• Aucun résultat trouvé

Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in foods from animal origin in Belgium

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in foods from animal origin in Belgium"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in foods from animal origin in Belgium

Y. Ghafir1, M. Cornelis4, M. Jouret4, K. Dierick2, M. Yde2, L.. De Zutter3, G. Daube*1

1Food Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium

2Public Health Institute - Louis Pasteur, Brussels, Belgium

3Food Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Gent, Gent, Belgium

4Institute of Veterinary Expertise (Public Health), Brussels, Belgium

Introduction

Listeria monocytogenes is a common environmental Gram-positive bacterium causing listeriosis in human and animals. It is

implicated in severe foodborne infections with high rate of mortality in susceptible individuals, such as immonucompromised hosts, elderly people, infants and pregnant women. It might cause severe diseases as meningitis and be involved in abortions or premature birth. The assessment of the rate and overall the level of this pathogen in several foods is essential for the risk prevention.

Material and methods

Results and discussion

Conclusion

Since 2000, the Belgian zoonosis surveillance program has assessed the contamination with Listeria monocytogenes in minced meat of beef and pork (in 1g), in ham, in pâté (in 25g) and in salami (in 25g in 2000 and in 1g in 2001). Approximately 300 samples were taken for each matrix and each year.

The detection of Listeria monocytogenes has been carried out with the officially validated method AFNOR BIO-12/3-03/96 Vidas Listeria monocytogenes followed by isolation on chromogenic L. monocytogenes medium. Briefly, this method consist of a pre-enrichment into Fraser (24h at 30°C) followed by an pre-enrichment in Fraser and the immunoassay Vidas LMO. Confirmation occurs on ALOA (AES) or Rapid L. mono (Bio-Rad) medium. The serovar of Listeria monocytogenes was determined for each isolate of meat products.

In 2000 and 2001, the prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes varied between 14 and 25% in minced meat, was around 5% in cooked products and 8,6% (2001) for salami (Fig.1).

The minced meat samples were equally distributed in the three categories of locations : low capacity establishments, supermarkets and butcheries. Most of the isolates were found in low capacity establishments. For ham and pâté, 2/3 of the samples had been handled after packaging (the others were cooked in the final packaging of consumer portion). More than 70% of isolates from these samples were found in handled products after packaging. For salami, 90% of the samples were equally distributed in little and big grade, the other samples were pure pork salami. More than 70% of the positive samples were isolated in little grade salami and none in pure pork salami (Fig. 2-4).

In butchery products, approximately half of the isolates of Listeria monocytogenes belonged to the serovar 1/2a, which does not correspond to the most frequent serovars in human isolates. In human isolates (Belgian sentinel laboratories), 43% of the isolates are of serovar 4 and 36% of serovar 1/2a (Fig. 5).

During storage, growth of Listeria monocytogenes is possible and many raw foodstuffs will probably never be completely free of

Listeria. The consumption of raw or undercooked food, but also of some ready-to-eat meat products, could be an important factor

in the transmission and epidemiology of Listeria infection. Appropriate application of hygiene and technology is therefore a basic requirement to control Listeria monocytogenes. Furthermore, consumers should be educated in proper handling.

References

G. Ducoffre. Surveillance des Maladies Infectieuses par un Réseau de Laboratoires de Microbiologie 2000 - Tendances Epidémiologiques 1983 - 1999

Institut Scientifique de la Santé Publique, Section d'Epidémiologie, Janvier 2002.

This study was financially supported by the Institute of Veterinary Expertise (Ministry of Public Health).

Fig. 1 : Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in meat (2000-2001)

Fig. 2-4 : Number of Listeria monocytogenes isolates in relation with the origin of the samples (2001)

Fig. 5 : Serovars of Listeria monocytogenes in meat (2001) and human isolates (2000)

Serovars of Listeria monocytogenes in pork butchery in Belgium (2001) and comparison with human isolates

53% 43% 21% 14% 20% 14% 19% 2% 13% 14% 43% 36% 58% 15% 7% 8% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Ham (n=15) Pâté (n=14) Salami (n=26) Human isolates (2000, n=42)

sérovar 1/2a sérovar 1/2b sérovar 1/2c sérovar 4b Listeria monocytogenes prevalence of pork and beef in Belgium (2000-2001)

18,3% 4,3% 8,6% 25,0% 14,8% 16,0% 4,9% 6,0% 4,6% 16,0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2000 2001

minced meat of pork (1g) minced meat of beef (1g) ham (25g) pâté (25g) salami (2000:25g) salami (2001:1g)

Figure

Fig. 1 : Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in meat (2000-2001)

Références

Documents relatifs

رئازجلا يف يداصتقلاا ومنلا ىلع يراجتلا حاتفنلاا رثلأ ةيسايقلا ةساردلا ثلاثلا لصفلا لصفلا ةصلاخ : في ةيسايق ةسارد لىإ انقرطت لصفلا

au niveau de cette région qu’il est possible observer des sites de modification post-traductionnelle, d’oxydation, glycation, déamination, d’attachement de methylglyoxal et

Les deux marqueurs ont un rôle important dans le diagnostic différentiel car ils ont une bonne spécificité, mais ils sont malheureusement peu sensibles car seulement la

Il convient maintenant de se pencher sur leur exécution et leur mise en place, que ce soit au niveau administratif par l'étude du dépouillement de l'appel d'offre pour la mise en

La mère s'en approchait volontiers; ce n'était plus pour jacasser comme avant, mais juste pour dire bonjour, prendre des nouvelles, montrer qu'elle était là, toujours en

This refers to the technical capacity and the level of authority that public sector entities responsible for sanitary and phytosanitary measures have to develop and set regulatory

Comme nous l’avons vu, plusieurs types de professionnels ont accepté de répondre à nos questions, ce qui a supposé un guide d’entretien suffisamment souple et adapté pour que

• Développer un procédé de synthèse du produit/matériau à l’échelle du laboratoire mais envisageable à plus grande échelle. • Maîtriser la qualité et