(willbeinsertedbyhandlater)
Your thesaurus odes are:
12.07.1;12.04.1;11.17.4 B0827+525
ASTRONOMY
AND
ASTROPHYSICS
July29,2000
CLASS B0827+525: `Dark lens' or binary radio-loud quasar?
L.V.E.Koopmans 1; 5 ,A.G.deBruyn 2;1 ,C.D.Fassna ht 3;4 ,D.R.Marlow 5;6 ,D.Rusin 6 ,R.D.Blandford 3 , I.W.A. Browne 5 , P. Helbig 5;1 , N. Ja kson 5 , S.T. Myers 6;4 , T.J. Pearson 3 , A.C.S. Readhead 3 , P.N. Wilkinson 5 ,E. Xanthopoulos 5 , H. Hoekstra 1 1
KapteynAstronomi alInstitute,P.O.Box800,9700AVGroningen,TheNetherlands
2
NFRA,P.O.Box2,7990AADwingeloo,TheNetherlands
3
CaliforniaInstituteofTe hnology,Pasadena,CA91125,USA
4
NRAO,P.O.BoxO,So orro,NM87801
5
UniversityofMan hester,NRALJodrellBank,Ma leseld,Cheshire SK119DL,England
6
DepartmentofPhysi s,UniversityofPennsylvania,Philadelphia,PA19104,USA
Re eived;a epted
Abstra t. We present radio, opti al, near-infrared and
spe tros opi observationsof thesour e B0827+525. We
onsider this sour e asthebest andidate from the
Cos-mi Lens All-Sky Survey (CLASS) for a `dark-lens'
sys-tem orbinary radio-loud quasar. The system onsists of
tworadio omponentswithsomewhatdierentspe tral
in-di es,separatedby2.815ar se .VLBAobservationsshow
thatea h omponenthassubstru tureonas aleofafew
mas. A deep K{band exposure with the W.M. Ke k{II
Teles ope reveals emission near both radio omponents.
TheK{bandemissionoftheweakerradio omponent
ap-pears extended, whereas the emission from the brighter
radio omponentis onsistent with apoint sour e.
Hub-ble Spa e Teles ope F160W{band observations with the
NICMOS instrument onrms this. A redshift of 2.064
is found for the brighter omponent, using the LRIS
in-strumentontheW.M.Ke k{IITeles ope.Theprobability
that B0827+525 onsists of two unrelated ompa t
at-spe trumradio sour esis3%,although thepresen eof
similarsubstru tureinboth omponentmightredu ethis.
We dis uss two alternative s enarios to explain this
system:(i) CLASSB0827+525is a`dark-lens'systemor
(ii)B0827+525isabinaryradio-loudquasar.B0827+525
hasmetall riteriathatthusfarhavein100%ofthe ases
onrmed asour e asan indisputable gravitationallens
system. Despite this, no lens galaxy has been dete ted
with m
F160W
23 mag. Hen e, we might have found the
rst binaryradio-loudquasar. At thismoment, however,
wefeelthatthe`dark-lens'hypothesis annotyetbefully
ex luded.
Key words:Cosmology:gravitationallensing{
Cosmol-ogy:darkmatter{quasars:individual:B0827+525
Sendoprintrequeststo:L.V.E.Koopmans
1.Introdu tion
There are severalindire t waysto dete t thepresen eof
dark matter in galaxies at relatively low redshifts (e.g.
mi rolensing,rotation urvesofspiralgalaxies,polar-ring
galaxies, et .). However, at intermediate and high
red-shifts, weak and strong gravitational lensing is the only
methodofdete tingthepresen eofdarkmatterongalaxy
s ales.
Gravitational lensing does not depend on the
lumi-nosity or olor of the lensing mass distribution. One
an therefore expe t to nd `dark-lens' galaxies in large
gravitational-lens surveys, if they make up a signi ant
fra tion of massivegalaxies (e.g. Hawkins1997). On the
basisof onrmedand andidatelarge-separation( >
3
ar -se )gravitational-lenssystems,whi hwereallopti ally
se-le ted, Hawkins(1997) on ludes that around75%of all
galaxies ould be `dark' (i.e. extremely underluminous).
This highfra tion wasshownto bein onsistentwith
ob-servationalresults(Ja ksonet al.1998)from theCosmi
LensAll-SkySurvey(CLASS;Browne1999;Myers1999)
andalsoveryunlikelyonthebasisofanumberof
statisti- alarguments(e.g.Ko hanek,Fal o&Mu~noz1999;Peng
etal.1999).Averyhighfra tionofdarkgalaxiestherefore
seems to be ex luded, although a mu h smaller fra tion
(10%) annotyet beruled out.Thedete tionofonlya
single dark-lensgalaxywould alreadyhave severe
onse-quen esforthestandardpi tureofgalaxyformation(e.g.
White & Rees 1978). Su h systems would have allowed
dark matter to ollapse in stru tures massive enoughto
reate multipleimages throughgravitationallensing,but
atthesametimeprohibitbaryoni mattertosettleinthe
dark-matterhaloandinitiatestarformation.Clearly,one
has to be areful in dismissing any andidate dark-lens
galaxyasbeingeither abinary quasarora han e
undoubt-A
B
A
MERLIN 5-GHz
VLA 15-GHz
VLA 5-GHz
VLA 1.4-GHz
VLA 8.5-GHz
VLBA 5-GHz
VLBA 5-GHz
B
1
2
2
1
Fig.1.SummaryoftheVLA,MERLIN andVLBAradioimagesof B0827+525(see textformoredetails). Contoursstartat
the3{levelandin reasebyfa torsof2.Therst ontoursare0.19 mJybeam 1 ,0.37 mJybeam 1 ,0.37mJybeam 1 ,1.15 mJy beam 1 , 0.88 mJybeam 1 ,0.40 mJybeam 1 ,0.77 mJy beam 1
, for the MERLIN 5{GHz,VLBA 5{GHz (A),VLBA
5{GHz(B),VLA15{GHz,8.5{GHz(dis overyimage), 5{GHZand1.4{GHzimages,respe tively.
Inthispaper,wepresentthestrongest`dark-lens'
an-didatefoundin theCLASSsurvey:CLASSB0827+525 1
.
InSe tion 2,wepresentradio,opti al,near-infraredand
spe tros opi observationsofthissystem.InSe tion3,we
examineboththe`dark-lens'andbinaryradio-loudquasar
hypotheses to explain this system. In parti ular, we
de-rive onstraintsonthelens-galaxymass-to-lightratioand
omparethosewithobservationsof`luminous-lens'
galax-1
Not to be onfused with the gravitational-lens system
ies. In Se tion 4, we summarize our results and suggest
future workonthissystem.
2.Observations
TheCLASSsurveyaimstondallmultiply-imaged
at-spe trum(0.5forS
/
)radiosour esinthe
north-ernhemispherewithatotal uxdensityofS
5GHz
30mJy,
a ux-densityratio betweenlens images 10,a Gala ti
latitudejbj>10 Æ
gravitationallens(GL)systems,that anbeusedtostudy
thestru ture andevolutionoflens galaxiesat
intermedi-ateredshiftsand onstrainthe osmologi alparameters,in
parti ulartheHubbleparameter(H
0
).AtpresentCLASS
hasdis overedatleast17newGLsystems(Browne1999;
Myers1999).
2.1. Radio observations
Ifnotspe iedotherwise,theradiodatapresentedinthis
se tion are ux- alibrated in the NRAO data-redu tion
pa kageAIPSandself- alibrated,imagedandmodel-tted
in DIFMAP (Shepherd 1997). To obtain ux-densities of
thetworadio omponentsofB0827+525,theuv-datawas
ttedbytypi allytwoGaussian omponents.
As part of the CLASS sample of around 15200
at-spe trum radio sour es observed during the 1994, 1995
and1998Very-Large-Array(VLA)A{arrayseasons
(My-ers1999), a30{se snapshotof B0827+525was madeat
8.5GHz on 1995 August 13. The alibrated VLA image
(Fig.1) showstwo unresolved omponents that are
sepa-ratedby2.8ar se andhavea ux-densityratioof2.7[i.e.
S
A
24mJyandS
B
9mJy℄.
Withanaveragesour edensityintheCLASSsurveyof
1persq.deg,theprobabilityof han ealignmentoftwo
unrelated ompa tradio-loudquasarswithin2.8ar se
isaround210 6
,whereasthelensingrateisaround10 3
.
Inasampleof15200sour estheo urren eofsu ha lose
alignmenthas aprobability ofonly 3%. B0827+525 was
thereforeregardedasa andidateGLsystem.
Toimprovetheresolutionandobtainatwo-point
spe -tral indexbetweentheradio omponents,asnapshot
im-age of B0827+525 was made on 1997 January 3 with
theMulti-ElementRadioLinked Interferometer Network
(MERLIN)at5GHz.A ux-densityratioof2.5wasfound
[i.e. S
A
34mJyand S
B
14mJy℄ and a omponent
sep-aration of 2.8 ar se ,very similar to the VLA 8.5{GHz
observations.Subsequentlong-tra kMERLIN5{GHz
ob-servationsweremadeon1997De ember8,withatotal
in-tegrationtimeonthesour eof10hours.The alibrated
image(Fig.1)hasanrms-noiselevelof60Jybeam 1
and
aresolution of 50mas. Both omponents remain
unre-solved.The ux-densitiesareS
A
34.0mJyandS
B 14.8
mJy,respe tively.Nosignofextendedemissionisdete ted
intheimageabovealevelof0.6%.Thesimilarityin
ux-density ratioat 8.5 and 5GHzstrengthened the asefor
alensingexplanationof thissystem.
To improve the resolution by another order of
mag-nitude, B0827+525 was observed with the V
ery-Long-Baseline-Array (VLBA) at 5GHz on 1997 August 2.
Snapshots were obtained over a range of hour angles
to improve the uv- overage. Phasereferen ing was done
by rapid swit hing between thenearbystrong alibrator
B0828+493 (2min) and B0827+525 (5{7min). The
to-tal integration time on B0827+525 was 35 min. The
-10
100
1
10
Flux (mJy)
Freq(GHz)
B0827+525
15GHz
5/98
6/99
6/99
5/98
A
B
Fig.2.Radiospe traofB0827+525AandB,determinedwith
theVLAinA{arrayat1.4,4.9,8.5and14.9GHzon1999June
27.
and an rms-noise level of 0.1mJybeam 1
. The two
ra-dio omponentswereea hmodeledbytwoGaussian
sub- omponents. Component A shows a NE{SW extension,
whereas omponent B shows an area of weak extended
emissionin theNW{dire tion.ThelowSNRs oftheNE{
omponentinimageAandtheNW{extensionofimageB
doesnotwarrantmodeling them bymorethan two
sub- omponents. Thepositions of thebest-t Gaussians and
theirrespe tive uxdensitiesarelistedinTable1.
Both radio omponents show fairly at spe tra from
4.9to8.5GHz.Theintegrated uxdensityofB0827+525
(A+B) in the WENSS survey, (705 mJy at 325 MHz,
mean epo h 1992.2), is about equal to the ux density
at 1.4GHzintheNVSS,FIRSTandWSRTobservations
takeninthesummerof1997.Thissuggeststhatthe
indi-vidual omponentspe tramust attentoaspe tralindex
of zero below 1.4GHz. Alternatively, one of the
ompo-nent spe tra ould be ome inverted leavingroomfor the
other to remain straight. High resolution low frequen y
dataareneededtodistinguishbetweenthesepossibilities.
A2{monthmonitoring ampaign (8 epo hs)with the
WSRTat 1.4GHz(with15{ar se resolution)in the
pe-riodJuly-September1997indi atesvariabilityinthetotal
uxdensity:thesour e uxdensityslowlyde reasedfrom
71to58mJywithatypi alerrorofabout1mJyin
indi-vidual measurements.It isnot leartowhi h omponent
these variationsshouldbeattributed.Thevariationtime
s ale is rather short even though both omponents are
ompa t.Itisperhapsmorelikelythatthe1.4{GHz
vari-ations are due to refra tiveinterstellar s attering (RISS;
e.g. Ri kett et al. 1984), an explanation requiring a less
extremesize forthe omponents.
To examinethe radio spe traof both omponents in
moredetail,near-simultaneousVLA1.4,4.9,8.5and14.9{
Table 1. VLBA 5{GHz data on B0827+525 (1997 Aug. 2) The VLBA phase- enter was RA 08 31 5:36200, DEC 52 Æ 25 0 20: 00
24100. Positions (x, y) are given with respe t to to this phase- enter.The 4.9{GHz ux-density (S
4:9 ) of the
sub- omponentsandtheir de onvolvedmajor axis,axialratioand positionangle(N!E) arealsogiven.Thesub- omponents
of omponentAareunresolved.Thepositionalerroris2.5masdividedbytwi etheSNRofthe omponents.Theerrorsonthe
majorandminoraxesofthesub omponentsinBareroughly25%.
A1 A2 B1 B2 x(mas) 1064.02 1063.18 1074.16 1076.43 y(mas) 930.74 929.89 900.40 899.78 maj.(mas) { { 1.75 2.23 min/maj { { 0.65 0.55 ( Æ ) { { -31.40 5.80 S4:9 (mJy) 24.80.1 6.80.1 9.30.1 3.60.1
Table 2. VLA multi-frequen y data on B0827+525, taken
near-simultaneouslyon1999 June27. Theinternal errorsare
indi ated. (GHz) SA(mJy) SB(mJy) 14.9 29.10.4 8.00.4 8.5 29.70.1 10.70.1 4.9 33.10.1 14.00.1 1.4 48.20.3 27.40.3
both omponentsareshownin Fig.2.ComponentsAand
Bhavefairlydierentradiospe trawithspe tralindi es
8:5 1:4 =0:270:01(A)and 8:5 1:4 =0:520:01(B)(where S /
). Variability in omponent A at 14.9 GHz was
dete ted from the 1998 May 15 and 1999 June 27 VLA
observations,whi his morelikelytobeintrinsi and not
RISS, be ausethe rms variability due to RISSde reases
rapidlytowardshigherfrequen ies(e.g.Ri kettetal.1995;
Walkeretal.1998;seealsoKoopmans&deBruyn2000).
Variability at both lower (1.4GHz) and higher
(15GHz) frequen ies makes a dire t omparison of the
spe tralindi esdiÆ ult.Theformaldieren einspe tral
indexdoesnotdisqualifythesour easpossibleGL
andi-date, but ompli ates theargumentationin a `dark-lens'
hypothesis.WewillreturntothisissueinSe t.4.
2.2. Opti al andnear-infraredobservations
HubbleSpa eTeles ope(HST)observationsweremadeon
1998April18with theNear-InfraredCameraand
Multi-Obje t Spe trometer (NICMOS) at 1.6 m (F160W),
roughly orresponding to ground-based H{band. The
NIC1 amera was used whi h provides a dete tor s ale
of 43 mas pixel 1 and a eld-of-view of 11 00 11 00 . The
total exposure time was 2624 se . The data were
sub-je ted to the standard NICMOS alibration pipeline in
IRAF 1
whi h (i) orre ts for known instrumental ee ts
(i.e. at eld and dark urrent), (ii) performs gain and
ux alibration and (iii) removes osmi rays and ags
degraded and suspe t data values 2
. The image was ut
around B0827+525 and rotated to orre t to standard
(middle). The primary northern omponent (A) is
un-resolved and learly dete ted (m
F160W
=19.60.2 mag).
Component B is just barelydete ted as a region of
ex-tended emission (m
F160W
=22.60.2 mag). No sign of a
lensing galaxy is seen in the image to m
F160W
=23 mag,
althoughtheextendedemissionnearimageB ouldpartly
befromapossiblelensgalaxy.Noopti al orre tion (i.e.
de onvolution)wasappliedtotheimage,be ausethePSF
distortion 2
isnotexpe tedto hangeappre iablyoverthe
image separationofonly2.8ar se .
Similarly,B0827+525wasobservedinK{bandon1998
May 9with theNear InfraRedCamera(NIRC)at Ke k.
A total of 25 frames, ea h having a 60{se integration
time,wereobtainedoftheeld.Theteles opewasmoved
by approximately 10{15 ar se between individual
inte-grations. Theseeing at thetime of the observations was
0.6{0.75ar se (FWHM).The exposures were ombined
and rotated to orre t the orientation and the resulting
imageisshowninFig.3(right).Theobservations onrm
the on lusions drawn from the HST exposure,that
im-ageAis onsistentwithapointsour eandimageBseems
somewhatextended.
An R{band image wastaken on1998 May19 on the
WHT. Two600-se exposures were obtainedwith a
see-ing of 1.4{1.5 ar se (FWHM). It was re-observed on
1998 May 20 with two exposures of 600{se and one of
300{se exposure,respe tively.Theseeingwasaround1.0
ar se (FWHM). All exposures were ombined and
re-du ed in the standard way in the data-redu tion
pa k-ageIRAF.Theresultingimage (Fig.3,left)onlyshow
im-age A, whereas image B is notdete ted abovethe noise
level. Unfortunately no useful alibration was obtained,
but basedontheexposuretime andexpe tednoise-level,
1
IRAF (Image Redu tion and Analysis Fa ility) is
dis-tributed by the National Opti al Astronomy Observatories,
whi hare operatedbythe Asso iationofUniversities for
Re-sear h in Astronomy under ooperative agreement with the
NationalS ien eFoundation.
2
Adetaileddes riptionoftheNICMOS alibrationpipeline
pro ess,zero-point uxes and PSF an befound inthe Near
NICMOS/F160W
B
A
B
A
10"
N
E
A
Keck NIRC K-band
WHT R-band
Fig.3.Left:R{bandimageofB0827+525,observed1998May19withtheWHTonLaPalma.Middle:HSTF160WNICMOS
image of B0827+525, observed on1998 April 18. The separation between omponentsA and B is 2.8 ar se . Right: NIRC
K{bandimageofB0827+525,observedwiththeW.MKe k{IITeles opeon1998May9.
weroughlyestimatefor omponentAanapparent
magni-tudeofm
R
22.0{22.5magandfor omponentBalower
limitm R > 24.0mag. 2.3. Spe tros opi observations
B0827+525wasobservedwiththeLowResolution
Imag-ing Spe trograph (LRIS; Oke et al. 1995)on the W. M.
Ke kIITeles opeonthenightof1998April21.Three
ex-posuresweretakeninlongslitmodewithatotalexposure
timeof4500se .The300groovesmm 1
gratingwasused,
givingadispersionof2.44
Aperpixel.Theslitwaspla ed
alongboth omponents,withapositionangleof50 Æ
.The
nalspe trum oversawavelengthrangeof4024{9012
A.
The spe trawere redu ed using standard IRAF tasks. A
orre tion for the response of the CCD was determined
from observations of the Oke standard star BD332642
(Oke 1990).The orre ted spe trawere weighted by the
squares oftheir SNRs and o-added to produ e thenal
B0827+525spe trum.Fig.4 showsthespe trumof
om-ponentA,whi hhasbeensmoothedusingabox arkernel
withawidthofvepixels.Emissionlinesasso iatedwith
Si-IV1397,C-IV1549,He-II1641,andpossiblyC-III℄
1909areseen,establishingasour eredshiftof2.064.No
emission atthe position of omponent Bisdete ted. We
alsondnoeviden einthespe trumof omponentAfor
ase ondredshift,possiblyfromalensgalaxy.
3. Analysis
Beforepro eedingwithouranalysis,letussummarizethe
mostimportantobservationalresults:Wehavefoundthat
B0827+525 onsists of two radio omponents, separated
both omponents have substru ture at a s ale of a few
mas. The integrated radio spe tra of both omponents
from 1.4 to 14.9 GHz are somewhat dierent. The
red-shift forthebrightestradio omponent(A) is2.064.
Op-ti al ounterparts for both radio omponents are found
in H and K{band observations. The emission asso iated
withthefainterradio omponentappearsextended,whi h
ouldsuggestthatitisveryfaintgalaxyemission.
3.1. The`dark-lens' hypothesis
To omparetheobservedlimitsonthemass-to-lightratio
ofapossiblelensgalaxywiththosefoundfortypi allens
galaxies, we rst al ulate the velo ity dispersionof the
lensing mass,using theSingular-Isothermal-Sphere(SIS)
mass model (Binney & Tremaine 1987). This model
re-latesthelens-imageseparation()to aline-of-sight
ve-lo ity dispersion (), given the osmologi al model and
thesour e-andlensredshifts:
=8 2 D ds D s ; (1)
where is the velo ity of light, and D
ds
and D
s are
the angular-diameter distan es between lens-sour e and
observer-sour e, respe tively (e.g. S hneider, Ehlers and
Fal o1992).The angular-diameterdistan eis afun tion
of redshifts and osmologi al model. Using the
ompo-nent separation, we an furthermore al ulate the mass
ontainedinsidetheEinstein radius
M()=3:110 10 1 00 2 D Gp M ; (2) whereDD d D s =D ds andD d
dis-Fig.4.LRISspe trumofB0827+525,observedwiththeW.MKe kIITeles opeon1998April21.
lensgalaxy,usingthelterband(e.g.U,B, V,:::),we
subsequentlyusetherelation
L =L ; =10 0:4(M ; m +DM+K ) ; (3)
whereDMisthedistan emodulusofthelensgalaxy,M
;
istheabsolutemagnitude ofthesun,m
istheapparent
magnitudeof thelensgalaxyandK
istheK{ orre tion
forthelterband.Weusethelowerlimitofm
F160W >23
mag on the lens galaxy, found from the HST exposure
(Fig.3)to onstrainthemass-to-lightratioinH{band.We
use the H{band observations, be ause K orre tions are
relativelysmall(<0.2magforz1and<0.5magforz2;
Poggianti 1997). Wedo not use evolutionary orre tions
andassumeM
H;
=3.46mag.
For a sour e redshift of 2.064, we have plotted the
H{band mass-to-lightratioin Fig.5for twodierent
os-mologies(A: m =1 and =0;B: m =0.3and =0.7) and H 0 =65 km s 1 Mp 1 . We assume a
Friedmann-Robertson-Walkeruniverse.Aminimummass-to-light
ra-tioaround100isfound,using osmologyB.This
mass-to-light ratio implies a lens-galaxyredshift around 1.5 and
a high velo ity dispersionof 400{500km/s. For
osmol-ogyA,theminimummass-to-lightratiowouldin reaseto
mass-to-light ratio in H{band for B0827+525is a fa tor
15{100largerthantheH{bandmass-to-lightratiosof
typ-i allensgalaxiesintheCLASSsurvey.
InFig.6, wehaveplotted theexpe ted H{band
mag-nitude of the lens galaxy as fun tion of redshift, galaxy
type and osmology.We used (i) the velo ity dispersion
determined from eqn.1,(ii)the relationbetweenvelo ity
dispersionand B{bandmagnitude ofellipti aland spiral
galaxies from Fukugita et al. (1991) and (iii) the olors
and K{ orre tions from Poggianti(1997).FromFig.6 an
upper limit on m
H
of 17 mag is found, nearly
indepen-dent of galaxy type. If evolutionary orre tions are
ap-plied (Poggianti 1997), we nd no signi ant dieren es
intheseresults.Theupperlimitisatleast6magbrighter
thanthelowerlimitontheH{bandmagnitudeofthe
pos-sible lens galaxy, whereas for all onrmed GL systems
(Ja ksonet al. 1998),for whi h the lensand sour e
red-shiftsareknown,dieren esbetweentheobservationsand
themodel are <
1mag.
Hen e,ifB0827+525isalenssystemthentheobje tis
indeed a`darklens'system.However,alsoimage Bmust
Fig.5.EstimatedlowerlimitontheH{bandmass-to-light
ra-tio of the lens galaxy, as fun tionof redshift(see text). The
solid line is for a (m=1, =0) osmology, the dot-dashed
line for a (m=0.3, =0.7) osmology. We assume H0=65
kms 1
Mp 1
.
3.2. Thebinary quasarhypothesis
As argued in Se t.2.1 the probability of a han e
align-ment oftworadio-loudquasarsis rather small.Hen e, if
thesour eisnotalenssystemsitismostlikelyapairof
physi ally lose quasars.We allthis the `binaryquasar'
hypothesis.However,weemphasizethatsofarwehaveno
eviden eforthequasarnatureof omponentBinthe
op-ti al!
The ompa t at-spe trumradiosour epopulation
se-le ted viaCLASS is generallybelieved to emit its radio
emission in a highly non-isotropi manner (e.g. Orr &
Browne 1982) with the radio axis pointed in our
dire -tion within a small angle. As rst argued by S heuer &
Readhead (1979) there should then be manyradio-quiet
quasars (QSO) for every radio-loud quasar (QSR). It is
then obvious that the probability of nding tworelated
radio-loud quasars pointed at us is rather small. In fa t
we anprobablystatethatforeveryQSR{QSRpairthere
should bearound20 QSR-QSOpairsin the CLASS
sur-vey,if5%ofallQSOsarealsoradio-loud,i.e.30mJyat
8.5GHz(e.g.Hooperet al.1995;Bis hof&Be ker1997).
Under the assumption that B0827+525 is the only
QSR{QSRpair(i.e.binaryradio-loudquasar)inCLASS,
theprobabilitythata at-spe trumradiosour eispartof
aQSR{QSR pairis around1in 15000.This meansthat
the probability that aCLASS sour e is part of a QSR{
QSOpairisaround1in750.IntheLargeBrightQuasar
Survey(LBQS;Hewett etal. 1998)twoQSO{QSOpairs
were found from a sample of around 1000 opti ally
se-le ted quasars,hen e1in 500.Thisnumberis very lose
to thatfoundfrom theCLASSsurvey,whi hmeansthat
is onsistent with therate of QSO{QSO pairsin opti al
quasarsurveys(seealsoKo haneket al.1999).
However,ifB0827+525 is abinaryradio-loud quasar
andwe ompareitwiththelistofwideseparationquasar
pairs in Ko hanek et al. (1999), we noti e two things:
First, B0827+525, has the smallest separation (2.8
ar -se or 23 kp /h
50
) of all quasar pairs. Se ond, only 2
outof13non-lens quasarpairshavehigherredshifts (i.e.
LBQS 1429-008 and Q2345+007). On the other hand,
B0827+525 would also be one of the largest separation
lens systems (e.g. Browne 1999; Myers 1999; CASTLES
survey 2
).B0827+525thusappearstobeatthe
parameter-spa eborderdelineated bytheopti alquasarpairslisted
byKo haneketal.(1999)andthe onrmedGLsystems.
It isdiÆ ulttoseehowsigni antthese issuesarein the
ontext of binary quasars and how it possibly relatesto
thefa t thatbothquasarsareradio-loud.
4.Dis ussion& Con lusions
Iftakenat fa evalue,mostoftheobservationaleviden e
seemsto beinfavorof B0827+525beingabinary
radio-loudquasar:(i)somewhatdierentradiospe trafrom1.4
to14.9GHzforthetwo omponents,(ii)adierentradio
andopti albrightnessratio,(iii)theweakerradio
ompo-nentappearsslightlyresolved,(iv)theextendednatureof
theopti alandnear-infraredemissionnear omponentB,
whereasthatofimageAis ompa tand(v)theagreement
withthenumberstatisti sofbinaryradio-loudquasarsin
theCLASSsurveywiththoseofopti alsurveys.
However, the most interesting explanation of
B0827+525, a `dark-lens' system, annot onvin ingly
be ex luded and in view of the osmologi alimportan e
of the presen e of galaxy-sized on entrations of dark
matter {eventhoughtheymustberare(e.g. Ja ksonet
al.1998){wenowdis usswhywebelievethe`dark-lens'
hypothesis an not yet be dis arded: (1) We have seen
that at least oneof the radio omponents is variable. If
theyarelensimages,atimedelaybetweenthem ombined
with variabilityofthesour e anresultinadieren ein
simultaneouslymeasuredspe tralindi es,espe iallyifthe
timedelayisoftheorderofthevariabilitytimes ale.(2)
If wepla e amassive`dark-lens' galaxynear omponent
B, ontaining alarge amountof dust, this galaxywould
obs ure most opti al and a signi ant fra tion of the
near-infrared emission from omponent B. In the se ure
lens systemB0218+357asimilarly largedis repan y has
been observed between the opti al and radio brightness
ratios of the lens images (e.g. CASTLES survey), whi h
an also be explained in terms of obs uration by the
high- olumn density of the ri h ISM in the lens galaxy
(e.g. Wiklind & Combes 1995; Menten & Reid 1996;
CombesWiklind&Nakai1997;Combes&Wiklind 1997;
Gerin et al. 1997; Combes & Wiklind 1998). This dust,
Fig.6.TheestimatedH{bandmagnitudeofthelensinggalaxyfor4galaxytypes{E(solid),S0(dash),Sa(dot-dash)andS
(dot){,plottedas fun tionof redshift(seetext). Thehorizontaldashedline indi atestheobservedlowerlimit of23mag on
theH{bandmagnitude.Two osmologiesareshown.
however,wouldprobably notblo k allof thelens-galaxy
emission. In fa t, most of the extended emission seen
near radio omponent B ould be omingfrom the lens
galaxy itself and not from the quasar. (3) The opti al
brightnessofimageBissurprisinglylowforaradio-loud
quasar,whi hmightsuggestsomeform ofextin tion.(4)
A high s attering measure, asso iated with the ionized
omponentoftheISMinthelensgalaxy(seeforexample
Marlowet al.1999;Joneset al.1996), ould furthermore
s atter-broaden radio omponent B, explaining why it
appearssomewhatresolved.
So far in the `dark-lens' hypothesis wehaveassumed
thatthelensingmassisasinglegalaxydominatedby
non-baryoni matterinitsinnerpartsandthereforeextremely
underluminous.Ifthelensingmassdistributionisa
high-redshift (z >
1) group or luster, the onstraints on the
mass-to-light ratio, whi h is usually an order of
magni-tudelargerin lustersand groupsofgalaxies thanin the
innerpartsofgalaxies(e.g.vanderMarel1991;Carlberg,
Yee &Ellingson1997), issomewhat alleviated.However,
formostofthelensgalaxiesfrom theCLASSsurvey,the
H{bandmass-to-lightratiosarearoundunity(Ja ksonet
al. 1998). This is two orders of magnitude smaller than
theminimumH{bandmass-to-lightratiofoundinSe t.3.1
and anthereforenotentirelya ountforthehigh
mass-to-lightratiowithinthe ontextofa`normal'galaxy
evo-lution. Hen e also in the ase that the lensing mass is
agroupor luster,it mustbeunderluminous.Apossible
andidateforthistypeofmass on entrationwasre ently
foundbyErbenet al.(2000).
Thus, although the binary quasar hypothesis seems
more likely at fa e value, the `dark-lens' hypothesis an
notberuledout onvin ingly.However,thelatter
hypoth-esisdoesgive on retepredi tions:First,thesubstru ture
tortedbytheinterveninggravitationalpotential.Wehave
obtainedmulti-frequen yglobalVLBIdataonB0827+525
atthreefrequen iestotestthis.(2)Ifthevariabilityofthe
radio omponentsis intrinsi , oneshould beable to
or-relate their light- urves to nd a time-delay. This ould
denitively prove or disprove whether B0827+525 is a
`dark-lens' system. (3) If the extended H and K{band
emission seen near omponent B is partly from a lens
galaxy,itshouldhavearedshiftsmallerthan2.064.
Near-infraredspe tros opyofthisemissionshould thereforebe
attempted.
A knowledgments
The authors would like to thank Lee Armus and David
Hogg for obtaining aKe k NIRC K{band image. LVEK
andAGdeBa knowledgethesupportfrom anNWO
pro-gram subsidy (grant number 781-76-101). This resear h
wassupportedinpartbytheEuropeanCommission,TMR
Program, Resear h Network Contra t
ERBFMRXCT96-0034`CERES'. TheNationalRadioAstronomy
Observa-tory is a fa ility of theNational S ien e Foundation
op-erated under ooperative agreement by Asso iated
Uni-versities,In . TheWesterbork SynthesisRadioTeles ope
(WSRT) is operated by the Netherlands Foundation for
Resear hinAstronomy(ASTRON)withthenan ial
sup-portfromtheNetherlandsOrganizationforS ienti
Re-sear h (NWO).MERLIN is anational UKfa ility
oper-atedbytheUniversityofMan hesteronbehalfofPPARC.
This resear h used observations with the Hubble Spa e
Teles ope, obtained at the Spa e Teles ope S ien e
In-stitute, whi h is operated by Asso iated Universities for
NAS5-Referen es
Binney,J.&Tremaine,S.1987,Gala ti Dynami s,Prin eton,
NJ,Prin eton UniversityPress, 1987
Bis hof,O.B.,Be ker,R.H.,1997,AJ113, 2000
Browne, I.W.A., 1999, to appear in \Gravitational Lensing:
Re entProgressandFutureGoals", eds.T.Brainerdand
C.Ko hanek
Carlberg,R.G.,Yee,H.K.C.&Ellingson,E.1997,ApJ478,
462
Combes,F.,Wiklind,T.&Nakai,N.1997,A&A327,L17
Combes,F.&Wiklind,T.1997, ApJL486,L79
Combes,F.&Wiklind,T.1998, A&A334,L81
Condon,J.J.,Cotton,W.D.,Greisen,E.W.,Yin,Q.F.,Perley,
R.A.,Taylor,G.B.,Broderi k,J.J., 1998,AJ115,1693
Erben,T.,vanWaerbeke,L.,Mellier, Y.,S hneider,P.,
Cuil-landre, J. -., Castander, F. J. and Dantel-Fort, M. 2000,
A&A355,23
FukugitaM.,TurnerE.L.,1991,MNRAS253,99
Gerin, M., Phillips, T. G., Benford, D. J., Young, K. H.,
Menten,K.M.&Frye,B.1997,ApJL488,L31
Hawkins,M.R.S.,1997,A&A328,L25
Hewett, P.C., Foltz, C.B., Harding,M.E., Lewis, G.F., 1998,
AJ 115,383
Hooper, E.J., Impey,C.D., Foltz, C.B., Hewett, P.C., 1995,
ApJ473, 746
Irwin,M. J.,Ibata,R.A.,Lewis,G.F.,&Totten,E.J.1998,
ApJ505, 529
Ja kson, N., Helbig, P., Browne, I.W.A., Fassna ht, C.D.,
Koopmans, L., Marlow, D., Wilkinson, P.N., 1998, A&A
334, L33
Jones,D. L.,Preston,R.A.,Murphy,D.W.,Jaun ey,D.L.,
Reynolds,J.E.,Tzioumis,A.K.,King,E.A.,MCCullo h,
P.M.,Lovell, J.E. J.,Costa, M.E., VanOmmen,T.D.,
1996, ApJ470, 23
Ko hanek,C.S.,Fal o,E.E.,Mu~noz, J.A.,1999,ApJ510,590
Koopmans,L.V.E.&deBruyn,A.G.2000,A&A358,793
Kormann,R.,S hneider,P.&Bartelmann,M.1994,A&A284,
285
Marlow, D.R.,Browne,I.W. A.,Ja kson, N.,Wilkinson, P.
N.,1999,MNRAS305,15
Menten,K.M.&Reid,M.J.1996,ApJL465,L99
Myers, S.T, 1999, to appear in \Gravitational Lensing:
Re- entProgressandFutureGoals",eds.T.BrainerdandC.
Ko hanek
Oke,J.B., 1990,AJ99,1621
Oke,J.B., Cohen,J.G.,Carr, M.,etal.,1995,PASP107,375
Orr,M.J.L.&Browne,I.W.A.1982,MNRAS200,1067
Peng, C.Y.,Impey,C.D.,Fal o,E.E., etal.,1999, ApJ524,
572
Poggianti,B.M.,1997,A&AS122,399
Rengelink,R.B.1997, Tang, Y.,DeBruyn,A.G., Miley,G.
K.,Bremer,M.N.,Roettgering,H.J.A.&Bremer,M.A.
R.1997,A&AS124,259
Ri kett,B.J.J.,Coles,W.A.&Bourgois,G.1984,A&A134,
390
Ri kett,B.J.,Quirrenba h,A.,Wegner,R.,Kri hbaum,T.P.
&Witzel,A.1995,A&A293,479
S heuer,P.A.G.&Readhead,A.C.S.1979,Nature277,182
S hneiderP.,EhlersJ.,Fal oE.E.,1992,GravitationalLenses,
ShepherdM.C.,1997,ADASSVI,A.S.PConferen eSeries,vol
125,eds.,GarethHuntandH.E.Payne,p77
VanDerMarel,R.P.1991,MNRAS253,710
White,S.D.M.&Rees,M.J.1978,MNRAS183,341