Presentation
of a simplified method
for the crashworthiness
of offshore wind turbine jackets
T i m o t h é e P i r e ( U L g , F R I A fe l l o w s h i p )
H e r v é L e S o u r n e ( G e M / I C A M )
L o ï c B u l d g e n ( U L g )
P h i l i p p e R i g o ( U L g )
Context
•
More and larger wind farms
•
Closer to traffic lanes
(passengers and commercials)
•
Need of maintenance
Collision risk
analysis
Probability
Damage
[offshorenergytoday.com]
[northnorfolknews.co.uk]
[maritimejobs.org]
Context
•
Several wind turbine
supporting structurures :
•
Monopile
•
Tripod
•
Jacket
•
Floating
•
Finite elements : accurate but time demanding
•
Need for a faster method for pre-design stage :
Continuous Elements Method
State of art
•
Only local crushing taken into account
•
Good results for low energy impact
s
•
Model too rigid
in case of large energy impacts
•
Other deformation modes have to be added
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4
For
ce
[M
N
]
Displacement [m]
Resultant force
SE LS-DYNA 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4En
er
gy
[M
J]
Displacement [m]
Total energy
SE LS-DYNA[BULDGEN L., LE SOURNE H., PIRE T., Extension of the Super-Elements Method to the Analysis of a Jacket Impacted by a ship, Marine
Structures, 2014, vol. 38, pp. 44 – 71]
Global deformation
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 0 0,05 0,1 0,15 0,2 0,25 0,3 En ergy [MJ ] Displacement [m]Total energy
SE LS-DYNA -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 0,05 0,1 0,15 0,2 0,25 0,3 Force [MN ] Displacement [m]Resultant force
SE LS-DYNALocal crushing : model
[BULDGEN L., LE SOURNE H., PIRE T., Extension of the Super-Elements Method to the Analysis of a Jacket Impacted by a ship, Marine
Structures, 2014, vol. 38, pp. 44 – 71]
Local crushing : developments
•
Local crushing
•
Rings
𝐸
𝑏
= 2𝑚
0
𝑉
𝐵
𝑅
2
+
1
𝑅
2
−
1
𝑅
1
𝑉
𝐹
+
𝐹
𝐸
χ
1
𝑑𝑙 +
𝐷
𝐹
χ
2
𝑑𝑙
•
Generators
𝐸
𝑚
θ, δ = 𝑛
0
−ξ
2ξ
1ε
𝑚
θ, δ, 𝑦 𝑑𝑦 = 𝑛
0
δ
1
ξ
1
+
1
ξ
2
𝑤 θ, δ
𝜕𝑤
𝜕δ
•
Total
𝑃
𝑙
δ 𝑎 δ =
𝑖
𝐸
𝑖
•
Three-hinges mechanism
𝑃
𝑔
δ =
𝐿
1
+ 𝐿
2
𝐿
1
𝐿
2
1 + ξ
𝑡
𝑀
0
1 −
𝑁 δ
2
𝑁
0
2
+ 𝑁(δ) δ − δ
𝑡
cos γ
𝑡
Punching : model
[HSIEH J.-R., Analytical formulations for ship-offshore wind turbine collisions, Master thesis, Nantes : ICAM (EMSHIP Erasmus Mundus Master
Course), 2015, 104 p.]
Buckling : developments
•
Hinges 1-3
𝐸
𝐻,1−3
= 2𝑚
0
0
π/2
𝜕α
𝜕θ
𝑅𝑑θ θ
•
Hinge 2
𝐸
𝐻,2
= 4𝑚
0
0
π/2
𝜕α
𝜕θ
𝑑𝑠𝑑θ θ
•
Membran
e
effect
𝐸
𝑀
= 4𝑛
0
0
𝐻
0
π/2
ε𝑑𝑠𝑑β𝑑𝑧
= 4𝑛
0
θ
π𝑅
0
𝐻
𝐿
2
α
𝑑𝑧
•
Total
𝑀 θ =
𝑖
𝐸
𝑖
1
3
2
β
R
L
αBuckling : results
0,000E+00 5,000E+06 1,000E+07 1,500E+07 2,000E+07 2,500E+070,000E+00 5,000E-02 1,000E-01 1,500E-01 2,000E-01 2,500E-01 3,000E-01
Mo m en t [N m ] Theta [-] SE LS-DYNA 0,000E+00 5,000E+05 1,000E+06 1,500E+06 2,000E+06 2,500E+06 3,000E+06 3,500E+06 4,000E+06
0,000E+00 5,000E-02 1,000E-01 1,500E-01 2,000E-01 2,500E-01 3,000E-01
E [
J]
Theta [-]
Complete model : scenario
•
Colliding ship :
•
Non-bulbous OSV
•
6000 tons (added mass included)
•
5m/s initial speed
•
75 MJ kinetic energy
•
Impact point
•
On a leg, between two nodes
Complete model : results
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4For
ce
[M
N
]
Displacement [m]
Resultant force
SE LS-Dyna 0 20 40 60 80 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4En
er
gy
[M
J]
Displacement [m]
Total energy
SE LS-DynaComplete model : comparison
•
Better accuracy for large energy impact
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4