• Aucun résultat trouvé

The new energy crisis : Climate, Economics and Geopolitics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "The new energy crisis : Climate, Economics and Geopolitics"

Copied!
16
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)30/10/2009. CGEMP - Université Paris Dauphine. The New Energy Crisis: Climate, Economics, and Geopolitics Jean-Marie CHEVALIER With 3 co-authors: Patrice GEOFFRON, Sophie MERITET & Pierre ZALESKI. Conférence franco brésilienne : Les vraies énergies du développement durable. Octobre 2009. 1. The New energy Crisis: Climate, Economics and Geopolitics •. “The New energy Crisis: Climate, Economics and Geopolitics” (Palgrave, 2009). •. “Les nouveaux défis de l’énergie: climat, énergie, géopolitique” (Economica, 2009). • •. Edited by Jean-Marie CHEVALIER Foreword by Claude MANDIL. With contributions of : Marie-Claire AOUN, Nadia CAMPANER, Michel CRUCIANI, Patrice GEOFFRON, Askar GUBAIDULLIN, Iva HRISTOVA, Jan Horst KEPPLER, Delphine LAUTIER,Sophie MERITET, Nadia OUEDRAOGO, Stéphane ROUHIER, Fabienne SALAUN, Yves SIMON, C. Pierre ZALESKI 2 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. 1.

(2) 30/10/2009. World Energy Balance 2030 Reference Scenario 17 Gtoe. 10%. 2%. 2%. 2006. 29%. 5%. Source: World Energy Outlook 2008 – IEA. 12 Gtoe 10%. 1%. 2%. 26%. 6%. 22%. 30% 21%. 34% 3. CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. Demographic Shift. 2050 9. 4 Billion. 2009. + 2.6. 6.8 Billion. China 15%. Source: Population Reference Bureau, 2009. China 20%. Others 31%. Others 30%. India 19%. India 17%. Africa 15%. OECD 18%. Africa 21%. OECD 14% 4. CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. 2.

(3) 30/10/2009. Source: CGEMP based on data available from BP (2008) and IEA (2008). Concentration des réserves sur les pays « à risque ». 5 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. Contents • • • • • • • • •. Ch 1 : Set the stage : the New Energy Crisis: Energy vs Climate Ch 2 : The Carbon dependent Asia: Looking for Growth and Wealth Ch 3 : Russia and Caspian region: Between East and West Ch 4 : Energy Poverty and Economic Development Ch 5: Middle East and North Africa: Oil as a blessing or a curse? Ch 6: The USA at a Turning Point? Ch 7: A European Energy Vision of the Future Ch 8: Energy Finance Ch 9: Winning the Battle. 6 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. 3.

(4) 30/10/2009. The Message 1. Energy. is a global issue and world energy future has to be sustainable. 2. Oil price is still the leading energy price 3. A. number of elements tend to indicate that energy prices will be much higher than in the past (70 to 80 $/b vs 20 to 30). 4. The. building of a single European energy market provides an energy vision of the future.. 5. The. key strategic principles : energy efficiency management of the climate change – diversification of energy technologies and sources.. 6. A. permanent challenge for market intelligence, energy intelligence, catching business and political opportunities. 7. CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. Conclusion. •. Action. •. Adaptation. •. Prices. •. What did you do today ?. 8 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. 4.

(5) 30/10/2009. Contents • • • • • • • • •. Ch 1 : Set the stage : the New Energy Crisis: Energy vs Climate Ch 2 : The Carbon dependent Asia: Looking for Growth and Wealth Ch 3 : Russia and Caspian region: Between East and West Ch 4 : Energy Poverty and Economic Development Ch 5: Middle East and North Africa: Oil as a blessing or a curse? Ch 6: The USA at a Turning Point? Ch 7: A European Energy Vision of the Future Ch 8: Energy Finance Ch 9: Winning the Battle. Patrice GEOFFRON 9 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. Origin of the energy consumption increase since 2000. China weights 50% of the incremental demand. Source: IEA.  Newest issues more located on the demand side. 5.

(6) 30/10/2009. Dynamics of the consumption by Region 2030. China will mechanically become the first energy market…. Source: IEA. Net oil imports in China and India. … meaning that the era of low fuel prices is behind us. Source: IEA. 6.

(7) 30/10/2009. Energy-related CO2 emissions by regions in the past…. OECD weights 2/3 of past emissions. Source: IEA.  OECD ± 15% of world population. … and in the future. Time for newly industrial countries to emit CO2?. Source: IEA. 7.

(8) 30/10/2009. Per-capita related CO2 emissions in 2005. 20%. Per-capita related CO2 emissions in 2030. 45%?. 8.

(9) 30/10/2009. Not only an issue of energy mix, but also of social organisation. Source: IEA. Contents • • • • • • • • •. Ch 1 : Set the stage : the New Energy Crisis: Energy vs Climate Ch 2 : The Carbon dependent Asia: Looking for Growth and Wealth Ch 3 : Russia and Caspian region: Between East and West Ch 4 : Energy Poverty and Economic Development Ch 5: Middle East and North Africa: Oil as a blessing or a curse? Ch 6: The USA at a Turning Point? Ch 7: A European Energy Vision of the Future Ch 8: Energy Finance Ch 9: Winning the Battle. Sophie MERITET 18 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. 9.

(10) 30/10/2009. Ch 6: The USA at a Turning Point?. Source: BP Statistical Review World Energy , 2008. US energy balance 1973-2007. 1973. Primary energy consumption by sources in % 1973 (75 708 364 Bil.Btu) & 2007 (99 872 921 Bil. Btu) 2007 19 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. Ch 6: The USA at a Turning Point? •. Exceptional development of American capitalism founded upon abundant, cheap and domestic energy resources: coal, oil, natural gas, hydro electricity and nuclear.. •. A growing dependence on imports for oil and natural gas and a decrease in the domestic productions. •. Strategic priority => security of SUPPLY. •. Obvious growing awareness of climate change. In the absence of a federal environmental policy, states are taking some initiatives. •. Obama (January 2009) “We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories”…. 20 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. 10.

(11) 30/10/2009. The American energy policy at a turning point….. • •. Energy - climate change : a challenge and not a constraint !. • •. A green revolution... Obama (2009) « America can be the 21st century clean energy leader by harnessing the power of alternative and renewable energy, ending our addiction to foreign oil, addressing the global climate crisis, and creating millions of new jobs that can’t be shipped overseas”. Project Bill : American Clean Energy and Security Act or Climate Change Bill. 21 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. Contents • • • • • • • • •. Ch 1 : Set the stage : the New Energy Crisis: Energy vs Climate Ch 2 : The Carbon dependent Asia: Looking for Growth and Wealth Ch 3 : Russia and Caspian region: Between East and West Ch 4 : Energy Poverty and Economic Development Ch 5: Middle East and North Africa: Oil as a blessing or a curse? Ch 6: The USA at a Turning Point? Ch 7: A European Energy Vision of the Future Ch 8: Energy Finance Ch 9: Winning the Battle. Pierre ZALESKI 22 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. 11.

(12) 30/10/2009. Need for new power plants ? Next few decades. 2-4. •. Priority to energy conservation and efficiency. •. BUT. •. Increase of population. •. Need for development for large part of world population – ¾. •. Therefore large consensus that demand of electricity will increase (also replacement of older plants). 23 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. Possible energy sources •. Fossil – coal gas, oil • Dominant – CO2 issue – Finite resources + Geopolitical issue. •. Hydroelectricity, geothermal • Limited resources economically acceptable. •. New renewable – wind, solar, waves… • Very expensive at least for time being. •. Nuclear. 24 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. 12.

(13) 30/10/2009. Criteria for selection • • • • • • •. Industrial feasibility Availability of capital (investment) Economy Security of supply Sustainability Environmental effects Effects on health of population. 25 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. Cost benefit - analysis In general and not purely economic sense. •. Varies from country to country. Needs, resources, cost of labor, cost of capital, sensitivity to environment and sanitary effects. •. We are therefore discussing examples of some important countries. 26 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. 13.

(14) 30/10/2009. Nuclear renaissance and low carbon economy •. Large uncertainties. Present. 2030. 2050. 370 GWe. 400-1000 GWe. 600-2000-2500 Gwe. 1000 GWe – save 8 G tones CO2/year. •. In 2030 differences between BAU and 450 scenarios – 19G tones CO2/year • competitive with coal in many countries - without penalty for CO2 • competitive with coal in all countries - with some penalty for CO2 (≥ 20 $). 27 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. Asia Nuclear Energy Perspectives Japan. 47 GWe 60 GWe 90 GWe. South Korea. China. 40% 60% + 20 GWt 18 GWe 25 Gwe 9 GWe 60 GWe 160 GWe 4 GWe 40 GWe* 400GWe*. India. *Including 5 Breeders of 0,5 GWe each. 2009 2017 2050. 45% 60% 5% 10%. 2009 2020 2035 2009 2020 2030 2009 2020 2050. *September 2009, declaration of Prime Minister of India. Other countries : Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia… ASIA:. 300 GWe. Estimates of maximum new builds by 2030 28. CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. 14.

(15) 30/10/2009. Nuclear Energy Perspectives in Russia and USA Russia. 22 GWe. 2009. 52 GWe. 2020. 230 GWe. 2050. industrial development of Breeders. 2025. Presently Breeders. USA. 1 breeder 0,6 GWe. operating for 25 years. 1 breeder 0,8 GWe. in construction. 100 GWe. 2009. 110 GWe. 2020. 300 GWe*. 2050. * MIT and EPRI’s perspective Russia + USA:. 100 Gwe Estimates of maximum new builds by 2030 29. CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. Uranium resources and production estimates. •. conventional including speculative. •. unconventional by product, Phosphate. •. ≈ 22 Millions tonnes. extremely expensive sea water, Granite. •. ≈ 16 Millions tonnes. ≈ 4000 Millions tonnes. present production ≈ 40 000 Millions tonnes/year. •. production 2015 ≈ 60 000 Millions tonnes/year. 30 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. 15.

(16) 30/10/2009. Uranium consumption •. Presently. ≈ 70 000 tonnes > 200 years with conventional resources. If dynamic development of nuclear energy. •. present technology • •. •. conventional and unconventional up to 2060 new reactor’s constructions. with Breeders •. •. few thousand years with already mined uranium. with sea water, granite and thorium •. factor 100 (additional). 31 CGEMP – The new Energy Crisis. AUP - October 2009. CGEMP - Université Paris Dauphine. The New Energy Crisis: Climate, Economics, and Geopolitics Jean-Marie CHEVALIER With 3 co-authors: Patrice GEOFFRON, Sophie MERITET & Pierre ZALESKI. Conférence franco brésilienne : Les vraies énergies du développement durable. Octobre 2009. 32. 16.

(17)

Références

Documents relatifs

Based on the study “Rice crisis, market trends, and food security in West Africa” (French), this briefing note draws on regional statistics, national market information systems

Une nouvelle étude, menée auprès de 353 grandes entreprises américaines à partir de données de la période 1996-2000, a également établi une corréla- tion entre la présence

This increase is of course not exclusively linked to purely technological determinants and also represents an increase in the average economic value of

Considering the extent of what we do not know about long term contract in the traditional rather national electricity sector, we still have rooms for research about how to build

We notice that the 2034.4 cm -1 band attributed to ketenimine and observed during the bombardment of the acrylonitrile ice with H-atoms is red shifted by 19.4 cm -1 (spectral

Pakistan’s energy policies are based on energy demand and, as the analysis shows that there was a high level of uncertainty in energy data, the effectiveness and correctness

Cette étude a été réalisée en deux phases: la première a consisté à réunir et analyser la bibliographie disponible de manière à rassembler les

Le nylon 6-10 est obtenu à partir d'une réaction de polymérisation entre le chlorure de décanedioyle et le 1,6-diaminohexane4. Sa molécule comporte le