Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (2011) 99:93-105 DOI 10. 1007/s I 0482-010-954 I -2
Pichia
anomala
in
biocontrol
for
apples:
20 years
of
fundamental
research
and
practical
applications
Jijakli
N{. Hai'ssantReceived:
l6
November 2010/Accepted: 4 December 2010/Published online: 8 January 2011 O Springer Science+Business Media B'V.20ll
Abstract
Fungal
pathogens such asBotrytis
cine-rea, Penicilliutn
expansum andthe
Gloeosporioidesgroup are
mainly
responsiblefor
important
econom-ical
losses
of
post-harvestapples.
Application of
biological control
agents(BCAs)
is
an
emergingalternative
to
synthetic fungicides. However, beforebecoming
an
economically feasible alternative
tochemical
control, BCAs have
to
satisfy
differentrequirements related to
biological,
technological andtoxicological
properties.The different
stepsfor
asuccessful strategy
of
disease
control
(selection,production and
formulation,
studyof
mechanismsof
action, ecological
characterization, molecularmoni-toring,
pilot
efficacy trials, registration) are reviewedin this paper considering the antagonistic yeast
Pichia
anomala strain K. This strain was selected
for
its highand
reliable
antagonisticactivity
againstB.
cittereaand
P.
exparlsum on apples.The
studiesof
modeof
action and ecological fitness are emphasized because
they can lead to a better efficacy
of
strainK.
Recentlyadvanced molecular techniques
have contributed
toimproving knowledge on the modes of action' Thanks
to
the identification
of
genesinvolved
in
biocontrolproperties,
the
genetic basisof
action
mechanismscan be understood. That approach was adopted
for
P'J. M. Haïssam
(8)
Gembloux Agro-Biotech, Plant Pathology Unit, Passage
des Déportés, University of Liege' 5030 Gembloux' Belgium
e-mail: jijakli.h@fsagx ac.be
anomala strain
K
and led
to
the
identification
of
genes coding
for
exo-B-1,3-glucanasesimplicated in
the efficacy. Based
on
thatidentification,
aformula-tion
involving
B-1,3-giucans
was
developed
andapplied
with
higher efficacyin
controlled conditions'The importance
of
ecological characterisationis
alsohighlighted
in
the contextof
pre-harvest applicationof
P.
anomala strain
K. UV light,
temperature andhumidity
were identified as rnajor factors influencingthe strain
K
population'A
modeltaking into
consid-eration temperature and
humidity
was developed andcould
be
useful
in
deciding whether
pre-harvesttreatment
is
sufficient
to
allow
fast colonization
of
wounds
prior to
the arrival
of
wound pathogens, orwhether
it
is
wise
to
apply further
post-harvesttreatment
to
increasethe
yeastpopulation
density'This
summary presenting 20 yearsof work
also paidattention
to
practical application
of
strain
K
and itsintegration
with
other methodsof
control'Keywords
Pichiaanomala' Botrytis
'Penicillium'
Bioiogical control
'
Apples
'
Post-harvestPost-harvest
diseasesof fruits:
apredilection
field
for
biological control
Despite modem
storagefacilities,
lossesfrom 5
to 25Voof
apples and pears arestilt
being
recordedin
storage
rooms. Fungal
pathogenssuch as
Botrytiscinerea, Penicillium
expansum and Gloeosporioidesgroup
aremainly
responsibleof
important
econom-ical
losses.Control
measuresof
post-harvest apples and pears arestill
principally
based on the protectionof
fruits from pre-
and
post-harvestinfection
with
pre- and post-harvest fungicide treatments. However,
in
the context
of
consumer reluctance
to
acceptchemical
residuesin
food
and
public
concern
for
environmental safety, there
is
an increasing demandto
develop alternative
methodsto
control
diseases.That demand becomes a
critical
needwith
respect tothe
deregistration
of
effective
and widely
usedfungicides and the development of fungicide-resistant
strains
of
post-harvest pathogens.Biological
control is generating a great enthusiasmto play
arole
in
sustainable agriculture although therelevance
of
biological control
agents
(BCAs)
inplant
pathology
appearslimited unril now.
In
thisrespect, post-harvest
biological
control could
beconsidered
as specially promising
on
a
practicalpoint
of view
because:(l)
The
application sites arelimited
to
the
harvested commodities,
(2)
Theenvironmental conditions are defined and
stablein
storage rooms, (3) The harvested commodities are
of
high
value.Scientific literature presents numerous examples
of
biocontrol
of
fruit
diseases(for
areview
seeJanis-iewicz and
Kosten 2002).
Most
of
the BCAs
are yeastsfollowed
by bacteria whereas onlyfew
speciesbelong
to mycelial fungi.
All
the potentialBCAs
areactive against post-harvest pathogens
of tropical
and./or
temperatefruits
(including
tomatofruits).
Applesand citrus are the most prevalent studied
fruits.
BCAsare targeting
mainly
the post-harvest diseasesinfect-ing fruits
thorough wounds (such
as
B.
cinerea,P.
expansum, Rhizopus spp.). However, some BCAsare also able to protect fungal pathogens which infect
fruits
or inflorescences via intact host surface (such asColletotrichum gloeosporioides).
Latent
infectionsare not mentioned to be controlled
by
BCAs.Table
I
presents
the
biopesticides
(formulatedBCAs)
targeting
post-harvest diseasesalready
onthe
market.
Three bacteria and
four
yeasts
areregistered.
Among
the bacteria, Pseudomonassyrin-gae strains are specially directed against post-harvest
diseases
while
a
Bacillus subtilis strain
is
alsoefficient
against
pre-harvest diseases. FormulationsTable
I
Commercially available biological control products to manage post-harvest fruits diseases Microorganism( s )contained
Product
Fungal disease targettrade name
Crop Manufacturer or distributor/ countries with registration Bacillus subtilis QSr713 Psettdomonas syringae ESC-10 Pseudomonas syringae ESC^1
I
Aureobasidium pullulans Cryptoccocus albidus Metschnikovvia fructicola Serenade/ rhapsody/ Sereande garden Bio-Save IOLP Bio-Save 110 Boni protect Yield plus ShemerCanida
oleophila
Nexy .çtrain OB. cirterea cutd P. expansLrnt
P. digitatum, P.italicum,
P.expansum.B. cinerea. Rhizopus stolonifer, Aspergillus niger, Fusarium and Sclerotinia sclerotium B. cinerea, Penicillium spp.
Apple and Pear
Citrus, pome and stone fruits, grapes, strawberries and sweet potâtoes
Pome fruits Powdery mildew, downy mildew,
Cercospora leaf spot, early btight, late blight, brown rot, fire blight, and others
B. cinerea, Penicillium spp., Mucor py rofo rmi s, G e o
ti
c hum c andidumB. cinerea, Penicillium spp., Mucor py roformis, GeotrichLtm candidum B. citterect
Cucurbits, grapes, hops, vegetables, peanuts, pome fruits, stone fruits. and others Pome fruit, citrus,
cherries, and potatoes Pome fruit, citrus,
cherries, and potatoes Pome lruit
AgraQuest (CA, USA/
European community, USA, Canada
EcoScience Corp. (Longwoord, FL)ruSA
EcoScience Corp. (Longwoord, FL)ruSA
Bio-Protect GmbH belonging to Bio-Firm from BIOMIN (Austria)/Germany, In preparation for Europe Anchor Yeast (South Africa)
belonging to Lallemand group/South Africa
Agrogreen, belonging to Bayer group/Israë1, in preparation for Europe
Lesaffre- Bionext (France)/ Europe
95 Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (2011) 99:93-105
based
from P.
syringae strains are the oldeston
themarket and
belong
to
aUS
company.The Bacillus
subtitis product
is
theonly
oneto
be registered bothin
USA
and Europe.A
strain
of
Aureobasidiumpullulans
is
directedagainst
B.
cinerea on
pomefruits but is
also activeagainst
fire blight
under
anothercommerciai
tradename.
Until
now, that
strain
is
only
registeredin
Germany. Metschnikov'ia
fructicola
was
isolatedin
Israël and is
efficient
against post-harvest diseases onvarious post-harvest commodities.
Ct1'ploccocusalbidus
and Candida oleophila strainO
are targetingpost-harvest diseases
of
apples and pears. C. albidusis commercialised
in
SouthAfrica while
C. oleophilais
registeredin
US,UK
and France and may be soldin
these countries.Pichia
anontala
is
often cited
to
protect
post-harvest
fruits
against
wound
pathogens
but
alsograins against
Penicilliunt roquefertii
(SchnÛrer andJonsson
2011).
However,before becoming an
eco-nomically
feasible alternative
to
chemical
control,this
yeast asany
otherBCA
hasto
satisfy
differentrequirements related to
biological,
technological andtoxicological
properties(Fig.
1). These requirementswili
be reviewed consideringP.
anonnla
strainK,
abiocontrol
agentisolated
20years ago
(Jijakli
andLepoivre
1993).Isolation and
selection ofPichia anomala
strain
K
To control post-harvest diseases, investigators usually
isolate naturaily occurring microorganisms from
fruits
just
before harvestingor
during
storage(Aloi
et
al'1991;
Gullino
et
al.
7991; Janisiewicz 1991).Never-theless, an absolute relationship between efficacy and
origin
of
isolation doesn't exist.
Actually,
microor-ganisms
exhibiting
antagonistic properties
againstB. cinerea
andP.
erpansumhave been isolatedfrom
soil, leaves
of
apple treesor from
fruits
or
leavesof
other plants (Janisiewicz 1988; Janisiewicz and
Roit-man
1988;
Wilson
and
Wisniewski
1989).
In
thisrespect,
an
elegant and
fast
method
of
antagonistisolation
has been adoptedby
Wilson
et al.
(1993)'They applied rinsing waters from tomatoes and apples
directly
on
u'ounds inoculated
with
the
pathogen(8.
cinerea) and isolated antagonistic microorganismsfrom
wounds which did notexhibit
any symptoms. We isolated microorganisms from rinsing watersof
Golden Delicious apples at harvest and after different periods of storage(Jijakii
andLepoivre
1993). Among 329epiphytic
microorganisms (yeasts and bacteria),Pichia anomala (strain
K)
(Hansen)Kurtzman
wasselected
for its high
andreliable biocontrol activity
against
infection by B.
cinereaot
Penicilliur?? sp' onwounded
Golden Delicious
(Jijakli
and
Lepoivre1993). Treatment of wounded sites
with
50 pl of yeast suspension (107CFU/ml)
was sufficient toinhibit
rotdevelopment
induced
by
50
pi
(106 spores/ml)
of
either B. cinerea or
Pencillium
sp. at5
and25"C'Production of strain K
When the number
of
strains of potential candidates issufficiently reduced, the technological properties
with
tion procedure
1i{ j.
:î,.
:il,
jlii
regard to amenability
for
the mass production and thepreparation
of
formulation
of
the
microorganismsmust be evaluated. The production and the
formula-tion
must leadto
a productwhich
has thefollowing
characteristics:
(1)
stableduring
its
storage period,(2)
easy
to
prepare
and apply
with
a
standardmaterial, (3) economically affordable
for
the industryand
the
fruit
grower.
The
cost production
of
amicroorganism includes
the
culture media and
theenergy
neededfor
production and
drying
process.Appropriate
adjuvantsrelative
to
thedrying
process(protectants,
carriers,...) must
be
addedto
increasethe
viability of
BCAs
dunng thediflèrent
processes.P.
anomala strainK
was testedfor
its
technolog-ical properties. The strain was produced
in
fermentors(media 863)
by
CWBI
(Centre
Wallon
de
Bio-Industrie, Gembloux
Agro Bio-Tech,
Ulg,
Belgium)and fermentation product was dried by lyophilisation.
The antagonistic strain can be produced in fermentors
and dried
while
maintaining its
antagonisticactivity
(Jijakli
etal.
1993b).The
multiple
functions
of
aproper strain
K
formulation
Formulation plays
a
greatpart
in
the
stability
of
abiopesticide
(shelf
life).
In
order
to
achieve
thisstability
goa1,protectants
are also
added
to
thepreparations
rvhich should remain active
duringseveral months. Often,
this stabiiity is
maintainedin
a
cold room
(towards
4"C) but the viable
rate
of
propagules decreases
generally
quickly
if
they
arepreserved
at
ambient
temperature.This
problem
of
viability
preservation
and
the
properties
of
theinoculum
constitute importantlimitations
to
the useof
biopesticides.To
fulfil
the
requirementsof
pres-ervation,
the
producer
of
microorganismswill
be rather inclined to propose a product formulatedin
dryform.
Some products arenow
able
to
be
preservedduring
oneor
two
years at4"C
such asP.
anomalastrain
K
produced and driedby
lyophilisation.Although
severalformulations
arenow
availableon the
market,
the
development
of
techniquesundoubtedly remains
slow due
to a
case-by-case approach.This
approach isstill
too often inspired bythe
formulation
of
the chemical
compounds whichdoes
not
necessarily address thecriteria
imposed bythe
use
of
biocontrol methods
such
as
thecompatibility
of
theformulation
with
the expressionof
the
antagonismof a
living
microorganism
orconcerning
minimum
impact on the environment bythe additives
of
formulations.Last but not least, a formulation must also stabilize
the level
of
protection brought
by the
antagonisticstrain
in
an
environment
which
is
not
always adequate.It
can contribute to increasing the survivaland
the
effectivenessof
the
microorganism
and/orallows
the reductionof
the concentrationin
antago-nists
to
be
applied
without
affecting
the level of
protection, thus
improving
the economicprofitability
of
theproduct. Nutrients
arefrequently
reported asadjuvants
which
stimulateor
stabilise the protectiveleve1
of
antagonistic strainsin
post-harvest diseases(Janisiewicz
1994;
Janisiewicz
et ai.
1992)-
Weselected 15 carbohydrates
and
16 nitrogenouscom-pounds
as potential
adjuvantsof
yeastformulation
(Jijakli et al.
1993a).Only
one sugar analogous(2-deoxy-o-glucose
or
2-gluc)
showed
a
protectiveeffect
againstB.
cinerea when applied alone
andincreased
the level
of
protection
from
about
60
to9O7o whenadded to P. anomala (strain
K)
suspension(l0s
CFU/ml). The
sole applicationof
2-gluc
inhib-ited
also
the
developmentof
B.
cinerea
on
beans(Jejelowo
et
al.
1988).
This
analogueof
glucose reducedin vitro
spore germination and hyphal growthof
B.
cinerea and
P.
expansum(Janisiewicz
1994;Jejelowo
et
al.
1988;Jijakli
et
al.
1993a) and couldact as a competitive
inhibitor
of
glucose metabolism(Janisiewicz 1994).
On the other hand, none
of
the other nutrients(L-asparagine, r--proline, galactose, mannitol, ribose and
sorbitol),
selectedfor
their
in
vitro
and
in
vivo
antagonist
stimulation
or
pathogeninhibition
eitherby
Janisiewiczet
al. (1992)or
Harperet al.
(1981)enhanced the protective
activity of
P. anomala strainK
in our
experiments. Thesedifferent
results show that an effect observedin
a specificplant-antagonist-pathogen combination
is not
automaticallytranspos-able
to
another system
when the nutrient
affectsspecifically the antagonistic agents'
In
contrast, whenthe nutrient has a specific effect on basic metabolism
of
the pathogenwith
no subsequentinhibition
of
theantagonist,
we
can expect an easier transpositionin
different
systems.The
application
of
calcium chloride
(20g/i)
in
mixtures
with
P.
anomala
strain
K
enhanced the97 Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (2011) 99:93-105
Mclaughin
et al.
(1990) and
Gullino
et
al.
(1991)observed
similar
resultswhen calcium was
appliedtogether
with
an antagonistic strain. The influenceof
calcium on increasing the resistance
of
host tissues isoften reporled (Conway 1991; Messiaen 1994),
while
its
action on
microorganismsis still poorly
studied.Nevertheless,
the
synergisticaction
of
a
combinedtreatment
calcium-antagonistled Mclaughlin
et
al'(1990)
to
suggestthe
secretionof
new
antifungalmetabolites
by
the BCAs.Certain other additives are intended
to
protect themicroorganisms against
the
unfavourable
environ-mental factors (relative humidity,
UV,
temperature,pH),
other
additivesaiming at
increasing protectionby
stimulating the
mechanismsof
action
of
thebiocontrol
agent are also employed.As long
as themechanisms
of
action
of
the
antagonist
and
itsecological
characteristicsare
not known, this
typeof
formuiation remains empirical.
In
case of
P.
anontala such additives
\Àrerefound after
deep studies (coveredin
relevant sections below).Challenges
in
studying
BCA
modesof
action
Knowledge
of
the
mechanismsof
antagonism
iscrucial
for
developing
successful post-harvestbio-control
strategies.It
is
necessaryin
order
to
(1)optimize the method and
timing of
applicationof
theantagonist,
(2)
optimize formulation
to
enhanceantagonist efficacy,
(3) rationally
selectmore
effec-tive
antagonists, and (4) registerbiocontrol
agentsfor
commercial use. Unfortunately, knowledge
of
themode
of
actionof
many
antagonistsof
post-harvestdiseases is
limited.
The comprehensionof
themech-anisms
of
action
is
hampered
by
the
complexinteractions between
host-pathogen-antagonist.Moreover,
the mechanisms studiedin vitro in
orderto
simplify
these complex interactions,
do
notnecessarily reflect
in
situ reality.Numerous efforts
to
elucidate the modeof
actionof
post-harvestbiocontrol
agents indicate thatmulti-ple
interactions between antagonist,host,
pathogen,and other
componentsof
fruit
natural
epiphyticmicroflora
take place at the siteof
action.For
mostBCAs, no
major
mechanism seemsto
dominatein
their
biocontrol
but rathermultiple
interactive modesof action.
It
appears that the modeof
actionof
aBCA
could
comprise
one
or
several
of
the
following
processes:
antibiosis,
nutrient
or
site
competition'direct
interactions between thebiocontrol
agent andthe
pathogen,and
induced
host
resistance(Janis-iewicz
and Kosten 2002;
Wilson
and
Wisnieswski1994).
A
long road to discovery
strain K
modesof action
Experimental evidence
for
roles
of
nutrient
compe-tition
in
BCA
antagonisticactivity
relationships isstill
missing although several studies
suggest thatcompetition
for
nutrients may
be
important.
Someauthors (Chalutz
et
al.
1991; Roberts 1991;
Wis-niewski
et
al.
1989) highlighted
the ability
of
antagonists
to
rapidly
multiply
at
the wounded sitesof
fruits but without
relating
this
aptitude
to
their
protective activity.
Resultsof
otherworkers
(Droby etal.
1989;Wisniewski
etal.
1991) showed that theaddition of nutrients can restore both the germination
of
the
pathogenand
its
developmenton fruits
in
presence of the antagonist. The
ability of
P. anotnalastrain
K
to colonise the wounds was also investigatedin
relation
with
their
protective
activity
againstB.
cinerea on
apples andwith
regardto
the
in
situconidial
germination
of
B.
cinerea (Jijakli
et
ai'1993a). Populations
of P'
anomala (strains
K)
in
wounds
increasedat
25oC
to
reach
a
maximumdensity
(-
1 log unit
over the
initial
density)
after12
h of
incubation
similarly to
the protection
levelagainst
B.
cinerea
which
also reacheda
maximumafter 12
h
of
yeast incubation.On
the other hand,in
situ
spore germinationof
B.
cinerea
was markedlyreduced on wounded sites treated
with
strainK,
evenwhen
pathogen
and yeast were applied
simulta-neously
with no
subsequentprotection.
This
sug-gested
that factor(s) other than
inhibition
of
sporegermination
may be involved
in
biocontrol
effec-tiveness.
Whatever
the
experimental conditions,no
antibi-osis nor induced host resistance was detected as part
of
the
modes
of
action
of
P.
anomala
strain K
(unpublished results).
On
the contrary,mycoparasit-ism
by
this
yeast
has
been
presumedto
explaininhibition
of
B.
cinerea
on
appleson the
basisof
biochemical studies
of
itshydrolytic
enzyme system'Endo- and
exo-B-1,3-glucanaseactivities,
but
nochitinolytic
activities,
have been detectedin
culturefiltrates
of
strain
K.
Specific activities were
higherwhen.B. cinerea
cell
wall
preparation (CWP)consti-tuted the sole source
of
carbon, rather than glucose orlaminarin
(jijakli
and Lepoivre
1998).
Exo-B-1,3-glucanases (EC 3.2.1.58) act by successive hydrolysis
of
the glycosidic
bondsat the
nonreducing endsof
1,3-B->glucans, releasing glucose whereas
endo-B-1,3-glucanases
(EC
3.2,1.39) cieaveinner
bondsof
the
polymer
chain releasing oligosaccharides' B-1,3-glucanase activitesof
strainK
were found to degradeB.
cinerea CWP, and
the
relative proportion of
exolytic
B-1,3-glucanaseactivity
was higheron
thatsubstrate
than
on
laminarin (Jijakli and
Lepoivre1998).Two bands of enzyme
activity
were detectedin
native polyacrylamide gels. The exo-B-1,3-glucanase
presenting the highest specific
activity
(PaExg2) waspurified from culture
filtrates
of
strain
K.
PaExg2showed
inhibitory
effect
on
germ tube growth
andconidial germination
(up
to
297a irthlbition) of
B.
cinerea, causingmorphologicai
changesin
germtubes. Exo-B-1,3-glucanase
activity
was also detectedin
apple wounds treatedwith
strainK.
Overall results suggestedthat
exo-B-1,3-giucanaseactivity
may
beinvolved
in
the protective effectof
P. anomala strainK
againstB.
cinerea.Recent advanced molecular techniques have
con-tributed
to
the developmentof
innovative alternativetools
for
improving
knowledge
on
the
antagonisticmechanisms
of
BCAs
and
for building on
insightsprovided
by
microbiological,
microscopic,
and/orbiochemical
studies. Thanksto
the identification
of
genes
involved
in
biocontrol
properties,the
genetic basisof
action mechanisms can be understood'A
firstmolecular approach called targeted strategy (Massart
et al.
2005) was adoptedfor
P.
anomala(strain
K).The
targeted strategy requiresprior
selectionof
oneor
afew
genes.This
selection can be based onpre-existing data such as the study
of
strainK
hydrolytic
enzyme system.
After
PCR amplificationwith
degen-erate primers,two
genes encodingexo-B-1,3-glucan-ases
(PAEXG1,
accessionnumber AJ002195'
andPAEXG2,
accessionnumber
AJ222862)have
beencloned
from
strain
K
genomicDNA
and sequenced(Grevesse
et al.
2003). However,
the
authors ruledout the
involvement
of
PAEXG2
in
the
biocontrolactivity
of
strain
K.
In
orderto
addressthe
contra-diction with that last
observation and
biochemicaldata,
the contribution
of
PAEXGI
andPAEXG2
toantagonism
of B.
cinerea
by
strain
K
was
investi-gated. That was realised
with
the help ofpaexgl-
andpaexg2-single-disruption mutants and
with
a doublemutant
strain
obtainedby
sequentialinactivation
of
both
genes(Friel et
al. 2003,2005).
It
wasdemon-strated
that the biocontrol efficiency
of P.
anomalastrain
K
was affectedby
inactivationof
the PAEXGIgene, the PAEXG2 gene,
or
both(Friel
et
aL.2007)'Furthermore,
the
data
(Table2)
highlighted
thecomplexity
of
the
antagonistic relationship
estab-lished
within the
host-antagonist-pathogen system,because
ditïerences
in
protection
level
betweenmutated
and
wilct-type strains were modulated
byapple maturity
and yeastinoculum
size.Both
highyeast
concentration
and
maturation
appeared
tocompensate
for
inactivation
of
the
PAEXGI
orPAEXG2
gene.Indeed
the
mutatedstrains
exertedno
protective effect when
iow
concentrations wereapplied to fresh apple
fruit,
but their protective effectwas
similar
to
that
of
the parental strain when theywere applied to mature apple
fruit
at medium or highconcentration
or to
fresh applefruit
athigh
concen-tration
(Table2).
Thus, a higher yeast population (a greaterinoculum
size) appears to counterbalance theeffect
of
the glucanase-minus mutations(Friel et
al'2007). The relative contribution of
exo-B-1,3-glucan-ases
to
biocontrol may be
greater under conditionswhere
that
of
other modes
of
action' such
ascompelition
for
nutrientsor
space,is
reduced.Based
on
the
demonstrationof
involvement
of
exo-B-1,3-glucanase
in
the
protective
activity
of
strain
K,
aformulation involving
YGT
(nameof
anadjuvant containing
B-1,3-glucans)was
testedat
a.concentration
of
2
gAin
controlledconditions'
Thatformation
leadto
a higher protection percentage (upto
1007o)than the
percentage obtainedby
the
solestrain
K
(107
CFU/ml)
againstboth
pathogens onapples against
B.
cinerea
andP.
expansum(Jijakli
et" aL.2002',
Lahlali
etal.
2009)'A
second molecular strategy rvas undertaken basedon an 'open'
approach. Such techniques have beenused
in
studies designedmainly
to
identify
genesinvolved
in
biocontrol. They
notablyinclude cDNA
Amplified
Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis(cDNA-AFLP),
differential display, and
subtractivehybridization. Massart and
Jijakli
(2006) usedcDNA-AFLP
to
identify
genespotentially involved
in
thebiological control of B. cinereaby
P. anomala strainKh5,
a haploid strain derived from P. anomola stra:inK.
Strain Kh5
was
grew
in
a
medium
containing99 Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (2011) 99:93-105
Table
2
Lesion diameter measuredwith
parental(K
and KH6) and mutated strainsKEl
(paexgl-),KF,2 Qtaexg2-)' and KE1E2 @aexgt-, paexg2-) applied to wounded Golden Deli-cious apple frûi|,24 h before inoculation wilh Botrytis cinerea (5x
104 spores/wound) (from Friel et al. 2007)StrainA Diameter, status
The targeted molecular strategy reveals its
power-fulness
in
demonstratingthe implication
of
some genes (such as exo-B-1,3-glucanases) in the controlof
B.
cinerea
by P.
anonmlastrain
K
andto
quantifytheir
impacr
on
the efficacy'
Togetherwith
proteo-mics
and
metabolomics, open strategywill
help
todevelop
a holistic
approachof
the
modesof
actionand
to
understand bettertheir
complexity
and theirregulation.
Development
of monitoring
toolsBesides knowledge
of
the
mechanismsof
action,monitoring tools
needto
be
developedto
study theecological fitness
of
P.
anonnla strain
K
aftertreatment
on
apples. Becausethe
protective
effectof
strain
K
seems
to
be
closely related
to
itscolonisation
on
the
apple
surface
(Jijakli
et
al'1999), assessment
of
strain
K
population
dynamicswill
help to
interpret and predictbiocontrol
efficacyin relation to modality of application, formulation and
environmental conditions.
In
addition,
identificationand quantification
of
strain
K
during
and
after
its mass production andformulation
are a prerequisite toestablish a
quality control
procedurefor
thebiofun-gicide.
Monitoring
strainK
requires its unambiguousdifferentiation
among
the
resident
micro-flora(including
;'east belongingto
the
same species) andits
quantification
on
the
surface
of
apples'
Theshortcomings
of
the biochemical-basedtyping
meth-ods,
which
depend on phenotypic expression, and thelack
of
morphoiogical
distinction among
similaryeasts
on Petri
dishes,led
to
the
developmentof
more
specificidentif,cation
methods based onDNA
sequences.
DNA
markersminimise the
difficulty of
type
ability
andlack of
reproducibility common
inthe use of phenotypic-based methods
(Olive
and Bean 1999).The
identification
of a
specific strain
K
naturalDNA
marker
was
obtained
using RAPD
(randomamplified
polymorphic
DNA)
analysis
(De
Clercqet al. 2003). SCAR (sequence-characterized amplified
region) primers
(Kl
and
K2)
were
designed andproved
to be
specificfor
amplification
of
a
262 bpP. anonnla
strainK
SCAR marker (De Clercq et al'2003).
The
identification
of
that
specific
SCARmarker was followed
by
the
development
of
amonitoring
methodcombining
dilution
plating
on
a I04 CFU/ wound 1.06 a 1.18 a J.O C 2.94 b 3.38 b,c 3.68 c i.04 a 1.15 a 2.09 b 2.38 b 2.28 b 3.67 cYeasts were inoculated at three different concentrations (103, 10a, and 10s CFU per wound). Five fi'uits (10 wounds) were used
for
each combination. For each apple stock and each concentration, values with the same letter are not significantly different (Duncan test, P < 0.05)A Lesion diameter measured with parental (K and KH6) and mutated strains
KE1
(paexgl-),KE2
@aexg2-)' KEIE2(paergt-, paexg2-) applied
to
wounded Golden Deliciousapples, 24
h
before inoculationwith
B.
cinerea (5x
101.nôr"r
o..
wound). Yeasts were inoculated at three differentÂncent,ations ( 103, 101, and 105 CFU per wound). Five apples (10 wounds) were used for each combination. For each apple stock and each concentration' values with the same letter are not significantly different (Duncan test, P < 0.05).
A/
Fresh apples, A2 Matured aPPlescDNA
fragments were
identified
corresponding to genes overexpressed in the presence of B. cinereacell
walls
and putatively involved
in
enzyme secretion,the
stress
response, sensing
or
transmission
of
environmental signals,
or
energy production.
Theisolation
of
these genesis
a first
stepleading
to
alarger study
of
their further
characterization and anenhanced understanding
of
their role
in
biological
control.
In
further work,
these
putative
functionsshould be confirmed
by functional
complementation,and their
role in
biocontrol properties investigated bysimple
or multiple
disruption approaches.103 CFU/ wound 105 CFU/ wound A1 K KH6 KE1 KEz KE1E2 Control A2 K KH6 KE1 LÊ) KE1E2 Control 0.45 a 0.41 a 1.17 b 1.69 b 1.44 b 3.68 c 0.45 a 0.68 a 1.1 a 1.2 a
l.l
a 3.6'7 b 0.14 a 0.37 a,b 0.41 a.b 0.55 a,b 0.78 b 3.68 c 0.09 a 0.11a 0.14 a 0.4 a 0.43 a 3.67 bQ
Springersemi-selective
medium (HST-PDA,
contained threefungicides and one antibiotic) and
strain-specificidentification of colony
forming
unitswith
the SCARmarker (De Clercq et al. 2003).
This
mixedmonitor-ing
method was then appliedon
apples treatedwith
strain
K
producedin
Petri dishes or in bioreactors andcompared
with
the
classical
plating
method.
The percentagesof white
coloniesidentified
asstrain
K
with
the useof
the specific SCAR marker were high(between
91
and
1007o). Consequently,this
conec-tion did not
lead
to
severe changesin
the dilution
plating
results. However, molecularidentification
of
the colony
forming
units gives a more valuable resultin
terms
of
specificity.
Some
of
the white
yeastcolonies
did
not
respondto
the SCAR primers
andwere, therefore, considered as contaminants.
As
the mixedmonitoring
methodis
laborious andtime
consuming, a second method was developedfor
P.
anomala strain
K
using
a
QC-PCR-ELOSA(Quantitative-Competitive
PolymeraseChain
Reac-tion
using Enzyme-Linked Oligosorbent Assay)with
the 262
bp
strain
K
SCAR marker
as target. Usingthat method,
it
was possible to quantify the numberof
yeast
cells
of
P.
anomalc strain
K
to
recover
theantagonist
from
the apple surface(Pujol et
al' 2004).The
yeastcell
numbersthat
were tested represent arealistic
rangeof
strainK
amounts expectedon
the surfaceof
pre-or
post-harvest treated apples (Jrjakliet aL
2002).The
sensitivity
thresholdof
QC-PCR-ELOSA
applied under practical conditions
alloweddetection
of
lessthan
103 yeast cells per apple (Pujolet al.
2004).
Using the
same techniqueto
recover yeast cellsfrom
treated apple surfaces, the sen-sitivityihreshold of the plating method was around 105 CFU/
apple
(De
Clercqet al.
2003).Finally,
manipulationtime
was
considerabiy reduced
by
means
of
itsautomation procedure
(Pujol
etal.
2004).Strain
K
ecologicalcharacteristics
Biocontrol
of
post-harvestfruit
decaysis
achievableby
post-harvest applicationof
antagonists but also bypre-harvest spraying
of biocontroi
agentsin
thefield
(Benbow
and Sugar 1999; Korsten
et al.
1997;Leibinger
et
al.
1991;Teixidô et
al'
1998).In
thelatter practice, the
antagonistis
appliedjust
beforeharvest so
that
it
cancolonize
thefruit
surface andany wounds
inflicted
during harvest before the arrivalof
wound
pathogens
(Ippolito and
Nigro
2000)'Researchers have
highlighted
thevery real
practicalproblem
of
promoting the effective establishmentof
prospective
antagonistsin a
natural
environment.This
can
be
crucial,
limiting
the
consistency
of
biocontrol
under f,eld conditions and the widespreadcommercialization
of
biocontrol
agents.The
fluctu-ation
of
abiotic factors
such as temperature, wateravailability, relative humidity
andUV
radiation
hasthe
greatestimpact on the growth
and
biologrcalproprieties
of
prospectivebiocontrol
agents (Magan2001;
Teixidô
etal.
1999). Toleranceto
such abioticfluctuations is a prerequisite to successful application
of
ecologically
competentbiocontrol
agents underfield
conditions(Elad
1990).The
influence
of
artificial
UV-B
radiation
onPichia
anomaLa strainK,
was evaluatedin vitro
andin
vivo. The
in
vitro LD90
valueswas
1'6 kJ/m2(equivalent
to
0.69 hof
natural sunlight), whereasin
vivo
lethal value was
5.16W1m2 (equivalent
to2.46
h of
natural sunlight).
That
adverseeffect of
sunlight
on
biocontrol
agentsmay require that UV
protectants must be included
in
the agent formulation(Lahlali
et
al.
2011). Eight
UV-protectants
were tested aloneor
in
combinationwith
strainK.
Lignin
or folic
acidcould
reduce yeastmortality
caused byUV-B
radiation on applefruit
surfaces and increasedsignificantly the
ability
of strain K to control thepost-harvest
pathogenP.
expansLunon
wounded
applefruit
(Lahlali
et aL 2011). Further investigations mustverify
the potential benefitof
li-sninor
folic
acidfor
UV-protection of strain
K in
pre-harvest applications'In
vitro
and invivo
studies were also undertaken todevelop
models predicting the
combinedeffects
of
relative humidity
(RH
75-98Vo),
temperature(5-25'C), and
initial
applied concentration
(l0a-108
CFU/ml)
of
P.
anontala strainK
(Lahlali et
al'2008a, b). Experiments on apple surface were carried
out
according
to
a
Box-Behnkenmatrix.
Multiple
regression analyses showed that the model yielded a
good prediction
of
yeast
density.
The
effect of
relative humidity
appeared greater
than
that
of
temperature.
The
number
of
yeast coiony-formingunits per
squarecentimetre
of
apple
fruit
surface increasedwith
increasing relativehumidity'
temper-ature, and
initial
applied
yeastconcentration'
Themodel predicted that under optimal growth conditions
(25'C,
987o),strain
K
should reach
a
density
of
r01 Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (201 1) 99:93-105
(strain
K).
Suchdensity
is
required
for
protectionagainst pathogens
affecting
wounded applesin
stor-age
(Andrews
1992;McGuire 1994;De
Clercq et al'2003;
Lahlali et al.
2008b). Indeed such developedmodels may help
in
choosingthe
concentrationof
yeast suspensions to be applied in order to achieve on
itre appte surface a yeast density
of
at least 104 CFU/cm2.
Our
model
is
capableof
predicting
the
yeastpopulation
densitieson the
apple surface 48h
afterfield
spraying
of
biocontrol
agents(Lahlali
et
al'2008b, 2009).
It
might be usefulin
deciding whetherpre-harvest treatment
is
sufficient
to
allow
fastcolonization
of
woundsinflicted during
harvest and packaging, prior to the arrival of wound pathogens, orwhether
it
is
wise
to
apply further
post-harvest treatment to increase the yeast population density andthus
ensurebetter protection
against
post-harvestapple decays arising
in
the storage room.Practical
applications of Piclùa anontals
strain
K
The
insufficient eff,cacy
of
BCAs
against
post-harvest
diseasesin
practical conditions
is
still
animportant factor
limiting
the
implementation
of
biocontrol
methods.
The
storage
of
commoditiesconstitutes a
field
where thelimits of
the biocontrolcould be overcome more easily because the
environ-mental
parametersof
the roomsof
storage arewell
defined and stable
in
the courseof
time.
In
contrast'the variation
of
the weather conditions explains veryoften the lack of stable and reproducible effectiveness
of
biological
control methodsin
the field. The lackof
effectiveness can be due to the inadequacy and/or the
variations
of
the
environmentalconditions
limiting
the effectiveness
of
the agentsof
biological
control,but
also
to
the difficulty
in
maintaining
the
effec-tiveness
of
the
antagonistfor
one suff,ciently
longperiod.
In
order
to
evaluatethe possibility
of
applyingP.
artonala strain
K
in
orchards,
its
biocontrolefficacy was
assessedwhen
the
yeast was
appliedpre-
or
post-harvestin
orchard
trials during
two
successive
growing
seasons(Lahlali
et al.
2009)'Temperature,
rain,
andrelative humidity
weremon-itored
aswell
as strainK
populationdynamic'
Treesof
cv.
GoldenDelicious
appleswere
treatedwith
apowder
of
strainK
(107CFU/ml)
produced byCWBI
supplemented
with
B-1,3-glucans and Ca' Thisthree-component
mixture was applied 12,
5,
ot
2 daysbefore harvest
in
thefirst
yearand
15,7, or
3 daysbefore han,est
in
the second year,by
spraying atlow
volume
(3001ha
-
1)
or high
volume (1'000l/ha)
(Lahlali
etal.
2009).The
first
year,
the
highest reduction
(95'2Vo)against
blue
decaywas
obtainedby
meansof
four
successive
fungicide
treatments and the next-highestlevel (8l.6Vo)
with
pre-harvest high-volume sprayingof
the
three
component
mixture
12days
beforeharvest (Table
3). The
second year, the best resultswere
obtainedwith
post-harvestSumico
(carbenda-zim25Vo and diethofencafu25To) treatment and
post-han
est biological
treatment,
both
by
dipping
theapples,
88.3 and
56'3Vo tespectively.
A
density Table3
Efficacy of biocontrol agent Pichia anomala strain K and chemical treatments against blue mould in relation to the method and time of application (from Lahlali et al' 2009)Treatment Infected fruits (%)
Year I Year 2 Pre-harvestA Biological, LVS (12 or 15 daYs) Biological, HVS (12 or 15 daYs) Biological, LVS (5 or 7 daYs) Biological, HVS (5 or 7 daYs) Biological. LVS (2 or 3 daYs) Biological, HVS (2 or 3 daYs) Standard chemicalD Post-harvest Biological, dipping Biological, drenching Standard chemicalE Control Untreated aPPles
LVS low volume spray, 11VS high-volume spray
A In parentheses: time oftreatment in days before han'est (first number, year 1; second number, year 2)
B Data are the mean of four replicates of incidence of decayed fruits (%) calculated based on number
of
infected fruits as compared to total fruits for each treatmentc This
column showswhen
differencesare
significant(P < 0.05);
if
trvo
results sharea
commonletter'
thedifference between them
is not
significant according to Newman-Keuls testD Spraying of Bavistin, Phytocap, Sumico, ardEuparen at the aurhoriied-Belgian doses, respectively
4,
3, 2, andI
week before harvest E Dipping in Sumico(l
g/l)l5.odB'c
68.3 c 11.3e
60.4 d 52.9bc
89.6 b 58.9b
94.0 b 53.3bc
95.6 b 43.3c
56.5 e 3.6f
51.8f
98.,1a
42.2 g 99.2a
43.2 g 13.0de
10.1 h 98.9a
98.5 aQ
Springerrs
;l
threshold
of
I x
104 CFU/cm2of
strain
K
on
the apple surface seemed to be requiredjust
after harvestfor
high protectiveactivity,
whatever the method andtime
of
application.
During the first
year,
averagedaily
temperaturesbefore
harvestwere between
18and 25oC.
Dry
weather was observed at the orchardexcept
for
one
heavy
rainfall lasting
10h
with
amaximal intensity
of
1.4 llm2hr
The relativehumid-ity
remained
high
(93-100c/o)lrom
12
to
5 daysbefore harvest.
During
the second year, temperatureswere lower,
rangingfrom
12to
19oC.The
weatherwas rainy,
with
four
heavy
rainfall
events
(up
to5lm
- 2h- l).
Rain
might
wash
off a
BCA
during
the first
year.
Furtherrnore,
as
strain K
development
is
temperature-dependentwith
anopti-mum between 20 and
25'C
(Lahlali
2006), the lowertemperature range observed
in
the second yearmight
have hindered development
of
the strain
K
popula-tion.
In
the caseof
pre-harvestbiological
treatments,variations
in
meteorological conditions between the2 years have considerably affected
strain
K
popula-tion
density
and
its
efficacies
(Lahlali
et
al.2009).
Theseresults
were
in
accordancewith
thepredictive models previously
established (Lahlali
et
al.
2008a, b).Integration of strain
K
with control
measuresThe complete substitution
of
pesticidesby biological
control does not constitute a realistic goal.
Biological
control must
be
considered
like
a
new
potentialstrategy to be integrated to a panel
of
other methods.In
this respect, thecompatibility of BCAs
treatmentsmust
be
firstly
evaluated
with
regard
to
theirintegration
to
the
successionof
fruit
conditioningoperations before storage.
A
first
strategyto
widen
the spectrumof
antago-nistic action consists
in
mixing
several BCAs (Nunesetalt.2002;
Janisiewicz 1996). The combiningof
theBCA
treatment
with
fungicides (Chandgoyal
andSpotts 1996), organic
(El
Gaouthet
a1. 2000;Jijakli
et
al.
2002) and inorganic additives
(Jijakli
et
al.1999; Nunes
et
al.
2002)
constitutes
a
secondapproach.
The
combination
of
chemical
treatmentswith
BCAs was more efficient than the applicationof
the sole antagonistic microorgansism. The success
of
biocontrol
integration
to
chemical
treatmentswill
depend
on
the selectionof
the best combinationsof
fungicide-antagonist
In
some cases, the combinationof
biological
and chemical applicationsallowed
thereduction
of
chemical
concentration(Droby
et
al.1993).The
integration
of
the biological
agents
toother physical measures (thermotherapy, gamma and
UV
inadiation, film-forming
polymers
treatments)could
be anothersolution
to
widen the
spectrumof
activity of
BCAs
(Leverentzet al.
2000;Jijakli
andLepoivre
2004).
The control
of
infections
due
to Gloeosporioide s fungt developing post-harvest apple rots from orchard latent infections, has to be assumed on post-harvest applesin
addition to the protectionof
wound
pathogens(Botrytis
andPenicilliran) (Jijakli
and
Lepoivre
1995).Heat
treatment appearedto
beefficient
against Gloeosporioideslenticel
infections(Bondoux 1992).
During a first year of trials, Golden Delicious
fruits
were
successivelydipped
for
10min.
in
water
at 45oC and 2 min.in
a water suspensionof
P. anomalastrain
K
and C.oleophila
strain O. The incidenceof
Gloeosporioides lenticel infections was reduced from
54.4Va
to
l.5Vo andPenicilliunt
maintainedto
a 1owievel (Jrjakli et
al.
1993a).During
a second yearof
trials,
combination
of
heat
treatment
and
yeastapplication could entirely control infections
causedby B.
cinerea and
Gloeosporioides
tot
and
thepercentage
of
apples rottedby
Penicillium
spp. wasreduced
ftom
18.2%
(untreated apples)
to
3.87o(Jijakli
et
al.
1993a).
During both
years,
qualityparameters
of
treated apples (weight, size, skin color,firmness,
acidity
and refractometricindex)
were notaffected. Nevertheless, the evaluation
of
the practicalfeasibility
of
an
integrated approachcombining
P.anornala strain
K
and thermotherapy must be furtherstudied.
Registration
of
BCAs: no longer
adrawback?
Registration
of a
BCA
is
necessarybefore
itscommercialisation.
In
Europe, thedirective
CEE19ll414,
amendedby
the directive
CEl2AUl36
(specif-ically
dealingwith
BCAs) is applied since 1993. Thetechnical registration dossier
of
aBCA
must provideinformation
necessaryconcerning
the
foreseeablerisks that
this
substance can createfor
human healthand
environment.
The
cost
of
the
procedure
isrelatively
high
and dependson
the
microorganism,Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (2011) 99:93-105 103
the
results
of
the first
toxicological tests
and
the presenceof
metabolites.At
least 3 years areneces-sary before
the
first
authorisationof
salesin
oneof
the
Europeancountries
(an
averageof
more
than50
months was recently
recorded).In
contrast, theUnited
States has since 1980 a single legislationfor
the
commercialisation andthe
useof
biopesticides.The
Agency
of
Environmental Protection
(EPA)encourages
the
developmentand
the
use
of
thesebiopesticides. The EPA considers a
priori
that the useof
thoseilvolves
less risks than thatof
theconven-tional
pesticides. Thus,in
general, the data requiredfor
the registration are fewer and the procedure takesa minimum
of
oneyear
anda half
(an
averageof
24
months was recently
recorded) whereasit
is
anaverage
of
more than
3 yearsfor
the recording
of
conventional pesticides.
A
novel European regulation(Regulation
(EC)
No
110112009of
the
EuropeanParliament and
of
theCouncil)
is
now coming into
force. One can hope that
it
will
go
towards
alightening
of
the registration procedures.Conclusions
The science and practice
of biological control
agentsis still
in
its
infancy
comparedto
fungicidal
treat-ment, even
if
progress madein
this
areaduring
thepast
two
decade has been remarkable.Many
chal-lenges must be met beforebiocontroi of
post-harvest diseases canbe
successfully usedon a
commercialbasis.
Biological
control
is
often
generatinga
greatenthusiasm
although
the
stiil
limited
relevanceof
BCA
today.
The
post-harvest environmentmay
beone
in
which
the best chanceto
develop successfulbiological control
exists becausemany
aspectsof it
can
be controlled.
Moreover, consumer demandfor
alternatives
to
post-harvest chen-rical treatmentscon-stitutes a major and special impetus
in
the searchfor
biocontrol
agents.Already
commerciaily
availableproducts
demonstratethe
realism
of
the
approach.However,
encouragementfrom
environmentalagen-cies and central government remain
crucial
in
deter-mining
the economic climatewithin
whichbiological
control
will
operate.This
isparticularly
trueconsid-ering registration Process.
Twenty
yearsof
research onP.
anonrcla strainK
has
ied to
a
better characterisationof
this
strain in
relation with
its
antagonisticactivity
againstpost-harvest
diseasesof
apples.
Thanks
to
increasingknowledge on that strain, several
tdals
havedemon-strated
its
potential application bothin
pre- andpost-harvest
practical
conditions.Moreover,
P.
anornalastrain
K
rrray constitute a significant part of integrated systems including physical treatments or chemicals toprovide
adequatecontroi
of
post-harvest diseases.In
thelong
term, basicinformation on
thegenet-ically
determined factors thatcontrol survival,
colo-nisation,
effectivenessin
the field
and
storage andproperties
of
massproduction
are
still
required
toovercome
the
random
processof
selection and
tofacilitate
the practical deveiopmentof
such a method(Jijakli
et
al.
1999).This
information
will
help
in
finding how
to
(1) further
enhancethe
protectiveaction
of
P.
anontala,
(2)
protect
its viability
andperformance under unfavourable environmental
con-ditions, (3)
ensurea
good
stability
of
the
productduring
storageprior to
application, and(4)
provide auser-friendly product that
is
easyto
apply.References
Aloi C, Benzi D, Testoni
A,
GullinoML
(1991) Biologicalcontrol of post-harvest diseases of apple
:
experimental results.In
:
ANPP-Third Intemational Conference on Plant Diseases, TomeII.
Ministère de i'Agriculture et Ministère dela
Recherche et dela
Technologie, Bor-deaux, pp 695-'702Andrews JH (1992) Biological control
in
the phyllosphere. Annu Rev PhYtoPathol 30:603*635Benbow JM, Sugar
D
(1999) Fruit surface colonization and biological control of post-harvest diseases of pear by pre-haruest yeast applications. Plant Dis 83:839-844 BondouxP
(1992) Maladies de conservation des fruits àpépins, pommes et poires. INRA and PHM revue Horti-cole. Paris
Chalutz E,, Droby S, Cohen L, Weiss B, Barkai-Golan R, Daus
A, Fushs
Y
(1991) Biological control of Borryris, Rhizo' pns and Alternaria rots of tomato fruit by Pichia guil-lennondii. In : Proccedings of an Intemational workshop on biological control of post-harvest diseases of fruits and vegetables, USA-USDA Publ. ARS-92, Shepherdstown, pp 7 1-85Chandgoyal T, Spotts RA (1996) Post-harvest biological con-rrol of blue mold of apple and brown rot of sweet cherry
by natural saprophytic yeasl's alone or
in
combinationilith
low doses of fungicides. Biol Control 6:253-259 Conway WS (1991) Posl-harvest calcium treatment of applefruit to provide broad-spectrum protection against
post-harvest pathogens. Plant Dis'l 5:620422
De Clercq