas of home gardens and other agroforestry systems (AFS) that have proven highly relevant for soil and biodiversity conservation. The positive interactions between above-ground and below-above-ground biodiversity is probably a key element to understand and promote the efficiency of these agro-ecosystems. To determine whether a relation exists between tree and soil macrofauna diversity and composition, we compared cacao AFS with contrasted tree diversity along a topography and forest cover gradient in Talamanca, Costa Rica. To deter-mine which components of the tree cover composition (species), structure (density, richness, Shannon, Pielou) and agroforest floor (litter more ground cover) best explain the composition (orders and families) and structure (density, richness, Shannon, Pielou) of the macrofauna community we performed two separate redundancy analyses (composition and structure) and constructed the “best models” based on the tree composition, tree structure and agroforest floor as explanatory matrices. Macrofauna composition was best explained by a mix of tree

macrofauna community structure while other diversity indices were not correlated with macro-fauna composition or structure. The soil macromacro-fauna is therefore more influenced by tree and litter composition than by the overall diversity or evenness of the tree community. This infor-mation is important to design the optimal combinations of species for the intensification of production and ecosystem services provision in cacao-based AFS.

Keywords: Ecosystem services, soil ecology, biodiversity, aboveground-belowground.

References:

1. Deheuvels, 2014, Agroforestry systems, doi 10.1007/s10457-014-9710-9 2. Rousseau, 2012, Ecological indicators, 535

3. Sayer, 2010, Biotropica, 194

Références

Documents relatifs

- High (HR) and moderate (MR) resolution NDVI were calibrated using field-truth and we derived HR-LAI maps and MR-LAI dynamics, for full sun coffee or for little shade.

Soil quality is a concept often considered as non-objective because no absolute reference to an optimal quality can be identified. This is a consequence of the extreme variability

Generalized linear models (GLMs) were then used to investigate the rela- tionship between tree recruitment (number of seedlings and saplings 0–500 cm) in the first 4 years after

Table 2 Agroforestry trees ranked by farmers according to their suitability to provide ES in different rainfall zones of Central Uganda; trees listed direct ly below each ES

We compared in August 2017 soil fertility from two management levels (organic and conventional, Table 1), both management being declined in three shade trees association:

Five of the sample plots exceeded 167 m3 ha'1 of wood. In three plots, density of bananas was up to 1733 plants per hectare, a density similar to intensive banana

General method VHSR image Tree locations automatic Tree locations manual Tree crown diameters automatic Tree crown diameters manual Tree height automatic Tree

1- CIRAD, UMR Eco&Sols, Montpellier, France 2- UM2, UMR AMAP, Montpellier, France 3- IRD, UMR AMP, Montpellier, France 4- INRIA, Ariana/I3S, Sophia-Antipolis, France 5-