• Aucun résultat trouvé

Tracking Consciousness in noncommunicating states

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Tracking Consciousness in noncommunicating states"

Copied!
34
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Tracking Consciousness

in noncommunicating states

Athena Demertzi, PhD

Coma Science Group

GIGA Research & Neurology Department

University & University Hospital of Liège

Belgium

&

Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière – ICM

Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris

France

New Scientist Instant Expert: Consciousness

March 24 2018, London UK

(2)

Patients cannot express themselves

(3)

The resuscitation greats

Resuscitation. 2003

Bjørn Ibsen

(Copenhagen)

(4)

Yu et al, Brain. 2014

84y male

Frontal air-filled cavity

Primary cerebellar agenesis

Typical brain

24y female

Brown & Vahidassr, BMJ Case Reports 2018

(5)

Laureys et al., Lancet Neurology, 2004

(sleep data from Pierre Maquet; anesthesia data from Mike Alkire)

84y male

Frontal air-filled cavity

Primary cerebellar agenesis

Typical brain

(6)

Demertzi, Boly, Laureys. Encyclopedia of Consciousness 2009 Laureys. Trends Cogn Sci 2005; Laureys et al, Nat Clin Med 2008

Coma General Anesthesia

Minimally Conscious state

“Vegetative” unresponsive Conscious Wakefulness Drowsiness St I-II Sleep St III-IV Sleep

= necessary but not sufficient

(7)

Laureys et al, Curr Opin Neurol 2005

COGNITIVE CAPACITY

MO

T

O

R

R

E

S

P

O

NS

IV

E

NE

S

S

coma

VEGETATIVE/UNRESPONSIVE

MINIMALLY

RESPONSIVE

severe

disability

arousal = eye opening

Communication ?

moderate

disability

good

recovery

live

independently

professional

reinsertion

Awareness ? = response to command or non-reflex movements

(8)

Terry Schiavo °1963, vegetative 1990, † 2005 USA

(9)

Vanhaudenhuyse et al JNNP 2008

Mirror Person Object

n=52

(10)

Schnakers et al, Ann Neurol 2006; BMC Neurol 2009

n=103 post-comatose patients

45 Clinical diagnosis of VS

18 Coma Recovery Scale MCS

40% misdiagnosed

Standardized assessment

PET Neuroimaging

Stender & Gosseries et al, Lancet 2014

(11)

Monti & Vanhaudenhuyse, Coleman, Boly, Pickard, Tshibanda, Owen, Laureys New England J Med 2010

(12)

Heine, Di Perri, Soddu, Laureys, Demertzi In: Clinical Neurophysiology in Disorders of Consciousness

Springer-Verlag 2015

Demertzi & Laureys, In: I know what you are thinking: brain

imaging and mental privacy

Oxford University Press 2012

(13)

Do you think patients in a ...

can feel pain?

Demertzi et al, Prog Brain Res 2009 Demertzi & Racine et al, Neuroethics 2012

What is awareness?

Laureys et al., Neuroimage 2002 Healthy controls UWS patients

Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome

Boly et al, Lancet Neurol 2008

Healthy controls MCS patients

Minimally conscious state

Nociception, pain, suffering?

UWS MCS

(n=2059)

VS

MCS

Ag re e m e n t (% ) **p<.001

**

59 96

(14)

William James (1842-1910)

The stream of thought (Chapter IX)

The principles of psychology 1890

The mind wanders

(15)

• The brain is ~2% of the weight of the body

• 80% of energy consumption supports neuronal signaling

• Performance-evoked changes in energy consumption <5%

While conscious awareness is energetically inexpensive,

it dependents on a very complex, dynamically

organized, non-conscious state of the brain that is

achieved at great expense

Raichle & Snyder. Intrinsic Brain Activity and Consciousness.

In: Laureys S, Tononi G, editors. The Neurology of Consciousness. Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press; 2009. p. 81-48

(16)

Biswal et al., Magn Reson Med 1995

Task Rest

(17)

Fox et al, Proc N Acad Sci 2005

(18)

Demertzi & Whitfield-Gabrieli. in: Neurology of Consciousness 2nded. 2015

Demertzi et al, Front Hum Neurosci 2013

Demertzi, Soddu, Laureys. Curr Opin Neurobiology 2013

External awareness

or anticorrelated network

Internal awareness

or Default mode network

Switch 0.01-0.1Hz

(19)

External-internal: r=-0.44, p<.02 Mean switch: 0.05Hz (range: 0.01-0.1)

Aw ar en es s Internal awareness External awareness

time (in sec)

FDR p<0.05 SVC p<0.05

Vanhaudenhuyse*, Demertzi* et al, J Cogn Neurosci 2011

(20)

Demertzi, Soddu, Faymonville et al, Prog Brain Res 2011

Demertzi, Vanhaudenhuyse, Noirhomme, Faymonville, Laureys, J Physiol Paris 2015

Normal consciousness

Autobiographical mental imagery

Hypnosis

p<0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons *p<.05

Normal consciousness

Autobiographical mental imagery

Hypnosis

(21)

Effect of arousal

Boveroux et al, Anesthesiology 2010

n=20

(22)

Effect of environment

(23)

DMN CORRELATIONS DMN ANTICORRELATIONS FM R I Co n n e ct iv it y

Di Perri, …, Demertzi*, Laureys*, Soddu*, Lancet Neurol 2017

(24)

Brain networks

(25)

FWE p<0.05 (cluster-level)

MCS> VS/UWS

Demertzi & Antonopoulos et al, Brain 2015 Demertzi et al, Neurosci Consciousness 2017

Which network discriminates best?

Training set: 45 DOC (26 MCS, 19 VS/UWS) Test set: 16 MCS, 6 VS/UWS 2 different centers

Demertzi & Antonopoulos et al, Brain 2015

Classification MCS Classification VS/UWS

Distance from decision plane

(26)

Listen to the heart

Raimondo, Rohaut, Demertzi et al, Annals Neurol 2017

Features

*

*

Auditory oddball paradigm

Local

Effect

Global

Effect

*

Local

Effect

Global

Effect

*

Post interval

(27)
(28)

2,475 medical professionals

66%

82%

28%

67%

Demertzi et al, J Neurol 2011

Treatment can be stopped in chronic...

Do not feel pain

Feel pain

Demertzi & Racine et al, Neuroethics 2012

Ag

re

em

en

t

(%

)

Ag

reem

en

t

MCS

VS/UWS

(n=2259)

(29)

Quality of life

Continuity of self-image

Healthy controls (n=20)

LIS patients (n=44)

Nizzi & Demertzi et al, Conscious & Cogn 2012

72%

28%

Bruno et al, Br Med J Open 2011

Best period

(30)
(31)

Patients cannot express themselves

(32)

States of Consciousness

Bayne, Hohwy, Owen. Trends Cogn Sci 2016

Self = Consciousness?

The minimal self

(33)

Conclusions

• Consciousess in non-communicating states needs to be inferred: need

of a framework for used technologies

(Demertzi et al, Neurosci Consciousness 2017)

• Consciousness carries a moral significance

• Consciousess is not out there to capture

(34)

a.demertzi@uliege.be

Coma Science Group & PICNIC Lab

The deparments of Neurology and

Radiology in Liège and Paris

…and mostly patients and their

families!

Références

Documents relatifs

We argue that the stationary limit of the Vector Approximate Message Passing (VAMP) algorithm [ RSF17 ] (that is its fixed point equations) for compressed sensing with

Conclusions: Der p 1 in either its recombinant form or in the natural context of house dust mite extracts specifically cleaves all zymogens, thus establishing its role as a

sont donc, du moins à l’heure actuelle, pas de droit positif, contrairement aux Règles de La Haye ou La Haye-Visby, ou aux Règles de Hambourg dans certains pays. Le

En étudiant le profil plasmatique d’un groupe de patients atteints d’OAN héréditaire en 1965, Rosen et ses collaborateurs observèrent que, chez certains d’entre eux, le taux

Edition Novembre 2019... Edition

A Class of Methods for the Analysis of Blade Tip Timing Data from Bladed Assemblies Undergoing Simultaneous Resonances—Part II: Experimental Validation.. Box 31, Derby DE24 8DJ, UK

L’examen des captures réalisées par piégeage lumineux révèle que les moucherons adultes du genre Culicoides peuvent se concentrer à l’intérieur d’une bergerie occupée par

Les procédés didactiques mis en œuvre par les enseignants sont étroitement liés aux caractéristiques de leurs élèves et plus particulièrement au caractère hétérogène de leur